Auditors’ perceptions of alternative performance measures – alternative truths and professional skepticism

References

• Allee, K. D., Bhattacharya, N., Black, E. L., & Christensen, T. E. (2007). Pro forma disclosure and investor sophistication: External validation of experimental evidence using archival data. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(3), 201–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2006.09.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson, P., & Hellman, N. (2007). Does pro forma reporting bias analyst forecasts? European Accounting Review, 16(2), 277–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180701390966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basu, S. (1997). The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24(1), 3–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(97)00014-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, O. L., Defond, M., Jiambalvo, J., & Subramanyam, K. R. (1998). The effect of audit quality on earnings management. Contemporary Accounting Research, 15(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.1998.tb00547.x
   Google Scholar
• Bedard, J. C., & Johnstone, K. M. (2004). Earnings manipulation risk, corporate governance risk, and auditors’ planning and pricing decisions. The Accounting Review, 79(2), 277–304. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2004.79.2.277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya, N., Black, E. L., Christensen, T. E., & Larson, C. R. (2003). Assessing the relative informativeness and permanence of pro forma earnings and GAAP operating earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 36(1–3), 285–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2003.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, D. E., & Christensen, T. E. (2018). Policy implications of research on non-GAAP reporting. Research in Accounting Regulation, 30(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.racreg.2018.03.001
   Google Scholar
• Black, D. E., Christensen, T. E., Ciesielski, J., & Whipple, B. (2018). Non-GAAP reporting: Evidence from academia and current practice. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 45(3–4), 259–294. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, D. E., Christensen, T. E., Ciesielski, J., & Whipple, B. (2021). Non-GAAP earnings: A consistency and comparability crisis? Contemporary Accounting Research, 38(3), 1712–1747. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blix, L. H., Chui, L. C., Pike, B. J., & Robinson, S. N. (2021). Improving auditor performance evaluations: The impact on self-esteem, professional skepticism, and audit quality. Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, 32(4), 84–98. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcaf.22512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloomfield, R., Nelson, M. W., & Soltes, E. (2016). Gathering data for archival, field, survey, and experimental accounting research. Journal of Accounting Research, 54(2), 341–395. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, C. J., & Luo, Y. (2021). Data visualization and cognitive biases in audits. Managerial Auditing Journal, 36(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-08-2017-1637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, L., Krishnan, G., & Pevznera, M. (2012). Pro forma disclosures, audit fees, and auditor resignations. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 31(3), 237–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2011.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciesielski, J. T., & Henry, E. (2017). Accounting’s tower of Babel: Key considerations in assessing non-GAAP earnings. Financial Analysts Journal, 73(2), 34–50. https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v73.n2.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., Dalton, D. W., & Harp, N. L. (2017). Neutral and presumptive doubt perspectives of professional skepticism and auditor job outcomes. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 62, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2017.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., Krishnamoorthy, G., & Wright, A. M. (2002). Corporate governance and the audit process. Contemporary Accounting Research, 19(4), 573–594. https://doi.org/10.1506/983M-EPXG-4Y0R-J9YK
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deloitte. (2016). Alternative performance measures. IFRS in focus – A practical guide. Retrieved July 2016, from https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/ru/Documents/audit/IFRS_news/july-27-2016.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Entwistle, G. M., Feltham, G. D., & Mbagwu, C. (2012). Credibility attributes and investor perceptions of non-GAAP earnings exclusions. Accounting Perspectives, 11(4), 229–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3838.12000
   Google Scholar
• ESMA. (2015). ESMA guidelines on alternative performance measures. 05/10/2015| ESMA/2015/1415en
   Google Scholar
• ESMA. (2021). ESMA proposes improvements to transparency directive after wirecard case. https://www.esma.europa.eu/sites/default/files/library/esma32-51-818_letter_to_the_ec_on_next_steps_following_wirecard.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Evans, L. (2003). The true and fair view and the ‘fair presentation’ override of IAS 1. Accounting and Business Research, 33(4), 311–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2003.9729656
   Google Scholar
• Feng, Z., Francis, J. R., Shan, Y., & Taylor, S. (2023). Do high-quality auditors improve non-GAAP reporting? The Accounting Review, 98(1), 215–250. https://doi.org/10.2308/TAR-2019-0592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FRC. (2019). Achieving high quality audits consistently. Financial Reporting Council. A letter by David Rule, FRC executive director of supervision, to audit firms. Retrieved November 8, 2019 from https://www.frc.org.uk/getattachment/a40f77f6-9542-47be-b1c5-e15ece70415a/Achieving-high-quality-audits-letter-(sent-to-firms-08-11-19).pdf
   Google Scholar
• FRC. (2021). Thematic review: Alternative performance measures. Financial Reporting Council. Retrieved October 2021, from https://www.frc.org.uk/getattachment/74ed739d-2237-4d3e-a543-af8ada9b0e42/FRC-Thematic-Review-on-APMs-October-2021.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Glover, S. M., & Prawitt, D. F. (2014). Enhancing auditor professional scepticism: The professional scepticism continuum. Current Issues in Auditing, 8(2), P1–P10. https://doi.org/10.2308/ciia-50895
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Black, B., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Hallman, N. J., Schmidt, J. J., & Thompson, A. M. (2022). Audit implications of non-GAAP reporting. Journal of Accounting Research, 60(5), 1947–1989. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, G., & Ohogartaigh, C. (2009). The third policeman: ‘The true and fair view’, language and the habitus of accounting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 20(8), 910–920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2009.02.003
   Google Scholar
• Healy, P., & Palepu, K. (2001). Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(1–3), 405–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00018-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, E., Hu, N., & Jiang, X. (2020). Relative emphasis on non-GAAP earnings in conference calls: Determinants and market reaction. European Accounting Review, 29(1), 169–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2019.1664312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herr, S. B., Lorson, P., & Pilhofer, J. (2022). Alternative performance measures: A structured literature review of research in academic and professional journals. Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, 74, 389–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41471-022-00138-8
   Google Scholar
• Hope, O.-K., Langli, J. C., & Thomas, W. B. (2012). Agency conflicts and auditing in private firms. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 37(7), 500–517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2012.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurtt, R. K. (2010). Development of a scale to measure professional skepticism. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 29(1), 149–171. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2010.29.1.149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurtt, R. K., Brown-Liburd, H., Earley, C., & Krishnamoorthy, G. (2013). Research on auditor professional skepticism: Literature synthesis and opportunities for future research. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 32(Suppl. 1), 45–97. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-50361
   Google Scholar
• IASB Conceptual Framework. (2018). IASB, IFRS Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• IFRS ED. (2019). IFRS exposure draft, ED/2019/7. General presentation and disclosures. December 2019. Published for comments only by the International Accounting Standards Board.
   Google Scholar
• IOSCO. (2016). Statement on NON-GAAP financial measures, final report. https://www.iosco.org/library/pubdocs/pdf/IOSCOPD532.pdf
   Google Scholar
• ISA 200. (2009). International Standard on Auditing 200. Overall objectives of the independent auditor and the conduct of an audit in accordance with international standards on auditing. Retrieved December 15, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Jahn, P., & Loy, T. (2023). Audit in Europe – A comparison of access requirements into the audit profession across the European Union. Accounting in Europe, 20(2), 244–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2023.2205867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jana, S., & McMeeking, K. (2021). Alternative performance measures: Determinants of disclosure quality – Evidence from Germany. Accounting in Europe, 18(1), 102–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2020.1829655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. C. (1993). The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. Journal of Finance, 48(3), 831–880. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb04022.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, M. J., & Oczkowski, E. (2021). The link between trait and state professional skepticism: A review of the literature and a meta-regression analysis. International Journal of Auditing, 25(2), 558–581. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klimczak, K., Hadro, D., & Meyer, M. (2023). Executive communication with stakeholders on sustainability: The case of Poland. Accounting in Europe, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2023.2213242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mura, A. (2023). Reconciling competing reporting objectives through deferred tax accounts: Evidence on private Italian firms. Accounting in Europe, 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2023.2213249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, M. W. (2009). A model and literature review of professional skepticism in auditing. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 28(2), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2009.28.2.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nolder, C. J., & Kadous, K. (2018). Grounding the professional skepticism construct in mindset and attitude theory: A way forward. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 67, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2018.03.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rautiainen, A., Järvenpää, M., & Mättö, T. (2022). Non-IFRS and changes in accounting institutions – Lessons from Nokia. Accounting History, 27(4), 524–548. https://doi.org/10.1177/10323732221094033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, S. N., Curtis, M. B., & Robertson, J. C. (2018). Disentangling the trait and state components of professional skepticism: Specifying a process for state scale development. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 37(1), 215–235. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-51738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, J. M. (2007). Attention to evidence of aggressive financial reporting and intentional misstatement judgments: Effects of experience and trust. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 19(1), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.2308/bria.2007.19.1.215
   Google Scholar
• Rossiter, J. R. (2002). The C-OAR-SE procedure for scale development in marketing. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 19(4), 305–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8116(02)00097-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundgren, S. (1998). Auditor choices and auditor reporting practices: Evidence from Finnish small firms. European Accounting Review, 7(3), 441–465. https://doi.org/10.1080/096381898336376
   Google Scholar
• Walton, P. (1993). Introduction: The true and fair view in British accounting. European Accounting Review, 2(1), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638189300000003
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1086/651257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar