Conclusion: Patterns of Non-Territorial Autonomy

References

• Abu Jaber, K. S. (1967). The millet system in the nineteenth-century Ottoman empire. The Muslim World, 57(3), 212–223. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-1913.1967.tb01260.x
   Google Scholar
• Aubert, W. (1978). Den Samiske befolkning i Nord-Norge: The Lappish population in Northern Norway. Oslo: Statistisk Sentralbyro.
   Google Scholar
• Austria: Statistische Zentralkommission. (1918). Specialortsreportorium der österreichischen Länder. Band 10. Mähren. Wien: K. K. Hof- und Staats-Druckerei.
   Google Scholar
• Ballita, J. (1943). Éléments de statistiques générales sur la population. Beirut: Bureau de Statistique.
   Google Scholar
• Barkey, E., & Gavrilis, G. (2015). The Ottoman millet system: Non-territorial autonomy and its contemporary legacy. Ethnopolitics, 15(1), doi:10.1080/17449057.2015.1101845
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barry, F. W. (1884). Report on the census of Cyprus, 1881, with appendix. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Bauböck, R. (2004). Territorial or cultural autonomy for national minorities? In A. Dieckhoff (Ed.), The politics of belonging: Nationalism, liberalism and pluralism (pp. 221–258). Lanham: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bauböck, R. (2005). Political autonomy or cultural minority rights? A conceptual critique of Renner’s model. In E. Nimni (Ed.), National cultural autonomy and its contemporary critics (pp. 97–111). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, O. (2000 [1924]). The question of nationalities and social democracy ( Joseph O'Donnell, Trans., E. Ninmni, Ed.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Belgium. (1954). Recensement général de la population au 31 décembre 1947: repartition, au point de vue des langues nationals parlées, des habitants [d’Anvers, etc.]. Brussels: extrait du Moniteur belge.
   Google Scholar
• Berg-Nordlie, M., Saglie, J., & Sullivan, A. (2015). Introduction: Perspectives on indigenous politics. In M. Berg-Nordlie et al. (Eds.), Indigenous politics: Institutions, representation, mobilisation (pp. 1–24). Colchester: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coakley, J. (2012). Nationalism, ethnicity and the state: Making and breaking nations. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Coakley, J. (2013). Primordialism and the study of nationalism. In M. H. Williams (Ed.), The multicultural dilemma: Migration, ethnic politics and state intermediation (pp. 153–68). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Coakley, J. (2015). Introduction: Dispersed minorities and non-territorial autonomy. Ethnopolitics, 15(1), doi:10.1080/17449057.2015.1101842
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cyprus (1962). Census of population and agriculture, 1960. Vol. 1. Nicosia: Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Dalle Mulle, E. (2015). Belgium and the Brussels question: The role of non-territorial autonomy. Ethnopolitics, 15(1), doi:10.1080/17449057.2015.1101839
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davison, R. (1963). Reform in the Ottoman Empire 1856–1876. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Costa, R. (2015). States’ definitions of indigenous peoples: A survey of practice. In M. Berg-Nordlie et al. (Eds.), Indigenous politics: Institutions, representation, mobilisation (pp. 25–60). Colchester: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Decker, D. C. (2007). The use of cultural autonomy to prevent conflict and meet the Copenhagen criteria: The case of Romania. Ethnopolitics, 6(3), 437–450. doi: 10.1080/17449050701487454
   Google Scholar
• Deringil, S. (2000). ‘There is no compulsion in religion’: On conversion and apostasy in the late Ottoman Empire: 1839–1856. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 42(3), 547–575. doi: 10.1017/S0010417500002930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dundas, G. (2004). Cyprus from 1960 to EU accession: The case for non-territorial autonomy. Australian Journal of Politics & History, 50(1), 86–94. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8497.2004.00322.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estonia. (1923–25). Rahva demograafiline koosseis ja korteriolud Eestis 1922 a. üldrahvalugemise andmed: Résultats du recensement de 1922 pour toute la République. Tallinn: Riigi Statistika Keskbüroo.
   Google Scholar
• Falch, T., Selle, P., & Strømsnes, K. (2015). The Sámi: 25 years of indigenous authority in Norway. Ethnopolitics, 15(1), doi:10.1080/17449057.2015.1101846
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gechtman, R. (2015). Jews and non-territorial autonomy: Political programs and historical perspectives. Ethnopolitics, 15(1), doi:10.1080/17449057.2015.1101843
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grbic, D., Ishizawa, H., & Crothers, C. (2010). Ethnic residential segregation in New Zealand, 1991–2006. Social Science Research, 39(1), 25–38. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2009.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, R. (2015). New Zealand Maori: The quest for indigenous autonomy. Ethnopolitics, 15(1), doi:10.1080/17449057.2015.1101844
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hooghe, L., Marks, G., & Schakel, A. H. (2008). Operationalising regional authority: A coding scheme for 42 countries, 1950–2006. Regional and Federal Studies, 18(2–3), 123–142. doi: 10.1080/13597560801979480
   Google Scholar
• Housden, M. (2004). Ambiguous activists. Estonia's model of cultural autonomy as interpreted by two of its founders: Werner Hasselblatt and Ewald Ammende. Journal of Baltic Studies, 35(3), 231–253. doi: 10.1080/01629770400000091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jászi, O. (1929). The dissolution of the Habsburg Monarchy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, R., Poulsen, M., & Forrest, J. (2005). The residential segregation of New Zealand Maori in comparative perspective: An ‘ecology of social inequality’? New Zealand Population Review, 31(2), 33–55.
   Google Scholar
• Karpat, K. H. (1978). Ottoman population records and the census of 1881/82–1893. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 9(3), 237–274. doi: 10.1017/S0020743800000088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katsikas, S. (2009). Millets in nation-states: The case of Greek and Bulgarian Muslims, 1912–1923. Nationalities Papers, 37(2), 177–201. doi: 10.1080/00905990902745726
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, T. M. (2003). Last best chance or last gasp? The compromise of 1905 and Czech politics in Moravia. Austrian History Yearbook, 34, 279–301. doi: 10.1017/S006723780002052X
   Google Scholar
• Klímová-Alexander, I. (2005). Prospects for Romani national-cultural autonomy. In E. Nimni (Ed.), National cultural autonomy and its contemporary critics (pp. 124–134). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kuzmany, B. (2015). Habsburg Austria: Experiments in non-territorial autonomy. Ethnopolitics, 15(1), doi:10.1080/17449057.2015.1101838
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kymlicka, W. (1992). Two models of pluralism and tolerance. Analyse und Kritik, 14(1), 33–56.
   Google Scholar
• Kymlicka, W. (2007). National cultural autonomy and international minority rights norms. Ethnopolitics, 6(3), 379–393. doi: 10.1080/17449050701487389
   Google Scholar
• Lenin, V. I. (1972 [1914]). The right of nations to self-determination. In Collected works, 20 (pp. 393–454). London: Lawrence and Wishart.
   Google Scholar
• Lenin, V. I. (1973 [1913]). Theses on the national question. In Collected works, 19 (pp. 243–251). London: Lawrence and Wishart.
   Google Scholar
• Lithuania. (1925). Lietuvos Gyventojai: 1923 m. rugsėjo 17 d. surašymo duomenys: Population de la Lithuanie: Donées du recensement du 17 Septembre 1923. Kaunas: Centralinis Statistikos Biuras.
   Google Scholar
• Luxemburg, R. (1976 [1909]). The national question and autonomy. In H. B. Davis (Ed.), The national question: Selected writings of Rosa Luxemburg (pp. 251–287). New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Macartney, C. A. (1934). National states and national minorities. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J. (2001). The Ottoman peoples and the end of empire. London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Nathans, B. (2002). Beyond the pale: The Jewish encounter with late imperial Russia. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand: Parliament. (2015). The 2014 New Zealand general election: Final results and voting statistics. Parliamentary Library Research Paper 2015/01. Wellington: Parliamentary Library.
   Google Scholar
• Nootens, G. (2005). Nations, state and the sovereign territorial ideal. In E. Nimni (Ed.), National cultural autonomy and its contemporary critics (pp. 51–62). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, P. (2005). National autonomy and indigenous sovereignty. In E. Nimni (Ed.), National cultural autonomy and its contemporary critics (pp. 112–123). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pettersen, T. (2015) The Sámediggi electoral roll in Norway—framework, growth and geographical shifts 1989–2009. In M. Berg-Nordlie et al. (Eds.), Indigenous politics: Institutions, representation, mobilisation (pp. 165–190). Colchester: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pinchuk, B. C. (2000). The Shtetl: An ethnic town in the Russian Empire. Cahiers du Monde russe, 41(4), 495–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poland. (1925). Annuaire statistique de la République Polonaise, vol. 3, 1924. Warsaw: Główny Urząd Statystyczny.
   Google Scholar
• Quataert, D. (2000). The Ottoman Empire, 1700–1922. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robbins, J. (2015). Indigenous political representation in liberal-democratic countries: A comparative analysis. In M. Berg-Nordlie et al. (Eds.), Indigenous politics: Institutions, representation, mobilisation (pp. 61-94). Colchester: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Russia. (1899–1905). Pervaya vseobshchaya perepis’ naseleniya Rossiiskoi Imperii 1897 g. [First general census of the population of the Russian Empire, 1897]. Peterburg: Izdanie Tsentralnogo Statisticheskogo Komiteta Ministerstva Vnutrennikh Del.
   Google Scholar
• Şaşmaz, M. (1994). Analysis of the population table of the census of Salonica of 1903–4. Ankara Üniversitesi Osmanlı Tarihi Araştırma ve Uygulama Merkezi Dergisi (OTAM), 5, 349–377.
   Google Scholar
• Selenica, T. (1928) Shqipria më 1927—L'Albanie en 1927. Tiranë: Shtypshkonja ‘Tirana’.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, S. J. (1978). The Ottoman census system and population, 1831–1914. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 9(3), 325–338. doi: 10.1017/S0020743800033602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, S. J., & Shaw, E. K. (1977). History of the Ottoman Empire and modern Turkey: Vol. 2: Reform, revolution, and republic: The rise of modern Turkey, 1808–1975. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slaastad, T. I. (2014). Samisk statistikk 2014. Oslo: Statistisk Sentralbyro.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. J. (2015). Estonia: A model for interwar Europe? Ethnopolitics, 15(1), doi:10.1080/17449057.2015.1101841
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith, D. J., & Cordell, K. (2007). Introduction: The theory and practice of cultural autonomy in Central and Eastern Europe. Ethnopolitics, 6(3), 337–343. doi: 10.1080/17449050701487330
   Google Scholar
• Stalin, J. V. (1948 [1913]). Marxism and the national question. In Marxism and the national and Colonial questions: A collection of speeches (pp. 3–61). London: Martin Lawrence.
   Google Scholar
• Stamatopoulos, D. (2006). From millets to minorities in the 19th-century Ottoman empire: An ambiguous modernization. In S. G. Ellis, G. Hálfdanarson, & A. K. Isaacs (Eds.), Citizenship in historical perspective (pp. 253–73). Pisa: Edizioni Plus—Pisa University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics New Zealand. (2015) [homepage]. Retrieved from www.stats.govt.nz
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Norway. (2015) Statistics Norway–Official statistics about Norwegian society since 1876. Retrieved from www.ssb.no
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, A. (2015). Maori representation and participation in national and local government politics. In M. Berg-Nordlie et al. (Eds.), Indigenous politics: Institutions, representation, mobilisation (pp. 115–134). Colchester: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Teleki, Count P., & Rónai, A. (1937). The different types of ethnic mixture of population. Budapest: Athenaeum.
   Google Scholar
• Torode, N. (2008). National-cultural autonomy in the Russian Federation: Implementation and impact. International Journal on Minority and Group Rights, 15(2–3), 179–193. doi: 10.1163/157181108X332596
   Google Scholar
• Van Parijs, P. (2011). The linguistic territoriality principle: Right violation or parity of esteem? In P. De Grauwe & P. Van Parijs (Eds.), The linguistic territoriality principle: Right violation or parity of esteem? (pp. 1–22). Brussels: Re-Bel e-books; Retrieved from www.rethinkingbelgium.eu/rebel-initiative-files/ebooks/ebook-11/Re-Bel-e-book-11.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Waber, L. (1915). Die zahlenmässige Entwicklung der Völker Österreichs 1846–1910. Statistische Monatschrift [der k.k. Statistischen Zentral-Kommission], N.F., 20, 589–721.
   Google Scholar
• Weaver, S. M. (1983) Australian aboriginal policy: Aboriginal pressure groups or government advisory bodies? Oceania, 54(1), 1–22 ; 54(2), 85–108. doi: 10.1002/j.1834-4461.1983.tb02014.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss-Wendt, A. (2008). Thanks to the Germans! Jewish cultural autonomy in interwar Estonia. East European Jewish Affairs, 38(1), 89–104. doi: 10.1080/13501670801897544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yetişgin, M. (2007). The Ottoman way of governing multi-ethnic and multi-religious communities. Ankara Üniversitesi Osmanlı Tarihi Araştırma ve Uygulama Merkezi Dergisi (OTAM), 21, 135–168.
   Google Scholar
• Yugoslavia. (1921). Present population (civil and military, permanent and temporary), by mother tongue and religion, Census 1921. Retrieved from http://webrzs.stat.gov.rs/
   Google Scholar