Population structure of bycaught harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) in Norway

References

• Andersen LW, Ruzzante DE, Walton M, Berggren P, Bjørge A, Lockyer C. 2001. Conservation genetics of harbour porpoises, Phocoena phocoena, in eastern and central North Atlantic. Conservation Genetics. 2:309–324. doi: 10.1023/A:1012534212853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ascobans. 2000. Resolution no. 3: incidental take of small cetaceans. 3rd Meeting of Parties; 26–28 July; Bristol, UK: ASCOBANS (Agreement on the Conservation of Small Cetaceans of the Baltic, North East Atlantic, Irish and North Seas).
   Google Scholar
• Bjørge A, Moan A. 2017. Revised estimates of harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) bycatches in two Norwegian coastal gillnet fisheries. 16 p.
   Google Scholar
• Bjørge A, Skern-Mauritzen M, Rossman MC. 2013. Estimated bycatch of harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) in two coastal gillnet fisheries in Norway, 2006–2008. Mitigation and implications for conservation. Biological Conservation. 161:164–173. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chehida YB, Thumloup J, Vishnyakova K, Gol’din P, Fontaine MC. 2019. Genetic homogeneity in face of morphological heterogeneity in the harbor porpoises from the Black Sea and adjacent waters. bioRxiv: 634329.
   Google Scholar
• De Luna CJ, Goodman SJ, Thatcher O, Jepson PD, Andersen L, Tolley K, Hoelzel AR. 2012. Phenotypic and genetic divergence among harbour porpoise populations associated with habitat regions in the North Sea and adjacent seas. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 25:674–681. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2012.02461.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ersts PJ. 2006. Geographic distance matrix generator. American Museum of Natural History, Center for Biodiversity and Conservation. http://biodiversityinformatics.amnh.org/open_source/gdmg.
   Google Scholar
• Evans PGH, Andersen L, Bjørge A, Fontaine M, Galatius A, Kinze CC, Lockyer C, Luna CD, Pierce G, Sveegaard S, et al. 2009. Harbour porpoise Phocoena phocoena. Report of the ASCOBANS/HELCOM small cetacean population structure workshop. ASCOBANS (Agreement on the Conservation of Small Cetaceans of the Baltic, North East Atlantic, Irish and North Seas).
   Google Scholar
• Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J. 2005. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Molecular Ecology. 14:2611–2620. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02553.x
   Google Scholar
• Fontaine MC. 2016. Chapter eleven, Harbour porpoises, Phocoena phocoena, in the Mediterranean Sea and adjacent regions: biogeographic relicts of the Last Glacial Period. In: Notarbartolo Di Sciara G, Podestà M, Curry BE, editors. Advances in Marine Biology. Academic Press; p. 333–358. doi: 10.1016/bs.amb.2016.08.006
   Google Scholar
• Fontaine MC, Baird SJE, Piry S, Ray N, Tolley KA, Duke S, Birkun A, Ferreira M, Jauniaux T, Llavona Á, et al. 2007. Rise of oceanographic barriers in continuous populations of a cetacean: the genetic structure of harbour porpoises in Old World waters. BMC Biology. 5:30. doi: 10.1186/1741-7007-5-30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontaine MC, Roland K, Calves I, Austerlitz F, Palstra FP, Tolley KA, Ryan S, Ferreira M, Jauniaux T, Llavona A, et al. 2014. Postglacial climate changes and rise of three ecotypes of harbour porpoises, Phocoena phocoena, in western Palearctic waters. Molecular Ecology. 23:3306–3321. doi: 10.1111/mec.12817
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontaine MC, Snirc A, Frantzis A, Koutrakis E, Öztürk B, Öztürk AA, Austerlitz F. 2012. History of expansion and anthropogenic collapse in a top marine predator of the Black Sea estimated from genetic data. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 109:E2569. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1201258109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabriel S, Ziaugra L, Tabbaa D. 2009. SNP genotyping using the Sequenom MassARRAY iPLEX platform. Current Protocols in Human Genetics. 60:2.12.11–12.12.18. doi: 10.1002/0471142905.hg0212s60
   Google Scholar
• Glover KA, Haug T, Øien N, Walløe L, Lindblom L, Seliussen BB, Skaug HJ. 2012. The Norwegian minke whale DNA register: a data base monitoring commercial harvest and trade of whale products. Fish and Fisheries. 13:313–332. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-2979.2011.00447.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond PS, Lacey C, Gilles A, Viquerat S, Börjesson P, Herr H, Macleod K, Ridoux V, Santos MB, Scheidat M, et al. 2017. Estimates of cetacean abundance in European Atlantic waters in summer 2016 from the SCANS-III aerial and shipboard surveys. 39 p. Synergy WordPress services. https://synergy.st-andrews.ac.uk/scans3/files/2017/04/SCANS-III-design-based-estimates-2017-04-28-final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hoelzel AR. 1998. Genetic structure of cetacean populations in sympatry, parapatry, and mixed assemblages: implications for conservation policy. Journal of Heredity. 89:451–458. doi: 10.1093/jhered/89.5.451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoelzel AR. 2009. Evolution of population genetic structure in marine mammal species. In: Rizzoli A, Vernesi C, Bertorelle G, Hauffe HC, Bruford MW, editors. Population genetics for animal conservation. Conservation biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; p. 294–318.
   Google Scholar
• Holm S. 1979. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics. 6:65–70. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4615733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsson M, Rosenberg NA. 2007. CLUMPP: a cluster matching and permutation program for dealing with label switching and multimodality in analysis of population structure. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England). 23:1801–1806. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jombart T. 2008. Adegenet: a R package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England). 24:1403–1405. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lah L, Trense D, Benke H, Berggren P, Gunnlaugsson Þ, Lockyer C, Öztürk A, Öztürk B, Pawliczka I, Roos A, et al. 2016. Spatially explicit analysis of genome-wide SNPs detects subtle population structure in a mobile marine mammal, the harbor porpoise. PLoS One. 11:e0162792. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162792
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H. 2011. A statistical framework for SNP calling, mutation discovery, association mapping and population genetical parameter estimation from sequencing data. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England). 27:2987–2993. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr509
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H, Durbin R. 2009. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England). 25:1754–1760. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R, Subgroup GPDP. 2009. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England). 25:2078–2079. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y-L, Liu J-X. 2018. Structureselector: a web-based software to select and visualize the optimal number of clusters using multiple methods. Molecular Ecology Resources. 18:176–177. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12719
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morin PA, Martien KK, Taylor BL. 2009. Assessing statistical power of SNPs for population structure and conservation studies. Molecular Ecology Resources. 9:66–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2008.02392.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NAMMCO and IMR. 2019. Report of Joint Norwegian Institute of Marine Research/North Atlantic Marine Mammal Commission international workshop on the status of harbour porpoises in the North Atlantic. NAMMCO (North Atlantic Marine Mammal Commission).
   Google Scholar
• Ochoa A, Storey JD. 2016. FST and kinship for arbitrary population structures I: Generalized definitions. bioRxiv: 083915.
   Google Scholar
• Ochoa A, Storey JD. 2018. popkin: estimate kinship and FST under arbitrary population structure. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=popkin.
   Google Scholar
• Palumbi SR. 1994. Genetic divergence, reproductive isolation, and marine speciation. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 25:547–572. doi: 10.1146/annurev.es.25.110194.002555
   Google Scholar
• Peakall R, Smouse PE. 2006. Genalex 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Molecular Ecology Notes. 6:288–295. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.01155.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P. 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics. 155:945–959. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01758.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quintela M, Skaug HJ, Øien N, Haug T, Seliussen BB, Solvang HK, Pampoulie C, Kanda N, Pastene LA, Glover KA. 2014. Investigating population genetic structure in a highly mobile marine organism: the minke whale Balaenoptera acutorostrata acutorostrata in the North East Atlantic. PLoS One. 9:e108640. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108640
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Read AJ, Drinker P, Northridge S. 2006. Bycatch of marine mammals in U.S. and global fisheries. Conservation Biology. 20:163–169. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00338.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiss H, Hoarau G, Dickey-Collas M, Wolff WJ. 2009. Genetic population structure of marine fish: mismatch between biological and fisheries management units. Fish and Fisheries. 10:361–395. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-2979.2008.00324.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice DW. 1998. Marine mammals of the world: systematics and distribution. Lawrence, KS: Society for Marine Mammalogy.
   Google Scholar
• Rosel PE, Dizon AE, Haygood MG. 1995. Variability of the mitochondrial control region in populations of the harbour porpoise, Phocoena, on interoceanic and regional scales. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. 52:1210–1219. doi: 10.1139/f95-118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg MS, Anderson CD. 2011. PASSaGE: pattern analysis, spatial statistics and geographic Exegesis. Version 2. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2:229–232. doi: 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2010.00081.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousset F. 2008. GENEPOP’007: a complete re-implementation of the genepop software for Windows and Linux. Molecular Ecology Resources. 8:103–106. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01931.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryman N, Palm S. 2006. POWSIM: a computer program for assessing statistical power when testing for genetic differentiation. Molecular Ecology Notes. 6:600–602. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2006.01378.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storfer A, Murphy MA, Spear SF, Holderegger R, Waits LP. 2010. Landscape genetics: where are we now? Molecular Ecology. 19:3496–3514. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04691.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolley KA, Rosel PE. 2006. Population structure and historical demography of eastern North Atlantic harbour porpoises inferred through mtDNA sequences. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 327:297–308. doi: 10.3354/meps327297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vachon F, Whitehead H, Frasier TR. 2018. What factors shape genetic diversity in cetaceans? Ecology and Evolution. 8:1554–1572. doi: 10.1002/ece3.3727
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandeputte M, Mauger S, Dupont-Nivet M. 2006. An evaluation of allowing for mismatches as a way to manage genotyping errors in parentage assignment by exclusion. Molecular Ecology Notes. 6:265–267. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.01167.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viaud-Martínez KA, Vergara MM, Goldin PE, Ridoux V, Öztürk AA, Öztürk B, Rosel PE, Frantzis A, Komnenou A, Bohonak AJ. 2007. Morphological and genetic differentiation of the Black Sea harbour porpoise Phocoena phocoena. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 338:281–294. doi: 10.3354/meps338281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar