Institutional consequentialism and global governance

References

• Bailey, J. W. 1997. Utilitarianism, Institutions, and Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berkey, B. 2016. “Against Rawlsian Institutionalism About Justice.” Social Theory and Practice 43 (4): 706–732.
   Google Scholar
• Bull, H. 1995. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. 2nd ed. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caney, S. 2005. Justice Beyond Borders: A Global Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, G. A. 2008. Rescuing Justice and Equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., and C. Sabel. 2006. “Extra Republicam Nulla Justitia?” Philosophy and Public Affairs 34 (2): 147–175. doi: 10.1111/j.1088-4963.2006.00060.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullity, G. 2004. The Moral Demands of Affluence. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, N. 2008. Just Health. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deaton, A. 2013. The Great Escape: Health, Wealth, and the Origins of Inequality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deets, S. 2006. “Pulling Back from Neo-Medievalism: The Domestic and International Politics of the Hungarian Status Law.” In Beyond Sovereignty: From Status Law to Transnational Citizenship?, edited by O. Ieda, 17–37. Sapporo: Slavic Research Center, Hokkaido University.
   Google Scholar
• Eggleston, B. 2014. “Act Utilitarianism.” In The Cambridge Companion to Utilitarianism, edited by B. Eggleston and D. Miller, 124–145. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodin, R. 1988. Reasons for Welfare: The Political Theory of the Welfare State. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodin, R. 1995. Utilitarianism as a Public Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hardin, R. 1988. Morality Within the Limits of Reason. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hare, R. M. 1981. Moral Thinking. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayek, F. A. 1976. Law, Legislation and Liberty: A New Statement of the Liberal Principles of Justice and Political Economy, Volume II. The Mirage of Social Justice. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kobrin, S. J. 1999. “Back to the Future: Neomedievalism and the Postmodern Digital World Economy.” In Globalization and Governance, edited by A. Prakash and J. Hart, 165–188. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• March, J. G., and H. A. Simon. 1958. Organizations. London: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Mendola, J. 2006. Goodness and Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miklós, A. 2009. “Public Health and the Rights of States.” Public Health Ethics 2 (20): 158–170. doi: 10.1093/phe/php011
   Google Scholar
• Miklós, A. 2011. “The Basic Structure and the Principles of Justice.” Utilitas 23 (2): 161–182. doi: 10.1017/S0953820811000045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miklós, A., and A. Tanyi. ms. “Consequentialism and Its Demands: The Role of Institutions.” https://www.academia.edu/18043101/Consequentialism_and_Its_Demands_The_Role_of_Institutions_with_Andras_Miklos_
   Google Scholar
• Miklósi, Z. 2008. “Compliance with Just Institutions.” Social Theory and Practice 34 (2): 183–207. doi: 10.5840/soctheorpract200834212
   Google Scholar
• Moellendorf, D. 2011. “Cosmopolitanism and Compatriot Duties.” The Monist 94 (4): 535–554. doi: 10.5840/monist201194427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulgan, T. 2007. Understanding Utilitarianism. London: Acumen.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, L. D. 1998. “Institutions and the Demands of Justice.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 27 (4): 251–291. doi: 10.1111/j.1088-4963.1998.tb00071.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagel, T. 1979. “Ruthlessness in Public Life.” Chap. 5 in Mortal Questions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
   Google Scholar
• Nagel, T. 1991. Equality and Partiality. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nagel, T. 2005. “The Problem of Global Justice.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 33 (2): 113–147. doi: 10.1111/j.1088-4963.2005.00027.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North, D. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. 2006. Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pogge, T. 1992. “Cosmopolitanism and Sovereignty.” Ethics 103: 48–75. doi: 10.1086/293470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pogge, T. 1994. “An Egalitarian Law of Peoples.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 23 (3): 195–224. doi: 10.1111/j.1088-4963.1994.tb00011.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pogge, T. 2007. “Introduction.” In Freedom from Poverty as a Human Right, edited by T. Pogge, 1–10. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pogge, T. 2008. World Poverty and Human Rights. 2nd ed.Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pogge, T. 2010. “The Health Impact Fund: Better Pharmaceutical Innovations at Much Lower Prices.” In Incentives for Global Public Health: Patent Law and Access to Essential Medicines, edited by T. Pogge, M. Rimmer, and K. Rubenstein, 135–154. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Railton, P. 1984. “Alienation, Consequentialism, and the Demands of Morality.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 13: 134–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. 1955. “Two Concepts of Rules.” Philosophical Review 64 (1): 3–32. doi: 10.2307/2182230
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. 1993. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. 1999. The Law of Peoples. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Regan, D. 1980. Utilitarianism and Cooperation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Risse, M. 2012. On Global Justice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Selgelid, M. 2008. “Ethics, Tuberculosis and Globalization.” Public Health Ethics 1: 10–20. doi: 10.1093/phe/phn001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A. 2009. The Idea of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sidgwick, H. 1907. The Methods of Ethics. 7th ed. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons, A. J. 2010. “Ideal and Nonideal Theory.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 38 (1): 5–36. doi: 10.1111/j.1088-4963.2009.01172.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, P. 1972. “Famine, Affluence, and Morality.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (3): 229–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2015). “Consequentialism.” In The Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta (Winter 2015 Ed). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2015/entries/consequentialism/.
   Google Scholar
• Smart, J. J. C. 1956. “Extreme and Restricted Utilitarianism.” Philosophical Quarterly 6 (25): 344–354. doi: 10.2307/2216786
   Google Scholar
• Tännsjö, T. 2008. Global Democracy: The Case for a World Government. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• UN Millennium Development Goals. 2015. “The Millennium Development Goals Report 2015.” http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/mdgnews.shtml
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2016. “Poverty and Shared Prosperity: Taking on Inequality.” http://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/poverty-and-shared-prosperity
   Google Scholar
• Yunker, J. A. 2012. “Evolutionary World Government.” The Canadian Journal of Peace and Conflict Studies 44 (1): 96–126.
   Google Scholar
• Zielonka, J. 2006. Europe as Empire: The Nature of the Enlarged European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zielonka, J. 2014. Is the EU Doomed? London: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar