Post-critical pedagogy as poetic practice: combining affirmative and critical vocabularies

References

• Anker, E. S., and R. Felski. 2017. “Introduction.” In Critique and Postcritique, edited by E. S. Anker and R. Felski, 1–28. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, R. J. 2008. “Richard Rorty’s Deep Humanism.” New Literary History 39 (1): 13–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, S., and S. Marcus. 2009. “Surface Reading: An Introduction.” Representations 108 (1): 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bittner, R. 2009. “Kritik, und wie es besser wäre.” In Was ist Kritik? edited by R. Jaeggi and T. Wesche, 134–149. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Boltanksi, L., and È. Chiapello. 2005. The New Spirit of Capitalism. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Bröckling, U. 2017. Gute Hirten führen sanft. Über Menschenregierungskünste. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Bünger, C. 2020. “Kritik.” In Handbuch Bildungs- und Erziehungsphilosophie, edited by G. Weiß and J. Zirfas, 161–173. Wiesbaden: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Castiglia, C. 2017. “Hope for Critique?” In Critique and Postcritique, edited by E. S. Anker and R. Felski, 211–229. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Felski, R. 2011. “Context Stinks!” New Literary History 42 (4): 573–591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felski, R. 2015. The Limits of Critique. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, A., and E. K. Sedgwick. 1995. “Shame in the Cybernetic Fold: Reading Silvan Tomkins.” Critical Inquiry 21 (2): 496–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frischmann, B. 2011. “Ironie als philosophische Denkform und Methode – Schlegel, Kierkegaard, Rorty.” In Mensch-sein. On Being Human, edited by H.-B. Lim and G. Mohr, 83–101. Frankfurt: Peter Lang Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Gröschner, M., and K. Wortmann. forthcoming. “Pädagogik: Erziehung als bildendes Gespräch.” In Handbuch Richard Rorty, edited by M. Müller. Wiesbaden: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hayot, E. 2017. “Then and Now.” In Critique and Postcritique, edited by E. S. Anker and R. Felski, 279–295. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, N., J. Vlieghe, and P. Zamojski. 2017. Manifesto for a Post-Critical Pedagogy. London: punctum books.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, N., J. Vlieghe, and P. Zamojski. 2018. “Education and the Love for the World: Articulating a Post-critical Educational Philosophy.” Foro De Educación 16 (24): 7–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kastner, J., and R. Sonderegger. 2014. “Emanzipation von ihren Extremen her denken. Ein einleitendes Plädoyer für Bourdieu und/mit Rancière.” In Pierre Bourdieu Und Jacques Rancière: Emanzipatorische Praxis Denken, edited by J. Kastner and R. Sonderegger, 7–30. Wien: Turia + Kant.
   Google Scholar
• Kluge, A., and J. Vogl. 2009. “Kritik aus nächster Nähe.” In Soll und Haben. Fernsehgespräche, 7–21. Zürich: diaphanes.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2004. “Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern.” Critical Inquiry 30 (2): 225–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2005a. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2005b. “From Realpolitik to Dingpolitik or How to Make Things Public.” In Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy, edited by B. Latour and P. Weibel, 14–41. Karlsruhe: Center for Art and Media.
   Google Scholar
• Małecki, W. 2011. “’If happiness is not the aim of politics, then what is?’: Rorty versus Foucault.” Foucault Studies 11: 106–125.
   Google Scholar
• Masschelein, J. 2004. “How to Conceive of Critical Educational Theory Today?” Journal of Philosophy of Education 38 (3): 351–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metcalf, S. 2007. Richard Rorty: What made him a crucial American philosopher? Online: [Accessed 24 August 2019]. https://slate.com/culture/2007/06/richard-rorty-remembered.html
   Google Scholar
• Oliverio, S. 2019. “An Edifying Philosophy of Education? Starting a Conversation between Rorty and Post-critical Pedagogy.” Ethics and Education 14 (4): –.
   Google Scholar
• Ramberg, B. 2001. “Rorty and the Instruments of Philosophy.” In Richard Rorty: Education, Philosophy, and Politics, edited by M. Peters and P. Ghiraldelli, 15–45. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Ramberg, B. T. 2013. “For the Sake of His Own Generation: Rorty on Destruction and Edification.” In Richard Rorty: From Pragmatist Philosophy to Cultural Politics, edited by A. Gröschner, C. Koopman, and M. Sandbothe, 49–72. London: Bloomsburry.
   Google Scholar
• Rancière, J. 2004. The Philosopher and His Poor. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rieger-Ladich, M. forthcoming. “Abstieg vom Feldherrenhügel. Konturen einer neuen Praxis der Kritik.” In Theorien! Horizonte für die Lehrerbildung, edited by M. Harant, U. Küchler, and P. Thomas:. Tübingen: Tübingen University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. 1979. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. 1982. Consequences of Pragmatism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. 1990. “The Dangers of Over-Philosophication – Reply to Arcilla and Nicholson.” Educational Theory 40 (1): 41–44.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. 1993. “Feminism, Ideology, and Deconstruction: A Pragmatist View.” Hypatia 8 (2): 96–103.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. 1994. “Religion as Conversation-stopper.” Common Knowledge 3 (1): 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. 1999. Hope in Place of Knowledge: The Pragmatics Tradition in Philosophy. Taipei: Institute of European and American Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. 2000a. Die Schönheit, die Erhabenheit und die Gemeinschaft der Philosophen. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. 2000b. “Response to Donald Davidson.” In Rorty and His Critics, edited by R. Brandom, 74–80. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. 2001. “Response to Richard Shusterman.” In Richard Rorty: Critical Dialogues, edited by M. Festenstein and S. Thompson, 153–157. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. 2007a. “The Fire of Life.” Poetry, November 2007, 129–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. 2007b. Philosophy as Cultural Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sandbothe, M. 2003. “Davidson and Rorty on Truth: Reshaping Analytic Philosophy for a Transcontinental Conversation.” In A House Divided: Comparing Analytic and Continental Philosophers, edited by C. Prado, 235–258. Amherst: Humanities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sandbothe, M. 2005. “Nachwort.” In Wozu Wahrheit? Eine Debatte, edited by M. Sandbothe, 326–348. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Sandbothe, M., and K. Wortmann. forthcoming. “Philosophie als Kulturpolitik.” In Handbuch Richard Rorty, edited by M. Müller. Wiesbaden: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Schulenberg, U. 2017. “From Finding to Making: Jacques Rancière, Richard Rorty, and the Antifoundationalist Story of Progress.” Culture, Theory and Critique 58 (3): 275–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumann, C. 2017. “On Happiness and Critique: From Bouquet V to ‘possible Elsewheres’.” Studier I Pædagogisk Filosofi 6 (1): 83–96.
   Google Scholar
• Schwimmer, M. 2019. “Rorty, Post-critical Pedagogy and Hope: A Response.” Ethics and Education 14 (4): ###–###.
   Google Scholar
• Sedgwick, E. K. 1997. “Paranoid Reading and Reparative Reading; Or, You’re so Paranoid, You Probably Think This Introduction Is about You.” In Novel Gazing: Queer Readings in Fiction, edited by E. K. Sedgwick, 1–37. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sedgwick, E. K. 2003. Touching Feeling: Affect, Pedagogy, Performativity. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Serres, M., and B. Latour. 1995. Conversations on Science, Culture, and Time. Ann Arbour: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sonderegger, R. 2012. “Negative versus Affirmative Critique: On Pierre Bourdieu and Jacques Rancière.” In Conceptions of Critique in Modern and Contemporary Philosophy, edited by K. de Boer and R. Sonderegger, 248–264. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Su, H. forthcoming. “The Educational Epistemology of Redescriptive Theorizing”. Paper draft.
   Google Scholar
• Thoilliez, B. 2019a. “Fitting Religious Life into the Life of Schools. James and Rorty in Conversation.” Ethics and Education 14 (2): 157–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thoilliez, B. 2019b. “Pedagogical Hope and Education beyond Critique.” Ethics and Education 14 (4): –.
   Google Scholar
• Vlieghe, J., and P. Zamojski. 2019. Towards an Ontology of Teaching: Thing-centred Pedagogy, Affirmation and Love for the World. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Vogelmann, F. 2017. “Measuring, Disrupting, Emancipating: Three Pictures of Critique.” Constellations 24 (1): 101–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wesche, T. 2009. “Reflexion, Therapie, Darstellung: Formen der Kritik.” In Was ist Kritik? edited by R. Jaeggi and T. Wesche, 193–220. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Wortmann, K. forthcoming. “Radikale Relationalität statt Theoretizismus: Pragmatistische Vorschläge zum pädagogischen Sprechen über Humanismus.” In Neue Konzepte des Humanismus für eine Schule von Morgen, edited by P. Duval, M. Oberlechner, and S. Rasheed. Schwalbach: Wochenschau Verlag.
   Google Scholar