DNA Barcoding of polychaetes collected during the 2018 Rapid Assessment Survey of floating dock communities from New England

References

• Aguado MT, Nygren A, Siddall ME. 2007. Phylogeny of Syllidae (Polychaeta) based on combined molecular analysis of nuclear and mitochondrial genes. Cladistics. 23:552–564. doi:10.1111/j.1096-0031.2007.00163.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander ME, Simon CA, Griffiths CL, Peters K, Sibanda S, Miza S, Groenewald B, Majiedt P, Sink KJ, Robinson TB. 2016. Back to the future: reflections and directions of South African marine bioinvasion research. African Journal of Marine Science. 38:141–144. doi:10.2989/1814232X.2016.1159984.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarez-Campos P, Giribet G, Riesgo A. 2017. The Syllis gracilis species complex: a molecular approach to a difficult taxonomic problem (Annelida, Syllidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 109:138–150. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2016.12.036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnich R, Fiege D. 2003. The Aphroditoidea (Annelida, Polychaeta) of the Mediterranean Sea. Abh. Abhandlungen der Senckenbergischen Naturforschenden Gesellschaft. 559:1–167.
   Google Scholar
• Bax N, Williamson A, Aguero M, Gonzalez E, Geeves W. 2003. Marine invasive alien species: a threat to global biodiversity. Marine Policy. 27:313–323. doi:10.1016/S0308-597X(03)00041-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blake JA. 1971. Revision of the genus Polydora from the east coast of North America (Polychaeta: Spionidae). Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology. 75:1–32. doi:10.5479/si.00810282.75.
   Google Scholar
• Blake JA. 1996. Family Spionidae Grube, 1850. Including a review of the genera and species from California and a revision of the genus Polydora Bosc, 1802. In: Blake JA, Hillbig B, Scott PH, editors. Taxonomic Atlas of the Benthic fauna of the Santa Maria Basin and Western Santa Barbara Channel, Vol. 6. Santa Barbara (CA): Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History; p. 171–182.
   Google Scholar
• Bonse S, Schmidt H, Eibye-Jacobsen D, Westheide W. 1996. Eulalia viridis (Polychaeta: Phyllodocidae) is a complex of two species in Northern Europe: results from biochemical and morphological analyses. Cahiers de Biologie Marine. 37:33–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlton JT. 1996. Biological invasions and cryptogenic species. Ecology. 77:1653–1655. doi:10.2307/2265767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr CM, Hardy SM, Brown TM, Macdonald TA, Hebert PDN. 2011. A tri-ocean perspective: DNA barcoding reveals geographic structure and cryptic diversity in Canadian polychaetes. PLoS One. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0022232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers SJ, Muir AL. 1997. Polychaetes: British Chrysopetaloidea, Pisionoidea and Aphroditoidea. Synopsis of the British Fauna. 54:1–202.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman JW, Carlton JT. 1991. A test of criteria for introduced species: the global invasion by the isopod Synidotea Laevidorsalis (Miers, 1881). Journal of Crustacean Biology. 11:386–400. doi:10.2307/1548465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins RA, Cruickshank RH. 2013. The seven deadly sins of DNA barcoding. Molecular Ecology Resources. 13:969–975. doi:10.1111/1755-0998.12046.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling JA, Blum MJ. 2007. DNA-based methods for monitoring invasive species: a review and prospectus. Biological Invasions. 9:751–765. doi:10.1007/s10530-006-9079-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling JA, Carlton JT. 2018. A framework for understanding marine cosmopolitanism in the Anthropocene. Frontiers in Marine Science. 5:293. doi:10.3389/fmars.2018.00293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R, Posada D. 2012. Jmodeltest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nature Methods. 9:772. doi:10.1038/nmeth.2109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David AA, Gardner K. 2017. Repurposing of archived CO1 sequence data reveals unusually high genetic structure between North American and European zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha). Mitochondrial DNA Part B: Resources. 2:853–855. doi:10.1080/23802359.2017.1407713.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David AA, Loveday BR. 2018. The role of cryptic dispersal in shaping connectivity patterns of marine populations in a changing world. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. 98:647–655. doi:10.1017/S0025315417000236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David AA, Simon CA. 2014. The effect of temperature on larval development of two non-indigenous poecilogonous polychaetes (Annelida: Spionidae) with implications for life history theory, establishment and range expansion. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 461:20–30. doi:10.1016/j.jembe.2014.07.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R. 1994. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology. 3:294–299.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Galil BS, Boero F, Campbell ML, Carlton JT, Cook E, Fraschetti S, Gollasch S, Hewitt CL, Jelmert A, Macpherson E, et al. 2015. ‘Double trouble’: the expansion of the Suez Canal and marine bioinvasions in the Mediterranean Sea. Biological Invasions. 17:973–976. doi:10.1007/s10530-014-0778-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geller J, Meyer C, Parker M, Hawk H. 2013. Redesign of PCR primers for mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I for marine invertebrates and application in all-taxa biotic surveys. Molecular Ecology Resources. 13:851–861. doi:10.1111/1755-0998.12138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geller JB, Walton ED, Grosholz ED, Ruiz GM. 1997. Cryptic invasions of the crab Carcinus detected by molecular phylogeography. Molecular Ecology. 6:901–906. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294X.1997.00256.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall TA. 1999. Bioedit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series. 41:95–98.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchings P, Kupriyanova E. 2018. Cosmopolitan polychaetes – fact or fiction? Personal and historical perspectives. Invertebrate Systematics. 32:1–9. doi:10.1071/IS17035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkegaard JB. 1992. Havbørsteorme I. Danmarks Fauna. 83:1–416.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkegaard JB. 1996. Havbørsteorme II. Danmarks Fauna. 86:1–451.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K, Battistuzzi FU. 2018. MEGA x: molecular Evolutionary Genetics analysis across computing platforms. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 35:1547–1549. doi:10.1093/molbev/msy096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maturana C, Moreno RA, Labra FA, Gonzalez-Wevar CA, Rozbaczylo N, Carrasco FD, Poulin E. 2011. DNA barcoding of marine polychaetes species of southern Patagonian fjords. Revista de Biologia Marina y Oceanografia. 46:35–42. doi:10.4067/S0718-19572011000100005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meusnier I, Singer GAC, Landry J-F, Hickey DA, Herbert PDN, Hajibabaei M. 2008. A universal DNA mini-barcode for biodiversity analysis. BMC Genomics. 9:214. doi:10.1186/1471-2164-9-214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Washington (DC): Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Molnar JL, Gamboa RL, Revenga C, Spalding MD. 2008. Assessing the global threat of invasive species to marine biodiversity. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 6:485–492. doi:10.1890/070064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nygren A, Norlinder E, Panova M, Pleijel F. 2011. Colour polymorphism in the polychaete Harmothoe imbricata (Linnaeus, 1767). Marine Biology Research. 7:54–62. doi:10.1080/17451001003713555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pederson JP, Bullock R, Carlton J, Dijkstra J, Dobroski N, Dyrynda P, Fisher R, Harris L, Hobbs N, Lambert G, et al. 2005. Marine invaders in the Northeast: Rapid assessment survey of non-native and native marine species of floating dock communities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Sea Grant College Program. 40 pp. MITSG 05-3.
   Google Scholar
• Pettibone MH. 1963. Marine polychaete worms of the New England region I. Aphroditidae through Trochochaetidae. Bulletin of the United States National Museum. 227:1–356. doi:10.5479/si.03629236.227.1.
   Google Scholar
• Pickett T, David AA. 2018. Global connectivity patterns of the notoriously invasive mussel, Mytilus galloprovincialis Lmk using archived CO1 sequence data. BMC Research Notes. 11:231. doi:10.1186/s13104-018-3328-3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pleijel F. 1988. Phyllodoce (Polychaeta, Phyllodocidae) from Northern Europe. Zoologica Scripta. 17:141–153. doi:10.1111/j.1463-6409.1988.tb00091.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pleijel F. 1993. Polychaeta Phyllodocidae. Marine Invertebrates of Scandinavia. 8:1–159.
   Google Scholar
• Pollock LW. 1998. A practical guide to the marine animals of north-eastern North America. New Brunswick (NJ): Rutgers University Press; p. 193–195.
   Google Scholar
• Rice LN, Lindsay S, Rawson P. 2018. Genetic homogeneity among geographically distant populations of the blister worm Polydora websteri. Aquatic Environment Interactions. 10:437–446. doi:10.3354/aei00281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice SA, Karl S, Rice KA. 2008. The Polydora cornuta complex (Annelida: Polychaeta) contains populations that are reproductively isolated and genetically distinct. Invertebrate Biology. 127:45–64. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7410.2007.00104.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roman J. 2006. Diluting the founder effect: cryptic invasions expand a marine invader’s range. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences. 273:2453–2459. doi:10.1098/rspb.2006.3597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmenti E, Musco L, Lo Brutto S, Mikac B, Nygren A, Badalamenti F. 2016. Mediterranean record of Eulalia ornata (Annelida: Phyllodocidae) corroborating its fidelity link with Sabellaria alveolata reef habitat. Mediterranean Marine Science. doi:10.12681/mms.1485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sekar V, Rajasekaran R, Prasannakumar C, Sankar R, Sridhar R, Sachithanandam V. 2016. Morphological and COI sequence based characterisation of marine polychaete species from Great Nicobar Island, India. In: Trivedi S, Ansari A, Ghosh S, Rehman H, editors. DNA barcoding in marine perspectives. Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-41840-7_6.
   Google Scholar
• Shiganova TA. 1998. Invasion of the Black Sea by the ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi and recent changes in pelagic community structure. Fisheries Oceanography. 7:305–310. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2419.1998.00080.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon CA. 2011. Polydora and Dipolydora (Polychaeta: Spionidae) associated with molluscs on the south coast of South Africa, with descriptions of two new species. African Invertebrates. 52:39–50. doi:10.5733/afin.052.0104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subasinghe RP. 2005. Epidemiological approach to aquatic animal health management: opportunities and challenges for developing countries to increase aquatic production through aquaculture. Preventative Veterinary Medicine. 67:117–124. doi:10.1016/j.prevetmed.2004.11.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun Y, Kupriyanova EK, Qiu JW. 2012. COI barcoding of Hydroides: a road from impossible to difficult. Invertebrate Systematics. 26:539–547. doi:10.1071/IS12024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villalobos-Guerrero TF, Bakken T. 2018. Revision of the Alitta virens species complex (Annelida: Nereididae) from the North Pacific Ocean. Zootaxa. 4483:201–257. doi:10.11646/zootaxa,4483.2.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiklund H, Nygren A, Pleijel F, Sundberg P. 2005. Phylogeny of Aphroditiformia (Polychaeta) based on molecular and morphological data. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 37:494–502. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2005.07.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams LG, Karl SA, Rice S, Simon C. 2017. Molecular identification of polydorid polychaetes (Annelida: Spionidae): is there a quick way to identify pest and alien species? African Zoology. 52:105–117. doi:10.1080/15627020.2017.1313131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar