Evolution education: treating evolution as a sensitive rather than a controversial issue

References

• Asghar, A., J. R. Wiles, and B. Alters. 2007. “Canadian Pre-Service Elementary Teachers’ Conceptions of Biological Evolution and Evolution Education.” McGill Journal of Education 42 (2): 189–210.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, S. 2003. Bone of Contention: Is Evolution True? 3rd ed. Rugby: Biblical Creation Society.
   Google Scholar
• Behe, M. J. 1996. Darwin’s Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, T. 2004. Pasts Beyond Memory: Evolution, Museums, Colonialism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Blancke, S., H. H. Hjermitslev, and P. C. Kjærgaard, eds. 2014. Creationism in Europe. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brickhouse, N. W., and W. J. Letts. 1998. “The Problem of Dogmatism in Science Education.” In Curriculum, Religion, and Public Education: Conversations for an Enlarging Public Square, edited by J. T. Sears and J. C. Carper, 221–230. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Bridges, D. 1986. “Dealing with Controversy in the Curriculum: A Philosophical Perspective.” In Controversial Issues in the Curriculum, edited by J. J. Wellington, 19–38. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• California Department of Education. 1990. Science Framework for California Public Schools. Sacramento: California Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Claire, H., and C. Holden, eds. 2007. The Challenge of Teaching Controversial Issues. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham.
   Google Scholar
• Conway, M. 2004. “Identifying the Past: An Exploration of Teaching and Learning Sensitive Issues in History at Secondary School Level.” Educate 4: 2.
   Google Scholar
• Cowan, P., and H. Maitles, eds. 2012. Teaching Controversial Issues in the Classroom: Key Issues and Debates. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Dagher, Z. R., and S. BouJaoude. 1997. “Scientific Views and Religious Views of College Students: The Case of Biological Evolution.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 34 (5): 429–445. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199705)34:5<429::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-S
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DCSF. 2007. “Guidance on Creationism and Intelligent Design.” www.teachernet.gov.uk/docbank/index.cfm?id=11890
   Google Scholar
• Dearden, R. F. 1984. Theory and Practice in Education. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Dembski, W. A. 1998. The Design Inference: Eliminating Chance through Small Probabilities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deniz, H., and L. A. Borgerding, eds. 2018. Evolution Education around the Globe. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Downie, J. R., and N. J. Barron. 2000. “Evolution and Religion: Attitudes of Scottish First Year Biology and Medical Students to the Teaching of Evolutionary Biology.” Journal of Biological Education 34 (3): 139–146. doi:10.1080/00219266.2000.9655704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durfee, A., and K. Rosenberg. 2009. “Teaching Sensitive Issues: Feminist Pedagogy and the Practice of Advocacy-Based Counseling.” Feminist Teacher 19 (2): 103–121. doi:10.1353/ftr.0.0047.
   Google Scholar
• Good, R. G., J. E. Trowbridge, S. S. Demastes, J. H. Wandersee, M. S. Hafner, and C. L. Cummins, eds. 1992. Proceedings of the 1992 Evolution Education Research Conference. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University.
   Google Scholar
• Graebsch, A., and Q. Schiermeier. 2006. “Anti-Evolutionists Raise Their Profile in Europe.” Nature 444: 406–407. doi:10.1038/nature05376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hand, M. 2008. “What Should We Teach as Controversial? A Defense of the Epistemic Criterion.” Educational Theory 58: 213–228. doi:10.1111/j.1741-5446.2008.00285.x.
   Google Scholar
• Hermann, R. S. 2008. “Evolution as a Controversial Issue: A Review of Instructional Approaches.” Science & Education 17: 1011–1032. doi:10.1007/s11191-007-9074-x.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, D. E. 2009. Controversy in the Classroom: The Democratic Power of Discussion. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hildebrand, D., B. Kimberly, and J. Capps. 2008. “Addressing Controversies in Science Education: A Pragmatic Approach to Evolution Education.” Science & Education 17: 1033–1052. doi:10.1007/s11191-006-9066-2.
   Google Scholar
• Interacademy Panel on International Issues. 2006. “IAP Statement on the Teaching of Evolution.” http://www.interacademies.net/File.aspx?id=6150
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, P. E. 1999. “The Wedge: Breaking the Modernist Monopoly on Science.” Touchstone 12 (4): 18–24.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, L., and M. J. Reiss, eds. 2007. Teaching about Scientific Origins: Taking Account of Creationism. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. 2011. Thinking Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar: Straus and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Kitcher, P. 1983. Abusing Science: The Case against Creationism. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koperski, J. 2008. “Two Bad Ways to Attack Intelligent Design and Two Good Ones.” Zygon 43: 433–449. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9744.2008.00926.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristjánsson, K. 2015. Aristotelian Character Education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Laats, A., and H. Siegel. 2016. Teaching Evolution in a Creation Nation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, R. M. 1993. Doing Research on Sensitive Topics. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, R. 2006. “Towards a Theoretical Framework for Teaching Controversial Socio-Scientific Issues.” International Journal of Science Education 28: 1201–1224. doi:10.1080/09500690600560753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, D. 2011. Evolution and Religion in American Education: An Ethnography. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lowe, P., and H. Jones. 2010. “Teaching and Learning Sensitive Topics.” Enhancing Learning in the Social Sciences 2 (3): 1–7. doi:10.11120/elss.2010.02030001.
   Google Scholar
• Lynagh, M., C. Gilligan, and T. Handley. 2010. “Teaching About, and Dealing With, Sensitive Issues in Schools: How Confident are Pre-Service Teachers?” Asia-Pacific Journal of Health, Sport and Physical Education 1 (3–4): 5–11. doi:10.1080/18377122.2010.9730332.
   Google Scholar
• Marples, R., ed. 1999. The Aims of Education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, T. 2003. “Teaching Controversial Issues in Citizenship Education.” In Education for Democratic Citizenship: Issues of Theory and Practice, edited by A. Lockyer, B. Crick, and J. Annette, 149–160. Aldershot: Avebury.
   Google Scholar
• Meadows, L., E. Doster, and D. F. Jackson. 2000. “Managing the Conflict between Evolution & Religion.” American Biology Teacher 62 (2): 102–107. doi:10.1662/0002-7685(2000)062[0102:MTCBER]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, S. C., P. A. Nelson, J. Moneymaker, S. Minnich, and R. Seelke. 2009. Explore Evolution: The Arguments for and against Neo-Darwinism. Melbourne: Hill House.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J. D., E. C. Scott, and S. Okamoto. 2006. “Public Acceptance of Evolution.” Science 313: 765–766. doi:10.1126/science.1126746.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, R. 2007. “The History of the Creationism/Evolution Controversy and Likely Future Developments.” In Teaching about Scientific Origins: Taking Account of Creationism, edited by L. Jones and M. Reiss, 11–29. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Nagel, T. 2008. “Public Education and Intelligent Design.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 36: 187–205. doi:10.1111/j.1088-4963.2008.00132.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Academy of Sciences and Institute of Medicine. 2008. Science, Evolution, and Creationism. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newall, E. 2017. “Evolution, Insight and Truth?” School Science Review 99 (367): 61–66.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, G. E. 2006. Creation: Facts of Life – How Real Science Reveals the Hand of God. Los Angeles, CA: New Leaf Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reiss, M. J. 2008a. “Should Science Educators Deal with the Science/Religion Issue?” Studies in Science Education 44: 157–186. doi:10.1080/03057260802264214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiss, M. J. 2008b. “Teaching Evolution in a Creationist Environment: An Approach Based on Worldviews, Not Misconceptions.” School Science Review 90 (331): 49–56.
   Google Scholar
• Reiss, M. J. 2011. “How Should Creationism and Intelligent Design Be Dealt with in the Classroom?” Journal of Philosophy of Education 45: 399–415. doi:10.1111/jope.2011.45.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiss, M. J. 2017. “Teaching the Theory of Evolution in Informal Settings to Those Who are Uncomfortable with It.” In Preparing Informal Science Educators: Perspectives from Science Communication and Education, edited by P. G. Patrick, 495–507. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Reiss, M. J. 2018. “Creationism and Intelligent Design.” In International Handbook of Philosophy of Education, edited by P. Smeyers, 1247–1259. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Reiss, M. J., and J. White. 2013. An Aims-Based Curriculum: The Significance of Human Flourishing for Schools. London: IOE Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robbins, J. R., and R. Roy. 2007. “Identifying & Correcting Non-Science Student Preconceptions through an Inquiry-Based, Critical Approach to Evolution.” American Biology Teacher 69 (8): 460–466. doi:10.1662/0002-7685(2007)69[460:TNSICN]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenblith, S., and B. Bindewald. 2014. “Between Mere Tolerance and Robust Respect: Mutuality as a Basis for Civic Education in Pluralist Democracies.” Educational Theory 64: 589–606. doi:10.1111/edth.12085.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, M. 2007. Rethinking Evolution in the Museum. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Selkirk, D. R., and F. J. Burows. 1987. Confronting Creationism: Defending Darwin. New South Wales University Press:Kensington, NSW.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. U., and H. Siegel. 2004. “Knowing, Believing, and Understanding: What Goals for Science Education?” Science & Education 13: 553–582. doi:10.1023/B:SCED.0000042848.14208.bf.
   Google Scholar
• Stradling, R. 1984. “Teaching Controversial Issues.” In Controversial Issues in the Classroom, edited by R. Stradling, M. Noctor, and B. Baines, 1–12. London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, J. L., J. Hart, and J. P. Martens. 2011. “Death and Science: The Existential Underpinnings of Belief in Intelligent Design and Discomfort with Evolution.” PLoS One 6 (3): e17349. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trollinger, S. L., and W. V. Trollinger. 2016. Righting America at the Creation Museum. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, M. E. 2006. “What Should and Should Not Be Said: Deliberating Sensitive Issues.” Journal of Social Philosophy 37 (2): 163–181. doi:10.1111/josp.2006.37.issue-2.
   Google Scholar
• Wellington, J., ed. 1986. Controversial Issues in the Curriculum. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• White, J. 2011. Exploring Well-Being in Schools: A Guide to Making Children’s Lives More Fulfilling. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. D. 2008. “Creationist Teaching in School Science: A UK Perspective.” Evolution: Education and Outreach 1: 87–95.
   Google Scholar
• Winslow, M. W., J. R. Staver, and L. C. Scharmann. 2011. “Evolution and Personal Religious Belief: Christian University Biology-Related Majors’ Search for Reconciliation.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 48: 1026–1049. doi:10.1002/tea.v48.9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar