Walking with technology: understanding mobility-technology assemblages

References

• Adey, P. 2012. “How to Engage? Assemblage as Ethos/Ethos as Assemblage.” Dialogues in Human Geography 2 (2): 198–201. doi:10.1177/2043820612449289.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, B. 2009. “Affective Atmospheres.” Emotion, Space and Society 2 (2): 77–81. doi:10.1016/j.emospa.2009.08.005.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, B., and C. McFarlane. 2011. “Assemblage and Geography.” Area 43 (2): 124–127. doi:10.1111/area.2011.43.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, B., M. Kearnes, C. McFarlane, and D. Swanton. 2012. “On Assemblages and Geography.” Dialogues in Human Geography 2 (2): 171–189. doi:10.1177/2043820612449261.
   Google Scholar
• BBC News. 2017. “Crossing lights for smartphone zombies.” https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/technology-38992655/crossing-lights-for-smartphone-zombies
   Google Scholar
• Bendiner-Viani, G. 2005. “Walking, Emotion, and Dwelling: Guided Tours in Prospect Heights, Brooklyn.” Space and Culture 8 (4): 459–471. doi:10.1177/1206331205280144.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, J. 2010. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Birenboim, A., and N. Shoval. 2016. “Mobility Research in the Age of the Smartphone.” Annals of the American Association of Geographers 106 (2): 283–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bissell, D. 2010. “Vibrating Materialities: Mobility–Body–Technology Relations.” Area 42 (4): 479–486. doi:10.1111/area.2010.42.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bissell, D. 2018. Transit Life: How Commuting Is Transforming Our Cities. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Casey, E. S. 2001. “Between Geography and Philosophy: What Does It Mean to Be in the Place-World?” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 91 (4): 683–693. doi:10.1111/0004-5608.00266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connolly, W. E. 2005. Pluralism. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, S., J. Shaw, and P. Simpson. 2016. “Jography: Exploring Meanings, Experiences and Spatialities of Recreational Road-Running.” Mobilities 11 (5): 744–769. doi:10.1080/17450101.2015.1034455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cresswell, T., and C. Martin. 2012. “On Turbulence: Entanglements of Disorder and Order on a Devon Beach.” Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie 103 (5): 516–529. doi:10.1111/tesg.2012.103.issue-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Currier, D. 2003. “Feminist Technological Futures: Deleuze and Body/Technology Assemblages.” Feminist Theory 4 (3): 321–338. doi:10.1177/14647001030043005.
   Google Scholar
• de Souza e Silva, A. 2006. “From Cyber to Hybrid: Mobile Technologies as Interfaces of Hybrid Spaces.” Space and Culture 9 (3): 261–278.
   Google Scholar
• Degen, M. M., and G. Rose. 2012. “The Sensory Experiencing of Urban Design: The Role of Walking and Perceptual Memory.” Urban Studies 49 (15): 3271–3287. doi:10.1177/0042098012440463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLanda, M. 2006. A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., and C. Parnet. 1987. Dialogues. London: Athlone.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 1987. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• DeLyser, D., and D. Sui. 2013. “Crossing the Qualitative-Quantitative Divide II: Inventive Approaches to Big Data, Mobile Methods, and Rhythmanalysis.” Progress in Human Geography 37 (2): 293–305. doi:10.1177/0309132512444063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewsbury, J. D. 2011. “The Deleuze‐Guattarian Assemblage: Plastic Habits.” Area 43 (2): 148–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duggan, M. 2017. “Questioning “Digital Ethnography” in an Era of Ubiquitous Computing.” Geography Compass 11 (5). doi:10.1111/gec3.12313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edensor, T. 2011. “Entangled Agencies, Material Networks and Repair in a Building Assemblage: The Mutable Stone of St Ann’s Church, Manchester.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 36 (2): 238–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ek, R. 2013. “Topologies of Human-Mobile Assemblages.” In Mobile Technology and Place, edited by R. Wilken and R. Goggin, 51–66. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Farías, I., and T. Bender. 2012. Urban Assemblages: How Actor-Network Theory Changes Urban Studies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1986. “Of Other Spaces.” Diacritics 16 (1): 22–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilmore, J. N. 2016. “Everywear: The Quantified Self and Wearable Fitness Technologies.” New Media & Society 18 (11): 2524–2539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grieco, M., and J. Urry. 2016. Mobilities: New Perspectives on Transport and Society. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hadfield-Hill, S., and C. Zara. 2018. “Being Participatory through the Use of App-Based Research Tools.” In Being Participatory: Researching with Children and Young People, edited by I. Coyne and B. Carter, 147–169. Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Haggerty, K. D., and R. V. Ericson. 2000. “The Surveillant Assemblage.” The British Journal of Sociology 51 (4): 605–622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannam, K., M. Sheller, and J. Urry. 2006. “Mobilities, Immobilities and Moorings.” Mobilities 1 (1): 1–22. doi:10.1080/17450100500489189.
   Google Scholar
• Heidegger, M. 1962. Being and Time. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Herman, A., J. Hadlaw, and T. Swiss. 2014. Theories of the Mobile Internet: Materialities and Imaginaries. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Holton, M., and N. Harmer. 2019. “‘You Don’t Want to Peer over People’s Shoulders, It Feels Too Rude!’: The Moral Geographies of Using Participants’ Personal Smartphones in Research.” Area 51 (1): 134–141. doi:10.1111/area.12425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, O. B., M. Sheller, and S. Wind. 2015. “Together and Apart: Affective Ambiences and Negotiation in Families’ Everyday Life and Mobility.” Mobilities 10 (3): 363–382. doi:10.1080/17450101.2013.868158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalin, J., and J. Frith. 2016. “Wearing the City: Memory P(A)Laces, Smartphones, and the Rhetorical Invention of Embodied Space.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 46 (3): 222–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinsley, S. 2014. “The Matter of ‘Virtual’ Geographies.” Progress in Human Geography 38 (3): 364–384. doi:10.1177/0309132513506270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kusenbach, M. 2003. “Street Phenomenology: The Go-Along as Ethnographic Research Tool.” Ethnography 4 (3): 455–485. doi:10.1177/146613810343007.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1992. “Where are the Missing Masses? the Sociology of a Few Mundane Artefacts.” In Shaping Technology/Building Society, edited by W. E. Bijker and J. Law, 205–224. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2002. “Morality and Technology: The End of the Means.” Theory, Culture and Society 19 (5–6): 247–260. doi:10.1177/026327602761899246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2004. Politics of Nature. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laurier, E., B. Brown, and M. McGregor. 2016. “Mediated Pedestrian Mobility: Walking and the Map App.” Mobilities 11 (1): 117–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law, J. 2004. After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. 1991a. Critique of Everyday Life: Foundations for a Sociology of the Everyday. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. 1991b. The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. 2004. Rhythmanalysis: Space, Time and Everyday Life. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Legg, S. 2011. “Assemblage/Apparatus: Using Deleuze and Foucault.” Area 43 (2): 128–133. doi:10.1111/area.2011.43.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukinbeal, C. 2005. “Cinematic Landscapes.” Journal of Cultural Geography 23 (1): 3–22. doi:10.1080/08873630509478229.
   Google Scholar
• Lund, K. 2012. “Landscapes and Narratives: Compositions and the Walking Body.” Landscape Research 37 (2): 225–237. doi:10.1080/01426397.2011.651111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. 2013. “The Digital Cyborg Assemblage: Haraway’s Cyborg Theory and the New Digital Health Technologies.” In The Handbook of Social Theory for the Sociology of Health and Medicine, edited by F. Collyer, 567–581. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. 1962. Phenomenology of Perception. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. 1968. The Visible and the Invisible: Followed by Working Notes. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Middleton, J. 2010. “Sense and the City: Exploring the Embodied Geographies of Urban Walking.” Social & Cultural Geography 11 (6): 575–596. doi:10.1080/14649365.2010.497913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Middleton, J. 2011. “Walking in the City: The Geographies of Everyday Pedestrian Practices.” Geography Compass 5 (2): 90–105. doi:10.1111/geco.2011.5.issue-2.
   Google Scholar
• Millward, H., J. Spinney, and D. Scott. 2013. “Active-Transport Walking Behavior: Destinations, Durations, Distances.” Journal of Transport Geography 28: 101–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, M. 2015. “Assemblages and Actor‐Networks: Rethinking Socio‐Material Power, Politics and Space.” Geography Compass 9 (1): 27–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, M., and C. Schurr. 2016. “Assemblage Thinking and Actor‐Network Theory: Conjunctions, Disjunctions, Cross‐Fertilisations.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 41 (3): 217–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neff, G., and D. Nafus. 2016. Self-Tracking. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Relph, E. 1976. Place and Placelessness. London: Pion.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, I., and R. Wilken. 2009. “Haptic Vision, Footwork, Place-Making: A Peripatetic Phenomenology of the Mobile Phone Pedestrian.” Second Nature: International Journal of Creative Media 1 (2): 22–41.
   Google Scholar
• Rink, B. M., and A. S. Gamedze. 2016. “Mobility and the City Improvement District: Frictions in the Human-Capital Mobile Assemblage.” Mobilities 11 (5): 643–661. doi:10.1080/17450101.2015.1053716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, G. 2012. Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to Researching with Visual Material. 3rd ed. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Salter, M. B. 2013. “To Make Move and Let Stop: Mobility and the Assemblage of Circulation.” Mobilities 8 (1): 7–19. doi:10.1080/17450101.2012.747779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheller, M., and J. Urry. 2006. “The New Mobilities Paradigm.” Environment and Planning A 38 (2): 207–226. doi:10.1068/a37268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solnit, R. 2006. A Field Guide to Getting Lost. Edinburgh: Canongate Books.
   Google Scholar
• Spinoza, B. 1996. Ethics. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, T. L. 2009. “The Assemblage of Play.” Games and Culture 4 (4): 331–339. doi:10.1177/1555412009343576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilley, C. 2008. Body and Image: Explorations in Landscape Phenomenology 2. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Doorn, N. 2013. “Assembling the Affective Field: How Smartphone Technology Impacts Ethnographic Research Practice.” Qualitative Inquiry 19 (5): 385–396. doi:10.1177/1077800413479566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waterton, E., and J. Dittmer. 2014. “The Museum as Assemblage: Bringing Forth Affect at the Australian War Memorial.” Museum Management and Curatorship 29 (2): 122–139. doi:10.1080/09647775.2014.888819.
   Google Scholar
• Woolf, V. 2013 [1930]. Street Haunting: A London Adventure. Redditch: Read Books Limited.
   Google Scholar