Rapid identification of the north-western Pacific billfish species using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction techniques

References

• Amaral JS, Santos CG, Melo VS, Costa J, Oliveira MBPP, Mafra I. 2015. Identification of duck, partridge, pheasant, quail, chicken and turkey meats by species-specific PCR assays to assess the authenticity of traditional game meat Alheira sausages. Food Control 47:190–95. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2014.07.009
   Google Scholar
• Anonymous. 2015. Fisheries statistical yearbook Taiwan, Kinmen and Matsu area 2015. http://www.fa.gov.tw/cht/PublicationsFishYear/index.aspx (accessed 30 December 2016) (available in English and Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Bedford DW, Hagerman FB. 1983. The billfish fishery resource of the California Current. California Cooperative Oceanic Fisheries Investigations Reports 24:70–78.
   Google Scholar
• Bustin SA, Benes V, Garson JA, Hellemans J, Huggett J, Kubista M, et al. 2009. The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments. Clinical Chemistry 55:611–22. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2008.112797
   Google Scholar
• Chen CH, Hsieh CH, Hwang DF. 2013. PCR-RFLP analysis using capillary electrophoresis for species identification of Cyprinidae-related products. Food Control 33:477–83. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.03.036
   Google Scholar
• Chow S. 1994. Identification of billfish species using mitochondrial cytochrome b gene fragment amplified by polymerase chain reaction. Collective Volume of Scientific Papers, ICCAT 41:549–56.
   Google Scholar
• Chuang PS, Chen MI, Shiao JC. 2012. Identification of tuna species by a real-time polymerase chain reaction technique. Food Chemistry 133:1055–61. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.01.076
   Google Scholar
• Collette BB, McDowell JR, Graves JE. 2006. Phylogeny of recent billfishes (Xiphioidei). Bulletin of Marine Science 79:455–68.
   Google Scholar
• De Battisti C, Marciano S, Magnabosco C, Busato S, Arcangeli G, Cattoli G. 2014. Pyrosequencing as a tool for rapid fish species identification and commercial fraud detection. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 62:198–205. doi: 10.1021/jf403545m
   Google Scholar
• Domingues RR, Okuda G, Bernard AM, Amorim AF, De Biasi J, Hilsdorf AW. 2015. A DNA tool for the identification of heavily exploited Atlantic billfishes. Conservation Genetics Resources 7:807–09. doi: 10.1007/s12686-015-0489-4
   Google Scholar
• Dwight Z, Palais R, Wittwer CT. 2011. uMELT: prediction of high-resolution melting curves and dynamic melting profiles of PCR products in a rich web application. Bioinformatics 27:1019–20. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr065
   Google Scholar
• Gibson UEM, Heid CA, Williams PM. 1996. A novel method for real time quantitative RT-PCR. Genome Research 6:995–1001. doi: 10.1101/gr.6.10.995
   Google Scholar
• Gillis KS, Ditton RB. 2002. A conjoint analysis of U.S. Atlantic billfish fishery management alternatives. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 22:1218–28. doi: 10.1577/1548-8675(2002)022<1218:ACAOUS>2.0.CO;2
   Google Scholar
• Graves JE, McDowell JR. 2015. Population structure of istiophorid billfishes. Fisheries Research 166:21–28. doi: 10.1016/j.fishres.2014.08.016
   Google Scholar
• Hanner R, Floyd R, Bernard A, Collette BB, Shivji M. 2011. DNA barcoding of billfishes. Mitochondrial DNA 22:27–36. doi: 10.3109/19401736.2011.596833
   Google Scholar
• Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, DeWaard JR. 2003. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 270:313–21. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2218
   Google Scholar
• Hebert PDN, Stoeckle MY, Zemlak TS, Francis CM. 2004. Identification of birds through DNA barcodes. PLoS Biology 2:e20312. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020312
   Google Scholar
• Heid CA, Stevens J, Livak KJ, Williams PM. 1996. Real time quantitative PCR. Genome Research 6:986–94. doi: 10.1101/gr.6.10.986
   Google Scholar
• Hellberg RSR, Morrissey MT. 2011. Advances in DNA-based techniques for the detection of seafood species substitution on the commercial market. Journal of Laboratory Automation 16:308–21. doi: 10.1016/j.jala.2010.07.004
   Google Scholar
• Herrero B, Lago FC, Vieites JM, Espiñeira M. 2011. Authentication of swordfish (Xiphias gladius) by RT–PCR and FINS methodologies. European Food Research and Technology 233:195–202. doi: 10.1007/s00217-011-1502-0
   Google Scholar
• Herrero B, Vieites JM, Espiñeira M. 2012. Fast real-time PCR for the detection of crustacean allergen in foods. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 60:1893–97. doi: 10.1021/jf2043532
   Google Scholar
• Hitchcock CHS, Crimes AA. 1985. Methodology for meat species identification: a review. Meat Science 15:215–24. doi: 10.1016/0309-1740(85)90077-4
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh HS, Chai TJ, Hwang DF. 2005. Rapid PCR-RFLP method for the identification of 5 billfish species. Journal of Food Science 70:C246–49. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2005.tb07167.x
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh HS, Chai TJ, Hwang DF. 2007. Using the PCR-RFLP method to identify the species of different processed products of billfish meats. Food Control 18:369–74. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2005.11.002
   Google Scholar
• Innes BH, Grewe PM, Ward RD. 1998. PCR-based genetic identification of marlin and other billfish. Marine and Freshwater Research 49:383–88. doi: 10.1071/MF98007
   Google Scholar
• Isenbarger TA, Carr CE, Johnson SS, Finney M, Church GM, Gilbert W, et al. 2008. The most conserved genome segments for life detection on Earth and other planets. Origins of Life and Evolution of Biospheres 38:517–33. doi: 10.1007/s11084-008-9148-z
   Google Scholar
• Klawe W. 1978. Estimates of Catches of Tunas and Billfishes by the Japanese, Korean and Taiwanese Longliners from Within the 200 mile Economic Zone of the Member Countries of the South Pacific Commission. Noumea, New Caledonia: South Pacific Commission. 41 pages.
   Google Scholar
• Lopez I, Pardo MA. 2010. Evaluation of a real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay for detection of Anisakis simplex parasite as a food-borne allergen source in seafood products. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 58:1469–77. doi: 10.1021/jf903492f
   Google Scholar
• McDowell JR, Graves JE. 2002. Nuclear and mitochondrial DNA markers for specific identification of istiophorid and xiphiid billfishes. Fishery Bulletin 100:537–44.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy RW, Crawford AJ, Bauer AM, Che J, Donnellan SC, Fritz U, et al. 2013. Cold Code: the global initiative to DNA barcode amphibians and nonavian reptiles. Molecular Ecology Resources 13:161–67. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12050
   Google Scholar
• Nakabō T. 2002. Fishes of Japan with Pictorial Keys to the Species, English edition. Tokyo: Tokai University Press. 1749 pages.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen RS, Morrissey MT. 2008. DNA-based methods for the identification of commercial fish and seafood species. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety 7:280–95. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-4337.2008.00046.x
   Google Scholar
• Rebrikov D, Trofimov DY. 2006. Real-time PCR: a review of approaches to data analysis. Applied Biochemistry and Microbiology 42:455–63. doi: 10.1134/S0003683806050024
   Google Scholar
• Reed GH, Kent JO, Wittwer CT. 2007. High-resolution DNA melting analysis for simple and efficient molecular diagnostics. Pharmacogenomics 8:597–608. doi: 10.2217/14622416.8.6.597
   Google Scholar
• Savolainen V, Cowan RS, Vogler AP, Roderick GK, Lane R. 2005. Towards writing the encyclopaedia of life: an introduction to DNA barcoding. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 360:1805–11. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2005.1730
   Google Scholar
• Sun CL, Yeh SZ, Liu CS, Su NJ, Chiang WC. 2015. Age and growth of black marlin (Istiompax indica) off eastern Taiwan. Fisheries Research 166:4–11. doi: 10.1016/j.fishres.2014.09.005
   Google Scholar
• Teletchea F. 2009. Molecular identification methods of fish species: reassessment and possible applications. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 19:265–93. doi: 10.1007/s11160-009-9107-4
   Google Scholar
• Teletchea F, Maudet C, Hänni C. 2005. Food and forensic molecular identification: update and challenges. Trends in Biotechnology 23:359–66. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2005.05.006
   Google Scholar
• Walsh PS, Metzger DA, Higuchi R. 1991. Chelex 100 as a medium for simple extraction of DNA for PCR-based typing from forensic material. Biotechniques 10:506–13.
   Google Scholar
• Ward RD, Zemlak TS, Innes BH, Last PR, Hebert PDN. 2005. DNA barcoding Australia’s fish species. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 360:1847–57. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2005.1716
   Google Scholar
• Wolf C, Rentsch J, Hübner P. 1999. PCR−RFLP analysis of mitochondrial DNA: a reliable method for species identification. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 47:1350–55. doi: 10.1021/jf9808426
   Google Scholar