Framing and localizing anti-corruption norms in transnational civil society organizations: Transparency International in Portugal

References

• Acharya, A. (2004). How ideas spread: Whose norms matter? Norm localization and institutional change in Asian regionalism. International Organization, 58(2), 239–275. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818304582024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayard de Volo, L., & Schatz, E. (2004). From the inside out: Ethnographic methods in political research. Political Science and Politics, 37(2), 267–271. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096504004214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, H. S. (1966). Introduction. In H. S. Becker (Ed.), Social problems: A modern approach (pp. 1–34). John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 611–639. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bezes, P., & Lascoumes, P. (2005). Percevoir et juger la « corruption politique ». Revue française de science politique, 55(5), 757–786. https://doi.org/10.3917/rfsp.555.0757
   Google Scholar
• Briquet, J.-L. (2009). Les conditions de félicité d'une croisade morale: Lutte anticorruption et conflits politiques dans l'Italie des années 1990. Droit et Société, 72(2), 285–301. https://doi.org/10.3917/drs.072.0285
   Google Scholar
• Brodkin, E. Z. (2017). The ethnographic turn in political science: Reflections on the state of the art. Political Science and Politics, 50(1), 131–134. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096516002298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callon, M., Lascoumes, P., & Barthe, Y. (2001). Agir dans un monde incertain: Essai sur la démocratie technique. Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, I., & Outhwaite, O. (2011). The role of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in combating corruption: Theory and practice. Suffolk University Law Review, 44(3), 615–664. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/sufflr44&i=1
   Google Scholar
• Contamin, J.-G. (2009). Analyse des cadres. In O. Fillieule, L. Mathieu, & C. Péchu (Eds.), Dictionnaire des mouvements sociaux (pp. 38–46). Presses de la Fondation nationale des sciences politiques.
   Google Scholar
• Destrooper, T. (2016). Using the human rights framework as a mobilizing tool: The case of indigenous women’s movements in post-conflict Guatemala. In L. E. Hancock (Ed.), Narratives of identity in social movements, conflicts and change (pp. 87–119). Emerald.
   Google Scholar
• Eigen, P. (2013). International corruption: Organized civil society for better global governance. Social Research, 80(4), 1287–1308. Retrieved May 6, 2021, from www.jstor.org/stable/24385660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eurostat. (2020). Real GDP per capita. Retrieved July 11, 2020, from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-datasets/-/SDG_08_10
   Google Scholar
• Everett, J., Neu, D., & Rahaman, A. S. (2006). The global fight against corruption: A foucaultian, virtues-ethics framing. Journal of Business Ethics, 65(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-8715-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization, 52(4), 887–917. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081898550789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galtung, F., & Pope, J. (1999). The global coalition against corruption: Evaluating Transparency International. In A. Schedler, L. Diamond, & M. F. Plattner (Eds.), The self-restraining state: Power and accountability in new democracies (pp. 257–284). Lynne Riener.
   Google Scholar
• Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1086/229213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gebel, A. C. (2012). Human nature and morality in the anti-corruption discourse of Transparency International. Public Administration and Development, 32(1), 109–128. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, C., & Henry, E. (2012). La définition des problèmes publics : entre publicité et discrétion. Revue française de sociologie, 53(1), 35–59. https://doi.org/10.3917/rfs.531.0035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harper&Row.
   Google Scholar
• GRECO. (2008). Deuxième cycle d’évaluation. Rapport de conformité sur le Portugal. 39ème Réunion Plénière.
   Google Scholar
• GRECO [Groupe d’États contre la corruption]. (2003). Premier cycle d’évaluation. Rapport d’évaluation sur le Portugal. 14ème Réunion Plénière.
   Google Scholar
• Gusfield, Joseph R. (1981). Drinking Driving and the symbolic order. The culture of public problems. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gusfield, J. R. (1989). Constructing the ownership of social problems: Fun and profit in the welfare state. Social Problems, 36(5), 431–441. https://doi.org/10.2307/3096810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammack, D. C., & Heydemann, S. (Eds.). (2009). Globalization, philanthropy, and civil society: Projecting institutional logics abroad. Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, E. (2006). Unpacking the anti-corruption agenda: Dilemmas for anthropologists. Oxford Development Studies, 34(1), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600810500495915
   Google Scholar
• Hindess, B. (2005). Investigating international anti-corruption. Third World Quarterly, 26(8), 1389–1398. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590500336864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, H., & Powell, W. W. (2009). The rationalization of charity: The influences of professionalism in the nonprofit sector. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(2), 268–298. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2009.54.2.268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keck, Margaret E., & Sikkink, Kathryn (1998). Activists beyond borders. Advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, M. (2012a). Building a social movement against corruption. Brown Journal of World Affairs, 18(2), 57–74. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/brownjwa18&i=305
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, M. (2012b). Why do so many anti-corruption efforts fail? New York University Annual Survey of American Law, 67(3), 467–496. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/annam67&i=487
   Google Scholar
• Larmour, P. (2005). Civilizing Techniques: Transparency International and the spread of anti-corruption. ANU Discussion Papers, Policy and Governance, 05–11.
   Google Scholar
• Magone, J. M. (2014). Politics in contemporary Portugal: Democracy evolving. Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Magrath, B. (2014). Global norms, organisational change: Framing the rights-based approach at ActionAid. Third World Quarterly, 35(7), 1273–1289. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2014.926117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maia, A. J. (2010). Corrupção: Realidade e Percepções: O Papel da Imprensa. Instituto Superior de Ciências Sociais e Políticas da Universidade Técnica.
   Google Scholar
• Marques, D., & Coroado, S. (2012). Sistema nacional de integridade. Report published by Transparência e Integridade, Associação Cívica.
   Google Scholar
• Martiny, A. (2004). Transparency International - die Koalition gegen Korruption. Wirkung und Nutzen einer Nichtregierungsorganisation in einem Dschungel verborgener Abhängigkeiten. Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung, 73(2), 330–338. https://doi.org/10.3790/vjh.73.2.330
   Google Scholar
• Merry, S. E. (2000). Colonizing Hawai’i: The cultural power of law: Princeton studies in culture, power, history. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merry, S. E. (2006). Transnational human rights and local activism: Mapping the middle. American Anthropologist, 108(1), 38–51. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.2006.108.1.38
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morais, P. (2012). ‘Corrupção em Portugal’, 9 July 2012 edition of the programme ‘O que fica do que passa’ with Paulo Morais, SAPO TV. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pE_VbjcFz4c
   Google Scholar
• Morais, P. (2014, February 3). ‘A política está dominada pela corrupção’. Interview with Paulo Morais on the European Commisison’s Anti-Corruption Report, in: RTP Notícias. http://www.rtp.pt/noticias/index.php?article=714221&tm=8&layout=123&visual=%2061
   Google Scholar
• Neveu, É. (2011). Sociologie des mouvements sociaux (5th ed.). La Découverte.
   Google Scholar
• Noakes, J. A., & Johnston, H. (2005). Frames of protest: A road map to a perspective. In H. Johnston & J. A. Noakes (Eds.), Frames of protest: Social movements and the framing perspective (pp. 1–27). Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Norad (Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation) (Ed.). (2011). Evaluation of Transparency International. Report 08/2010. Channel Research. http://www.norad.no/en/tools-and-publications/publications/publication?key=268570
   Google Scholar
• Offerlé, M. (1998). Sociologie des groupes d'intérêt (2nd ed.). Montchrestien.
   Google Scholar
• Philp, M. (2007). Conceptualizing corruption. In A. J. Heidenheimer & M. Johnston (Eds.), Political corruption: Concepts & contexts (pp. 41–58). Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Robert, C., & Vauchez, A. (2010). L’Académie européenne: Savoirs, experts et savants dans le gouvernement de l’Europe. Politix, 89(1), 9–34. https://doi.org/10.3917/pox.089.0009
   Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. A. (1988). An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sciences, 21(2/3), 129–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, S. (2010). The anti-corruption industry: From movement to institution. Global Crime, 11(2), 261–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/17440571003669258
   Google Scholar
• Schophaus, M. (2009). Der Kampf um die Köpfe: Wissenschaftliche Expertise und Protestpolitik bei Attac. Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, D. A. (2004). Framing processes, ideology, and discursive fields. In D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule, & H. Kriesi (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 380–412). Blackwell Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D. (1988). Ideology, frame resonance and participant mobilization. International Social Movement Research, 1, 197–219.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, D. A., Rochford, E. B., Worden, S. K., & Benford, R. D. (1986). Frame alignment processes, micromobilization and movement participation. American Sociological Review, 51(4), 464–481. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soule, S. A. (2004). Diffusion processes within and across movements. In D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule, & H. Kriesi (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 294–310). Blackwell Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Sousa, L. D. (2005). Transparency International in search of a constituency: The franchising of the global anticorruption movement. ANU Discussion Papers, 5(14), 1–38. https://openresearchrepository.anu.edu.au/bitstream/10440/1155/1/DeSousa_Transparency2005.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sousa, L. D. (2012). ‘Above the law, below ethics’: Some findings on Portuguese attitudes towards corruption. In D. Tänzler, K. Maras, & A. Giannakopoulos (Eds.), Law, crime and culture: The social construction of corruption in Europe (pp. 245–263). Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Sousa, L. D. (2013). ‘A Corrupção e o programa da Troika’, 4 December 2013 edition of the programme ‘Negócios da semana’ with Luís Sousa, in: SIC Notícias. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=khAXJYHsnhQ&list=UUPhx6Axfk8k-dJXoxEU_Guw
   Google Scholar
• Sousa, L. D., & Larmour, P. (2009). Transparency International: Global franchising and the war of information against corruption. In R. Burke & C. Cooper (Eds.), Research companion to corruption in organizations (pp. 269–284). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Sousa, L. D., & Moriconi, M. (2013). Why voters do not throw the rascals out? A conceptual framework for analysing electoral punishment of corruption. Crime, Law and Social Change, 60(5), 471–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-013-9483-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sousa, L. D., & Triães, J. (Eds.). (2008a). A Corrupção e os Portugueses: Atitudes, práticas, valores [La Corruption et les Portugais: Attitudes, pratiques, valeurs]. RCP.
   Google Scholar
• Sousa, L. D., & Triães, J. (2008b). Introdução. In L. de Sousa & J. Triães (Eds.), A Corrupção e os Portugueses: Atitudes, práticas, valores [La Corruption et les Portugais: Attitudes, pratiques, valeurs] (pp. 23–52). RCP.
   Google Scholar
• Tänzler, D. (2010). Transparency International: von der Moralinstitution zur Politikberatungsagentur. In E. Schröter, N. Stehr, C. Wallner, & S. A. Jansen (Eds.), Transparenz: Multidisziplinäre Durchsichten durch Phänomene und Theorien des Undurchsichtigen (pp. 330–347). VS.
   Google Scholar
• TIAC. (2009b). Plano Estratégico. Constituição e Institucionalização do Capítulo Português da Transparency International, 2009–2014. Retrieved June 16, 2014, from http://transparencia.pt/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/ Plano-Estrat%C3%A9gico-da-TIAC-2009-2014.pdf
   Google Scholar
• TIAC. (2011). Plano de communicação, 2011–2015, unedited document.
   Google Scholar
• TIAC. (2014). A corrupção não é uma prática normal ou tradicional em determinadas sociedades? Retrieved October 20, 2014, from https://transparencia.pt/
   Google Scholar
• TIAC. (2017). Índice de Transparência Municipal. Retrieved July 27, 2018, from http://poderlocal.transparencia.pt/
   Google Scholar
• TIAC. (2019, May). Consolidação e Crescimento. Relatório e Contas 2018. Publicação da responsabilidade da Direção de Transparencia e Integridade, Associação Cívica. Retrieved July 10, 2020, from https://transparencia.pt/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/TI-PT-Relat%C3%B3rio-e-Contas-2018-web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• TIAC [Transparência e Integridade, Associação Cívica]. (2009a). Estatutos. Retrieved June 16, 2014, from http://transparencia.pt/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Estatutos-da-TIAC.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Transparency International. (2012). Shedding light on lobbying: How to tackle undue influence and conflicts of interests in key policy fields across Europe, unedited draft outline.
   Google Scholar
• Transparency International. (2016). People and corruption: Europe and central Asia. Global Corruption Barometer 2016, ed. by Coralie Pring. Retrieved July 10, 2020, from https://images.transparencycdn.org/images/2016_GCB_ECA_EN.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Transparency International. (2018). Our organisation – Overview. Retrieved July 29, 2018, from https://www.transparency.org/whoweare/organisation
   Google Scholar
• Transparency International. (2020). Corruption Perceptions Index 2019. Western Europe & European Union. Retrieved July 11, 2020, from https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2019
   Google Scholar
• Wang, H., & Rosenau, J. N. (2001). Transparency International and corruption as an issue of global governance. Global Governance, 7(1), 25–49. https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-00701005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, D. J., & Soule, S. A. (2012). Social movement organizational collaboration: Networks of learning and the diffusion of protest tactics, 1960–1995. American Journal of Sociology, 117(6), 1674–1722. https://doi.org/10.1086/664685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisbein, J. (2001). Le militant et l'expert: les associations civiques face au système politique européen. Politique Européenne, 4(3), 105–118. https://doi.org/10.3917/poeu.004.0105
   Google Scholar
• Weisbein, J. (2003). Sociogenèse de la “société civile européenne”. Raisons Politiques, 10(2), 125–137. https://doi.org/10.3917/rai.010.0125
   Google Scholar