Distinction and relatedness – Taxonomic and genetic studies reveal a new species group of goatfishes (Upeneus; Mullidae)

References

• Akaike H. 1974. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 19:716–23. doi: 10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhargava AK, Gulati DK, Varghese S, Uikey DE, Mali KS. 2004. Field Guide for Identification of Marine Fisheries Resources. Mumbai: Fishery Survey of India. 71 pages.
   Google Scholar
• Blegvad H, Løppenthin B. 1944. Fishes of the Iranian Gulf. Danish Scientific Investigations in Iran. Copenhagen: Einar Munksgaard. 247 pages.
   Google Scholar
• Boldsystems. 2015. The Barcode of Life Systems. http://www.boldsystems.org (accessed 18 June 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Clement M, Posada D, Crandall KA. 2000. TCS: A computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Molecular Ecology 9:1657–60. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.01020.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R, Posada D. 2012. jModelTest 2: More models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nature Methods 9:772. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eschmeyer WN, editor. 2015. Catalog of Fishes: Genera, Species, References. http://research.calacademy.org/research/ichthyology/catalog/fishcatmain.asp (accessed 23 January 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Felsenstein J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783–91. doi: 10.2307/2408678
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Froese R, Pauly D, editors. 2015. FishBase. World Wide Web Electronic Publication. www.fishbase.org (accessed April 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Hasegawa M, Kishino K, Yano T. 1985. Dating the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. Journal of Molecular Evolution 22:160–74. doi: 10.1007/BF02101694
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, DeWaart JR. 2003. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 270:313–21. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubert N, Hanner R, Holm E, Mandrak NE, Taylor E, Burridge M, et al 2008. Identifying Canadian freshwater fishes through DNA barcodes. PLoS One 3:e2490. 8 pages. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002490
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubert N, Meyer CP, Bruggemann HJ, Guérin F, Komeno RJL, Espiau B, et al. 2012. Cryptic diversity in Indo-Pacific coral-reef fishes revealed by DNA-barcoding provides new support to the Centre-of-Overlap hypothesis. PLoS One 7:e28987. 8 pages. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028987
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones S, Kumaran M. 1980. Fishes of the Laccadive Archipelago. Cochin, India: Mathrubhumi Press. 760 pages.
   Google Scholar
• Khedkar GD, Jamdade R, Naik S, David L, Haymer D. 2014. DNA barcodes for the fishes of the Narmada, one of India's longest rivers. PLoS One 9:e101460. 10 pages. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101460
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimura M. 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution 16:111–20. doi: 10.1007/BF01731581
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumaran B, Kambala SN, Nadarajan J. 2012. Assessment of ichthyo-faunal diversity in Giriyampeta Estuary, Yanam (U.T.of Puducherry). Bulletin of Environment, Pharmacology and Life Sciences 1:17–25.
   Google Scholar
• Lakra WS, Verma MS, Goswami M, Lal KK, Mohindra V, Punia P, et al. 2011. DNA barcoding of Indian marine fishes. Molecular Ecology Resources 11:60–71. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02894.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, et al. 2007. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23:2947–48. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm404
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mabragaña E, Díaz de Astarloa JM, Hanner R, Zhang J, González Castro M. 2011. DNA barcoding identifies Argentine fishes from marine and brackish waters. PLoS One 6:e28655. 11 pages. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028655
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajan PT, Sreeraj CR, Immanuel T. 2012. The goatfishes (family Mullidae) of Andaman and Nicobar Islands. Records of the Zoological Survey of India 111:35–48.
   Google Scholar
• Rajkumar U. 2004. Fishery and some aspects of population dynamics of goatfish Upeneus vittatus (Forskal) off Visakhapatnam. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of India 46:192–97.
   Google Scholar
• Rambaut A, Drummond AJ. 2009. Tracer version 1.5. http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk (accessed 5 March 2015). Computer program.
   Google Scholar
• Ratnasingham S, Hebert PDN. 2013. A DNA-based registry for all animal species: The Barcode Index Number (BIN) system. PLoS One 8:e66213. 16 pages. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066213
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro AD, Caires RA, Mariguela TC, Pereira LHG, Hanner R, Oliveira C. 2012. DNA barcodes identify marine fishes of São Paulo State, Brazil. Molecular Ecology Resources 12:1012–20. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572–74. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sluka RD. 2013. Coastal marine fish biodiversity along the western coast of India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 5:3574–79. doi: 10.11609/JoTT.o3187.118
   Google Scholar
• Swofford DL. 2002. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Version 4. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates. Computer program.
   Google Scholar
• Uiblein F. 1991. Ontogenetic shifts in resource use and shoaling tendency related to body size in Red Sea goatfish (Parupeneus forsskali, Mullidae). Marine Ecology 12:153–61. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0485.1991.tb00249.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uiblein F. 2007. Goatfishes (Mullidae) as indicators in tropical and temperate coastal habitat monitoring and management. Marine Biology Research 3:265–88. doi: 10.1080/17451000701687129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uiblein F, Causse R. 2013. A new deep-water goatfish of the genus Upeneus (Mullidae) from Vanuatu, South Pacific. Zootaxa 3666:337–44. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.3666.3.4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uiblein F, Gledhill D. 2015. A new goatfish of the genus Upeneus (Mullidae) from Australia and Vanuatu, with inter- and intraspecific comparisons. Marine Biology Research 11:475–91. doi: 10.1080/17451000.2014.958088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uiblein F, Gouws G. 2014. A new goatfish species of the genus Upeneus (Mullidae) based on molecular and morphological screening and subsequent taxonomic analysis. Marine Biology Research 10:655–81. doi: 10.1080/17451000.2013.850515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uiblein F, Heemstra PC. 2010. A taxonomic review of the Western Indian goatfishes of the genus Upeneus (family Mullidae), with descriptions of four new species. Smithiana Bulletin 11:35–71.
   Google Scholar
• Uiblein F, Heemstra PC. 2011a. A new goatfish, Upeneus seychellensis sp. nov. (Mullidae), from the Seychelles Bank, with remarks on Upeneus guttatus and a key to Western Indian Ocean Upeneus species. Marine Biology Research 7:637–50. doi: 10.1080/17451000.2010.547202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uiblein F, Heemstra PC. 2011b. Description of a new goatfish species, Upeneus randalli n. sp. (Mullidae), from the Persian Gulf, with remarks and identification keys for the genus Upeneus. Scientia Marina 75:585–94. doi: 10.3989/scimar.2011.75n3585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uiblein F, McGrouther M. 2012. A new deep-water goatfish of the genus Upeneus (Mullidae) from northern Australia and the Philippines, with a taxonomic account of U. subvittatus and remarks on U. mascareinsis. Zootaxa 3550:61–70.
   Google Scholar
• Uiblein F, White WT. 2015. A new goatfish of the genus Upeneus (Mullidae) from Lombok, Indonesia and first verified record of U. asymmetricus for the Indian Ocean. Zootaxa 3980:51–66.
   Google Scholar
• Van Velzen R, Weitschek E, Felici G, Bakker FT. 2012. DNA barcoding of recently diverged species: relative performance of matching methods. PLoS One 7:e30490. 12 pages. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030490
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Victor BC. 2014. Three new endemic cryptic species revealed by DNA barcoding of the gobies of the Cayman Islands (Teleostei: Gobiidae). Journal of the Ocean Science Foundation 12:25–60.
   Google Scholar
• Ward RD, Zemlak TS, Innes BH, Last PR, Hebert PDN. 2005. DNA barcoding Australia's fish species. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 360:1847–57. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2005.1716
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weigt LA, Baldwin CC, Driskell A, Smith DG, Ormos A, Reyier EA. 2012. Using DNA barcoding to assess Caribbean reef fish biodiversity: Expanding taxonomic and geographic coverage. PLoS One 7:e41059. 7 pages. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J. 2011. Species identification of marine fishes in China with DNA barcoding. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine 978253:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Hanner R. 2012. Molecular approach to the identification of fish in the South China Sea. PLoS One 7:e30621. 9 pages. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030621
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar