Effects of diets differing in protein source and technical treatment on digestibility, performance and visceral and biochemical parameters of fattening pigs

References

• Anderson-Hafermann JC, Zhang Y, Parsons CM. 1993. Effects of processing on the nutritional quality of canola-meal. Poult Sci. 72:326–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Araba M, Dale NM. 1990. Evaluation of protein solubility as an indicator of overprocessing soybean-meal. Poult Sci. 69:76–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassily NS, Michael KG, Said AK. 1982. Blood urea content for evaluating dietary-protein quality. Molecular Nutr Food Res. 26:759–764.
   Google Scholar
• Bell JM. 1984. Nutrients and toxicants in rapeseed meal – a review. J Anim Sci. 58:996–1010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellof G, Steiner T. 2009. Qualitätssicherung für Eiweißfuttermittel in der ökologischen Tierernährung: Sojabohnen und -kuchen. Freising: Bundesprogramm ökologischer Landbau; [cited 2015 Sept 20]. Available from: http://orgprints.org/16490/1/16490-06OE233-hswt-bellof-2009-eiweissfuttermittel.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Canibe N, Hojberg O, Hojsgaard S, Jensen BB. 2005. Feed physical form and formic acid addition to the feed affect the gastrointestinal ecology and growth performance of growing pigs. J Anim Sci. 83:1287–1302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho JH, Chen YJ, Yoo JS, Wang Q, Kimi JD, Kim IH. 2007. Evaluation of FSP (fermented soy protein) to replace soybean meal in weaned pigs: growth performance, blood urea nitrogen and total protein concentrations in serum and nutrient digestibility. Asian-Austral J Anim Sci. 20:1874–1879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dänicke S, Meyer U, Winkler J, Schulz K, Ulrich S, Frahm J, Kersten S, Rehage J, Breves G, Häußler S, et al. 2014. Description of a bovine model for studying digestive and metabolic effects of a positive energy balance not biased by lactation or gravidity. Arch Anim Nutr. 68:460–477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DIN (Deutsches Institut für Normung e.V.). 1987a. DIN 66165-1: Partikelgrößenanalyse; Siebanalyse; Grundlagen. Berlin: Beuth Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• DIN (Deutsches Institut für Normung e.V.). 1987b. DIN 66165-2: Partikelgrößenanalyse; Siebanalyse; Durchführung. Berlin: Beuth Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• DIN (Deutsches Institut für Normung e.V.). 2001. DIN ISO 3310-1; Analysensiebe; Technische Anforderungen und Prüfungen; Teil 1: Analysensiebe mit Metalldrahtgewebe 19.210. Berlin: Beuth Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Döll S, Goyarts T, Tiemann U, Dänicke S. 2007. Practically relevant concentrations of deoxynivalenol in diets for growing-finishing pigs offered as mash or pellets. Arch Anim Nutr. 61:247–265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggum BO. 1970. Blood urea measurement as a technique for assessing protein quality. Br J Nutr. 24:983–988.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisemann JH, Argenzio RA. 1999. Effects of diet and housing density on growth and stomach morphology in pigs. J Anim Sci. 77:2709–2714.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fladlandsmo K, Slagsvold P. 1971. Effect of grain particle size and pellets on development of gastric ulcers in swine. J Anim Sci. 33:1263–1265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [GfE] Committee for Requirement Standards of the Society of Nutrition Physiology. 2005. Determination of digestibility as the basis for energy evaluation of feedstuffs for pigs. Proc Soc Nutr Physiol. 14:207–213.
   Google Scholar
• [GfE] Committee for Requirement Standards of the Society of Nutrition Physiology. 2008. Recommendations for the supply of energy and nutrients to pigs. Frankfurt am Main: DLG-Verlags-GmbH.
   Google Scholar
• Harr KE. 2006. Diagnostic value of biochemistry. In: Harrison GJ, Lightfoot TL, editors. Clinical avian medicine. Palm Beach: Spix Publishing; p. 611–630.
   Google Scholar
• Hedemann MS, Mikkelsen LL, Naughton PJ, Jensen BB. 2005. Effect of feed particle size and feed processing on morphological characteristics in the small and large intestine of pigs and on adhesion of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium DT12 in the ileum in vitro. J Anim Sci. 83:1554–1562.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISO Norm. 1992. Rapeseed- determination of glucosinolate content – part 1: method using high-performance liquid chromatography. ISO 9167-1, p. 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen AH, Becker DE. 1965. Effect of pelleting diets and dietary components on performance of young pigs. J Anim Sci. 24:392–397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamphues J, Brüning I, Papenbrock S, Mößeler A, Wolf P, Verspohl J. 2007. Lower grinding intensity of cereals for dietetic effects in piglets? Livestock Sci. 109:132–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr BJ, Mckeith FK, Easter RA. 1995. Effects on performance and carcass characteristics of nursery to finisher pigs fed reduced crude protein, amino acid-supplemented diets. J Anim Sci. 73:433–440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liermann W, Berk A, Böschen V, Dänicke S. 2015. Effects of particle size and hydro-thermal treatment of feed on performance and stomach health in fattening pigs. Arch Anim Nutr. 69:455–472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindermayer H, Preißinger W, Propstmeier G. 2011. Schweinefütterung mit heimischen Eiweißfuttermitteln. 2nd ed. Freising-Tüntenhausen (Germany): Bayrische Landesanstalt für Landwirtschaft (LfL).
   Google Scholar
• Medel P, Latorre MA, de Blas C, Lazaro R, Mateos GG. 2004. Heat processing of cereals in mash or pellet diets for young pigs. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 113:127–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menke KH, Huss W. 1987. Tierernährung und Futtermittelkunde. 3rd ed. Stuttgart: Eugen Ulmer GmbH.
   Google Scholar
• Mikkelsen LL, Naughton PJ, Hedemann MS, Jensen BB. 2004. Effects of physical properties of feed on microbial ecology and survival of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium in the pig gastrointestinal tract. Appl Environ Microbiol. 70:3485–3492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naumann C, Bassler R. 1976. Die chemische Untersuchung von Futtermitteln. Darmstadt: VDLUFA Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• O’Doherty JV, McGlynn SG, Murphy D. 2001. The effect of expander processing and pelleting on the nutritive value of feed for growing and finishing pigs. J Sci Food Agric. 81:135–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oryschak MA, Zijlstra RT. 2002. Effect of dietary particle size and nutrient supply on energy digestibility and nitrogen excretion in ileal cannulated grower pigs. Can J Anim Sci. 82:603–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papenbrock S, Stemme K, Amtsberg G, Verspohl J, Kamphues J. 2005. Investigations on prophylactic effects of coarse feed structure and/or potassium diformate on the microflora in the digestive tract of weaned piglets experimentally infected with Salmonella Derby. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr. 89:84–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park JS, Kim IH, Hancock JD, Wyatt CL, Behnke KC, Kennedy GA. 2003. Effects of expander processing and enzyme supplementation of wheat-based diets for finishing pigs. Asian-Austral J Anim Sci. 16:248–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons CM, Hashimoto K, Wedekind KJ, Baker DH. 1991. Soybean protein solubility in potassium hydroxide - an invitro test of in vivo protein-quality. J Anim Sci. 69:2918–2924.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons CM, Hashimoto K, Wedekind KJ, Han Y, Baker DH. 1992. Effect of overprocessing on availability of amino-acids and energy in soybean-meal. Poult Sci. 71:133–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin G, ter Elst ER, Bosch MW, van der Poel AFB. 1996. Thermal processing of whole soya beans: studies on the inactivation of antinutritional factors and effects on ileal digestibility in piglets. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 57:313–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siljander-Rasi H, Valaja J, Alaviuhkola T, Rantamaki P, Tupasela T. 1996. Replacing soya bean meal with heat-treated, low-glucosinolate rapeseed meal does not affect the performance of growing-finishing pigs. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 60:1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traylor SL, Behnke KC, Hancock JD, Hines RH, Johnston SL, Chae BJ, Han IK. 1999. Effects of expander operating conditions on nutrient digestibility in finishing pigs. Asian-Austral J Anim Sci. 12:400–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Eys JE. 2012. Manual of quality analyses for soybean products in the feed industry. 2nd ed. Fourqueux: U.S. export council.
   Google Scholar
• Visscher CF, Winter P, Verspohl J, Stratmann-Selke J, Upmann M, Beyerbach M, Kamphues J. 2009. Effects of feed particle size at dietary presence of added organic acids on caecal parameters and the prevalence of Salmonella in fattening pigs on farm and at slaughter. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr. 93:423–430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [ZDS] Zentralverband der deutschen Schweineproduktion e.V. 2007. Richtlinie für die Stationsprüfung auf Mastleistung, Schlachtkörperwert und Fleischbeschaffenheit beim Schwein des Ausschusses fur Leistungsprüfungen und Zuchtwertfeststellung beim Schwein (ALZ) des Zentralverbandes der Deutschen Schweineproduktion (ZDS) vom 04.09.2007. Bonn: ZDS; [cited 2015 Sept 20]. Available from: http://www.zds-bonn.de/publikationen/
   Google Scholar