An agenda for creative practice in the new mobilities paradigm

References

• Aceti, Lanfranco, Hana Iverson, and Mimi Sheller. 2016. “L.A. Re.Play: Mobile Network Culture in Placemaking.” Leonardo Electronic Almanac 21 (1): 14–27.
   Google Scholar
• Back, Les, and Nirmal Purwar. 2012. Live Methods, Blackwell, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, Karen. 2003. “Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 28 (3): 801–831. doi:10.1086/345321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, Estelle. 2007. “Introduction.” In Practice as Research: Approaches to Creative Arts Enquiry, edited by Estelle Barrett and Barbara Bolt, 1–14. London: I. B. Tauris.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, Estelle, and Barbara Bolt. 2007. Practice as Research: Approaches to Creative Arts Enquiry. London: I. B. Tauris.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, Kaya. 2020. “Creative Arts Practice in Mobilities.” In Handbook on Research Methods and Applications for Mobilities, edited by Monika Busher, Malene Freudendal-Pederson, and Sven Kesselring. Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, Kaya, and Jondi Keane. 2020. Creative Measures of the Anthropocene: Art, Mobilities and Participatory Geographies. Cham: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Bhabha, Jacqueline, ed. 2011. Children without a State: A Global Human Rights Challenge. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya, Diti, and Kaya Barry. 2021. “On Orientations and Adjustments: An Exploration of Walking, Wandering and Wayfinding in Brisbane – Meanjin.” Australian Geographer 52 (3): 257–272. doi:10.1080/00049182.2021.1969786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, Claire. 2006. Participation. London: Whitechapel Gallery.
   Google Scholar
• Bourriaud, Nicolas. 2002. Relational Aesthetics: Collection Documents Sur L’art. Dijon: Les Presses Du Réel.
   Google Scholar
• Buscher, Monika, Urry John, and Witchger Katian. 2011. Mobile Methods. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Büscher, Monika, Mimi Sheller, and David Tyfield. 2016. “Mobility Intersections: social Research, Social Futures.” Mobilities 11 (4): 485–497. doi:10.1080/17450101.2016.1211818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Büscher, Monika, Margit, Kristensenand Preben Mogensen. 2007. “Making the Future Palpable: Notes from a Major Incident Future Laboratory.” In: ISCRAM 2007 Academic Proceedings Papers, edited by Van de Walle, Bartel, Paul Burghardt, and Kees Nieuwenhuis. Delft, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Büscher, Monika. 2006. “Vision in Motion.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 38 (2): 281–299. doi:10.1068/a37277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clement, Susannah, and Gordon Waitt. 2018. “Pram Mobilities: affordances and Atmospheres That Assemble Childhood and Motherhood On-the-Move.” Children’s Geographies 16 (3): 252–265. doi:10.1080/14733285.2018.1432849.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, Rosalina Pisco, Catarina Sales Oliveira, and A Marcia Barbosa. 2020. “Desenhando a mobilidade. A potencialidade do sketching nos estudos de mobilidade.” Forum Sociológico 36: 67–76. CESNOVA. doi:10.4000/sociologico.9216.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, Nigel. 2006. Designerly Ways of Knowing. London: Springer London.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, Heather, and Etienne Turpin, eds. 2015. Art in the Anthropocene. London: Open Humanities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edensor, Tim, and Shanti Sumartojo. 2018. “Reconfiguring Familiar Worlds With Light Projection: The Gertrude Street Projection Festival, 2017.” GeoHumanities 4 (1): 112–131. doi:10.1080/2373566X.2018.1446760.
   Google Scholar
• Edensor, Tim, ed. 2010. Geographies of Rhythm: Nature, Place, Mobilities and Bodies. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Farman, Jason. 2012. Mobile Interface Theory: Embodied Space and Locative Media. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Felt, Ulrike, and Brian Wynne. 2007. Taking European Knowledge Society Seriously. Report of the Expert Group on Science and Governance to the Science, Economy and Society Directorate, Directorate-General for Research, European Commission. Luxemborg: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Frieling, Rudolph. 2008. “Toward Participation in Art.” In The Art of Participation 1950 to Now. New York: Thames and Hudson.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, Gilian, and Ross Harvey. 2004. Aviopolis: A Book about Airports. London: Black Dog Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Gerlach, Joe. 2013. “Lines, Contours and Legends Coordinates for Vernacular Mapping.” Progress in Human Geography 38 (1): 22–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groys, Boris. 2008. “A Genealogy of Participatory Art.” In The Art of Participation 1950 to Now. New York: Thames and Hudson.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, Harriet. 2019. “Geography’s Creative (Re)Turn: Toward a Critical Framework.” Progress in Human Geography 43 (6): 963–984. doi:10.1177/0309132518804341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper, Douglas. 2012. Visual Sociology. Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Heddon, Deirdre, and Myers. Misha. 2017. “The Walking Library: Mobilizing Books, Places, Readers and Reading.” Performance Research 22 (1): 32–48. doi:10.1080/13528165.2017.1285560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hieslmair, Michael, and Michael Zinganel. 2018. “Stop and Go: Investigating Nodes of Transofmration and Transition.” In Envisioning Networked Urban Mobilities: Art, Performances, Impacts, edited by Aslak Aamot Kjaerulff, Sven Kesselring, Peter Peters, and Kevin Hannam, 96–108. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hjorth, Larisa, Adriana de Souza e Silva, and Lanson Klare, eds. 2020. The Routledge Companion to Mobile Media Art. 1st ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, Ainsley, and Kathy Mee. 2018. “Journeys Unknown: Embodiment, Affect, and Living With Being ‘Lost’ and ‘Found’.” Geography Compass 12 (6): e12372. doi:10.1111/gec3.12372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingold, Tim, and Joe Lee Vergunst. 2008. Ways of Walking. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, Ole B. 2021. “Pandemic Disruption, Extended Bodies, and Elastic situations - Reflections on COVID-19 and Mobilities.” Mobilities 16 (1): 66–80. doi:10.1080/17450101.2021.1867296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaprow, Allan, and Jeff Kelley. 1993. Essays on the Blurring of Art and Life. Berkley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kara, Helen. 2015. Creative Research Methods in the Social Sciences. Bristol: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kester, Grant H. 2004. Conversation Pieces: Community and Communication in Modern Art. Berkeley, Calif. and London: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kjaerulff, Aslak Aamot, Sven Kesselring, Peter Peters, and Kevin Hannam, eds. 2018. Envisioning Networked Urban Mobilities: Art, Performances, Impacts. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lacy, Suzanne, ed. 1995. Mapping the Terrain: New Genre Public Art. Seattle, Washington: Bay Press.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, Jonas, and John Urry. 2011. “Gazing and Performing.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 29 (6): 1110–1125. doi:10.1068/d21410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 2018. Down to Earth: Politics in the New Climatic Regime. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Law, John, and, John Urry. 2004. “Enacting the Social.” Economy and Society 33 (3): 390–410. doi:10.1080/0308514042000225716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leavy, Patricia. 2015. Method Meets Art: Arts-Based Research Practice. New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lorimer, Hayden. 2011. “Walking: New Forms and Spaces for Studies of Pedestrianism.” In Geographies of Mobilities: Practices, Spaces, Subjects, edited by Tim Cresswell and Peter Merriman. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Lury, Celia, and, Wakeford Nina. 2012. Inventive Methods: The Happening of the Social. London. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, Gavin. 2014. “Moving Bodies and the Map: relational and Absolute Conceptions of Space in GPS Based Art.” Acoustic Space 12: 167–177.
   Google Scholar
• Marres, Noortje, Michael Guggenheim, and Alex Wilkie. 2018. Inventing the Social. Mattering Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mekdjian, Sarah. 2015. “Mapping Mobile Borders: Critical Cartographies of Borders Based on Migration Experiences.” In: Borderities and the Politics of Contemporary Mobile Borders, 204–223. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Merriman, Peter, and Catrin Webster. 2009. “Travel Projects: Landscape, Art, Movement.” Cultural Geographies 16 (4): 525–535. doi:10.1177/1474474009340120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, Lesley, and Sara Upstone. 2014. Researching & Representing Mobilities: Transdisciplinary Encounters. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan
   Google Scholar
• Myers, Misha. 2011. “Walking Again Lively: Towards an Ambulant and Conversive Methodology of Performance and Research.” Mobilities 6 (2): 183–201. doi:10.1080/17450101.2011.552775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pase, Andrea, Laura Lo Presti, Tania Rossetto, and Giada Peterle. 2021. “Pandemic Cartographies: A Conversation on Mappings, Imaginings and Emotions.” Mobilities 16 (1): 134–153. doi:10.1080/17450101.2020.1866319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, Peter. 2017. “On Becoming a Parcel: Artistic Interventions as Ways of Knowing Mobile Worlds.” In Envisioning Networked Urban Mobilities: Art, Performances, Impacts, edited by Aslak Aamot Kjaerulff, Sven Kesselring, Peter Peters, and Kevin Hannam, 26–37. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsey, Kevin. 2008. “A Call for Agonism: GIS AND THE Politics of Collaboration.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 40 (10): 2346–2363. doi:10.1068/a4028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, Gillian. 2014. “On the Relation Between ‘Visual Research Methods’ and Contemporary Visual Culture.” The Sociological Review 62 (1): 24–46. doi:10.1111/1467-954X.12109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumsby, Charlie. 2020. “Retrospective (Re)Presentation: Turning the Written Ethnographic Text into an ‘Ethno-Graphic’.” Entanglements Journal 3: 7–27. ISSN 2516–5860
   Google Scholar
• Serota, Nicholas. 2018. “The Arts Have a Leading Role to Play in Tackling Climate Change.” The Guardian, November 20. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/nov/20/arts-climate-change.
   Google Scholar
• Schewel, Kerylin. 2020. “Understanding Immobility: Moving beyond the Mobility Bias in Migration Studies.” International Migration Review 54 (2): 328–355. doi:10.1177/0197918319831952.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheller, Mimi. 2014. “The New Mobilities Paradigm for a Live Sociology.” Current Sociology 62 (6): 789–811. doi:10.1177/0011392114533211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheller, Mimi, and John Urry. 2006. “The New Mobilities Paradigm.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 38 (2): 207–226. doi:10.1068/a37268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simone, Abdoumaliq, and Edgar Pieterse. 2018. New Urban Worlds: Inhabiting Dissonant Times. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Southern, Jen. 2012. “Comobility: How Proximity and Distance Travel Together in Locative Media.” Canadian Journal of Communication 37 (1): 75–91. doi:10.22230/cjc.2012v37n1a2512.
   Google Scholar
• Southern, Jen, and Chris Speed. 2015. “Sharing Occasions at a Distance: The Different Dimensions of Comobility.” In Moving Sites: Investigating Site Specific Dance Performance, edited by Victoria Hunter. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stansfield, Allison. 2018. “A Spectrum of Experience: A Community Art Project to Build Empathy Through Identity Sharing in a Suburban High School.” Master thesis, Lesley University.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, Lucy, Randall Trigg, and Jeanette Blomberg. 2002. “Working Artefacts: ethnomethods of the Prototype.” The British Journal of Sociology 53 (2): 163–179. 10.1080/00071310220133287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, Graeme. 2010. Art Practice as Research: Inquiry in Visual Arts. 2nd ed. Los Angeles: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Sunderland, Naomi., Helen Bristed, Ori Gudes, Jennifer Boddy, and M. Da Silva. 2012. “What Does It Feel like to Live Here? Exploring Sensory Ethnography as a Collaborative Methodology for Investigating Social Determinants of Health in Place.” Health & Place 18 (5): 1056–1067. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2012.05.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trandberg Jensen, Martin. 2018. “Urban Pram Strolling: A Mobilities Design Perspective.” Mobilities 13 (4): 584–600. doi:10.1080/17450101.2017.1394683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verran, Helen. 1998. “Re-Imagining Land Ownership in Australia.” Postcolonial Studies 1 (2): 237–254. doi:10.1080/13688799890165.
   Google Scholar
• Witzgall, Susanne, Gerlinde Vogl, and Sven Kesselring, eds. 2013. New Mobilities Regimes in Art and Social Sciences. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar