417
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Utilizing informal modes of engagement: civil society, substantive representation of women, and the Philippine women’s rights law

References

  • Beckwith, K. (2000). Beyond compare? Women’s movements in comparative perspective. European Journal of Political Research, (374), 431–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00521
  • Beckwith, K., & Cowell-Meyers, K. (2007). Sheer numbers: Critical representation thresholds and women’s political representation. Perspectives on Politics, 5(3), 553–565. https://doi.org/10.1017/S153759270707154X
  • Brandt, M., & Kaplan, J. (1995). The tension between women’s rights and religious rights: Reservations to CEDAW by Egypt, Bangladesh and Tunisia. Journal of Law and Religion, 12(1), 105–142. https://doi.org/10.2307/1051612
  • Celis, K., Childs, S., Kantola, J., & Krook, M. L. (2008). Rethinking women’s substantive representation. Representation, 44(2), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344890802079573
  • Chaney, P. (2012). Critical actors vs. Critical mass: The substantive representation of women in the scottish parliament. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 14(3), 441–457. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2011.00467.x
  • Chaney, P. (2015). The ‘complementarity conjecture’ — does civil society engagement strengthen input legitimacy and shape policy delivery? The case of gender mainstreaming in India and Nepal 2005–15. Journal of Comparative Asian Development, 14(3), 377–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/15339114.2015.1099827
  • Chaney, P. (2016). Gendered political space: Civil society, contingency theory, and the substantive representation of women. Journal of Civil Society, 12(2), 198–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2016.1178964
  • Childs, S. (2013). Negotiating gendered institutions: Women’s parliamentary friendships at westminster. Politics and Gender, 9(2013), 127–151. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X13000019
  • Cruz, C., Labonne, J., & Querubin, P. (2017). Politician family networks and electoral outcomes: Evidence from the Philippines. American Economic Review, 107(10), 3006–3037. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20150343
  • Curtin, J. (2008). Women, political leadership and substantive representation : The case of New Zealand. Parliamentary Affairs, 61(3), 490–504. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsn014
  • Devere, H., & Smith, G. M. (2010). Friendship and politics. Political Studies Review, 8(3), 341–356. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-9302.2010.00214.x
  • Dolan, J., Deckman, M. M., & Swers, M. L. (2017). Women and politics: Paths to power and political influence (3rd ed.). Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  • Edwards, M. (2014). Civil society (3rd ed.). Polity.
  • Gains, F., & Lowndes, V. (2014). How is institutional formation gendered, and does it make a difference? A new conceptual framework and a case study of police and crime commissioners in England and Wales. Politics and Gender, 10(4), 524–548. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X14000403
  • Helmke, G., & Levitsky, S. (2004). Informal institutions and comparative politics: A research agenda. Perspectives on Politics, 2(04), 725–740. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592704040472
  • Honculada, J., & Ofreneo, R. P. (2003). The national commission on the role of Filipino Women, the women’s movement and gender mainstreaming in the Philippines. In S. M. Rai (Ed.), Mainstreaming gender, democratizing the state (pp. 131–145). Manchester University Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203786680-6
  • Howell, J. (2005). Women’s organisations and civil society in China: Making a difference. In J. Howell & D. Mulligan (Eds.), Gender and civil society: Transcending Boundaries (pp. 54–77). Routledge.
  • Htun, M., Lacalle, M., & Micozzi, J. P. (2013). Does women’s presence change legislative behavior? Evidence from Argentina, 1983–2007. Journal of Politics in Latin America, 5(1), 95–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/1866802X1300500105
  • Htun, M., & Weldon, S. L. (2010). When do governments promote women’s rights? A framework for the comparative analysis of sex equality policy. Perspectives on Politics, 8(1), 207–216. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592709992787
  • Ileto, R. (1993). The “unfinished revolution” in Philippine political discourse. Japanese Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 31(1), 62–82.
  • Johnson, N., & Josefsson, C. (2016). A new way of doing politics ? cross-party women ‘s caucuses as critical actors in Uganda and Uruguay. Parliamentary Affairs, 69(4), 845–859. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsw011
  • Jones, M. P. (1997). Legislator gender and legislator policy priorities in the Argentine chamber of deputies and the United States House of representatives. Policy Studies Journal, 25(4), 613–629. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.1997.tb00045.x
  • Lee, L. (1988). The contemporary women’s movement in the Philippines. Australian Feminist Studies, 3(7–8), 217–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/08164649.1988.9961620
  • Lombardo, E., & Meier, P. (2014). The symbolic representation of gender: A discursive approach. Ashgate.
  • Mackay, F. (2008). ‘Thick’ conceptions of substantive representation: Women, gender and political institutions. Representation, 44(2), 125–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344890802079607
  • Mananzan, S. M. J. (2002). Church-state relationships during martial law in the Philippines. Studies in World Christianity, 8(2), 195–205. https://doi.org/10.3366/swc.2002.8.2.195
  • Mazur, A. (2005). The impact of women’s participation and leadership on policy outcomes: A focus on women’s policy machineries. United Nations expert group meeting on equal participation of women and Men in decision-making processes, with particular emphasis on political participation and leadership 24 to 27 October 2005.
  • Mendoza, R., Beja Jr., E., Venida, V., & Yap, D. (2013). Political dynasties and poverty: Resolving the “chicken or the egg” question. 48380. http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/48380/
  • Mendoza, R. U., Beja, E. L., Venida, V. S., & Yap, D. B. (2012). Inequality in democracy: Insights from an empirical analysis of political dynasties in the 15th Philippine congress. Philippine Political Science Journal, 33(2), 132–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/01154451.2012.734094
  • Meyer, B. (2003). Much ado about nothing? Political representation policies and the influence of women parliamentarians in Germany. Review of Policy Research, 20(3), 401–421. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-1338.00028
  • Minutes of the Meeting of the Committee on Women, Philippine House of Representatives, 27 November 2007. (2007).
  • Osborn, T., & Mendez, J. M. (2010). Speaking as women: Women and floor speeches in the senate. Journal of Women, Politics and Policy, 31(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/15544770903501384
  • Pitkin, H. F. (1967). The concept of representation. University of California Press.
  • Presidential Decree No. 633: Creating the National Commission on the Role of Filipino Women. (1975).
  • Querubin, P. (2012). Political reform and elite persistence: Term limits and political dynasties in the Philippines. APSA 2012 Annual Meeting Paper.
  • Querubin, P. (2016). Family and politics: Dynastic persistence in the Philippines. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 11(2), 151–181. https://doi.org/10.1561/100.00014182
  • Quimpo, N. G. (2005). The left, elections, and the political party system in the Philippines. Critical Asian Studies, 37(1), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/1467271052000305241
  • Roces, M. (2010). Rethinking ‘the Filipino woman’ A century of women’s activism in the Philippines, 1905– 2006. In M. Roces, & L. Edwards (Eds.), Women’s movements in Asia : feminisms and Transnational activism (pp. 34–52). Routledge. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/auckland/detail.action?docID=537871
  • Savery, L. (2007). Engendering the state: The international diffusion of women’s human rights. Routledge.
  • Schwindt-Bayer, L. A., & Mishler, W. (2005). An integrated model of women ‘ s representation. The Journal of Politics, 67(2), 407–428. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2005.00323.x
  • Smith, G. M. (2018). Friendship as a political concept: A groundwork for analysis. Political Studies Review, 17(1), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929918786856
  • Sobritchea, C. (2004). Women’s movement in the Philippines and the politics of critical collaboration with the state. In H. G. Lee (Ed), Civil society in Southeast Asia (pp. 101–121). ISEAS Publishing.
  • Squires, J. (2008). The constitutive representation of gender: Extra-parliamentary re-presentations of gender relations. Representation, 44(2), 187–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344890802080464
  • Stevenson, L. (2005). The impact of feminist civil society and political alliances on gender policies in Mexico. In J. Howell, & D. Mulligan (Eds.), Gender and Civil society (pp. 163–195). Routledge.
  • Swers, M. L. (1998). Are women more likely to vote for women’s issue bills than their male counterparts. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 23(3), 435–448. https://doi.org/10.2307/440362
  • Swers, M. L. (2002). The difference women make: The policy impact of women in congress. University of Chicago Press.
  • Tadem, T. S. E., & Tadem, E. C. (2016). Political dynasties in the Philippines: Persistent patterns, perennial problems. South East Asia Research, 24(3), 328–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967828X16659730
  • Tam, W. (2017). Do female legislators have different policy priorities than their male colleagues in an undemocratic/semi-democratic legislature? The case of Hong Kong. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 23(1), 44–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2017.1283174
  • Tamerius, K. L. (2010). Sex, gender, and leadership in the representation of women. In M. L. Krook, & S. Childs (Eds.), Women, gender, and politics: A reader (pp. 243–250). Oxford University Press.
  • Taylor-Robinson, M. M., & Heath, R. M. (2003). Do women legislators have different policy priorities than their male colleagues? A critical case test. Women & Politics, 24(4), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1300/J014v24n04_04
  • Thomas, S. (1991). The impact of women on state legislative policies. The Journal of Politics, 53(4), 958–976. https://doi.org/10.2307/2131862
  • Waylen, G. (2014a). A seat at the table - Is it enough? Gender, multiparty negotiations, and institutional design in South Africa and northern Ireland. Politics and Gender, 10(4), 495–523. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X14000397
  • Waylen, G. (2014b). Informal institutions, institutional change, and gender equality. Political Research Quarterly, 67(1), 212–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912913510360
  • Weiss, A. M. (2003). Interpreting islam and women’s rights: Implementing CEDAW in Pakistan. International Sociology, 18(3), 581–601. https://doi.org/10.1177/02685809030183007
  • Weldon, L. (2002). Beyond bodies: Institutional sources of representation for women in democratic policy-making. The Journal of Politics, 64(4), 1153–1174. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2508.00167
  • Weldon, S. L. (2004). The dimensions and policy impact of feminist civil society. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 6(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461674032000165914
  • Zwingel, S. (2012). How DO norms travel? Theorizing international women’s rights in transnational perspective. International Studies Quarterly, 56(1), 115–129. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2011.00701.x

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.