Mundane intermodality: a comparative analysis of bike-renting practices

References

• Akrich, M. 1992. “The De-Scription of Technical Objects.” In Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, edited by W. E. Bijker and J. Law, 204–224. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Behrendt, F. 2013. “Smart E-Bikes as Digital Networks Scenario of Future Mobilities, E-Mobility, Immobility and Alt-Mobility.” paper presented at the Mobility Futures Conference, Lancaster, UK, September 4 –6.
   Google Scholar
• Büscher, M., and J. Urry. 2009. “Mobile Methods and the Empirical.” European Journal of Social Theory 12 (1): 99–116. doi:10.1177/1368431008099642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Büscher, M., J. Urry, and K. Witchger. 2011. Mobile Methods. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M. 1986a. “The Sociology of an Actor-Network: The Case of the Electric Vehicle.” In Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology: Sociology of Science in the Real World, edited by M. Callon, A. Rip, and J. Law, 19–34. London: Macmillan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M. 1986b. “Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay.” In Power, Action, and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? edited by J. Law, 196–223. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Calvignac, C., and F. Cochoy. 2016. “From “Market Agencements” to “Vehicular Agencies”: Insights from the Quantitative Observation of Consumer Logistics.” Consumption Markets & Culture 19 (1): 133–147. doi:10.1080/10253866.2015.1067617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherry, C., and R. Cervero. 2007. “Use Characteristics and Mode Choice Behavior of Electric Bike Users in China.” Transport Policy 14 (3): 247–257. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.02.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochoy, F. 2008. “Calculation, Qualculation, Calqulation: Shopping Cart Arithmetic, Equipped Cognition and the Clustered Consumer.” Marketing Theory 8 (1): 15–44. doi:10.1177/1470593107086483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochoy, F. 2011. Sociologie d’un « curiositif »,Smartphone, code-barres 2D et self-marketing, Lormont, Le Bord de l’Eau.
   Google Scholar
• Cochoy, F., J. Hagberg, and R. Canu. 2015. “The Forgotten Role of Pedestrian Transportation in Urban Life: Insights from a Visual Comparative Archaeology (Gothenburg and Toulouse, 1875–2011).” Urban Studies 52 (12): 2267–2286. doi:10.1177/0042098014544760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochoy, F., D. Normark, J. Hagberg, and H. Ducourant, 2016. “Funny Bikes: A Symmetrical Study of Urban Space, Vehicular Units and Mobility through the Voyeuristic Spokesperson of A Video Lens.”In IVSA 2016 Annual Conference, Visualizing Sustainability: IMAGINED FUTURES, June 22–24, 2016. Lillehammer: Norw ay.
   Google Scholar
• Cochoy, F. J., H. D. Normark, H. Ducourant, U. Holmberg, and C. Calvignac. 2017. “Bicycles, Cyclists and Loads: A Comparative Analysis of Cycling Practices in Gothenburg and Toulouse.” Applied Mobilities. doi:10.1080/23800127.2017.1347026.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, P. 2013. “E-Mobility, Immobility and Alt-Mobility.” paper presented at the Mobility Futures Conference, Lancaster, UK, September 4 –6.
   Google Scholar
• Crabtree, A. 2000. “Remarks on the Social Organisation of Space and Place.” Journal of Mundane Behaviour 1 (1): 25–44.
   Google Scholar
• Dewsbury, J. D., P. Harrison, M. Rose, and J. Wylie. 2002. “Enacting Geographies.” Geoforum 33 (4): 437–440. doi:10.1016/s0016-7185(02)00029-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dujarier, M.-A. 2008. Le Travail du Consommateur, de Mcdo à eBay: Comment Nous Coproduisons ce que Nous Achetons. Paris: La Découverte.
   Google Scholar
• Fishman, E., S. Washington, and N. Haworth. 2013. “Bike Share: A Synthesis of the Literature.” Transport Reviews 33 (2): 148–165. doi:10.1080/01441647.2013.775612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Palomares, J. C., J. Gutiérrez, and M. Latorre. 2012. “Optimizing the Location of Stations in Bike-Sharing Programs: A GIS Approach.” Applied Geography 35 (1): 235–246. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H. 2002. Ethnomethodology’s Program: Working Out Durkheim’s Aphorism. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H., and E. Livingston. 2003. “Phenomenal Field Properties of Order in Formatted Queues and Their Neglected Standing in the Current Situation of Inquiry.” Visual Studies 18 (1): 21–28. doi:10.1080/147258603200010029.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. 1971. Relations in Public: Microstudies of the Public Order. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hagberg, J., and D. Normark. 2015. “From Basket to Shopping Bag: Retailers’ Role in the Transformation of Consumer Mobility in Sweden, 1941–1970.” Journal of Historical Research in Marketing 7 (4): 452–475. doi:10.1108/JHRM-06-2014-0016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannam, K., M. Sheller, and J. Urry. 2006. “Mobilities, Immobilities and Moorings.” Mobilities 1 (1): 1–22. doi:10.1080/17450100500489189.
   Google Scholar
• Hansson, N. 2015. ““Mobility-Things” and Consumption: Conceptualizing Differently Mobile Families on the Move with Recent Purchases in Urban Space.” Consumption Markets & Culture 18 (1): 72–91. doi:10.1080/10253866.2014.899494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, C., J. Hindmarsh, and P. Luff. 2010. Video in Qualitative Research: Analysing Social Interaction in Everyday Life. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Jäppinen, S., T. Toivonen, and M. Salonen. 2013. “Modelling the Potential Effect of Shared Bicycles on Public Transport Travel Times in Greater Helsinki: An Open Data Approach.” Applied Geography 43: 13–24. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.05.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, O. B. 2013. Staging Mobilities. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, P. 2005. “Performing the City: A Body and a Bicycle Take on Birmingham, UK.” Social & Cultural Geography 6 (6): 813–830. doi:10.1080/14649360500353046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, J.-C. 2011. Le Sac, un Petit Monde d’Amour. Paris: J.-C. Lattès.
   Google Scholar
• Lahire, B. 2011. The Plural Actor. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, J. 2017. “Bicycle Parking and Locking: Ethnography of Designs and Practices.” Mobilities 12 (1): 53–75. doi:10.1080/17450101.2014.993534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1991. Nous n’Avons Jamais été Modernes. Essai d’Anthropologie Symétrique. Paris: La Découverte.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1992. Aramis, ou, l’Amour des Techniques. Paris: La Découverte.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1996. “On Interobjectivity.” Mind, Culture, and Activity 3 (4): 228–245. doi:10.1207/s15327884mca0304_2.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B., and E. Hermant. 1998. Paris, Ville Invisible. Paris: Les Empêcheurs de penser en Rond La Découverte.
   Google Scholar
• Laurier, E. 2014. “Capturing Motion: Video Set-Ups for Driving, Cycling and Walking.” In The Routledge Handbook of Mobilities, edited by P. Adey, D. Bissell, K. Hannam, P. Merriman, and M. Sheller, 493–502. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, M. 2016. “‘It’s on Video, Every Second of It’: A Micro-Sociological Analysis of Cycle Rage.” Visual Studies 31 (3): 206–220. doi:10.1080/1472586X.2016.1209986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López-Pumarejo, T. 2011. “Urban Consumers on Two Wheels: Metropolitan Bike-Sharing Schemes and Outdoor Advertising in Paris, Montreal, New York, and San Juan.” Transfers 1 (3): 90–112. doi:10.3167/trans.2011.010306.
   Google Scholar
• Mauss, M. 2002. The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McIlvenny, P. 2014. “Vélomobile Formations-in-Action: Biking and Talking Together.” Space and Culture 17 (2): 137–156. doi:10.1177/1206331213508494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeil, N., J. Broach, and J. Dill. 2018. “Breaking Barriers to Bike Share: Lessons on Bike Share Equity.” Institute of Transportation Engineers. ITE Journal 88 (2): 31–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michael, M. 2000. Reconnecting Culture, Technology and Nature: From Society to Heterogeneity. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. 1993. “ Les Artefacts Cognitifs”, Raisons Pratiques, N° 4, les objets dans l’Action. Paris: Presses de l’EHESS.
   Google Scholar
• Normark, D. 2006. “Tending to Mobility: Intensities of Staying at the Petrol Station.” Environment and Planning A 38 (2): 241–252. doi:10.1068/a37280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pink, S. 2007. Doing Visual Ethnography: Images, Media and Representation in Research. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Raviv, T., and O. Kolka. 2013. “Optimal Inventory Management of a Bike-Sharing Station.” IIE Transactions 45 (10): 1077–1093. doi:10.1080/0740817X.2013.770186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinney, J. 2010. “Performing Resistance? Re-Reading Practices of Urban Cycling on London’s South Bank.” Environment and Planning A 42 (12): 2914–2937. doi:10.1068/a43149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinney, J., and W. Lin. 2018. “Are You Being Shared? Mobility, Data and Social Relations in Shanghai’s Public Bike Sharing 2.0 Sector.” Applied Mobilities 3 (1): 66–83. doi:10.1080/23800127.2018.1437656.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, L. 1987. Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thrift, N. 2011. “Lifeworld Inc-And What to Do about It.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 29 (1): 5–26. doi:10.1068/d0310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tironi, M. 2013. “Usagers, Technologie Et Mobilité Durable: Le Cas Du Vélo En Libre-Service À Paris.” Thèse de doctorat, Centre de Sociologie de l’Innovation, Paris, ENSMP.
   Google Scholar
• Urry, J. 2007. Mobilities. Oxford: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vidalis, S., F. Najafi, D. Chernick, J. Jackson, J. Parker, and S. Ryland. 2010. “Modern Analysis of Bike Sharing Feasibility.” International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences 4 (11): 1–15. doi:10.18848/1833-1882/CGP/v04i11/53037.
   Google Scholar
• Whyte, W. H., and P. Underhill. 2009 [1988]. City: Rediscovering the Center. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Woolgar, S. 1990. “Configuring the User: The Case of Usability Trials.” The Sociological Review 38 (S1): 58–99. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.1990.tb03349.x.
   Google Scholar
• Wylie, J. 2002. “An Essay on Ascending Glastonbury Tor.” Geoforum 33 (4): 441–454. doi:10.1016/S0016-7185(02)00033-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar