DNA barcoding for the identification of soft remains of prey in the stomach contents of grey seals (Halichoerus grypus) and harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena)

References

• Alfonsi E, Hassani S, Carpentier F-G, Le Clec'h J-Y, Dabin W, Van Canneyt O, et al. 2012. A European melting pot of harbour porpoise in the French Atlantic coasts inferred from mitochondrial and nuclear data. PLoS ONE 7(9):e44425. 11 pages. 10.1371/journal.pone.0044425
   Google Scholar
• Alfonsi E, Méheust E, Fuchs S, Carpentier F-G, Quillivic Y, Viricel A, et al. 2013. The use of DNA barcoding to monitor the marine mammal biodiversity along the French Atlantic coast. In: Nagy ZT, Backeljau T, De Meyer M, Jordaens K, editors. DNA Barcoding: A Practical Tool for Fundamental and Applied Biodiversity Research. ZooKeys 365:5–24.
   Google Scholar
• Beck CA, Iverson SJ, Bowen WD. 2005. Blubber fatty acids of gray seals reveal sex differences in the diet of a size-dimorphic marine carnivore. Canadian Journal of Zoology 83:377–88. 10.1139/z05-021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borisenko AV, Lim BK, Ivanova NV, Hanner RH, Hebert PDN. 2008. DNA barcoding in surveys of small mammal communities: a field study in Suriname. Molecular Ecology Resources 8:471–79. 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01998.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen WD, Harrison GD. 1994. Offshore diet of grey seals Halichoerus grypus near Sable Island, Canada. Marine Ecology Progress Series 112:1–11. 10.3354/meps112001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen WD, Iverson SJ. 2013. Methods of estimating marine mammal diets: A review of validation experiments and sources of bias and uncertainty. Marine Mammal Science 29:719–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowles E, Schulte PM, Tollit DJ, Deagle BE, Trites A. 2011. Proportion of prey consumed can be determined from faecal DNA using real-time PCR. Molecular Ecology Resources 11:530–40. 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02974.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carreon-Martinez L, Johnson TB, Ludsin SA, Heath DD. 2011. Utilization of stomach content DNA to determine diet diversity in piscivorous fishes. Journal of Fish Biology 78:1170–82. 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2011.02925.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casper RM, Jarman SN, Gales NJ, Hindell MA. 2007. Combining DNA and morphological analyses of faecal samples improves insight into trophic interactions: A case study using a generalist predator. Marine Biology 152:815–25. 10.1007/s00227-007-0732-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke MP. 1986. A Handbook for the Identification of Cephalopod Beaks. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 273 pages.
   Google Scholar
• Das K, Lepoint G, Leroy Y, Bouquegneau JM. 2003. Marine mammals from the southern North Sea: Feeding ecology data from δ13C and δ15N measurements. Marine Ecology Progress Series 263:287–98. 10.3354/meps263287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Pierrepont JF, Dubois B, Desormonts S, Santos MB, Robin JP. 2005. Stomach contents of English Channel cetaceans stranded on the coast of Normandy. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 85:1539–46. 10.1017/S0025315405012762
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deagle BE, Kirkwood R, Jarman SN. 2009. Analysis of Australian fur seal diet by pyrosequencing prey DNA in faeces. Molecular Ecology 18:2022–38. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04158.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deagle BE, Thomas AC, Shaffer AK, Trites AW, Jarman SN. 2013. Quantifying sequence proportions in a DNA-based diet study using Ion Torrent amplicon sequencing: Which counts count? Molecular Ecology Resources 13:620–33. 10.1111/1755-0998.12103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duguy R. 1977. Notes on the small cetaceans off the coasts of France. Reports of the International Whaling Commission 27:500–01.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn MR, Szabo A, McVeagh MS, Smith PJ. 2010. The diet of deepwater sharks and the benefits of using DNA identification of prey. Deep-Sea Research I 57:923–30. 10.1016/j.dsr.2010.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunshea G. 2009. DNA-based diet analysis for any predator. PLoS ONE 4:e5252. 9 pages. 10.1371/journal.pone.0005252
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R. 1994. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome. Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology 3:294–99.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haelters J, Kerckhof F, Toussaint E, Jauniaux T, Degraer S. 2012. The Diet of Harbour Porpoises Bycaught or Washed Ashore in Belgium, and Relationship with Relevant Data from the Strandings Database. Oostende: Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Marine Ecosystem Management Unit, p 1–48.
   Google Scholar
• Hall T. 1999. BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41:95–98.
   Google Scholar
• Hammond PS, Berggren P, Benke H, Borchers DL, Collet A, Heide-Jørgensen MP, et al. 2002. Abundance of harbour porpoise and other cetaceans in the North Sea and adjacent waters. Journal of Applied Ecology 39:361–76. 10.1046/j.1365-2664.2002.00713.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond PS, Macleod K, Berggren P, Borchers DL, Burt L, Cañadas A, et al. 2013. Cetacean abundance and distribution in European Atlantic shelf waters to inform conservation and management. Biological Conservation 164:107–22. 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.04.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Härkönen TJ. 1986. Guide to the Otoliths of the Bony Fishes of the Northeast Atlantic. Hellerup: Danbui ApS. 256 pages.
   Google Scholar
• Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, deWaard JR. 2003. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 270:313–21. 10.1098/rspb.2002.2218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herr H, Fock HO, Siebert U. 2009. Spatio-temporal associations between harbour porpoise Phocoena phocoena and specific fisheries in the German Bight. Biological Conservation 142:2962–72. 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.07.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanova NV, Dewaard JR, Hebert PDN. 2006. An inexpensive, automation-friendly protocol for recovering high-quality DNA. Molecular Ecology Notes 6:998–1002. 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2006.01428.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iverson SJ, Frost KJ, Lowry LF. 1997. Fatty acid signatures reveal fine scale structure of foraging distribution of harbor seals and their prey in Prince William Sound, Alaska. Marine Ecology Progress Series 151:255–71. 10.3354/meps151255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iverson SJ, Field C, Bowen WD, Blanchard W. 2004. Quantitative fatty acid signature analysis: A new method of estimating predator diets. Ecological Monographs 74:211–35. 10.1890/02-4105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarman SN, Deagle BE, Gales NJ. 2004. Group-specific polymerase chain reaction for DNA-based analysis of species diversity and identity in dietary samples. Molecular Ecology 13:1313–22. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02109.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson M, Zaretskaya I, Raytselis Y, Merezhuk Y, McGinnis S, Madden TL. 2008. NCBI BLAST: A better web interface. Nucleic Acids Research 36:W5–W9. 10.1093/nar/gkn201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung J-L, Stéphan E, Louis M, Alfonsi E, Liret C, Carpentier FG, et al. 2009. Harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) in north-western France: Aerial survey, opportunistic sightings and strandings monitoring. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 89:1045–50. 10.1017/S0025315409000307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundström K, Hjerne O, Lunneryd S-G, Karlsson O. 2010. Understanding the diet composition of marine mammals: Grey seals (Halichoerus grypus) in the Baltic Sea. ICES Journal of Marine Science 67:1230–39. 10.1093/icesjms/fsq022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLeod CD, Santos MB, Reid RJ, Scott BE, Pierce GJ. 2007. Linking sandeel consumption and the likelihood of starvation in harbour porpoises in the Scottish North Sea: Could climate change mean more starving porpoises? Biology Letters 3:185–88. 10.1098/rsbl.2006.0588
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall HD, Hart KA, Yaskowiak ES, Stenson GB, McKinnon D, Perry EA. 2010. Molecular identification of prey in the stomach contents of harp seals (Pagophilus groenlandicus) using species-specific oligonucleotides. Molecular Ecology Resources 10:181–89. 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02713.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mèndez-Fernandez P, Bustamante P, Bode A, Chouvelon T, Ferreira M, López A, et al. 2010. Foraging ecology of five toothed whale species in the Northwest Iberian Peninsula, inferred using carbon and nitrogen isotope ratios. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 413:150–58. 10.1016/j.jembe.2011.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons KM, Piertney SB, Middlemas SJ, Hammond PS, Armstrong JD. 2005. DNA-based identification of salmonid prey species in seal faeces. Journal of Zoology 266:275–81. 10.1017/S0952836905006904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pompanon F, Deagle BE, Symondson WOC, Brown DS, Jarman SN, Taberlet P. 2012. Who is eating what: Diet assessment using next generation sequencing. Molecular Ecology 21:1931–50. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05403.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratnasingham S, Hebert PDN. 2007. BOLD: The Barcode of Life Data System ( www.barcodinglife.org). Molecular Ecology Notes 7:355–64. 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01678.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reijnders PJH. 1992. Harbour porpoises Phocoena phocoena in the North Sea: Numerical responses to changes in environmental conditions. Netherlands Journal of Aquatic Ecology 26:75–85. 10.1007/BF02298029
   Google Scholar
• Ridoux V, Spitz J, Vincent C, Walton MJ. 2007. Grey seal diet at the southern limit of its European distribution: Combining dietary analyses and fatty acid profiles. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 87:255–64. 10.1017/S002531540705463X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos MB, Pierce GJ. 2003. The diet of harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) in the northeast Atlantic: A review. Oceanography and Marine Biology 41:335–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos MB, Pierce GJ, Learmonth JA, Reid RJ, Ross HM, Patterson IAP, et al. 2004. Variability in the diet of harbor porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) in Scottish waters 1992–2003. Marine Mammal Science 20:1–27. 10.1111/j.1748-7692.2004.tb01138.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spitz J, Rousseau Y, Ridoux V. 2006. Diet overlap between harbour porpoise and bottlenose dolphin: An argument in favour of interference competition for food? Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 70:259–70. 10.1016/j.ecss.2006.04.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas AC, Jarman SN, Haman KH, Trites AW, Deagle BE. 2014. Improving accuracy of DNA diet estimates using food tissue control materials and an evaluation of proxies for digestion bias. Molecular Ecology 23:3706–18. 10.1111/mec.12523
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentini A, Pompanon F, Taberlet P. 2009. DNA barcoding for ecologists. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 24:110–17. 10.1016/j.tree.2008.09.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vestheim H, Jarman SN. 2008. Blocking primers to enhance PCR amplification of rare sequences in mixed samples – A case study on prey DNA in Antarctic krill stomachs. Frontiers in Zoology 5:12. 11 pages. 10.1186/1742-9994-5-12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent C. 2001. Ecological Bases for the Conservation of the Grey Seal, Halichoerus grypus, in the Iroise Sea. PhD Thesis. Brest: Université de Bretagne Occidentale. 220 pages.
   Google Scholar
• Vincent C, Fedak MA, McConnell BJ, Meynier L, Saint-Jean C, Ridoux V. 2005. Status and conservation of the grey seal, Halichærus grypus, in France. Biological Conservation 126:62–73. 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.04.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viricel A, Rosel PE. 2012. Evaluating the utility of cox1 for cetacean species identification. Marine Mammal Science 28:37–62. 10.1111/j.1748-7692.2010.00460.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker WA, Bradley Hanson M, Baird RW, Guenther TJ. 1998. Food habits of the harbour porpoise, Phocoena phocoena, and Dall's porpoise, Phocoenoides dalli, in the inland waters of British Columbia and Washington. Alaska Fisheries Science Center Processed Report 98-10:1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Ward RD, Zemlak TS, Innes BH, Last PR, Hebert PDN. 2005. DNA barcoding Australia's fish species. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 360:1847–57. 10.1098/rstb.2005.1716
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward RD, Hanner R, Hebert PDN. 2009. The campaign to DNA barcode all fishes, FISH-BOL. Journal of Fish Biology 74:329–56. 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2008.02080.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar