REFERENCES
- Berlin, I.1969. “Two Concepts of Liberty.” In Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Broome, J.2001. “Are Intentions Reasons? And How Should We Cope with Incommensurable Values?” In Practical Rationality and Preference: Essays for David Gauthier, edited by ChristopherMorris and ArthurRipstein, 98–120. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Chang, R.1997. “Introduction.” In Incommensurability, Incomparability and Practical Reason, edited by RuthChang. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Chang, R.2002. “The Possibility of Parity.” Ethics112 (4): 659–688.
- Cronbach, L.1960. Essentials of Psychological Testing. New York: Harper & Row.
- Crowder, G.1998. “John Gray's Pluralist Critique of Liberalism.” Journal of Applied Philosophy15 (3): 287–298.
- Dancy, J.2000. “The Particularist's Progress.” In Moral Particularism, edited by B.Hooker and M.Little. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Davis, A.1998. The Limits of Educational Assessment. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Gipps, C. 1999. “Socio-Cultural Aspects of Assessment.” In Review of Research in Education, edited by Asghar Iran-Nejad and P. David Pearson, vol. 24, 355–392. Washington, DC: American Education Research Association.
- Griffiths, P.2006. “Messiaen.” In Grove Music Online, edited by L.Macy. http://www.oxfordmusiconline.com.ezphost.dur.ac.uk/subscriber/article/grove/music/18497?q = Messiaen&search=quick&pos=2&_start = 1#firsthit.
- Harlen, W.2004. “A Systematic Review of the Evidence of Reliability and Validity of Assessment by Teachers Used for Summative Purposes.” In Research Evidence in Education Library (REEL). London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education.
- Isaacston, S.1999. “Instructionally Relevant Writing Assessment.” Reading and Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties15: 29–48.
- Kant, I.1928. Critique of Judgment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Lukes, S.1997. “Comparing the Incomparable: Trade-Offs and Sacrifices.” In Incommensurability, Incomparability and Practical Reason, edited by RuthChang. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Nystrom, P.2004. “Reliability of Educational Assessments: The Case of Classification Accuracy.” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research48 (4): 427–440.
- Plaw, A.2004. “Why Monist Critiques Feed Value Pluralism: Ronald Dworkin's Critique of Isaiah Berlin.” Social Theory and Practice30 (1): 105–126.
- QCA. 2006. Futures: Meeting the Challenge. London: QCA.
- Scruton, R.1997. The Aesthetics of Music. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Shaper-Landau, R.1994. “Ethical Disagreement, Ethical Objectivism and Moral Indeterminacy.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research54 (2): 331–344.
- Wiliam, D.2003. “National Curriculum Assessment: How to Make it Better.” Research Papers in Education18 (2): 129–136.
- Williams, B.1980. “Introduction to Isaiah Berlin.” In Concepts and Categories, edited by HenryHardy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Wittgenstein, L.1958. Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Wollheim, R.1987. Painting as an Art. London: Thames & Hudson.