Effects of particle size and hydro-thermal treatment of feed on performance and stomach health in fattening pigs

References

• Anugwa FOI, Varel VH, Dickson JS, Pond WG, Krook LP. 1989. Effects of dietary fiber and protein-concentration on growth, feed-efficiency, visceral organ weights and large-intestine microbial-populations of swine. J Nutr. 119:879–886.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baustad B, NafstadI. 1969. Gastric ulcers in swine. 4. Effects of dietary particle size and crude fiber contents on ulceration. Pathol Vet. 6:546–556.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chae BJ, Han IK, Kim JH, Yang CJ, Chung YK, Rhee YC, Ohh SJ, Ryu KH. 1997a. Effects of extrusion conditions of corn and soybean meal on the physico-chemical properties, ileal digestibility and growth of weaned pig. Asian Austral J Anim. 10:170–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chae BJ, Han IK, Kim JH, Yang CJ, Ohh SJ, Rhee YC, Chung YK. 1997b. Effects of feed processing and feeding methods on growth and carcass traits for growing-finishing pigs. Asian Austral J Anim. 10:164–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamberlain CC, Merriman GM, Lidvall ER, Gamble CT. 1967. Effects of feed processing method and diet form on incidence of esophagogastric ulcers in swine. J Anim Sci. 26:72–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choct ME, Selby EAD, Cadogan DJ, Campbell RG. 2004. Effects of particle size, processing, and dry or liquid feeding on performance of piglets. Aust J Agr Res. 55:237–245.
   Google Scholar
• DIN (Deutsches Institut für Normung e. V.). 1987a. DIN 66165-1: Partikelgrößenanalyse; Siebanalyse; Grundlagen. Berlin: Beuth Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• DIN (Deutsches Institut für Normung e. V.). 1987b. DIN 66165-2: partikelgrößenanalyse; Siebanalyse; Durchführung. Berlin: Beuth Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• DIN (Deutsches Institut für Normung e. V.). 2001. DIN ISO 3310-1; Analysensiebe; Technische Anforderungen und Prüfungen; Teil 1: Analysensiebe mit Metalldrahtgewebe 19.210. Berlin: Beuth Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Directive 2010/63/EU. 2010. Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes. Off J Eur Union L. 276:33–79.
   Google Scholar
• DirkzwagerA, ElbersARW, van der AarP, VosJH. 1998. Effect of particle size and addition of sunflower hulls to diets on the occurrence of oesophagogastric lesions and performance in growing-finishing pigs. Livest Prod Sci. 56:53–60.
   Google Scholar
• Döll S, Goyarts T, Tiemann U, Dänicke S. 2007. Practically relevant concentrations of deoxynivalenol in diets for growing-finishing pigs offered as mash or pellets. Arch Anim Nutr. 61:247–265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisemann JH, Argenzio RA. 1999a. Effects of diet and housing density on growth and stomach morphology in pigs. J Anim Sci. 77:2709–2714.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisemann JH, Argenzio RA. 1999b. Effects of diets differing in propensity to promote gastric lesions on defense systems in gastric mucosae. J Anim Sci. 77:2715–2720.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farries FE, Oslage HJ. 1961. Zur Technik langfristiger Stoffwechselversuche an wachsenden Schweinen. Z Tierphysiol Tierernähr Futtermittelkd. 16:11–19.
   Google Scholar
• Fladlandsmo K, Slagsvold P. 1971. Effect of grain particle size and pellets on development of gastric ulcers in swine. J Anim Sci. 33:1263–1265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [GfE] Committee for Requirement Standards of the Society of Nutrition Physiology. 2008. Recommendations for the sipply of energy and nutrients to pigs. Frankfurt am Main: DLG Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Gomez MH, Aguilera JM. 1983. Changes in the starch fraction during extrusion-cooking of corn. J Food Sci. 48:378–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GrosseLiesner V, Taube V, Leonhard-Marek S, Beineke A, Kamphues J. 2009. Integrity of gastric mucosa in reared piglets - effects of physical form of diets (meal/pellets),pre-processing grinding (coarse/fine) and addition of lignocellulose (0/2.5%). J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr. 93:373–380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock JD, Hines RH, Gugle TL. 1991. Extrusion of sorghum, soybean meal, and whole soybeans improves growth performance and nutrient digestibility in finishing pigs. In: Goodband B, Tokach M, editors. Kansas State University Swine day 1991. Report of Progress 641, p. 107–109.
   Google Scholar
• Healy BJ, Hancock JD, Kennedy GA, Bramel-Cox PJ, Behnke KC, Hines RH. 1994. Optimum particle-size of corn and hard and soft sorghum for nursery pigs. J Anim Sci. 72:2227–2236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedemann MS, Mikkelsen LL, Naughton PJ, Jensen BB. 2005. Effect of feed particle size and feed processing on morphological characteristics in the small and large intestine of pigs and on adhesion of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium DT12 in the ileum in vitro. J Anim Sci. 83:1554–1562.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston SL, Hines RH, Hancock JD, Behnke KC, Traylor SL, Chae BJ, Han IK. 1999. Effects of expander conditioning of complex nursery diets on growth performance of weanling pigs. Asian Austral J Anim. 12:395–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr BJ, Mckeith FK, Easter RA. 1995. Effects on performance and carcass characteristics of nursery to finisher pigs fed reduced crude protein, amino acid-supplemented diets. J Anim Sci. 73:433–440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirchgessner M, Roth FX, Bollwahn W, Heinritzi K. 1985. Mastleistung, Nährstoffverdaulichkeit und Magenschleimhautveränderungen von Schweinen bei unterschiedlicher Futterstruktur. Zbl Vet Med A. 32:641–651.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence TLJ. 1983. The effects of cereal particle-size and pelleting on the nutritive-value of oat-based diets for the growing-pig. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 8:91–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundblad KK, Issa S, Hancock JD, Behnke KC, McKinney LJ, Alavi S, Prestløkken E, Fledderus J, Sørensen M. 2011. Effects of steam conditioning at low and high temperature, expander conditioning and extruder processing prior to pelleting on growth performance and nutrient digestibility in nursery pigs and broiler chickens. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 169:208–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell CV, Grummer RH, Kowalczy T, Beneveng NJ, Hoekstra WG, Reimann EM. 1972. Use of tritiated-water to assess, in-vivo, effect of dietary particle-size on mixing of stomach contents of swine. J Anim Sci. 34:212–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell CV, Reese NA, Muggenburg BA, Reimann EM, Kowalczy T, Grummer RH, Hoekstra WG. 1967. Effect of oat hulls and other oat fractions on development of gastric ulcers in swine. J Anim Sci. 26:1312–1318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medel P, Latorre MA, de Blas C, LázaroR, Mateos GG. 2004. Heat processing of cereals in mash or pellet diets for young pigs. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 113:127–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikkelsen LL, Naughton PJ, Hedemann MS, Jensen BB. 2004. Effects of physical properties of feed on microbial ecology and survival of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium in the pig gastrointestinal tract. Appl Environ Microb. 70:3485–3492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millet S, Kumar S, DeBoever J, Ducatelle R, DeBrabander D. 2012. Effect of feed processing on growth performance and gastric mucosa integrity in pigs from weaning until slaughter. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 175:175–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mösseler A, Köttendorf S, Liesner VG, Kamphues J. 2010. Impact of diets’ physical form (particle size; meal/pelleted) on the stomach content (dry matter content, pH, chloride concentration) of pigs. Livest Sci. 134:146–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naumann C, Bassler R. 1976. Die chemische Untersuchung von Futtermitteln. Darmstadt: VDLUFA Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann KD, Feil A. 2011. Mischfutterstabilität nicht kompaktierter Futtermischungen. Mühle + Mischfutter. 8:238–246.
   Google Scholar
• Nuwer AJ, Perry TW, Pickett RA, Curtin TM. 1967. Expanded or heat-processed fractions of corn and their relative ability to elicit esophagogastric ulcers in swine. J Anim Sci. 26:518–525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Doherty JV, McGlynn SG, Murphy D. 2001. The effect of expander processing and pelleting on the nutritive value of feed for growing and finishing pigs. J Sci Food Agr. 81:135–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohh SH, Han KN, Chae BJ, Han IK, Acda SP. 2002. Effects of feed processing methods on growth performance and ileal digestibility of amino acids in young pigs. Asian Austral J Anim. 15:1765–1772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oryschak MA, Zijlstra RT. 2002. Effect of dietary particle size and nutrient supply on energy digestibility and nitrogen excretion in ileal cannulated grower pigs. Can J Anim Sci. 82:603–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiemann R. 1981. Methodische Richtlinien zur Durchführung von Verdauungsversuchen für die Futterwertschätzung. Arch Anim Nutr. 31:1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traylor SL, Behnke KC, Hancock JD, Hines RH, Johnston SL, Chae BJ, Han IK. 1999. Effects of expander operating conditions on nutrient digestibility in finishing pigs. Asian Austral J Anim. 12:400–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf P, Rust P, Kamphues J. 2010. How to assess particle size distribution in diets for pigs?Livest Sci. 133:78–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wondra KJ, Hancock JD, Behnke KC, Stark CR. 1995. Effects of mill type and particle-size uniformity on growth-performance, nutrient digestibility, and stomach morphology in finishing pigs. J Anim Sci. 73:2564–2573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [ZDS] Zentralverband der deutschen Schweineproduktion e.V. 2007. Richtlinie fur die Stationsprüfung auf Mastleistung, Schlachtkörperwert und Fleischbeschaffenheit beim Schwein des Ausschusses fur Leistungsprüfungen und Zuchtwertfeststellung beim Schwein (ALZ) des Zentralverbandes der Deutschen Schweineproduktion (ZDS) vom 04.09.2007 [Internet]. Bonn: ZDS; [cited 2015 Jul 20]. Availiable from: http://www.zds-bonn.de/lpa_rassencodes.html?highlight=stationspruefung&.
   Google Scholar