Publication Cover
Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies
An International Interdisciplinary Journal for Research, Policy and Care
Volume 16, 2021 - Issue 2
288
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

Relationship satisfaction in cohabiting university students: evidence from the role of duration of cohabitation, loneliness and sex-life satisfaction

ORCID Icon &
Pages 134-143 | Received 07 Apr 2020, Accepted 19 Oct 2020, Published online: 02 Nov 2020

References

  • Adamczyk, K. (2015). An Investigation of loneliness and perceived social support among single and partnered young adults. Current Psychology, 34(1), 82–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-015-9337-7
  • Adamczyk, K., & Segrin, C. (2015). Direct and indirect effects of young adults’ relationship status on life satisfaction through loneliness and perceived social support. Psychologica Belgica, 55(4), 196–211. https://doi.org/10.5334/pb.bn
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power and analysis for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • DiTommaso, E., Brannen, C., & Best, L. A. (2004). Measurement and validity characteristics of the short version of the social and emotional loneliness scale for adults. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64(1), 99–119. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164403258450
  • Duyilemi, A. N., Tunde-Awe, B. M., & Lois, L. O. A. (2018). Cohabitation in Nigeria Tertiary Institutions: A case study of Adekunle Ajasin University, Akungba-Akoko, Ondo state Nigeria. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3(1), 27–37.
  • Ekpenyong, N. S., & Ekpenyong, A. S. (2016). Perceived factors influencing premarital sexual practice among University students in Niger Delta University, Bayelsa State, Nigeria. Canadian Social Science, 12(11), 79–88.
  • Fallis, E. E. (2014). The Longitudinal association of relationship satisfaction and sexual satisfaction [A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfilment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Psychology]. UWSpace Waterloo's Intitutional Repository.
  • Fareo, D. O., & Moses, K. (2018). Cohabitation among students of Tertiary Institutions in Adamawa state, Nigeria. International Journal of Scientific and Education Research, 2(4), 31–42.
  • Hendrick, S. S. (1988). A generic measure of relationship satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50(1), 93–98. https://doi.org/10.2307/352430
  • Kasim, O. F., & Falola, O. (2017). Cohabitation and Students’ Academic Performance in Selected Tertiary Institutions in Ibadan, Nigeria. African Journal for the Psychological Study of Social Issues, 20(2), 188–200. http://ajpssi.org
  • Kenney, C. T., & McLanahan, S. S. (2006). Why are cohabitating relationships more violent than marriages?”. Demography, 43(1), 127–140. https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2006.0007
  • Kerlinger, F. N. (1964). Foundations of behavioural research. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED090962.pdf
  • Kumar, R. (1996). Research methodology: A step-by-step guide for beginners. Sage Production.
  • Montesi, J. L., Fauber, R. L., Gordon, E. A., & Heimberg, R. G. (2010). The specific importance of communicating about sex to couples’ sexual and overall relationship satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28(5), 591–609. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407510386833
  • Mund, M., & Johnson, M. D. (2020). Lonely me, lonely you: Loneliness and the longitudinal course of relationship satisfaction. Journal of Happiness Studies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-020-00241-9.
  • Neto, F. (2012). The satisfaction with sex life scale. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 45(1), 18–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175611422898
  • Ojewola, F. O., & Akinduyo, T. E. (2017). Prevalence and factors responsible for cohabitation among undergraduates of Adekunle Ajasin University, Ondo State, Nigeria. American Journal of Educational Research, 5(6), 650–654. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-5-6-10
  • Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S. M., & Markman., H. J. (2009). The pre-engagement cohabitation effect: A replication and extension of previous findings. Journal of Family Psychology, 23(1), 107–111. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014358
  • Sakmar, E. (2010). The predictive role of communication on the relationship satisfaction in married individuals with and without children and in cohabiting individuals: The moderating role of sexual satisfaction [A thesis submitted to the graduate School of Social Sciences of Middle East Technical University]. http://www.metu.edu.tr
  • Soboyejo, O. M. (2013). Perception of Students on Cohabitation among Undergraduates in Selected Higher Institutions in Ogun State. Unpublished dissertation submitted to the Department of Home Science and Management, Federal University of Agriculture.
  • Sprecher, S., & Cate, R. (2004). Sexual satisfaction and sexual expression as predictors of relationship satisfaction and stability. In J. H. Harvey, A. Wenzel, & S. Sprecher (Eds.), The handbook of sexuality in close relationships (pp. 235–256). Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Stewart, M. R. (2012). The impact of length of relationship on conflict communication and relationship satisfaction in couples [Graduate Theses and Dissertations]. 12474. IOWA State University Digital Repository.
  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education.
  • Tai, T., Bazter, J., & Hewitt, B. (2014). Do co-residence and intentions make a difference? Relationship satisfaction in married, cohabiting, and living apart together couples in four countries. Demographic Research, 31(3), 71–104. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2014.31.3
  • Taylor, R. J., Brown, E., Chatters, L. M., & Lincoln, K. D. (2012). Extended family support and relationship satisfaction among married, cohabiting, and romantically involved African Americans and Black Caribbeans. Journal of African American Studies, 16(3), 373–389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12111-011-9205-y
  • Unachukwu, D. I., & Iloakasia, J. A. (2018). Perceived effects of premarital cohabitation on students academic performance in tertiary institutions in Anambra state: Counseling implications. IDOSR Journal of Communication and English, 3(1), 58–69. https://www.idosr.org
  • Vangelisti, A. L. (2004). Handbook of Family Communication. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers.
  • Yucel, D. (2018). The dyadic nature of relationships: Relationship satisfaction among married and cohabiting couples. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 13(1), 37–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-017-9505-z

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.