Capitalising or Expensing Development Costs? – Mixed Methods Evidence on the Determinants and Motives of the Accounting Policy in the context of UK Private Companies

References

• Aboody, D., & Lev, B. (1998). The value relevance of intangibles: The case of software capitalization. Journal of Accounting Research, (36), 161–191. https://doi.org/10.2307/2491312
   Google Scholar
• Abrahams, T., & Sidhu, B. K. (1998). The role of R&D capitalisations in firm valuation and performance measurement. Australian Journal of Management, 23(2), 169–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/031289629802300203
   Google Scholar
• Achleitner, A.-K., Günther, N., Kaserer, C., & Siciliano, G. (2014). Real earnings management and accrual-based earnings management in family firms. European Accounting Review, 23(3), 431–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2014.895620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed, K., & Falk, H. (2006). The value relevance of management's research and development reporting choice: Evidence from Australia. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 25(3), 231–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2006.03.002
   Google Scholar
• Baber, W. R., Fairfield, P. M., & Haggard, J. A. (1991). The effect of concern about reported income on discretionary spending decisions: The case of research and development. The Accounting Review, 66(4), 818–829. http://www.jstor.org/stable/248158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, R., & Shivakumar, L. (2005). Earnings quality in UK private firms: Comparative loss recognition timeliness. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(1), 83–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2004.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, R., Thomas, R. E., & McGrath, J. (1991). Influence of R&D accounting conventions on internal decision-making of companies. R&D Management, 21(4), 261–270. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.1991.tb01320.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bange, M. M., & De Bondt, W. F. M. (1998). R&D budgets and corporate earnings targets. Journal of Corporate Finance, 4(2), 153–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1199(98)00006-6
   Google Scholar
• Beatty, A., & Harris, D. G. (1999). The effects of taxes, agency costs and information asymmetry on earnings management: A comparison of public and private firms. Review of Accounting Studies, 4(3), 299–326. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009642403312
   Google Scholar
• Beatty, A. L., Ke, B., & Petroni, K. R. (2002). Earnings management to avoid earnings declines across publicly and privately held banks. The Accounting Review, 77(3), 547–570. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2002.77.3.547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, A. N., & Udell, G. F. (1995). Relationship lending and lines of credit in small firm finance. The Journal of Business, 68(3), 351–381. https://doi.org/10.1086/296668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, A. N., & Udell, G. F. (1998). The economics of small business finance: The roles of private equity and debt markets in the financial growth cycle. Journal of Banking & Finance, 22(6–8), 613. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4266(98)00038-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boot, A. W. A. (2000). Relationship banking: What Do We know? Journal of Financial Intermediation, 9(1), 7–25. https://doi.org/10.1006/jfin.2000.0282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruns, W. J., & Merchant, K. A. (1990). The dangerous morality of managing earnings. Management Accounting, 72(2), 22–25.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. (2004). Social research methods. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burgstahler, D. C., Hail, L., & Leuz, C. (2006). The importance of reporting incentives: Earnings management in European private and public firms. The Accounting Review, 81(5), 983–1016. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2006.81.5.983
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bushee, B. J. (1998). The influence of institutional investors on myopic R&D investment behavior. The Accounting Review, 73(3), 305–333. https://www.jstor.org/stable/248542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cahan, S. F., Liu, G., & Sun, J. (2008). Investor protection, income smoothing, and earnings informativeness. Journal of International Accounting Research, 7(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.2308/jiar.2008.7.1.1
   Google Scholar
• Cano-Rodríguez, M. (2010). Big auditors, private firms and accounting conservatism: Spanish evidence. European Accounting Review, 19(1), 131–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180902989426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cazavan-Jeny, A., & Jeanjean, T. (2006). The negative impact of R&D capitalization: A value relevance approach. European Accounting Review, 15(1), 37–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180500510384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cazavan-Jeny, A., Jeanjean, T., & Joos, P. (2011). Accounting choice and future performance: The case of R&D accounting in France. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 30(2), 145–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2010.09.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, L. K. C., Lakonishok, J., & Sougiannis, T. (2001). The stock market valuation of research and development expenditures. The Journal of Finance, 56(6), 2431–2456. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, F., Hope, O.-K., Li, Q., & Wang, X. (2011). Financial reporting quality and investment efficiency of private firms in emerging markets. The Accounting Review, 86(4), 1255–1288. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-10040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, J.-C., Lu, C.-C., & Kuo, N.-T. (2016). R&D capitalization and audit fees: Evidence from China. Advances in Accounting, 35, 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2016.05.003
   Google Scholar
• Coenenberg, A. G., & Meyer, M. A. (2003). Kapitalflussrechnung als Objekt der Bilanzpolitik. In P. Wollmert, N. Schönbrunn, U. Jung, H. Siebert, & M. Henke (Eds.), Wirtschaftsprüfung und Unternehmensüberwachung (pp. 336–383). IDW-Verlag GmbH.
   Google Scholar
• Collis, J., Jarvis, R., & Skerratt, L. (2017). The role and current status of IFRS in the completion of national accounting rules – evidence from the UK. Accounting in Europe, 14(1–2), 235–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2017.1300673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coppens, L., & Peek, E. (2005). An analysis of earnings management of European private firms. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 14(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2005.01.002
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basic of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Daley, L. A., & Vigeland, R. L. (1983). The effects of debt covenants and political costs on the choice of accounting methods. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 5, 195–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(83)90012-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dargenidou, C., Jackson, R. H. G., Tsalavoutas, I., & Tsoligkas, F. (2021). Capitalisation of R&D and the informativeness of stock prices: Pre- and post-IFRS evidence. The British Accounting Review, 53(4), 100998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2021.100998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De George, E. T., Ferguson, C. B., and Spear, N. A. (2013). How much does IFRS cost? IFRS adoption and audit fees. The Accounting Review, 88(2), 429–462. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23525942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Degeorge, F., Patel, J., & Zeckhauser, R. (1999). Earnings management to exceed thresholds. The Journal of Business, 72(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1086/209601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Meyere, M., Vander Bauwhede, H., and van Cauwenberge, P. (2018). The impact of financial reporting quality on debt maturity: The case of private firms. Accounting and Business Research, 48(7), 759–781. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2018.1431103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. (1989). The research Act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods, prentice-Hall. Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Dhaliwal, D. S., Heninger, W. G., & Hughes K. E., II (1999). The investment opportunity set and capitalization versus expensing methods of accounting choice. Accounting and Finance, 39(2), 151–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-629X.00022
   Google Scholar
• Dinh, T., Kang, H., & Schultze, W. (2016). Capitalizing research & development: Signaling or earnings management? European Accounting Review, 25(2), 373–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2015.1031149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dye, R. A. (2001). An evaluation of “essays on disclosure” and the disclosure literature in accounting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 32(1–3), 181–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00024-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eierle, B., & Wencki, S. (2016). The determinants of capitalising development costs in private companies: Evidence from Germany. Journal of Business Economics, 86(3), 259–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-015-0778-0
   Google Scholar
• Elsas, R. (2005). Empirical determinants of relationship lending. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 14(1), 32–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfi.2003.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entwistle, G. M. (1999). Exploring the R&D disclosure environment. Accounting Horizons, 13(4), 323–342. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.1999.13.4.323
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, M., & Wang, S.-w. (1999). Earnings management by acquiring firms in stock for stock mergers. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 27(2), 149–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(99)00008-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewert, R., & Wagenhofer, A. (2005). Economic effects of tightening accounting standards to restrict earnings management. The Accounting Review, 80(4), 1101–1124. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2005.80.4.1101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. 2015. 12 Industry Classifications, 2015. http://mba.tuck.dartmouth.edu/pages/faculty/ken.french/Data_Library/det_12_ind_port.html.
   Google Scholar
• Fields, T. D., Lys, T. Z., & Vincent, L. (2001). Empirical research on accounting choice. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(1-3), 255–307. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00028-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortin, S., & Pittman, J. (2007). The role of auditor choice in debt pricing in private firms. Contemporary Accounting Research, 24(3), 859–896. https://doi.org/10.1506/car.24.3.8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, J. R., Khurana, I. K., Martin, X., & Pereira, R. (2008). The role of firm-specific incentives and country factors in explaining voluntary IAS adoptions: Evidence from private firms. European Accounting Review, 17(2), 331–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180701819899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fryges, H., Kohn, K., & Ullrich, K. (2015). The interdependence of R&D activity and debt financing of young firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 53, 251–277. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaver, J. J., Gaver, K. M., & Austin, J. R. (1995). Additional evidence on bonus plans and income management. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 19(1), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(94)00358-C
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Givoly, D., Hayn, C. K., & Katz, S. P. (2010). Does public ownership of equity improve earnings quality? The Accounting Review, 85(1), 195–225. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2010.85.1.195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grafton, J., Lillis, A. M., & Mahama, H. (2011). Mixed methods research in accounting. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 8(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1108/11766091111124676
   Google Scholar
• Graham, J. R., Harvey, C. R., & Rajgopal, S. (2005). The economic implications of corporate financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 40(1–3), 3–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2005.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guidry, F., Leone, A. J., & Rock, S. (1999). Earnings-based bonus plans and earnings management by business-unit managers. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 26(1–3), 113–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(98)00037-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunny, K. A. (2010). The relation between earnings management using real activities manipulation and future performance: Evidence from meeting earnings benchmarks*. Contemporary Accounting Research, 27(3), 855–888. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2010.01029.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haga, J., Höglund, H., & Sundvik, D. (2015). Real earnings management in UK private and public firms. SSRN Working Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Hagerman, R. L., & Zmijewski, M. E. (1979). Some economic determinants of accounting policy choice. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 1(2), 141–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(79)90004-1
   Google Scholar
• Healy, P. M. (1985). The effect of bonus schemes on accounting decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 7(1–3), 85–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(85)90029-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healy, P. M., & Wahlen, J. M. (1999). A review of the earnings management literature and its implications for standard setting. Accounting Horizons, 13(4), 365–383. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.1999.13.4.365
   Google Scholar
• Holthausen, R. W., Larcker, D. F., & Sloan, R. G. (1995). Annual bonus schemes and the manipulation of earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 19(1), 29–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(94)00376-G
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holthausen, R. W., & Leftwich, R. W. (1983). The economic consequences of accounting choice: Implications of costly contracting and monitoring. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 5, 77–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(83)90007-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hope, O.-K., Thomas, W. B., & Vyas, D. (2013). Financial reporting quality of U.S. Private and Public Firms. The Accounting Review, 88(5), 1715–1742. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23526001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeny, A., & Moldovan, R. (2021). Accounting for intangible assets - insights from meta-analysis of R&D research. Journal of Accounting Literature, ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAL-11-2021-0004
   Google Scholar
• Jick, T. D. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4), 602–611. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. J., & Solomon, J. F. (2010). Social and environmental report assurance: Some interview evidence. Accounting Forum, 34(1), 20–31. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2009.11.002
   Google Scholar
• Jones, S. (2011). Does the capitalization of intangible assets increase the predictability of corporate failure? Accounting Horizons, 25(1), 41–70. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2011.25.1.41
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knechel, W. R., Niemi, L., & Sundgren, S. (2008). Determinants of auditor choice: Evidence from a small client market. International Journal of Auditing, 12(1), 65–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-1123.2008.00370.x
   Google Scholar
• Kothari, S. P., Laguerre, T. E., & Leone, A. J. (2002). Capitalization versus expensing: Evidence on the uncertainty of future earnings from capital expenditures versus R&D outlays. Review of Accounting Studies, 7(4), 355–382. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020764227390
   Google Scholar
• Kreß, A., Eierle, B., & Tsalavoutas, I. (2019). Development costs capitalization and debt financing. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 46(5-6), 636–685. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnan, G. V., & Wang, C. (2014). Are capitalized software development costs informative about audit risk? Accounting Horizons, 28(1), 39–57. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-50580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo, N.-T., & Lee, C.-F. (2018). Investor legal protection, capitalized development costs, and audit fees: A cross-country analysis. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 29(1), 57–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/jifm.12068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lev, B. (2001). Intangibles: Management, measurement and reporting. Brookings institution press.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, J.-h., & Chang, J.-h. (2017). Earnings management of mergers and acquisitions of target candidates and deal withdrawn. Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR), 33(3), 467–474. https://doi.org/10.19030/jabr.v33i3.9937
   Google Scholar
• Mande, V., File, R. G., & Kwak, W. (2000). Income Smoothing and Discretionary R&D Expenditures of Japanese Firms. Contemporary Accounting Research, 17(2), 263–302. https://doi.org/10.1506/QXBV-UY71-A6W1-FWT4
   Google Scholar
• Markarian, G., Pozza, L., & Prencipe, A. (2008). Capitalization of R&D costs and earnings management: Evidence from Italian listed companies. The International Journal of Accounting, 43(3), 246–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intacc.2008.06.002
   Google Scholar
• Martin, R., & Jarvis, R. (2020). The financial reporting of Intangibles by SMEs in Europe. EFAA Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzi, F., Slack, R., Tsalavoutas, I., & Tsoligkas, F. (2019a). Country-level corruption and accounting choice: Research & development capitalization under IFRS. British Accounting Review, 51(5), 100821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2019.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzi, F., Slack, R., Tsalavoutas, I., & Tsoligkas, F. (2019b). The capitalisation debate: R&D expenditure, disclosure content and quantity, and stakeholder views. ACCA Report.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzi, F., Slack, R., Tsalavoutas, I., & Tsoligkas, F. (2022). Exploring investor views on accounting for R&D costs under IAS 38. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 41(2), 106944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2022.106944
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niskanen, M., Karjalainen, J., & Niskanen, J. (2011). Demand for audit quality in private firms: Evidence on ownership effects. International Journal of Auditing, 15(1), 43–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-1123.2010.00422.x
   Google Scholar
• Osma, B. G. (2008). Board Independence and real earnings management: The case of R&D expenditure. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(2), 116–131. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2008.00672.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osma, B. G., & Young, S. (2009). R&D expenditure and earnings targets. European Accounting Review, 18(1), 7–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180802016718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oswald, D. R. (2008). The determinants and value relevance of the choice of accounting for research and development expenditures in the United Kingdom. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 35(1–2), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.2007.02060.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oswald, D. R., & Zarowin, P. (2007). Capitalization of R&D and the informativeness of stock prices. European Accounting Review, 16(4), 703–726. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180701706815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penno, M., & Simon, D. T. (1986). Accounting choices: Public versus private firms. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 13(4), 561–569. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.1986.tb00518.x
   Google Scholar
• Perry, S., & Grinaker, R. (1994). Earnings expectations and discretionary research and development spending. Accounting Horizons, 8(4), 43–51.
   Google Scholar
• Prencipe, A., Markarian, G., & Pozza, L. (2008). Earnings management in family firms: Evidence from R&D cost capitalization in Italy. Family Business Review, 21(1), 71–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2007.00112.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritter, A., & Wells, P. (2006). Identifiable intangible asset disclosures, stock prices and future earnings. Accounting and Finance, 46(5), 843–863. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-629X.2006.00190.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2005). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Seybert, N. (2010). R&D capitalization and reputation-driven real earnings management (Partially retracted). The Accounting Review, 85(2), 671–693. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2010.85.2.671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shehata, M. (1991). Self-selection bias and the economic consequences of accounting regulation: An application of two-stage switching regression to SFAS No. 2. The Accounting Review, 66(4), 768–787. https://www.jstor.org/stable/248155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, D. T., Percy, M., & Richardson, G. D. (2001). Discretionary capitalization of R&D: Evidence on the usefulness in an Australian and Canadian context. Advances in International Accounting, 14, 15–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0897-3660(01)14004-3
   Google Scholar
• Tashakkori, A., & Creswell, J. W. (2007). Editorial: The new era of mixed methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 3–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/2345678906293042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trombley, M. A. (1989). Accounting method choice in the software industry: Characteristics of firms electing early adoption of SFAS No. 86. The Accounting Review, 64(3), 529–538. https://www.jstor.org/stable/247604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tutticci, I., Krishnan, G., & Percy, M. (2007). The role of external monitoring in firm valuation: The case of R&D capitalization. Journal of International Accounting Research, 6(2), 83–107. https://doi.org/10.2308/jiar.2007.6.2.83
   Google Scholar
• Van Tendeloo, B., & Vanstraelen, A. (2008). Earnings management and audit quality in Europe: Evidence from the private client segment market. European Accounting Review, 17(3), 447–469. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180802016684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verrechia, R. W. (1983). Discretionary disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 5, 179–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(83)90011-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagenhofer, A. (1990). Voluntary disclosure with a strategic opponent. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 12(4), 341–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(90)90020-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagenhofer, A., & Ewert, R. (2015). Externe Unternehmensrechnung. Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, R. L., & Zimmerman, J. L. (1978). Towards a positive theory of the determination of accounting standards. The Accounting Review, 53(1), 112–134. https://www.jstor.org/stable/245729
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wohlgemuth, F. (2007). Ifrs: Bilanzpolitik und Bilanzanalyse: Gestaltung und Vergleichbarkeit von Jahresabschlüssen. Erich Schmidt Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Wyatt, A. (2005). Accounting recognition of intangible assets: Theory and evidence on economic determinants. The Accounting Review, 80(3), 967–1003. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2005.80.3.967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zang, A. Y. (2012). Evidence on the trade-off between real activities manipulation and accrual-based earnings management. The Accounting Review, 87(2), 675–703. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-10196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar