Arguing about religion: BBC World Service Internet forums as sites of postcolonial encounter

References

• Altheide, David L. 1991. “The Impact of Television News Formats on Social Policy.” Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 35(1): 3–22.
   Google Scholar
• Asad, Talal. 1999. “Religion, Nation-State and Secularism.” In Nation and Religion: Perspectives on Europe and Asia, edited by Peter van der Veer and Hartmut Lechmann, 178–196. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Atkins, Ros. 2012. “We’re Not Here, We’re There…” Accessed April 27, 2013. http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/worldhaveyoursay/
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M.M. 1981. The Dialogical Imagination. Translated by Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• BBC Trust. n.d. “Purpose Plan for Delivering the BBC Public Purpose: Bringing the UK to the World and the World to the UK.” Accessed August 8, 2013. http://www.bbc.co.uk/aboutthebbc/insidethebbc/whoweare/publicpurposes/world.html
   Google Scholar
• Benahbib, Seyla. 1992. “Models of Public Space: Hannah Arendt, the Liberal Tradition, and Jürgen Habermas.” In Habermas and the Public Sphere, edited by Craig Calhoun, 73–98. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benson, Rodney D. 2009. “What Makes News More Multiperspectival? A Field Analysis.” Poetics 37(5–6): 402–418.
   Google Scholar
• Beyers, Hans. 2004. “Interactivity and Online Newspapers: A Case Study on Discussion Boards.” Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies (10): 11–20. doi:10.1177/135485650401000403.
   Google Scholar
• Bohman, James. 2004. “Expanding Dialogue: The Internet, the Public Sphere and Prospects for Transnational Democracy.” The Sociological Review 52(1): 131–155. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.2004.00477.x.
   Google Scholar
• Cottle, Simon. 2006. Mediatized Conflicts. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, Lincoln. 2001. “The Internet and Democratic Discourse: Exploring the Prospects of Online Deliberative Forums Extending the Public Sphere.” Information, Communication and Society 4(4): 615–633. doi:10.1080/13691180110097030.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, Lincoln. 2005. “The Corporate Colonization of Online Attention and the Marginalization of Critical Communication?” Journal of Communication Inquiry 29(2): 160–180. doi:10.1177/0196859904272745.
   Google Scholar
• FCO. 2006. “Active Diplomacy for a Changing World: The UK’s International Priorities.” White Paper presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Foreign & Commonwealth Affairs. Accessed October 1, 2007. http://www.fco.gov.uk/Files/kfile/fullintpriorities2006.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. 1992. “Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy.” In Habermas and the Public Sphere edited by C. Calhoun, 109–142. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gaus, Gerald, and Kevin Vallier. 2009. “The Roles of Religious Conviction in a Publicly Justified Polity: The Implications of Convergence, Asymmetry and Political Institutions.” Philosophy and Social Criticism 35(1–2): 51–76.
   Google Scholar
• Gitlin, Todd. 1998. “Public Sphere or Public Spherecules.” In Media, Ritual and Identity, edited by Tamar Liebes and J. Curran, 168–174. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen. 1987. A Theory of Communicative Action. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen. [1962] 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen. 1996. Between Facts and Norms. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen. 2008. “Notes on Post-Secular Society.” New Perspectives Quarterly 25 (4): 17–29. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5842.2008.01017.x.
   Google Scholar
• Hain, Peter. 2000. “The BBC World Service: A Service for Freedom.” Accessed October 1, 2007. http://www.fco.gov.uk/en/newsroom/latest-news/?view=Speech&id=2148677
   Google Scholar
• Heller, P. 2009. “Democratic Deepening in India and South Africa.” Journal of Asian and African Studies 44: 123–149.
   Google Scholar
• Herbert, David. 2003. Religion and Civil Society. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Linaa Jensen, Jakob. 2003. “Public Spheres on the Internet: Anarchic or Government-Sponsored: A Comparison.” Scandinavian Political Studies 26(4): 349–374. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9477.2003.00093.x.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, Quentin, and Rafaeli Shaizaf. 2000. “Time to Split, Virtually: ‘Discourse Architecture’ and ‘Community Building’ Create Vibrant Virtual Publics.” Electronic Markets 10(4): 214–223. doi:10.1080/101967800750050326.
   Google Scholar
• De, Luca, Kevin, and Jennifer Peeples. 2002. “Public Sphere and Public Screen: Democracy, Activism and the ‘Violence’ of Seattle.” Critical Studies in Media Communication 19(2): 125–151.
   Google Scholar
• Mayhew, Leon H. 1997. The New Public: Professional Communication and the Means of Social Influence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Milioni, Dimitra L. 2009. “Probing the Online Counterpublic Sphere: The Case of Indymedia Athens.” Media, Culture and Society 31(3): 409–431.
   Google Scholar
• Mitra, Ananda. 2005. “Creating Immigrant Identities in Cybernetic Space: Examples from a Non-resident Indian Website.” Media, Culture and Society 27(3): 371–390.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, Pippa, and Ronald Inglehart. 2004. Sacred and Secular: Religion and Politics Worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poole, Elizabeth. 2002. Reporting Islam: Media Representations of British Muslims. London: I.B. Tauris.
   Google Scholar
• Rajagopal, Arvind. 2001. Politics After Television: Hindu Nationalism and the Reshaping of the Public in India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sandell, Mark. 2008. Interview with World Have Your Say editor Mark Sandell, conducted and recorded by Tracey Black, 20 March.
   Google Scholar
• van der Veer, Peter. 1999. “The Moral State. Religion, Nation and Empire in Victorian Britain and British India.” In Nation and Religion: Perspectives on Europe and Asia, edited by Peter van der Veer and Hartmut Lehmann, 15–43. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, Scott, and John Street. 2007. “Democracy, Deliberation and Design: the Case of Online Discussion Forums.” New Media and Society 9(5): 849–869.
   Google Scholar