How a Human Needs Theory Understanding of Conflict Enhances the Use of Consociationalism as a Conflict Resolution Mechanism: The Good Friday Agreement in Northern Ireland

References

• Aitken, R. (2007). Cementing divisions? An assessment of the impact of international interventions and peace-building policies on ethnic identities and divisions. Policy Studies, 28(3), 247–267. doi: 10.1080/01442870701437568
   Google Scholar
• Azar, E. (1990). The management of protracted social conflict: Theory and causes. Dartmouth: Aldershoot.
   Google Scholar
• Belfast Telegraph. (1999, June 21) More talk less walk advice to Orangemen. Belfast Telegraph. Retrieved from http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/imported/more-talk-less-walk-advice-to-orangemen-28270660.html
   Google Scholar
• Bowcott, O. (2006, May 20). Northern Ireland: Orangeman forced off parades commission . The Guardian (London), p. 7.
   Google Scholar
• Burton, J. (1997). Violence explained. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, L. (1999). Developing democracy: Toward consolidation. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, J. (1999). Governance and citizenship in contested states: The Northern Ireland peace agreement as internationalised governance. Irish Studies in International Affairs, 10, 201–219.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, J. (Ed.). (2010). Policing the narrow ground. Dublin: Royal Irish Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, A. (2004, January 9). Growing appetite among protestant, unionist and loyalist people to learn Irish language . The Belfast Telegraph. Retrieved from http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/northern-ireland/growing-appetite-among-protestant-unionist-and-loyalist-people-to-learn-irish-language-says-wife-of-former-pup-leader-29901196.html
   Google Scholar
• GFA. (1998, April 10). Agreement reached in the multi-party negotiations. Retrieved from http://www.nio.gov.uk/agreement.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Government of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. (1998). Public processions (Northern Ireland) Act. London: Stationary Office.
   Google Scholar
• Great Britain. Government. (1998, February 2). Strand One (Paper One). Discussion paper presented by the British Government, to the multi-party Talks, on the issue of the proposed Northern Ireland Assembly, London.
   Google Scholar
• Higson, R. (2008). Anti-consociationalism and the Good Friday agreement: A rejoinder. Journal of Peace, Conflict and Development, 12, 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• House of Commons Northern Ireland Affairs Committee. (2009). The report of the consultative group on the past in Northern Ireland. Second report of session 2009–10: Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence, Ordered by the House of Commons.
   Google Scholar
• Kelman, H. (1997). Social-Psychological dimensions of international conflict. In I. William Zartman & Lewis Rasmussen (Eds.), Peacemaking in international conflict (pp. 191–236). Washington, DC: USIP Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lijphart, A. (1969). Consociational democracy. World Politics, 21(2), 207–25. doi: 10.2307/2009820
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lijphart, A. (1971). Cultural diversity and theories of political integration. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 4(1), 1–14. doi: 10.1017/S000842390002624X
   Google Scholar
• Lijphart, A. (2004). Constitutional design for divided societies. Journal of Democracy, 15(2), 96–109. doi: 10.1353/jod.2004.0029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marker, S. (2003, August). Unmet human needs. In Guy Burgess & Heidi Burgess (Eds.), Beyond intractability. Boluder: Conflict Information Consortium, University of Colorado. Retrieved from http://www.beyondintractability.org/essay/human-needs
   Google Scholar
• McGarry, J., & O'Leary, B. (2004). The Northern Ireland conflict. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McGarry, J., & O'Leary, B. (2006a). Consociational theory, Northern Ireland's conflict, and its agreement. Part 1: What consociationalists can learn from Northern Ireland. Government and Opposition, 41(1), 43–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-7053.2006.00170.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGarry, J., & O'Leary, B. (2006b). Consociational theory, Northern Ireland's conflict, and its agreement. Part 1: What critics of consociation can learn from Northern Ireland. Government and Opposition, 41(2), 249–277. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-7053.2006.00178.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Northern Ireland Affairs Committee. (2004–05). (Northern Ireland) Act 1998. Second report of session 2004–05, Volume I, Report, together with formal minutes, London, Stationary Office .
   Google Scholar
• The North/South Ministerial Council. (2006). About Us – Areas of Cooperation of the Council. Retrieved June 10, 2014, from http://www.northsouthministerialcouncil.org/index/about-us.htm
   Google Scholar
• O'Leary, B. (2002). The Belfast and British-Irish agreements. In Andrew Reynolds (Ed.), The architecture of democracy (pp. 293–356). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parades Commission. (2005). Public processions and related protest meetings guide 2005. Belfast: Stationary Office.
   Google Scholar
• Reilly, B. (2002). Electoral systems for divided societies. Journal of Democracy, 13(2), 156–170. doi: 10.1353/jod.2002.0029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothman, J. (1997). Resolving identity-Based conflict in nations, organizations, and communities. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, R. (2006). The Belfast agreement and the politics of consociationalism: A critique. The Political Quarterly, 77(2), 217–226. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-923X.2006.00764.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, D. (2014). Northern Ireland and the independent parades commission: Delegation and legitimacy. Irish Political Studies. doi: 10.1080/07907184.2014.942291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilford, R. (Ed.). (2001) Aspects of the Belfast agreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, K. P., & Neal, J. G. (2001). Resolving Nationalist conflicts: Promoting overlapping identities and pooling sovereignty: The 1998 Northern Ireland peace agreement. Political Psychology, 22(3), 571–599. doi: 10.1111/0162-895X.00254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff, S. (2009). Complex power-sharing and the centrality of territorial self-governance in contemporary conflict settlements. Ethnopolitics, 8(1), 27–45. doi: 10.1080/17449050902738853
   Google Scholar