Telling a story in a deliberation: addressing epistemic injustice and the exclusion of indigenous groups in public decision-making

References

• Adams, B. 2014. “Reason-Giving in Deliberative Forums.” Journal of Public Deliberation 10 (2): 1–25. Available at: http://www.publicdeliberation.net/jpd/vol10/iss2/art6.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, E. 2010. The Imperative of Integration. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Black, L. 2008. “Deliberation, Storytelling, and Dialogic Moments.” Communication Theory 18: 93–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, L., et al. 2012. “How People Communicate During Deliberative Events.” In Democracy in Motion: Evaluating the Practice and Impact of Deliberative Civic Engagement, edited by T. Nabatchi, 59–81. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bohman, J. 2006. “Deliberative Democracy and the Epistemic Benefits of Diversity.” Episteme; Rivista Critica Di Storia Delle Scienze Mediche E Biologiche 3 (3): 175–191.
   Google Scholar
• Brasil. 2008. “Ministério Público Federal. Sociedade Pró-Preservação Urbanística e Ecológica de Camboinhas (Soprecam). Ação cautelar. n° 2008.51.02.001616-2 na 3ª Vara Federal da Comarca de Niterói”. Brasil. https://www.jusbrasil.com.br/diarios/69492904/trf-2-jud-jfrj-28-04-2014-pg-2926.
   Google Scholar
• Campos, M. 2012. A arte do corpo Mbyá-Guarani: Processos de negociação, patrimonialização e circulação de memória. PhD dissertation, Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro.
   Google Scholar
• Campos, C., and M. Reis. 2011. “Trajetória Histórica Guarani Mbyá: De Paraty Mirim à Niterói.” In Anais do XXVI Simpósio Nacional de História, edited by ANPUH, 1–19. São Paulo: ANPUH.
   Google Scholar
• Crocker, D. 2007. “Deliberative Participation in Local Development.” Journal of Human Development 8 (3): 431–455.
   Google Scholar
• Dieleman, S. 2012. “An Interview with Miranda Fricker.” Social Epistemology 26 (2): 253–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dotson, K. 2014. “Conceptualizing Epistemic Oppression.” Social Epistemology 28 (2): 115–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drake, A., and A. McCulloch. 2011. “Deliberative Consociationalism in Deeply Divided Societies.” Contemporary Political Theory 10 (3): 372–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enos, R., and C. Celaya. 2018. “The Effect of Segregation on Intergroup Relations.” Journal of Experimental Political Science 5 (1): 26–38.
   Google Scholar
• Fagundes, L. 2013. “As Mulheres dos Panos Mbyá-Guarani”.” In Presença Indígena na Cidade: Reflexões, Ações e Políticas, edited by R. Rosado, and L. Caldas Fagundes, 63–87. Hartmann: Porto Alegre.
   Google Scholar
• Fiocruz. 2015. “Índios Guarani-Mbyá sem espaço para viver”. Fiocruz. http://mapadeconflitos.ensp.fiocruz.br/?conflito=rj-indios-guarani-mbya-sem-espaco-para-viver-em-paraty-se-instalam-em-area-protegida-de-camboinhas-decididos-a-preservar-sambaquis-mas-sofrem-violencia-e-lutam-contra-a-expulsao.
   Google Scholar
• Fragoso, K. 2019. A Relational Egalitarian Account of Poverty: Towards a Deliberative Strategy. PhD dissertation, Catholic University of Louvain.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. 1990. “Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy.” Social Text 25 (26): 56–80.
   Google Scholar
• Fricker, M. 2007. Epistemic Injustice. Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford: Oxford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fricker, M., et al. 2015. “Epistemic Contribution as a Central Human Capability.” In The Equal Society: Essays on Equality in Theory and Practice, 73–90, edited by George Hull. London: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Fricker, M. 2017. “Evolving Concepts of Epistemic Injustice.” In Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Injustice, edited by I. J. Kidd, J. Medina, and G. Pohlhaus Jr, 53–60. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• FUNAI. 2009. Populações indígenas no Brasil. FUNAI. www.funai.gov.br.
   Google Scholar
• Fung, A. 2003. “Survey Article: Recipes for Public Spheres: Eight Institutional Design Choices and Their Consequences.” Journal of Political Philosophy 11 (3): 338–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gosselin, A. 2019. “Philosophizing from Experience: First-Person Accounts and Epistemic Justice.” Journal of Social Philosophy 50 (1): 45–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goulet, D. 1989. “Participation in Development: New Avenues.” World Development 17 (2): 165–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1996. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, T., and M. Williams. 2018. “The Ethics of Indigenous Rights.” In The Routledge Handbook of Ethics and Public Policy, edited by A. Lever, and A. Poama, 318–333. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, G. F., and R. Howsam. 2018. “Can Consultation Ever be Collaborative?” Policy Design and Practice 1 (4): 253–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khader, S. 2011. Adaptive Preferences and Women’s Empowerment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koggel, C. 2018. “Epistemic Injustice in a Settler Nation: Canada’s History of Erasing, Silencing, Marginalizing.” Journal of Global Ethics 14 (2): 240–251.
   Google Scholar
• Krause, S. 2008. Civil Passions: Moral Sentiments and Democratic Deliberation. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krenak, A. 2015. A Luta Pela Terra não Parou até Hoje. Rio de Janeiro: Azougue Editora.
   Google Scholar
• Landemore, H. 2013. “Deliberation, Cognitive Diversity, and Democratic Inclusiveness: An Epistemic Argument for the Random Selection of Representatives.” Synthese 190 (7): 1209–1231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manne, K. 2018. Down Girl: The Logic of Misogyny. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, J., et al. 2010. “The Place of Self-Interest and the Role of Power in Deliberative Democracy.” Journal of Political Philosophy 18 (1): 64–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medina, J. 2012. “Hermeneutical Injustice and Polyphonic Contextualism: Social Silences and Shared Hermeneutical Responsibilities.” Social Epistemology 26 (2): 201–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murdock, E. 2018. “Storied with Land: ‘transitional Justice’ on Indigenous Lands.” Journal of Global Ethics 14 (2): 232–239.
   Google Scholar
• Nunes Tupã, D., and M. Carvalho. 2008. Festa do Renascimento da aldeia Guarani. Available at: http://goo.gl/N69kyK. Acessed on 25. Sept. 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, K. 2020. The Solidarity Solution: Principles for a Fair Income Distribution. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ottonelli, V. 2017. “Democratic Deliberation, Respect and Personal Storytelling.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 20 (5): 601–618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira, V. 2014. Aqueles que não vemos: uma etnografia das relações de alteridade entre os Mbyá-Guarani. PhD dissertation. Universidade Federal Fluminense.
   Google Scholar
• Polletta, F. 2008. “Storytelling in Politics.” Contexts 7 (4): 26–31.
   Google Scholar
• Polletta, F., B. Gardner, et al. 2018. “The Forms of Deliberative Communication.” In The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy, edited by Bachtiger, 70–85. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polletta, F., and J. Lee. 2006. “Is Telling Stories Good for Democracy? Rhetoric in Public Deliberation After 9/11.” American Sociological Review 71 (1): 699–721.
   Google Scholar
• Ryfe, D. 2006. “Narrative and Deliberation in Small Group Forums.” Journal of Applied Communication Research 34 (1): 72–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, L. M. 1997. “Against Deliberation.” Political Theory 25 (3): 347–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarti, A. et al. 2018. “Around the Table with Policymakers: Giving Voice to Children in Contexts of Poverty and Deprivation.” Action 16 (4): 396–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siu, A., and D. Stanisevki. 2012. “Deliberation in Multicultural Societies: Addressing Inequality, Exclusion, and Marginalization.” In Nabatchi et al. Democracy in Motion: Evaluating the Practice and Impact of Deliberative Civic Engagement, edited by T. Nabatchi, J. Gastil, M. Weiksner, and M. Leighninger, 83–102. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, J., et al. 2017. Deliberation Across Deeply Divided Societies: Transformative Moments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. R. 2002. “The law of Group Polarization.” Journal of Political Philosophy 10 (2): 175–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend, D., and L. Townsend. 2021. “Epistemic Injustice and Indigenous Peoples in the Inter-American Human Rights System.” Social Epistemology 35 (2): 147–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsosie, R. 2017. “Indigenous Peoples, Anthropology, and the Legacy of Epistemic Injustice.” In The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Injustice, edited by I. J. Kidd, J. Medina, and G. Pohlhaus Jr, 356–369. New York: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Vilaça, A. 2020. Morte na Floresta: Um Ensaio Seminal Sobre o Contágio dos Povos Indígenas no Brasil. São Paulo: Todavia.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. 1996. “Communication and the Other: Beyond Deliberative Democracy.”.” In Democracy and Difference, edited by S. Benhabib, 120–135. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. 2002. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. 2004. “Situated Knowledge and Democratic Discussions”.” In The Politics of Inclusion and Empowerment: Gender, Class and Citizenship, edited by J. Andersen, and B. Siim, 19–35. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar