711
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Trends in forms of civic involvement in the Netherlands between 2008 and 2020

ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon

References

  • Arends, J., & Schmeets, H. (2018). Vrijwilligerswerk: Activiteiten, duur en motieven. Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek.
  • Bauman, Z. (2001). Identity in the globalizing World1. Social Anthropology, 9(2), 121–129. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8676.2001.tb00141.x
  • Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. Sage.
  • Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2002). Individualization. Sage.
  • Bekkers, R., De Wit, A., & Wiepking, P. (2017). Jubileumspecial: Twintig jaar Geven in Nederland. In R. Bekkers, T. N. M. Schuyt, & B. M. Gouwenberg (Eds.), Geven in Nederland 2017: Giften, Sponsoring, Legaten en Vrijwilligerswerk (pp. 61–94). Lenthe.
  • Bekkers, R., Gouwenberg, B. M., Koolen-Maas, S., & Schuyt, T. N. M. (Eds.). (2022). Geven in Nederland 2022. Lenthe.
  • Bekkers, R., Gouwenberg, B. M., & Schuyt, T. N. M. (Eds.). (2020). Geven in Nederland 2020. Lenthe.
  • Bekkers, R., & Ruiter, S. (2009). Generatieverschillen in maatschappelijke waarden en vrijwillige inzet. In R. Bekkers, B. M. Gouwenberg, & T. N. M. Schuyt (Eds.), Geven in Nederland 2020 (pp. 22–48). Lenthe. 2020.
  • Bekkers, R., & Van Teunenbroek, C. (2020). Generatieverschillen in geefgedrag en vrijwilligerswerk. In R. Bekkers, B. M. Gouwenberg, & T. N. M. Schuyt (Eds.), Geven in Nederland 2020 (pp. 22–48). Lenthe.
  • Burger, A., & Veldheer, V. (2001). The growth of the nonprofit sector in the Netherlands. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30(2), 221–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764001302004
  • Cnaan, R. A., & Handy, F. (2005). Towards understanding episodic volunteering. Vrijwillige Inzet Onderzocht, 2(1), 29–35.
  • Damian, E. (2019). Formal volunteering in Europe: Evidence across nations and time. Cross-Cultural Research, 53(4), 385–409. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397118802228
  • Dekker, P. (2002). De oplossing van de civil society. Over vrijwillige associaties in tijden van vervagende grenzen. Social and Cultural Planning Office.
  • Dekker, P. (2013). Dutch civil society in macro quantitative perspectives. In A. Zimmer (Ed.), Civil society compared (pp. 141–160). Nomos Verlag.
  • Dekker, P. (2019). From pillarized active membership to populist active citizenship: The Dutch do democracy. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 30(1), 74–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-018-00058-4
  • De Wit, A., & Bekkers, R. (2020). Can charitable donations compensate for a reduction in government funding? The role of information. Public Administration Review, 80(2), 294–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13154
  • Gesthuizen, M., Scheepers, P., Van der Veld, W., & Völker, B. (2013). Structural aspects of social capital: Tests for cross-national equivalence in Europe. Quality & Quantity, 47(2), 909–922. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9573-3
  • Gordon, C. W., & Babchuk, N. (1959). A typology of voluntary associations. American Sociological Review, 24(1), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.2307/2089579
  • Habraken, R., Meijs, L., Schulpen, L., & Temmink, C. (2013). Dutch civil society at crossroads. Development in Practice, 23(5&6), 742–754. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614524.2013.801398
  • Heelas, P. (1996). Introduction: Detraditionalization and its rivals. In P. Heelas, S. Lash, & P. Morris (Eds.), Detraditionalization. Critical reflections on authority and identity (pp. 1–20). Blackwell Publishers.
  • Hoffmann, J. P., & Miller, A. (1997). Social and political attitudes among religious groups: Convergence and divergence over time. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 36(1), 52–70. https://doi.org/10.2307/1387882
  • Knack, S. (2003). Groups, growth and trust: Cross-country evidence on the Olson and Putnam hypotheses. Public Choice, 117(3-4), 341–355. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PUCH.0000003736.82456.04
  • Kuyper, L., Van Houwelingen, P., Dekker, P., & Steenbekkers, A. (2019). Maatschappelijke en politieke participatie en betrokkenheid. In A. Wennekers, J. Boelhouwer, C. Van Campen, & J. Kullberg (Eds.), De sociale staat van Nederland 2019 (pp. 223–244). Social and Cultural Planning Office.
  • Lee, Y. J. (2020). Facebooking alone? Millennials’ use of social network sites and volunteering. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 49(1), 203–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764019868844
  • Lelieveldt, H., Astudillo, J., & Stevenson, L. (2007). The spectrum of associational activities. In W. A. Maloney & S. Roβteutscher (Eds.), Social capital and associations in European democracies: A comparative analysis (pp. 99–133). Routledge.
  • Macduff, N. (2005). Societal changes and the rise of the episodic volunteer. Emerging Areas of Volunteering, 1(2), 49–61.
  • Mannheim, K. (1967). The problem of generations. Psychoanalytic Review, 53(3), 378–404.
  • Pichler, F., & Wallace, C. (2009). Social capital and social class in Europe: The role of social networks in social stratification. European Sociological Review, 25(9), 319–332. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcn050
  • Pries, L. (2019). Introduction: Civil society and volunteering in the so-called refugee crisis of 2015-ambiguities and structural tensions. In M. Feischmidt, L. Pries, & C. Cantat (Eds.), Refugee protection and civil society in Europe (pp. 1–25). Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.
  • Putnam, R. D. (2007). E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century. The 2006 Johan Skytte Prize Lecture. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(2), 137–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.x
  • Salamon, L., & Sokolowski, W. (2004). Global civil society: Dimensions of the nonprofit sector (volume 2). Kumarian Press.
  • Scherpenzeel, A. (2009). Start of the LISS panel: Sample and recruitment of a probability-based internet panel. Centerdata.
  • Schmeets, H. (2013). Sociale samenhang brokkelt niet af. Economisch Statistische Berichten, 98(4657), 212–215.
  • Statistics Netherlands. (2022). Fewer and fewer people volunteer. https://www.cbs.nl/nl-nl/nieuws/2022/42/steeds-minder-mensen-doen-vrijwilligerswerk
  • Stolle, D., Hooghe, M., & Micheletti, M. (2005). Politics in the supermarket: Political consumerism as a form of political participation. International Political Science Review, 26(3), 245–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512105053784
  • Van der Meer, T. W. G., te Grotenhuis, M., & Scheepers, P. L. H. (2009). Three types of voluntary associations in comparative perspective: The importance of studying associational involvement through a typology of associations in 21 European countries. Journal of Civil Society, 5(3), 227–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/17448680903351743
  • Van der Veer, L. (2022). Treacherous elasticity, callous boundaries: Aspiring volunteer initiatives in the field of refugee support in Rotterdam. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 33(1), 83–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-020-00260-3
  • Van Ingen, E. (2008). Social participation revisited: Disentangling and explaining period, life-cycle and cohort effects. Acta Sociologica, 51(2), 103–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699308090038
  • Van Ingen, E., & Dekker, P. (2011a). Changes in the determinants of volunteering: Participation and time investment between 1975 and 2005 in the Netherlands. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(4), 682–702. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764010363324
  • Van Ingen, E., & Dekker, P. (2011b). Dissolution of associational life? Testing the individualization and informalization hypotheses on leisure activities in the Netherlands between 1975 and 2005. Social Indicators Research, 100(2), 209–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9612-9
  • Van Teunenbroek, P. S. C., & Bekkers, R. (2019). Follow the crowd: Social information and crowdfunding donations in a large field experiment. Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, 3(1), 1–17.
  • Wilson, J., & Musick, M. (1997). Who cares? Toward an integrated theory of volunteer work. American Sociological Review, 62(5), 694–713. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657355