References
- Abbott, L. J., Gunny, K., & Zhang, T. C. (2012). When the PCAOB talks, who listens? Evidence from stakeholder reaction to GAAP-deficient PCAOB inspection reports of small auditors. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 32(2), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-50374
- Acito, A. A., Hogan, C. E., & Mergenthaler, R. D. (2017). The effects of PCAOB inspections on auditor–client relationships. The Accounting Review, 93(2), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51811
- Anantharaman, D. (2014). How objective is peer review? Evidence from self-regulation of the accounting profession. Working paper. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1015810
- Barton, J. (2005). Who cares about auditor reputation? Contemporary Accounting Research, 22(3), 549–586. https://doi.org/10.1506/C27U-23K8-E1VL-20R0
- Beattie, V., Fearnley, S., & Hines, T. (2013). Perceptions of factors affecting audit quality in the post-SOX UK regulatory environment. Accounting and Business Research, 43(1), 56–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2012.703079
- Boone, J. P., Khurana, I. K., & Raman, K. K. (2015). Did the 2007 PCAOB disciplinary order against Deloitte impose actual costs on the firm or improve its audit quality? The Accounting Review, 90(2), 405–441. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50867
- Carcello, J. V., Hollingsworth, C., & Mastrolia, S. A. (2011). The effect of PCAOB inspections on Big 4 audit quality. Research in Accounting Regulation, 23(2), 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.racreg.2011.10.001
- Carcello, J. V., & Li, C. (2013). Costs and benefits of requiring an engagement partner signature: Recent experience in the United Kingdom. The Accounting Review, 88(5), 1511–1546. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50450
- Carson, E., Simnett, R., & Vaanstraelen, A. (2017). The effect of national inspection regimes on audit quality. Working paper. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3049828
- Choi, J. H., Kim, J. B., Liu, X. H., & Simunic, D. A. (2008). Audit pricing, legal liability regimes, and Big 4 premiums: Theory and cross-country evidence. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(1), 55–99. https://doi.org/10.1506/car.25.1.2
- Christensen, H. B., Liu, L. Y., & Maffettl, M. G. (2017). Proactive financial reporting enforcement and shareholder wealth. Working paper. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2843884
- CMA. (2019). Statutory audit services market study: Final summary report. Competition and Markets Authority. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5cb74577e5274a7416b64f01/final_summary_report.pdf
- DeFond, M. L. (2010). How should the auditors be audited? Comparing the PCAOB inspections with the AICPA peer reviews. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 49(1-2), 104–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2009.04.003
- Defond, M., & Lennox, C. (2011). The effect of SOX on small auditor exits and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 52(1), 21–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2011.03.002
- DeFond, M., & Lennox, C. (2017). Do PCAOB inspections improve the quality of internal control audits? Journal of Accounting Research, 55(3), 591–627. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12151
- DeFond, M., & Zhang, J. Y. (2014). A review of archival auditing research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 58(2-3), 275–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2014.09.002
- De Fuentes, C., & Porcuna, R. (2019). Predicting audit failure: Evidence from auditing enforcement releases. Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting/Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad, 48(3), 274–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/02102412.2018.1524220
- Durham European Law Institute. (2013). The proposal for a new EU Regulation on statutory audit: Risks and benefits. DELI Blog, 19 November. https://delilawblog.wordpress.com/2013/11/19/the-proposal-for-a-new-eu-regulation-on-statutory-audit-risks-and-benefits/
- EC. (2000). Commission recommendation on quality assurance for the statutory audit in the European Union: Minimum requirements. European Commission.
- EC. (2003a). Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament reinforcing statutory audit in the EU. Official Journal of the European Union, 2 October. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:C2003/236/02& from = EN
- Ettredge, M., & Greenberg, R. (1990). Determinants of fee cutting on initial audit engagements. Journal of Accounting Research, 28(1), 198–210. https://doi.org/10.2307/2491224
- European Commission. (2006). Directive 2006/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the council of 17 May 2006 on statutory audits of annual accounts and consolidated accounts, amending council directives 78/660/EEC and 83/349/EEC and repealing council directive 84/253/EEC statutory audit (2006/43/EC).
- FEE. (2006). Quality assurance arrangements across Europe. Fédération des Experts Comptables Européens. http://www.fee.be/images/publications/auditing/Quality_Assurance_Arrangements_Across_Europe_0612181200761426.pdf
- FEE. (2014). EU Directive on statutory audits of annual and consolidated accounts and EU regulation on statutory audit of public interest entities. Fédération des Experts Comptables Européens. https://www.accountancyeurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/Factsheet_Audit_Policy_ 1404.pdf
- Florou, A., Morricone, S., & Pope, P. F. (2018). Proactive financial reporting enforcement: Audit fee and financial reporting quality effects. The Accounting Review, 95(2), 167–197. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-52497
- Florou, A., & Yuan, S. (2020). The costs of public audit oversight: Evidence from the EU. Working paper.
- FRC. (2014). Audit firm specific reports. FRC [website]. https://www.frc.org.uk/Our-Work/Audit-and-Actuarial-Regulation/Audit-Quality-Review/Audit-firm-specific-reports.aspx.
- FRC. (2012). FRC publishes updates to UK Corporate Governance Code and Stewardship Code. FRC News, 28 September. https://www.frc.org.uk/news/september-2012/frc-publishes-updates-to-uk-corporate-governance-c
- FRC. (2016). Audit firm specific reports. FRC [website]. https://www.frc.org.uk/Our-Work/Audit-and-Actuarial-Regulation/Audit-Quality-Review/Audit-firm-specific-reports.aspx
- Ghosh, A. L., & Lustgarten, S. (2006). Pricing of initial audit engagements by large and small audit firms. Contemporary Accounting Research, 23(2), 333–368. https://doi.org/10.1506/927U-JGJY-35TA-7NT1
- Gipper, B., Leuz, C., & Maffett, M. (2017). Public audit oversight and reporting credibility: Evidence from the PCAOB inspection regime. Finance Working Paper No. 453/2015, European Corporate Governance Institute, Brussels, Belgium. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2641211
- Glover, S. M., Prawitt, D. F., & Taylor, M. H. (2009). Audit standard setting and inspection for US public companies: A critical assessment and recommendations for fundamental change. Accounting Horizons, 23(2), 221–237. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2009.23.2.221
- Gramling, A. A., Krishnan, J., & Zhang, Y. (2011). Are PCAOB-identified audit deficiencies associated with a change in reporting decisions of triennially inspected audit firms? Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30(3), 59–79. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-10048
- Groff, M. Z., & Hocevar, M. (2009). Public oversight of the audit profession: Comparison of implemented practices in the EU and the US. Central European Public Administration Review, 7(3), https://doi.org/10.17573/cepar.v7i3.133
- Gul, F. A. (2006). Auditors’ response to political connections and cronyism in Malaysia. Journal of Accounting Research, 44(5), 931–963. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2006.00220.x
- Gunny, K. A., & Zhang, T. C. (2013). PCAOB inspection reports and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 32(2), 136–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2012.11.002
- Hilary, G., & Lennox, C. (2005). The credibility of self-regulation: Evidence from the accounting profession’s peer review program. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 40(1-3), 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2005.03.002
- IFIAR. (2013). Members and member profiles. International Forum of Independent Audit Regulators. https://www.ifiar.org/Members.aspx
- Kim, I., & Skinner, D. J. (2012). Measuring securities litigation risk. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53(1), 290–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2011.09.005
- Koch, C., Weber, M., & Wüstemann, J. (2012). Can auditors be independent? Experimental evidence on the effects of client type. European Accounting Review, 21(4), 797–823. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2011.629416
- Lamoreaux, P. (2013). Does PCAOB inspection exposure affect auditor reporting decisions? [Phd dissertation], University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ. https://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona/bitstream/10150/306135/1/azu_etd_12982_sip1_m.pdf
- Lennox, C. (2009). The changing regulatory landscape: Editorial. International Journal of Auditing, 13(2), 79–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-1123.2009.00407.x
- Lennox, C., & Pittman, J. (2010). Auditing the auditors: Evidence on the recent reforms to the external monitoring of audit firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 49(1-2), 84–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2009.04.002
- Lyon, J. D., & Maher, M. W. (2005). The importance of business risk in setting audit fees: Evidence from cases of client misconduct. Journal of Accounting Research, 43(1), 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679x.2005.00165.x
- Magee, R. P., & Tseng, M. C. (1990). Audit pricing and independence. The Accounting Review, 65(2), 315–336.
- Menon, K., & Williams, D. O. (1994). The insurance hypothesis and market prices. The Accounting Review, 69(2), 327–342.
- Opijnen, M.V., Poel, K.V.D., Vanstraelen, A. (2011). Public oversight and audit quality: Evidence from public oversight of audit firms in the Netherlands. Working paper. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1916558.
- Osma, B. G., Clemente, A. G., & Heras, E. D. L. (2017). Public oversight systems for statutory auditors in the European Union. European Journal of Law & Economics, 44(3), 517–552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-014-9460-1
- Palmrose, Z. V. (2006). Maintaining the value and viability of independent auditors as gatekeepers under SOX: An auditing master proposal. In Y. Fuchita, & R. E. Litan (Eds.), Financial gatekeepers: Can they protect investors? (pp. 103–135). Brookings Institution Press and the Nomura Institute of Capital Markets Research.
- Professional Oversight Board. (2012). Report to the secretary of state for business, innovation and skills. FRC. https://www.frc.org.uk/Our-Work/Publications/POB/Report-to-the-Secretary-of-State-for-Business,-(3).pdf
- Seetharamanan, A., Gul, F. A., & Lynn, S. G. (2002). Litigation risk and audit fees: Evidence from UK firms cross-listed on US markets. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33(1), 91–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00046-5
- Simon, D., & Francis, J. (1988). The effects of auditor change on audit fees: Test of price cutting and price recovery. The Accounting Review, 63, 255–269.
- Simunic, D. A. (1980). The pricing of audit services: Theory and evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 18(1), 161–190. https://doi.org/10.2307/2490397
- Skinner, D. J., & Srinivasan, S. (2012). Audit quality and auditor reputation: Evidence from Japan. The Accounting Review, 87(5), 1737–1765. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50198
- Sundgren, S., & Svanström, T. (2013). Audit office size, audit quality and audit pricing: Evidence from small and medium-sized enterprises. Accounting and Business Research, 43(1), 31–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2012.691710
- Tendeloo, B. V., & Vanstraelen, A. (2008). Earnings management and audit quality in Europe: Evidence from the private client segment market. European Accounting Review, 17(3), 447–469. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180802016684
- Teoh, S. W., & Wong, T. J. (1993). Perceived auditor quality and the earnings response coefficient. The Accounting Review, 68(2), 346–366.
- Turpen, R. (1990). Differential pricing on auditors’ initial engagements: Further evidence. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 9(2), 60–76.
- UK Government. (2016). Companies Act 2006. HMSO.
- Weber, J., Willenborg, M., & Zhang, J. (2008). Does auditor reputation matter? The case of KPMG Germany and ComROAD AG. Journal of Accounting Research, 46(4), 941–972. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2008.00298.x
- Wieczynska, M. (2016). The ‘big’ consequences of IFRS: How and when does the adoption of IFRS benefit global accounting firms? The Accounting Review, 91(4), 1257–1283. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51340