6,606
Views
48
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Turkey’s tamed civil society: Containment and appropriation under a competitive authoritarian regime

References

  • Alagappa, M. (2004). Civil society and political change. In Civil society and political change in Asia (pp. 25–60). California: Stanford University Press.
  • Albrecht, H. (2005). How can opposition support authoritarianism? Lessons from Egypt Democratization, 12(3), 378–397. doi: 10.1080/13510340500126798
  • Amnesty International. (2018). Government crackdown suffocating civil society through deliberate climate of fear. Retrieved from https://www.amnesty.org/
  • Baser, B., Akgönül, S., & Öztürk, E. (2017). “Academics for peace” in Turkey: A case of criminalising dissent and critical thought via counterterrorism policy. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 10(2), 274–296. doi: 10.1080/17539153.2017.1326559
  • Bee, C., & Chrona, S. (2017). Youth activists andoccupygezi: Patterns of social change in public policy and in civic and political activism in Turkey. Turkish Studies, 18(1), 157–181. doi: 10.1080/14683849.2016.1271722
  • Bee, C., & Kaya, A. (2017). Youth and active citizenship in Turkey. JSEBSS, 17(1), 129–143.
  • Berman, S. (1997). Civil society and the collapse of the Weimar Republic. World Politics, 49(3), 401–429. doi: 10.1353/wp.1997.0008
  • Brownlee, J. (2016). Why Turkey’s authoritarian descent shakes up democratic theory. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/
  • Buttigieg, J. A. (2005). The contemporary discourse on civil society: A Gramscian Critique. Boundary 2, 32(1), 33–52. doi: 10.1215/01903659-32-1-33
  • Çakmaklı, D. (2015). Active citizenship in Turkey: Learning citizenship in civil society organizations. Citizenship Studies, 19(3–4), 421–435. doi: 10.1080/13621025.2015.1006174
  • Carothers, T., & Brechenmacher, S. (2014). Closing space. Washington: Carnegie Endowment.
  • Cavatorta, F., & Durac, V. (2011). Civil society and democratization in the Arab world. Oxon: Routledge.
  • Centre for Civil Society. (2004). What is Civil Society? London School of Economics Centre for Civil Society. Retrieved from http://www.lse.ac.uk/international-development/conflict-and-civil-society
  • Cerrah, S. (2018, February 16). Kudüs Ümmetin Haremidir. Fikirname.
  • Chandhoke, N. (2001). The “civil” and the “political” in civil society. Democratization, 8(2), 1–24. doi: 10.1080/714000194
  • CIVICUS. (2018a). State of civil society report 2018.
  • CIVICUS. (2018b). Unending restrictions on civic freedoms.
  • Cohen, J. L., & Arato, A. (1994). Civil society and political theory. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Cumhuriyet. (2013, November 19). ‘Çapulcu’ Gelmesin Vay Vay. Retrieved from http://www.cumhuriyet.com.tr
  • Cumhuriyet. (2016a). Erdoğan’ın Hocasına Bedelsiz Tahsis.
  • Cumhuriyet. (2016b). AKP’li Belediyeden Bilal Erdoğan’ın Vakfına 10 Yıllık Peşkeş.
  • Davenport, C. (2007). State repression and political order. Annual Review of Political Science, 10(1), 1–23. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.101405.143216
  • Dereci, S., & Ersen, T. (2017). Monitoring matrix on enabling environment for civil society development (No. 74). Balkan Civil Society Development Network.
  • Dereci, S., Ersen, T., & Varon, L. (2018). Monitoring matrix on enabling environment for civil society development (No. 76). Balkan Civil Society Development Network.
  • Diamond, L. (1994). Toward democratic consolidation. Journal of Democracy, 5(3), 4–17. doi: 10.1353/jod.1994.0041
  • Diez, T., Agnantopoulos, A., & Kaliber, A. (2005). Turkey, Europeanization and civil society. SESP, 10(1), 1–15.
  • Doyle, J. (2017). State control of civil society organizations: The case of Turkey. Democratization, 24(2), 244–264. doi: 10.1080/13510347.2016.1159555
  • Edwards, M. (2004). Civil society. Oxford: Polity.
  • Edwards, M. (2005). Civil society: Theory and practice. In The encyclopedia of informal education. Retrieved from: http://infed.org/mobi/civil-society/
  • Eldén, Å., & Levin, P. (2018). Swedish aid in the era of shrinking space – the case of Turkey. Expertgruppen för biståndsanalys (EBA). Retrieved from https://eba.se/en/
  • Encarnación, O. G. (2003). The myth of civil society. New York: Palgrave.
  • Enneli, P. (2011). The Turkish young people as active citizens: Equal participation or social exclusion. In R. Donmez & P. Enneli (Eds.), Societal peace and ideal citizenship for Turkey (pp. 257–280). Lanham: Lexington.
  • Ensar. (2017, July/December). Ensar Bülteni. Retrieved from http://www.ensar.org
  • Erdoğan, E., & Uyan-Semerci, P. (2017). Understanding young citizens’ political participation in Turkey. JSEEBS, 17(1), 57–75.
  • Ergun, A. (2010). Civil society in Turkey and local dimensions of Europeanization. Journal of European Integration, 32(5), 507–522. doi: 10.1080/07036337.2010.498634
  • Esen, B., & Gumuscu, S. (2016). Rising competitive authoritarianism in Turkey. Third World Quarterly, 37(9), 1581–1606.
  • European Commission. (2018). Annual report on Turkey. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/near/files/20180417-turkey-report.pdf
  • Feinberg, R., Waisman, C., & Zamosc, L. (2006). Civil society and democracy in Latin America New York: Springer.
  • Foley, M., & Edwards, B. (1996). The paradox of civil society. Journal of Democracy, 7(3), 38–52. doi: 10.1353/jod.1996.0048
  • Franco, J. (2004). Fractious civil society and competing visions of democracy. In M. Alagappa (Ed.), Civil society and political change in Asia (pp. 97–134). California: Stanford University Press.
  • Giersdorf, S., & Croissant, A. (2011). Civil society and competitive authoritarianism in Malaysia. Journal of Civil Society, 7(1), 1–21. doi: 10.1080/17448689.2011.553401
  • Hardt, M. (1995). The withering of civil society. Social Text, 45, 27–44.
  • HDN. (2014). Charity NGO counting Turkish PM’s son. Retrieved from http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/
  • Heinrich, V. F. (2005). Studying civil society across the world: Exploring the Thorny issues of conceptualization and measurement. Journal of Civil Society, 1(3), 211–228. doi: 10.1080/17448680500484749
  • Helliker, K. (2012). Civil society and state-centred struggles. Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 30(1), 35–47. doi: 10.1080/02589001.2012.641723
  • Heper, M., & Yildirim, S. (2011). Revisiting civil society in Turkey. JSEEBS, 11(1), 1–18.
  • Heurlin, C. (2010). Governing civil society: The political logic of NGO–state relations under dictatorship. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 21(2), 220–239.
  • Heydemann, S. (2007). Upgrading authoritarianism in the Arab World (Analysis Paper 13). The Saban Centre for Middle East Policy. Washington: Brookings Institute.
  • HRW. (2018). Turkey: Crackdown on social media posts. Retrieved from https://www.hrw.org/
  • ICNL. (2018). Civic freedom monitor Turkey. Retrieved from http://www.icnl.org/research/monitor/turkey.html
  • IHOP. (2017). State of emergency report (in Turkish). İnsan Hakları Ortak Platformu. Retrieved from http://www.ihop.org.tr/
  • Jamal, A. A. (2007). Barriers to democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • KADEM. (n.d). Egitimler. Retrieved from http://kadem.org.tr/egitimler/
  • KADEM. (2015, June 7). Kadın Hareketi ve KADEM. Retrieved from http://kadem.org.tr/aysel-cekilyay-kadin-hareketi-ve-kadem/
  • KADEM. (2018, June 11). “Nafaka Mağdurları” Ekonomisi. Retrieved from http://kadem.org.tr/doc-dr-sare-aydin-yilmazin-para-dergisine-nafaka-ile-ilgili-yaptigi-aciklama-nafaka-magdurlari-ekonomisi/
  • Kaliber, A. (2016). De-Europeanisation of civil society and public debates in Turkey. SESP, 21(1), 59–74.
  • Kaya, A. (2015, June 30). ‘Democracy and civil society in Turkey’ text. IAI Istituto Affari Internazionali. Retrieved from http://www.iai.it/
  • Ketola, M. (2010). Europeanisation and civil society (PhD thesis). LSE, London.
  • Keyman, E. F., Tocci, N., & Werz, M. (2017). Trends in Turkish civil society. IAI Istituto Affari Internazionali. Retrieved from http://www.iai.it/
  • Keyman, F., & Icduygu, A. (2003). Globalization, civil society and citizenship in Turkey: Actors, boundaries and discourses. Citizenship Studies, 7(2), 219–234. doi: 10.1080/1362102032000065982
  • Kopecky, P., & Mudde, C. (2005). Uncivil society? London: Routledge.
  • Levitsky, S., & Way, L. A. (2002). The rise of competitive authoritarianism. JoD, 13(2), 51–65.
  • Lewis, D. (2013). Civil society and the authoritarian state: Cooperation, Contestation and discourse. Journal of Civil Society, 9(3), 325–340. doi: 10.1080/17448689.2013.818767
  • Linz, J., & Stepan, A. (1996). Problems of democratic transition and consolidation. London: JHU Press.
  • Liverani, A. (2008). Civil society in Algeria. London: Routledge.
  • Lorch, J., & Bunk, B. (2017). Using civil society as an authoritarian legitimation strategy: Algeria and Mozambique in comparative perspective. Democratization, 24(6), 987–1005. doi: 10.1080/13510347.2016.1256285
  • Mackreath, H., & Sagnic, S. (2017). Civil society and Syrian refugees in Turkey (in Turkish). Yurttaşlık Derneği. Retrieved from http://www.hyd.org.tr
  • Obadare, E. (2011). Revalorizing the political: Towards a new intellectual agenda for African civil society discourse. Journal of Civil Society, 7(4), 427–442. doi: 10.1080/17448689.2011.626211
  • Ocakli, F. (2015). Political entrepreneurs, clientelism, and civil society: Supply-side politics in Turkey. Democratization, 23(4), 723–746. doi: 10.1080/13510347.2015.1013467
  • Öktem, K., & Akkoyunlu, K. (2017). Exit from democracy: Illiberal governance in Turkey and beyond. Oxon: Routledge.
  • Ortmann, S. (2012). Policy advocacy in a competitive authoritarian regime. Administration & Society, 44(6), 13S–25S. doi: 10.1177/0095399712460080
  • Özler, İ., & Obach, B. (2018). Polarization and the environmental movement in Turkey. Journal of Civil Society, 14(4), 311–327. doi: 10.1080/17448689.2018.1518773
  • Palys, T. (2008). Purposive sampling. In SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (pp. 698–698). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
  • Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Rivetti, P., & Cavatorta, F. (2014). Iranian student activism between authoritarianism and democratization: Patterns of conflict and cooperation between the office for the Strengthening of Unity and the regime. Democratization, 21(2), 289–310. doi: 10.1080/13510347.2012.732067
  • Rodan, G. (2003). Embracing electronic media but suppressing civil society: Authoritarian consolidation in Singapore. The Pacific Review, 16(4), 503–524. doi: 10.1080/0951274032000132236
  • Rodrik, D. (2018, January 20). A good citizen jailed in Turkey. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/03/opinion/osman-kavala-erdogan-turkey.html
  • Rosenblum, N., & Post, R. (2002). Civil society and government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Rumelili, B., & Bosnak, B. (2015). Taking stock of Europeanisation of civil society in Turkey. In A. Tekin & A. Güney (Eds.), Europeanization of Turkey (pp. 124–144). London: Routledge.
  • Rumelili, B., & Çakmaklı, D. (2017). Civic participation and citizenship in Turkey: A comparative study of five cities. SESP, 22(3), 365–384.
  • Sarkissian, A., & Özler, İ. (2013). Democratization and the politicization of religious civil society in Turkey. Democratization, 20(6), 1014–1035. doi: 10.1080/13510347.2012.669895
  • Seckinelgin, H. (2006). Civil society between the state and society: Turkish women with Muslim headscarves?. Critical Social Policy, 26(4), 748–769. doi: 10.1177/0261018306068472
  • Seckinelgin, H. (2016). Social policy and conflict: The Gezi Park–taksim demonstrations and uses of social policy for reimagining Turkey. Third World Quarterly, 37(2), 264–280. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2015.1089164
  • Şen, F., & Şen, F. (2016). Online environmental activism in Turkey: The case study of “The Right to Water”. Global Bioethics, 27(1), 1–21. doi: 10.1080/11287462.2015.1137184
  • Sjögren, A. (2001). State, civil society and democratisation. In B. Beckman, E. Hansson, & A. Sjögren (Eds.), Civil society and authoritarianism in the third world (pp. 21–48). Stockholm: Stockholm University.
  • Sönmez, B. (2018). Nafakada yeni politika: Boşanmayın barışın!. Retrieved from https://www.gazeteduvar.com.tr/
  • Spires, A. J. (2011). Contingent symbiosis and civil society in an authoritarian state: Understanding the survival of China’s grassroots NGOs. American Journal of Sociology, 117(1), 1–45. doi: 10.1086/660741
  • Sümer, S., & Eslen-Ziya, H. (2015). New waves for old rights? EJWS, 24(1), 23–38.
  • T24. (2017). İBB, Hükümete Yakın Vakıflara Yardım Ediyor. Retrieved from https://t24.com.tr
  • Toepler, S., & Salamon, L. M. (2003). NGO development in Central and Eastern Europe. East European Quarterly, 37(3), 365–378.
  • Toprak, B. (1995). Civil society in Turkey. In A. Norton (Ed.), Civil society in the Middle East (pp. 87–118). Leiden: Brill.
  • TUSEV. (2015). Civil society monitoring report 2013-2014. Retrieved from https://www.tusev.org.tr
  • Vladisavljević, N. (2014). Competitive authoritarianism and popular protest. IPSR, 37(1), 36–50.
  • Way, L. (2004). The sources and dynamics of competitive authoritarianism in Ukraine. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 20(1), 143–161. doi: 10.1080/13523270410001687145
  • Wiktorowicz, Q. (2000). Civil society as social control: State power in Jordan. Comparative Politics, 33(1), 43–61. doi: 10.2307/422423
  • Yabanci, B. (2016). Populism as the problem child of democracy. JSEEBS, 16(4), 591–617.
  • YADA. (2015). CSOs in numbers (in Turkish). Retrieved from www.yada.org.tr
  • Yegen, M., Keyman, F., Caliskan, M., & Tol, U. (2010). Civil society culture in voluntary organisations in Turkey (in Turkish). YADA. Retrieved from www.yada.org.tr
  • Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Zihnioglu, O. (2013). European Union civil society policy and Turkey. New York: Palgrave.