Whose ethics, whose accountability? A debate about university research ethics committees

References

• Ball , S , Vincent , C and Radnor , H . 1997 . Into confusion: LEAs, accountability and democracy . Journal of Education Policy , 12 ( 3 ) : 147 – 63 .
   Google Scholar
• Chandler , J , Barry , J and Clark , H . 2002 . Stressing academe: The wear and tear of new public management . Human Relations , 55 ( 9 ) : 1051 – 69 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DuBois , J and James , M . 2004 . Is compliance a professional virtue for researchers? Reflections on promoting the responsible conduct of research . Ethics & Behavior , 14 : 383 – 95 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards , S , Kirchin , S and Huxtable , R . 2004 . Research ethics committees and paternalism . Journal of Medical Ethics , 30 : 88 – 91 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elcock , J . 1995 . Ethical principles and guidelines for research with human participants , Cheltenham & Gloucester College of Higher Education, London : British Sociological Association and the British Psychological Society .
   Google Scholar
• Haggerty , K . 2004 . Ethics creep: Governing social science research in the name of ethics . Qualitative Sociology , 27 ( 4 ) : 391 – 414 .
   Google Scholar
• Halloway , D . 2004 . Strategic planning and Habermasian informed discourse; Reality or rhetoric . Critical Perspectives on Accounting , 15 : 469 – 83 .
   Google Scholar
• Henkel , M . 2000 . Academic identities and policy change in higher education , London : Jessica Kingsley Publishers .
   Google Scholar
• Hoecht , A . 2004 . Control in collaborative research and technology development: A case study in the chemical industry . Journal of Managerial Psychology , 19 ( 3 ) : 218 – 34 .
   Google Scholar
• Hoecht , A . 2006 . Quality assurance in UK higher education: Issues of trust, control, professional autonomy and accountability . Higher Education , 51 : 541 – 63 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphrey, J., and H. Schmitz. 1996. Trust and economic development. Discussion Paper no. 355, Brighton: IDS, University of Sussex
   Google Scholar
• Keith-Spiegel , P , Koocher , G and Tabachnik , B . 2006 . What scientists want from their research ethics committee . Journal for Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics , 1 : 67 – 82 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macfarlane , B . 2009 . Researching with integrity: The ethics of academic enquiry , London : Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• Middlehurst , R and Woodhouse , D . 1995 . Coherent systems for external quality assurance . Quality in Higher Education , 1 ( 3 ) : 257 – 68 .
   Google Scholar
• Milgram , S . 1974 . Obedience to authority , New York, NY : Harper & Row .
   Google Scholar
• Merton, R., ed. 1973. The normative structure of science. In The sociology of science, 223–80. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery , K and Oliver , A . 2009 . Shifts in guidelines for ethical scientific conduct: How public and private organizations create and change norms of research integrity . Social Studies of Science , 39 ( 1 ) : 137 – 55 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilly , M , Dixon-Woods , M , Angell , E , Ashcroft , R and Bryman , A . 2009 . Doing accountability: A discourse analysis of research ethics committee letters . Sociology of Health and Illness , 31 ( 2 ) : 246 – 61 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power , M . 1997 . The audit society , Oxford : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Rehg , W . 1994 . Insight and solidarity. A study in the discourse ethics of Jürgen Habermas , Berkeley : University of California Press .
   Google Scholar
• Singer, P., ed. 1993. A companion to ethics. Oxford: Blackwell
   Google Scholar
• Tinker , A and Coomber , V . 2004 . University research ethics committees. Their role, remit and conduct , London : King’s College .
   Google Scholar
• Yu , K . 2008 . Confidentiality revisited . Journal of Academic Ethics , 6 ( 2 ) : 161 – 72 .
   Google Scholar
• Zimbardo , PG . 1973 . On the ethics of intervention in human psychology research: With special reference to the Stanford prison experiment . Cognition , 2 : 243 – 56 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar