Making and breaking links: the transformative potential of shared mobility from a practice theories perspective

References

• Andor, Mark A., Andreas Gerster, Kenneth T. Gillingham, and Marco Horvath. 2020. “Running a Car Costs Much More than People Think – Stalling the Uptake of Green Travel.” Nature 580 (7804): 453–455. doi:10.1038/d41586-020-01118-w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, Sophia, and Clemens Rudolf. 2018. “Exploring the Potential of Free Cargo-Bikesharing for Sustainable Mobility.” GAIA – Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 27 (1): 156–164. doi:10.14512/gaia.27.1.11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellotti, Elisa, and Emanuela Mora. 2016. “Networks of Practices in Critical Consumption.” Journal of Consumer Culture 16 (3): 718–760. doi:10.1177/1469540514536191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blue, Stanley. 2019. “Institutional Rhythms: Combining Practice Theory and Rhythmanalysis to Conceptualise Processes of Institutionalisation.” Time & Society 28 (3): 922–950. doi:10.1177/0961463X17702165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blue, Stanley, Elizabeth Shove, Chris Carmona, and Michael P. Kelly. 2016. “Theories of Practice and Public Health: Understanding (Un)Healthy Practices.” Critical Public Health 26 (1): 36–50. doi:10.1080/09581596.2014.980396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blue, Stanley, Elizabeth Shove, and Peter Forman. 2020. “Conceptualising Flexibility: Challenging Representations of Time and Society in the Energy Sector.” Time & Society 29 (4): 923–944. doi:10.1177/0961463X20905479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blue, Stanley, and Nicola Spurling. 2017. “Qualities of Connective Tissue in Hospital Life. How Complexes of Practice Change.” In The nexus of practices. Connections, constellations and practitioners, edited by Allison Hui, Theodore R. Schatzki and Elizabeth Shove, 24–37. London, New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Bongardt Daniel, Creutzig Felix, Hüging Hanna, Sakamoto Ko, Bakker Stefan Gota, Sudhir. and Böhler-Baedeker Susanne. 2013. Low-Carbon Land Transport: Policy Handbook. London: Taylor and Francis. doi:10.4324/9780203071229.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre. 1990. The Logic of Practice. Oxford, UK: B. Blackwell; Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brand, Karl-Werner. 2011. “Umweltsoziologie und der praxistheoretische Zugang.” In Handbuch Umweltsoziologie, edited by Matthias Gross, 173–198. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Brand, Ulrich, and Markus Wissen. 2021. The Imperial Mode of Living: Everyday Life and the Ecological Crisis of Capitalism. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Buehler, Ralph. 2012. “Determinants of Bicycle Commuting in the Washington, DC Region: The Role of Bicycle Parking, Cyclist Showers, and Free Car Parking at Work.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 17 (7): 525–531. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2012.06.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canzler, Weert. 2021. “Abschied Vom Auto?” In Soziologie der Nachhaltigkeit edited by SONA-Netzwerk Soziologie der Nachhaltigkeit, 403–416. Bielefeld: Transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Castelo, Aricia F. M., Martina Schäfer, and Minelle E. Silva. 2021. “Food Practices as Part of Daily Routines: A Conceptual Framework for Analysing Networks of Practices.” Appetite 157: 104978. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2020.104978.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceccato, Riccardo, Andrea Chicco, and Marco Diana. 2021. “Evaluating Car-Sharing Switching Rates from Traditional Transport Means Through Logit Models and Random Forest Classifiers.” Transportation Planning and Technology 44 (2): 160–175. doi:10.1080/03081060.2020.1868084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decrop, Alain, Giacomo Del Chiappa, Jérôme Mallargé, and Pietro Zidda. 2018. “Couchsurfing Has Made Me a Better Person and the World a Better Place”: the Transformative Power of Collaborative Tourism Experiences.” Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing 35 (1): 57–72. doi:10.1080/10548408.2017.1307159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2020. “Sustainable & Smart Mobility Strategy. Putting European Transport on Track for the Future.” https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:5e601657-3b06-11eb-b27b-01aa75ed71a1.0001.02/DOC_1&format = PDF.
   Google Scholar
• European Environment Agency. 2021. “Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Transport in Europe.” Accessed 31 January 2022. https://www.eea.europa.eu/ims/greenhouse-gas-emissions-from-transport.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, Anthony. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration/Anthony Giddens. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Giesel, Flemming, and Claudia Nobis. 2016. “The Impact of Carsharing on Car Ownership in German Cities.” Transportation Research Procedia 19: 215–224. doi:10.1016/j.trpro.2016.12.082.
   Google Scholar
• Gossen, Maike, Jonas Pentzien, and Jan Peuckert. 2019. “What Use is It Really for Sustainability? Potentials and Impacts of Peer-to-Peer Sharing in the Domains of Accommodation and Mobility.” NachhaltigkeitsManagementForum 27 (2): 125–138. doi:10.1007/s00550-019-00488-8.
   Google Scholar
• Hartl, Barbara, Thomas Sabitzer, Eva Hofmann, and Elfriede Penz. 2018. “Sustainability is a Nice Bonus” the Role of Sustainability in Carsharing from a Consumer Perspective.” Journal of Cleaner Production 202: 88–100. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henckel, Dietrich. 2014. “Raumzeitpolitik: Zeitliche Dimensionen der Verkehrspolitik.” In Handbuch Verkehrspolitik, edited by Weert Canzler, Andreas Knie, and Oliver Schwedes, 1–18. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
   Google Scholar
• Hui, Allison, Theodore R. Schatzki, and Elizabeth Shove, eds. 2017. The Nexus of Practices: Connections, Constellations and Practitioners. 1st Edition. London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Jaeger-Erben, Melanie, Jana Rückert-John, and Martina Schäfer, eds. 2017. Soziale Innovationen für Nachhaltigen Konsum: Wissenschaftliche Perspektiven, Strategien der Förderung und Gelebte Praxis.. Wiesbaden: Springer VS (Innovation und Gesellschaft).
   Google Scholar
• Kent, Jennifer L. 2014. “Carsharing as Active Transport: What Are the Potential Health Benefits?” Journal of Transport & Health 1 (1): 54–62. doi:10.1016/j.jth.2013.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent, Jennifer L. 2022. “The Use of Practice Theory in Transport Research.” Transport Reviews 42 (2): 222–244. doi:10.1080/01441647.2021.1961918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent, Jennifer L., and Robyn Dowling. 2013. “Puncturing Automobility? Carsharing Practices.” Journal of Transport Geography 32: 86–92. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.08.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent, Jennifer L., and Robyn Dowling. 2018. “Commercial Car Sharing, Complaints and Coping: Does Sharing Need Willingness?” Urban Policy and Research 36 (4): 464–475. doi:10.1080/08111146.2018.1486297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loske, Reinhard. 2018. “Die Share Economy: Nachhaltigkeitstreiber oder Konsumstimulator? Politische Gestaltungsbedarfe in der Ökonomie des Teilens.” In Share Economy, edited by Nils Goldschmidt, Frank Schorkopf, and Julian Dörr, 171–197. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
   Google Scholar
• Ludmann, Sabrina. 2019. “Ökologische Betrachtung des Peer-to-Peer Sharing.” In Digitale Kultur des Teilens: Mit Sharing Nachhaltiger Wirtschaften, edited by Siegfried Behrendt, 71–94. Wiesbaden: Gabler.
   Google Scholar
• Manderscheid, Katharina. 2019. “The Logic of Couplings: A Quantitative Practice-Theoretical Perspective on Mobilities.” Swiss Journal of Sociology 45 (2): 161–183. doi:10.2478/sjs-2019-0008.
   Google Scholar
• Manderscheid, Katharina. 2021. “Nachhaltige Mobilität: Eine soziologische Dimensionalisierung.” In Soziologie der Nachhaltigkeit, edited by SONA -Netzwerk Soziologie der Nachhaltigkeit, 417–434. Bielefeld: Transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Mattioli, Giulio, Anable, Jillian, and Vrotsou, Katerina. 2016. “Car Dependent Practices: Findings from a Sequence Pattern Mining Study of UK Time Use Data.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 89: 56–72. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2016.04.010.
   Google Scholar
• Moreau, Hélie, Loïc de Jamblinne Meux, Vanessa Zeller, Pierre D’Ans, Coline Ruwet, and Wouter M. Achten. 2020. “Dockless E-Scooter: A Green Solution for Mobility? Comparative Case Study between Dockless E-Scooters, Displaced Transport, and Personal E-Scooters.” Sustainability 12 (5): 1803. doi:10.3390/su12051803.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Münzel, Karla, Wouter Boon, Koen Frenken, Jan Blomme, and Dennis van der Linden. 2020. “Explaining Carsharing Supply across Western European Cities.” International Journal of Sustainable Transportation 14 (4): 243–254. doi:10.1080/15568318.2018.1542756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nehrke, Gunnar, and Willi Loose. 2018. Nutzer und Mobilitätsverhalten in verschiedenen CarSharing-Varianten. Berlin: Bundesverband CarSharing.
   Google Scholar
• Piétron, Dominik, Anouk Ruhaak, and Valentin Niebler. 2021. Öffentliche Mobilitätsplattformen: Digitalpolitische Strategien für eine sozial-ökologische Mobilitätswende. Berlin: Institut für Gesellschaftsanalyse der Rosa-Luxemburg-Stiftung.
   Google Scholar
• Priddat, Birger P. 2015. “Share Economy: mehr Markt als Gemeinschaft.” Wirtschaftsdienst. Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik 95. (2): 98–101. doi: 10.1007/s10273-015-1785-z.
   Google Scholar
• Rammler, Stephan. 2016. “Nachhaltige Mobilität: Gestaltungsszenarien und Zukunftsbilder.” In Handbuch Verkehrspolitik: Mit 84 Abbildungen und 26 Tabellen, edited by Oliver Schwedes, Weert Canzler, and Andreas Knie. 899–918. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Reckwitz, Andreas. 2002. “Toward a Theory of Social Practices.” European Journal of Social Theory 5 (2): 243–263. doi:10.1177/13684310222225432.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, Louise, and Katherine Ellsworth-Krebs. 2019. “Nudge(Ography) and Practice Theories.” Progress in Human Geography 43 (2): 295–313. 030913251775077. doi:10.1177/0309132517750773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisch, Lucia, and Sabine Bietz. 2014. Zeit für Nachhaltigkeit – Zeiten der Transformation: Elemente einer Zeitpolitik für die gesellschaftliche Transformation zu nachhaltigeren Lebensstilen. Dessau-Roßlau: Umweltbundesamt.
   Google Scholar
• Riegler, Sebastian, Maria Juschten, Reinhard Hössinger, Regine Gerike, Rößger Lars, Bernhard Schlag, Wilko Manz, Christoph Rentschler, and Johanna Kopp. 2016. “CarSharing 2025 – Nische oder Mainstream?” https://www.ifmo.de/files/publications_content/2016/ifmo_2016_Carsharing_2025_de.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ruhrort, Lisa. 2019. Transformation im Verkehr: Erfolgsbedingungen für verkehrspolitische Schlüsselmaßnahmen. 1st ed. Berlin: VS Springer. Studien zur Mobilitäts- und Verkehrsforschung.
   Google Scholar
• Ruhrort, Lisa. 2020. “Reassessing the Role of Shared Mobility Services in a Transport Transition: Can They Contribute the Rise of an Alternative Socio-Technical Regime of Mobility?” Sustainability 12 (19): 8253. doi:10.3390/su12198253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatzki, Ted. 2017. “Sayings, Texts and Discursive Formations.” In The nexus of practices. Connections, constellations and practitioners, edited by Allison Hui, Theodore R. Schatzki und Elizabeth Shove, 126–140. London, New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, Theodore. 2010. “Materiality and Social Life.” Nature and Culture 5 (2): 123–149. doi:10.3167/nc.2010.050202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatzki, Theodore R., Karin D. Knorr-Cetina, and Eike. v Savigny. 2001. The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, TheodoreR. 2002. The Site of the Social. Pennsylvania: State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwedes, Oliver, ed. 2021. Öffentliche Mobilität. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
   Google Scholar
• Shaheen, Susan A., Nelson D. Chan, and Teresa Gaynor. 2016. “Casual Carpooling in the San Francisco Bay Area: Understanding User Characteristics, Behaviors, and Motivations.” Transport Policy 51: 165–173. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shove, Elizabeth. 2014. “Putting Practice into Policy: reconfiguring Questions of Consumption and Climate Change.” Contemporary Social Science 9 (4): 415–429. doi:10.1080/21582041.2012.692484.
   Google Scholar
• Shove, Elizabeth, Mika Pantzar, and Matt Watson. 2012. The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and How It Changes. Los Angeles: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Shove, Elizabeth, and Nicola Spurling. 2013. “Sustainable Practices: Social Theory and Climate Change.” In Routledge Advances in Sociology, edited by Elizabeth Shove, Nicola Spurling, vol. 95. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shove, Elizabeth, and Frank Trentmann, eds. 2019. Infrastructures in Practice: The Dynamics of Demand in Networked Societies. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shove, Elizabeth, Matt Watson, and Nicola Spurling. 2015. “Conceptualizing Connections.” European Journal of Social Theory 18 (3): 274–287. doi:10.1177/1368431015579964.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smetschka, Barbara, Dominik Wiedenhofer, Claudine Egger, Edeltraud Haselsteiner, Daniel Moran, and Veronika Gaube. 2019. “Time Matters: The Carbon Footprint of Everyday Activities in Austria.” Ecological Economics 164: 106357. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Southerton, Dale. 2003. “′Squeezing Time.” Time & Society 12 (1): 5–25. doi:10.1177/0961463X03012001001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spurling, Nicola. 2019. “Making Space for the Car at Home. Planning, Priorities and Practices.” In Infrastructures in Practice: The Dynamics of Demand in Networked Societies, edited by Elizabeth Shove and Frank Trentmann, 128–140. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Spurling, Nicola. 2020. “Parking Futures: The Relationship between Parking Space, Everyday Life and Travel Demand in the UK.” Land Use Policy 91: 103872–103878. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.02.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spurling, Nicola, and Andrew McMeekin. 2015. “Interventions in Practices. Sustainable Mobility Policies in England.” In Social Practices, Intervention and Sustainability: Beyond Behaviour Change, edited by Yolande Strengers and Cecily Maller, 78–94. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Svennevik, Elisabeth M. C., Tom E. Julsrud, and Eivind Farstad. 2020. “From Novelty to Normality: reproducing Car-Sharing Practices in Transitions to Sustainable Mobility.” Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy 16 (1): 169–183. doi:10.1080/15487733.2020.1799624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umweltbundesamt. 2017. Die Stadt für Morgen. Umweltschonend mobil – lärmarm – grün – kompakt – durchmischt. Dessau-Roßlau: Umweltbundesamt.
   Google Scholar
• Urry, John. 2004. “The ‘System’ of Automobility.” Theory, Culture & Society 21 (4–5): 25–39. doi:10.1177/0263276404046059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vihalemm, Triin. 2015. “From Intervention to Social Change: A Guide to Reshaping Everyday Practices.” In Solving Social Problems, edited by Triin Vihalemm, Margit Keller, and Maie Kiisel, England, Estonia, Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate, University of Tartu.
   Google Scholar
• Warde, Alan. 2005. “Consumption and Theories of Practice.” Journal of Consumer Culture 5 (2): 131–153. doi:10.1177/1469540505053090.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, Matt. 2012. “How Theories of Practice Can Inform Transition to a Decarbonised Transport System.” Journal of Transport Geography 24: 488–496. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, Matt. 2017. “Placing Power in Practice Theory.” In The nexus of practices. Connections, constellations and practitioners, edited by Allison Hui, Theodore R. Schatzki und Elizabeth Shove, 169–182. London, New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Witzke, Sarah. 2016. Carsharing und die Gesellschaft von Morgen. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
   Google Scholar