Power-Sharing and Partition amid Israel–Palestine

References

• Akenson, D. H. (1992). God’s peoples: Covenant and land in South Africa, Israel, and Ulster. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Amirav, M., & Siniora, H. (1991–1992). Jerusalem: Resolving the unresolvable. Jerusalem: Israel/Palestine Center for Research and Information.
   Google Scholar
• Beinart, P. (2012). The crisis of Zionism. New York, NY: Times Books/Henry Holt.
   Google Scholar
• Bekerman, Z. (2004). Potential and limitations of multicultural education in conflict-ridden areas: Bilingual Palestinian-Jewish Schools in Israel. Teachers College Record, 106(3), 574–610. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9620.2004.00351.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Porat, G. (Ed.). (2008). The failure of the Middle East peace process? A comparative analysis of peace implementation in Israel/Palestine, Northern Ireland and South Africa. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bogaards, M. (1998). The favourable factors for consociational democracy: A review. European Journal of Political Research, 33(4), 475–496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollens, S. A. (2001). City and Soul: Sarajevo, Johannesburg, Jerusalem, Nicosia. City, 5(2), 169–187. doi: 10.1080/13604810120092454
   Google Scholar
• Braude, B., & Lewis, B. (Eds.). (1982). Christians and Jews in the Ottoman Empire: The functioning of a plural society. Two vols. Vol. II: The Arabic-Speaking Lands. New York, NY: Holmes and Meier.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (2012). Parting ways: Jewishness and the critique of Zionism. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chazan, N. (1988, June 8–11). Israel and South Africa: Some preliminary reflections. New Outlook, pp. 8–11.
   Google Scholar
• Chazan, N., Moughrabi, F., & Khalidi, R. (1991). Negotiating the non-negotiable: Jerusalem in the Framework of an Israeli-Palestinian Settlement (Emerging Issues; Occasional Paper No. 7). Cambridge, MA: International Security Studies Program American Academy of Arts and Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Cleary, J. (2001). Colonial partitions: Literature and nation-state in Ireland, Israel, and Palestine. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elkins, C., & Pedersen, S. (2005). Settler colonialism in the twentieth century: Projects, practices, legacies. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Esman, M. (1994). Israelis and Palestinians: Whose Land ? In Ethnic politics (pp. 111–146). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, T. G. (1984). Partition in Ireland, India, and Palestine: Theory and practice. New York, NY: St. Martin's Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, S., & Atkinson, D. (1994). The small Miracle: South Africa's negotiated settlement, South African Review 7. Johannesburg: Ravan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frisch, H. (2005). Nationalizing a universal text: The Quran in Arafat’s Rhetoric. Middle Eastern Studies, 41(3), 321–336. doi: 10.1080/00263200500105893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galnoor, I. (1995). The partition of Palestine: Decision crossroads in the Zionist movement. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gelvin, J. L. (2005). The Israel-Palestine conflict; one hundred years of war. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gewirth, A. B. (1997). The moral status of Israel. In T. Kapitan (Ed.), Philosophical perspectives on the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict (pp. 95–104). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Ghanem, A. (1998). State and Minority in Israel: The case of ethnic state and the predicament of its minority. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 21(3), 428–448. doi: 10.1080/014198798329892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghanem, A. (2000). The Palestinian minority in Israel: The ‘Challenge’ of the Jewish State and its implications. Third World Quarterly, 21(1), 87–104. doi: 10.1080/01436590013242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giliomee, H., & Gagiano, J. (Eds.). (1990). The elusive search for peace: South Africa, Israel, and Northern Ireland, contemporary South African Debates. Cape Town: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Irwin, C. (2012). 20 Peace lessons from Northern Ireland to Israel and Palestine. E-book available online as a PDf: printed on demand by CreateSpace. Scotts Valley, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Israel/Palestine Center for Research and Information. (1992). A model for the future of Jerusalem (Draft Version). Jerusalem: Israel/Palestine Center for Research and Information.
   Google Scholar
• Judt, T. (2003, October 23). Israel: The Alternative. The New York Review of Books. http://www.nybooks.com/articles/2003/10/23/israel-the-alternative/
   Google Scholar
• Kapitan, T. (1997). Philosophical perspectives on the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Karsh, E. (2001). Review of “One Palestine, complete. Jews and Arabs under the British Mandate. The Middle East Quarterly, 8(3), 90–91.
   Google Scholar
• Khalidi, R. (2013). Brokers of deceit: How the US has undermined peace in the Middle East. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Khalidi, W. (1996). Islam, the West and Jerusalem. Washington, DC: Center for Contemporary Arab Studies & Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding Georgetown University.
   Google Scholar
• Khalidi, W. (2000). The Ownership of the U.S. embassy site in Jerusalem (Special Report). Jerusalem: Institute of Jerusalem Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Klausner, S. (1960). Why they chose Israel. Archives de sociologie des Religions, 9(1), 29–44.
   Google Scholar
• Knox, C., & Quirk, P. (2000). Peace building in Northern Ireland, Israel and South Africa: Transition, transformation and reconciliation. Ethnic and Intercommunity Conflict Series. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Lijphart, A. (1969). Consociational democracy. World Politics, 21(2), 207–225. doi: 10.2307/2009820
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lijphart, A. (1975). The politics of accommodation: Pluralism and democracy in the Netherlands (2nd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lijphart, A. (1977). Democracy in plural societies: A comparative exploration. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lijphart, A. (1984). Time politics of accommodation: Reflections – fifteen years later. Acta Politica, 19(1), 9–18.
   Google Scholar
• Lustick, I. S. (1979). Stability in deeply divided societies: Consociationalism versus control. World Politics, 31(3), 325–344. doi: 10.2307/2009992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lustick, I. S. (1980). Arabs in the Jewish State: Israel's control of a national minority (Modern Middle East Series: No. 6). Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lustick, I. S. (1988). For the land and the Lord: Jewish fundamentalism in Israel. New York, NY: Council on Foreign Relations.
   Google Scholar
• Lustick, I. S. (1993). Unsettled states, disputed lands: Britain and Ireland, France and Algeria, Israel and the West Bank-Gaza. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lustick, I. S. (1996). The Fetish of Jerusalem: A hegemonic analysis. In M. N. Barnett (Ed.), Israel in Comparative perspective: Challenging the conventional wisdom (pp. 143–172). Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lustick, I. S. (1997). The illusion of a radical solution to cultural conflict when ‘we’ and ‘them’ are part of ‘us’. Politics and the Life Sciences, 16(2), 262–264.
   Google Scholar
• Lustick, I. S. (1999). Israel as a Non-Arab State: The political implications of mass immigration of non-Jews. Middle East Journal, 53(3), 417–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maney, G. M., Ibrahim, I. Higgins, G. I., & Herzog, H. (2006). The past’s promise: Lessons from peace processes in Northern Ireland and the Middle East. Journal of Peace Research, 43(2), 181–200. doi: 10.1177/0022343306060899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margalit, A. (1991). The Myth of Jerusalem. The New York Review, 38, 21.
   Google Scholar
• Masalha, N. (1997). A land without a people: Israel, transfer and the Palestinians 1949–96. London: Faber & Faber.
   Google Scholar
• McGarry, J. (1998). Political settlements in Northern Ireland and South Africa. Political Studies, 46(5), 853–870. doi: 10.1111/1467-9248.00171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGarry, J., & Moore, M. (1997). The problems with partition. Politics and the Life Sciences, 16(2), 266–268.
   Google Scholar
• McGarry, J., & O’Leary, B. (2006). Consociational theory, Northern Ireland’s conflict, and its agreement. part one. What consociationalists can learn from Northern Ireland. Government and Opposition, 41(1), 43–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-7053.2006.00170.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGarry, J., O'Leary, B., & Simeon, R. (2008). Integration or accommodation? The enduring debate in conflict regulation. In C. Choudry (Ed.), Constitutional design for divided societies: Integration or accommodation? (pp. 41–88). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mearsheimer, J., & Walt, S. (2006). The Israel Lobby. London Review of Books, 28(6), 3–12.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, G. J. (2000). Making peace (2nd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, P., Evans, G., & O’Leary, B. (2009). Extremist outbidding in ethnic party systems is not inevitable: Tribune parties in Northern Ireland. Political Studies, 57(2), 397–421. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2008.00769.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nimni, E. (2003). The challenge of post-Zionism: Alternatives to Israeli fundamentalist politics. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Nordlinger, E. A. (1972). Conflict regulation in divided societies (Occasional Papers in International Affairs. Vol. 29). Cambridge, MA: Center for International Affairs, Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• O’Leary, B. (1989). The limits to coercive consociationalism in Northern Ireland. Political Studies, 37(4), 562–588. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1989.tb00289.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Leary, B. (2004). The nature of the agreement. In J. McGarry & B. O’Leary (Eds.), The Northern Ireland conflict: Consociational engagements (pp. 260–293). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Leary, B. (2005). Debating consociational politics: Normative and explanatory arguments. In S. J. R. Noel (Ed.), From power-sharing to democracy: Post-conflict institutions in ethnically divided societies, (pp. 3–43). Toronto: McGill-Queens University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Leary, B. (2007). Analyzing partition: Definition, classification and explanation. Political Geography, 26(8), 886–908. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2007.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Leary, B. (2011). Debating partition: Evaluating the standard justifications. In K. Cordell & S. Wolff (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of ethnic conflict (pp. 140–157). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pappalardo, A. (1981). The conditions for consociational democracy: A logical and empirical critique. European Journal of Political Research, 9, 365–390. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.1981.tb00614.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peatling, G. K. (2004). The failure of the Northern Ireland peace process. Dublin: Irish Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peled, Y. (1992). Ethnic democracy and the legal construction of citizenship: Arab citizens of the Jewish State. American Political Science Review, 86(2), 432–443. doi: 10.2307/1964231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popper, K. (1976–1957). The poverty of historicism. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Rodinson, M. (1973). Israel: A colonial-settler state? London: Pathfinder Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ron, J. (2003). Frontiers and ghettos: State violence in Serbia and Israel. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rothchild, D. (1997). Secession is a last resort. Politics and the Life Sciences, 16(2), 270–272.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, S. (1997). Between separation and unity. Politics and the Life Sciences, 16(2), 268–270.
   Google Scholar
• Sand, S. (2011). The invention of the Jewish people. Translated by Yael Lotan. Pbk. ed. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Segev, T. (2000). One Palestine, complete. Jews and Arabs under the British Mandate. New York, NY: Metropolitan Books.
   Google Scholar
• Shafir, G., & Peled, Y. (1998). Citizenship and stratification in an ethnic democracy. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 21(3), 408–427. doi: 10.1080/014198798329883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shavit, A. (2004, January 8). Survival of the fittest. Haaretz. Retrieved from http://www.haaretz.com/survival-of-the-fittest-1.61345
   Google Scholar
• Smooha, S. (1980). Control of minorities in Israel and Northern Ireland. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 22(2), 256–280. doi: 10.1017/S0010417500009336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smooha, S. (1990). Minority status in an ethnic democracy: The status of the Arab Minority in Israel. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 13(3), 389–413. doi: 10.1080/01419870.1990.9993679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, R. (Ed.). (2009). Consociational theory: Mcgarry and O'leary and the Northern Ireland conflict. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tilley, V. (2005). The one-state solution: A breakthrough for peace in the Israeli-Palestinian Deadlock. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tullberg, J., & Tullberg, B. S. (1997). Separation or unity? A model for solving ethnic conflicts. Politics and the Life Sciences, 16(2), 237–248.
   Google Scholar
• Tutunji, J., & Khaldi, K. (1997). A Binational State in Palestine: The rational choice for Palestinians and the moral choice for Israelis. International Affairs, 73(1), 31–58. doi: 10.2307/2623549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Special Committee on Palestine. (1987). Binationalism not partition. In W. Khalidi (Ed.), From Haven to conquest: Readings in Zionism and the Palestine problem until 1948, from haven to conquest: readings in Zionism and the Palestine problem until 1948 (pp. 795–803). Washington: The Institute for Palestine Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Van Schendelen, M. P. C. M. (1984). The views of Arend Lijphart and collected criticism. Acta Politica, 1, 19–55.
   Google Scholar
• Weiler, J. (1985). Israel and the creation of a Palestinian state: A European perspective. London: Croom Helm.
   Google Scholar
• Weller, M., Metzger, B., & Johnson, N. (Eds.). (2008). Settling self-determination disputes: Complex power-sharing in theory and practice. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Ye’or, B. (1985). The Dhimmi: Jews and Christians under Islam. Translated by David Maisel, Paul Fenton and David Littman. Rutherford: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yiftachel, O. (2006). Ethnocracy: Land and identity politics in Israel/Palestine. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zartman, I. W. (2001). The timing of peace initiatives: Hurting stalemates and ripe moments. The Global Review of Ethnopolitics, 1(1), 8–18. doi: 10.1080/14718800108405087
   Google Scholar
• Zertal, I., & Akiva Eldar, A. (2007). Lords of the land: The War over Israel’s settlements in the occupied Territories: 1967–2007. Avalon: Nation Books.
   Google Scholar