258
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Rights and Duties of Circulation on American Streets: To ‘Proceed Uninterruptedly’ or ‘with Reasonable Care?’

&

References

  • Adey, P. 2006. “If Mobility is Everything Then It Is Nothing: Towards a Relational Politics of (Im)mobilities.” Mobilities 1 (1): 75–94.
  • Albers, Appellant v. City of Cincinnati, Appellee (No. 8724, Court of Appeals of Ohio, First Appellate District, Hamilton County, 111 Ohio App. 295; 165 N.E.2d 456; 12 Ohio Op. 2d 77, February 29, 1960 , Decided).
  • Betras, Admr., Appellee, v. G.M. McKelvey Co., Appellant. No. 30970 (Supreme Court of Ohio, 148 Ohio St. 523; 76 N.E.2d 280; 36 Ohio Op. 173, November 26, 1947, Decided).
  • Blomley, N. 1994. Law, Space, and the Geographies of Power. New York: The Guilford Press.
  • Blomley, N. 2007a. “Civil Rights Meets Civil Engineering: Urban Public Space and Traffic Logic.” Canadian Journal of Law and Society 22 (2): 55–72.
  • Blomley, N. 2007b. “How to Turn a Beggar into a Bus Stop: Law, Traffic, and the ‘Function of the Place.” Urban Studies 44 (9): 1697–1712.
  • Blomley, N. 2009a. “Rights.” In The Dictionary of Human Geography, edited by D. Gregory, R. Johnston, G. Pratt, M. Watts and S. Whatmore, 565–657. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Blomley, N. 2009b. “Social Justice.” In The Dictionary of Human Geography, edited by D. Gregory, R. Johnston, G. Pratt, M. Watts and S. Whatmore, 694–695. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Blomley, N. 2010. “The Right to Pass Freely: Circulation, Begging, and the Mobile Self.” Social and Legal Studies. 19 (3): 331–350.
  • Blomley, N. 2011. Rights of Passage: Sidewalks and the Regulation of Public Flow. New York: Routledge.
  • Bohm, S., C. Jones, C. Land, and M. Paterson, eds. 2006. Against Automobility. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Calanan, A. 2009. Duty and Integrity in Tort Law. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
  • Charles Farley, et al., Plaintiff-Apellants, v. Mary Allen, Defendant-Appellee. No. 7095 (Court of Appeals, Second Appellate District, Montgomery County, Ohio. October 26, 1981).
  • Coleman, J. L., and J. Kraus. 1986. “Rethinking the Theory of Legal Rights.” The Yale Law Journal 95 (7): 1335–1371.
  • Cresswell, T. 2006a. On the Move: Mobility in the Modern Western World. New York: Taylor and Francis.
  • Cresswell, T. 2006b. “The Right to Mobility: The Production of Mobility in the Courtroom.” Antipode 38 (4): 735–754.
  • Cresswell, T. 2010. “Towards a Politics of Mobility.” Environment and Planning D 28 (1): 17–31.
  • Dickerhoof, Admr., Appellee, v. City of Canton, Appellant (No. 82-1173, Supreme Court of Ohio, 6 Ohio St. 3d 128, August 3, 1983, Decided).
  • Dollar Savings & Trust Co., Exr., Appellee, v. City of Youngstown, Appellant No. 4846, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Seventh Appellate District, Mahoning County, 19 Ohio App. 2d 225; 250 N.E.2d 883; 48 Ohio Op. 2d 359, September 16, 1969, Decided).
  • Ehrenfeucht, R., and A. Loukaitou-Sideris. 2007a. Constructing the Sidewalks: Law and Regulation in Nineteenth-Century America. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
  • Ehrenfeucht, R., and A. Loukaitou-Sideris. 2007b. “Constructing the Sidewalks: Municipal Government and the Production of Public Space in Los Angeles, California, 1880-1920.” Journal of Historical Geography 33 (1): 104–124.
  • Eichorn, Appellee v. Lustig’s, Inc., Appellant (No. 33542, Supreme Court of Ohio, 161 Ohio St. 11; 117 N.E.2d 436; 52 Ohio Op. 467; February 17, 1954, Decided).
  • Erdman, Appellee v. Mestrovich, Appellant (No. 32115, Supreme Court of Ohio, 155 Ohio St. 85; 97 N.E.2d 674; 44 Ohio Op. 97; 31 A.L.R.2d 1417; March 14, 1951, Decided).
  • Featherstone, M., N. Thrift, and J. Urry, eds. 2005. Automobilities. London: Sage.
  • Fife, N., ed. 1998. Images of the Street: Planning, Identity, and Control in Public Space. London: Routledge.
  • Freund, P., and G. Martin. 2007. “Hyperautomobility, the Social Organization of Space, and Health.” Mobilities 2 (1): 37–49.
  • Furness, Z. 2007. “Critical Mass, Urban Space, and Vélomobility.” Mobilities 2 (2): 299–319.
  • Furness, Z. 2010. One Less Car: Bicycling and the Politics of Automobility. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
  • George R. Hart, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert M. Blue (City of Whitehall et al.), Defendants-Appellees), (No. 81AP-929, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Tenth Appellate District, Franklin County, Ohio, June 29, 1982).
  • Gladon, Appellee and Cross-Appellant, v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority, Appellant and Cross-Appellee (No. 94-1063, Supreme Court of Ohio, 75 Ohio St. 3d 312; 1996 Ohio 137; 662 N.E.2d 287; September 13, 1995 and December 13, 1995, Submitted, March 6, 1996, Decided).
  • Grass, Appellant, v. Ake, Exr., Appellee (No. 32034, Supreme Court of Ohio, 154 Ohio St. 84; 93 N.E.2d 590; 42 Ohio Op. 151, June 28, 1950, Decided).
  • Gray, Appellent, v. Totterdale Brothers Supply Company, Inc., Defendent-Appellent (No. 07 BE 11, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Seventh District, Belmont County, 2007-Ohio-4992, September)
  • Griffin, Appellee, v. City of Cincinnati, Appellant (No. 33799; Supreme Court of Ohio; 162 Ohio St. 232; 123 N.E.2d 11; 55 Ohio Op. 118; November 24, 1954, Decided).
  • Hague, E. 2010. “‘The Right to Enter Every Other State’ – The Supreme Court and African-American Mobility in the United States.” Mobilities 5 (3): 331–347.
  • Hannam, K., M. Sheller, and J. Urry. 2006. “Editorial: Mobilities, Immobilities and Moorings.” Mobilities 1 (1): 1–22.
  • Holding et al., Appellants, v. Chappel et al., Appellees (No. 13114, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Ninth Appellate District, Summit County, 41 Ohio App. 3d 250; 535 N.E.2d 350; October 14, 1987, Decided).
  • Howard, Appellee, et al., v. Miami Township Fire Division et al. (119 Ohio St.3d 1, 2008-Ohio-2792.]
  • Hunter et al., Appellees, v. City of Cleveland, Appellant (No. 75-592, Supreme Court of Ohio, 46 Ohio St. 2d 91; 346 N.E.2d 303; 75 Ohio Op. 2d 160; April 28, 1976, Decided).
  • Jain, S., and S. Lochlann. 2004. “‘Dangerous Instrumentality:’ The Bystander as Subject in Automobility.” Cultural Anthropology 19 (1): 61–94.
  • Jean M. Walker, et al., Plaintiff-Appellant v. City of Parma, et al., Defendant-Appellees (No. 60540; Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth Appellate District, Cuyahoga County; May 30, 1991).
  • Johnston, B. 2008. “Planning for Child Pedestrians: Issues of Health, Safety, and Social Justice.” Journal of Urban Design 13 (1): 141–145.
  • Kimball, Appellee, v. City of Cincinnati, Appellant (No. 33512, Supreme Court of Ohio, 160 Ohio St. 370; 116 N.E.2d 708; December 23, 1953, Decided).
  • Lewyn, M. 2007. “How Government Regulation Forces Americans in to Their Cars: A Case Study.” Widener Law Journal 16: 839–852.
  • Lewyn, M. 2008. “Why Pedestrian-Friendly Street Design is Not Negligent.” University of Louisville Law Review 47: 339–371.
  • Louis Young, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Hills Cab Co., United Transportation, Inc., Marvin Glassman, Kenneth L. Kaufman, City of Columbus, Defendants-Appellees (No. 73AP-114, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Tenth Appellate District, Franklin County;September 11, 1973).
  • Loukaitou-Sideris, A., and R. Ehrenfeucht. 2009. Sidewalks: Conflict and Negotiation over Public Space. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • MacDonald, K., and M. Grieco. 2007. “Editorial: Accessibility, Mobility and Connectivity: The Changing Frontiers of Everyday Routine.” Mobilities 2 (1): 1–14.
  • Martinovich, A minor, Appellee, v. the E.R. Jones Co., Appellant (No. 27067, Supreme Court of Ohio, 135 Ohio St. 137; 19 N.E.2d 952; 13 Ohio Op. 529; March 15, 1939, Decided)
  • Massey, D. 1993. “Power-Geometry and a Progressive Sense of Place.” In Mapping the Futures: Local Cultures, Global Change, edited by J. Bird, B. Curtis, T. Putnam, G. Robertson, and L. Tickner, 59–69. London: Routledge.
  • Meghann D. Wall, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Adam C. Sprague, Defendant-Appellee (No. CA2007-05-065, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Twelfth Appellate District, Clermont County, July 7, 2008).
  • Merriman, P. 2007. Driving Spaces: A Cultural-Historical Geography of England’s M1 Motorway. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Mitchell, D. 2003. The Right to the City: Social Justice and the Fight for Public Space. New York: The Guilford Press.
  • Mitchell, D. 2005a. “The S.U.V. Model of Citizenship: Floating Bubbles, Buffer Zones, and the Rise of the ‘‘Purely Atomic’’ Individual.” Political Geography 24: 77–100.
  • Mitchell, D. 2005b. “Property Rights, the First Amendment, and Judicial Anti-Urbanism: The Strange Case of Virginia v Hicks.” Urban Geography 26 (7): 565–586.
  • Mitchell, D. 2010. “Review of K. Iveson Publics and the City.” Progress in Human Geography 34 (1): 133–136.
  • National Committee on Uniform Traffic Laws and Ordinances. 1972. Traffic Laws Annotated. Charlottesville, VA: The Michie Company.
  • Nelkin, D. 2009. “Law, Liability, and Culture.” In Fault Lines: Tort Law and Cultural Practice, edited by D. Engel and M. McCann, 21–38. Stanford, CA: Stanford Law Book.
  • Norton, P. 2007. “Street Rivals: Jaywalking and the Invention of the Motor Age Street.” Technology and Culture 48 (2): 331–359.
  • Ohio Legislative Service Commission. 2003. “Bill Analysis: Senate Bill 106.” Accessed March 1, 2013. http://www.lsc.state.oh.us
  • Owen, D. 1995. “Why Philosophy Matters to Tort Law.” In Philosophical Foundations of Tort Law, edited by D. Owen, 1–28. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: The Harvard University Press.
  • Robyn Gordon v. Terrance Dziak (No. 88882, Eight Appellate District, Ohio-570, February 14, 2008, Decided).
  • Sheller, M., and J. Urry. 2000. “The City and the Car.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 24 (4): 737–756.
  • Short, J. R., and L. M. Pinet-Peralta. 2009. “No Accident: Traffic and Pedestrians in the Modern City.” Mobilities 5 (1): 41–59.
  • Simons, K. 1995. “Contributory Negligence: Conceptual and Normative Issues.” In Philosophical Foundations of Tort Law, edited by D. Owen, 461–485. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Staeheli, L., and D. Mitchell. 2008. The People’s Property: Power, Politics, and the Public. New York: Routledge.
  • State of Ohio, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Goldie L. Huston, Defendant-Appellant. (No. 04AP-466, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Tenth Appellate District, Franklin County, November 16, 2004).
  • The City of East Cleveland v. Wald (No. 16762Supreme Court of Ohio, 103 Ohio St. 373; 133 N.E. 798; November 9, 1921, Decided).
  • Tina M. Ballash et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Ohio Department of Transportation et al., Defendants-Appellees No. 01AP-668 (Court of Appeals of Ohio, Tenth Appellate District, Franklin County, 2002 Ohio 620; February 19, 2002, Decided).
  • United States Department of Transportation. 2011. Summary of Travel Trends: 2009 National Household Travel Survey. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
  • Wasylina Molodylo, Appellee v. Dean C. Kent, Appellant (No. 37758, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth Appellate District, Cuyahoga County, January 25, 1979).
  • Wright, R. 1995. “Right, Justice and Tort Law.” In Philosophical Foundations of Tort Law, edited by D. Owen, 1–28. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Zahra Saade, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William K. Westley, Defendant-Appellee (No. 50637, Court of Appeals, Eighth Appellate District of Ohio, Cuyahoga County, Ohio, May 15, 1986).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.