Object as subject: Material agency in Ismat Chughtai’s “The Quilt” and “Chhoti Apa”

References

• Appadurai, Arjun, ed.1986. “Introduction: Commodities and the Politics of Value.” In The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective, edited by Arjun Appadurai, 3–63. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ardener, Shirley. 1993. Women and Space: Ground Rules and Social Maps. London: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, Marilyn, ed.. 2010. “Introduction.” In Harem Histories Envisioning Places and Living Spaces, edited by Marilyn Booth, 1–19. Durham, N.C: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, Partha. 1990. “The Nationalist Resolution of the Women’s Question.” In Recasting Women: Essays in Indian Colonial History, edited by Kumkum Sangari and Sudesh Vaid, 233–253. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chughtai, Ismat. 2012. A Life in Words: Memoirs, Translated by M. Asaduddin. New Delhi: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Chughtai, Ismat. 2004. A Chughtai Collection, Translated by Tahira Naqvi and Syeda S. Hameed. New Delhi: Women Unlimited.
   Google Scholar
• Crossland, Zoë. 2010. “Materiality and Embodiment.” In The Oxford Handbook of Material Culture Studies, edited by Dan Hicks and Mary C. Beaudry, 387–405. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199218714.013.0001.
   Google Scholar
• de Beauvoir, Simone. [1949] 2015. The Second Sex. London: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, Erving. 1979. Gender Advertisements. London: Macmillan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gopal, Priyamvada. 2005. Literary Radicalisation in India: Gender, Nation and the Transition to Independence. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haynes, Douglas, and Gyan Prakash. 1991. Contesting Power: Resistance and Everyday Social Relations in South Asia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Helly, Dorothy O., and Susan M. Reverby. 1992. Gendered Domains: Rethinking Public and Private in Women’s History. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, Dan, and Mary C. Beaudry, eds. 2010. “Introduction: Material Culture Studies: A Reactionary View.” In The Oxford Handbook of Material Culture Studies, edited by Dan Hicks and Mary C. Beaudry, 1–22. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199218714.013.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins, Janet. 1998. Biographical Objects: How Things Tell the Stories of People’s Lives. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jalil, Rakhshanda. 2014. Liking Progress, Loving Change: A Literary History of the Progressive Writers’ Movement in Urdu. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, Andrew M., and Nicole Boivin. 2010. “The Malice of Inanimate Objects: Material Agency.” In The Oxford Handbook of Material Culture Studies, edited by Dan Hicks and Mary C. Beaudry, 334–352. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199218714.013.0014.
   Google Scholar
• Kandiyoti, Deniz. 1988. “Bargaining with Patriarchy.” Gender & Society 2 (3): 274–290. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/089124388002003004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khanna, Neetu. 2020. The Visceral Logics of Decolonization. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, Henri. 1991. The Production of Space. Translated by Donald Nicholson-Smith. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, Reina, and Sarah Mills, eds. 2003. “Introduction.” In Feminist Postcolonial Theory: A Reader, edited by Reina Lewis and Sarah Mills, 1–22. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mahmood, Saba. 2011. The Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, Doreen. 2005. For Space. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Patel, Geeta. 2001. “Marking the Quilt: Veil, Harem/ Home,and the Subversion of Colonial Civility.” Colby Quarterly 37 (2): 174–188. https://digitalcommons.colby.edu/cq/vol37/iss2/7.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, Sarah. 2004. “Introduction: Changing Gender in the Sensory Home.” In Home Truths: Gender, Domestic Objects and Everyday Life, edited by Sarah Pink, 9–24. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Sarkar, Mahua. 2008. Visible Histories, Disappearing Women. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suleri, Sara. 1992. “Woman Skin Deep: Feminism and the Postcolonial Condition.” Critical Inquiry 18 (4): 756–769. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/448655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilley, Christopher. 2002. “Metaphor, Materiality and Interpretation.” In The Material Culture Reader, edited by Victor Buchli, 23–56. New York: Berg.
   Google Scholar