Optimization of fishery resources assessment methods and ecological effects evaluation of artificial reefs

References

• Abecasis D, Bentes L, Lino P G, Santos MN, Erzini K. 2013. Residency, movements and habitat use of adult white seabream (Diplodus sargus) between natural and artificial reefs. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science. 118:80–85. doi:10.1016/j.ecss.12.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acolas ML, Anras MB, Veron V, Jourdan H, Sabatie MR, Bagliniere JL. 2004. An assessment of the upstream migration and reproductive behaviour of allis shad (Alosa alosa L.) using acoustic tracking. ICES Journal of Marine Science. 61(8):1291–1304. doi:10.1016/j.icesjms.2004.07.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed KI, Demsar U. 2013. Improving seabed classification from Multi-beam echo sounder (MBES) backscatter data with visual data mining. Journal of Coastal Conservation. 17(3):559–577. doi:10.1007/s11852-013-0254-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ainsworth CH, Pitcher TJ, Rotinsulu C. 2008. Evidence of fishery depletions and shifting cognitive baselines in Eastern Indonesia. Biological Conservation. 141(3):848–859. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2008.01.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajemian MJ, Wetz JJ, Shipley LB, Stunz GW. 2015. Rapid assessment of fish communities on submerged oil and gas platform reefs using remotely operated vehicles. Fisheries Research. 167:143–155. doi:10.1016/j.fishres.2015.02.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azzurro E, Pais A, Consoli P, Andaloro F. 2007. Evaluating day–night changes in shallow Mediterranean rocky reef fish assemblages by visual census. Marine Biology. 151(6):2245–2253. doi:10.1007/s00227-007-0661-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard ATF, Götz A, Kerwath SE, Wilke CG. 2013. Observer bias and detection probability in underwater visual census of fish assemblages measured with independent double-observers. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 443:75–84. doi:10.1016/j.jembe.2013.02.039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianchi G, Gislason H, Graham K, et al. 2000. Impact of fishing on size composition and diversity of demersal fish communities. ICES Journal of Marine Science. 57(3):558–571. doi:10.1006/jmsc.2000.0727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollinger M, Kline R. 2015. Validating side scan sonar as a fish survey tool over artificial reefs in the Gulf of Mexico. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 137(4):2334–2334. doi:10.1121/1.4920525.
   Google Scholar
• Bonaldo D, Benetazzo A, Bergamasco A, Falcieri F, Carniel S, Aurighi M, Sclavo M. 2014. Sediment transport modifications induced by submerged artificial reef systems: A case study for the Gulf of Venice. Oceanological and Hydrobiological Studies. 43(1):7–20. doi:10.2478/s13545-014-0112-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen YX, Li XG, Tong F, et al. 2019. Impact of Dongshanhai artificial reef on hydrodynamics in nearby sea area in Huizhou. Guangdong Province. South China Fisheries Science. 14(06):19–28.
   Google Scholar
• De Robertis A, Higginbottom I. 2007. A post-processing technique to estimate the signal-to-noise ratio and remove echosounder background noise. ICES Journal of Marine Science. 64(6):1282–1291. doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsm112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Draštík V, Kubečka J. 2005. Fish avoidance of acoustic survey boat in shallow waters. Fisheries Research. 72(2):219–228. doi:10.1016/j.fishres.2004.10.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edgar GJ, Barrett NS, Morton AJ. 2004. Biases associated with the use of underwater visual census techniques to quantify the density and size-structure of fish populations. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 308(2):269–290. doi:10.1016/j.jembe.2004.03.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everson I, Bravington M, Goss C. 1996. A combined acoustic and trawl survey for efficiently estimating fish abundance. Fisheries Research. 26:75–91. doi:10.1016/0165-7836(95)00404-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabi G, Sala A. 2002. An assessment of biomass and diel activity of fish at an artificial reef (Adriatic Sea) using a stationary hydroacoustic technique. ICES Journal of Marine Science. 59(59):411–420. doi:10.1006/jmsc.2001.1173.
   Google Scholar
• Falcão M, Santos MN, Drago T, Serpa D, Monteiro C. 2009. Effect of artificial reefs (southern Portugal) on sediment–water transport of nutrients: Importance of the hydrodynamic regime. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science. 83(4):451–459. doi:10.1016/j.ecss.2009.04.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falcão M, Santos MN, Vicente M, Monteiro C. 2007. Biogeochemical processes and nutrient cycling within an artificial reef off Southern Portugal. Marine Environmental Research. 63(5):429–444. doi:10.1016/j.marenvres.2006.12.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fariñas-Franco JM, Allcock L, Smyth D, Dai R. 2013. Community convergence and recruitment of keystone species as performance indicators of artificial reefs. Journal of Sea Research. 78(3):59–74. doi:10.1016/j.seares.2012.10.008.
   Google Scholar
• Gunderson DR. 1993. Surveys of fisheries resources. New York: John Wiley and Sons, p. 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Kim HY, Hwang BK, Lee YW, Shin HO, Kwon JN, Lee K. 2011. Hydro-acoustic survey on fish distribution and aggregated fish at artificial reefs in marine ranching area. Bulletin of the Korean Society of Fisheries Technology. 47(2):139–145. doi:10.3796/KSFT.2011.47.2.139.
   Google Scholar
• Koslow JA. 2009. The role of acoustics in ecosystem-based fishery management. ICES Journal of Marine Science. 66(6):966–973. doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsp082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krieger K, Heifetz J, Ito D. 2001. Rockfish assessed acoustically and compared to bottom-trawl catch rates. Alaska Fishery Research Bulletin. 8:71–77.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson GL, Rose GA. 1999. The importance of detectability to acoustic surveys of semi-demersal fish. ICES Journal of Marine Science. 56:370–380. doi:10.1006/jmsc.1999.0476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leitão F, Santos MN, Erzini K, Monteiro C. 2008. Fish assemblages and rapid colonization after enlargement of an artificial reef off the Algarve coast (Southern Portugal). Marine Ecology. 29(4):435–448. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0485.2008.00253.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li D, Tang C, Xia C, Zhang H. 2017. Acoustic mapping and classification of benthic habitat using unsupervised learning in artificial reef water. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science. 185:11–21. doi:10.1016/j.ecss.2016.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitson RB. 1983. Acoustic detection and estimation of fish near the sea-bed and surface. FAO Fisheries Report. 300:27–34.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno I. 2006. Artificial reefs as a Tool for coastal Management in Balearic Islands (Western Mediterranean). Journal of Coastal Research. 1068(1):1843–1846.
   Google Scholar
• Parkerstetter SL, Rudstam LG, Sullivan PJ, Warner DM. 2009. Standard Operating Procedures for Fisheries acoustic surveys in the great Lakes. Ann Arbor: Great Lakes Fishery Commission, p. 103–146.
   Google Scholar
• Patranella A, Kilfoyle K, Pioch S, Spieler RE. 2017. Artificial reefs as juvenile fish habitat in a marina. Journal of Coastal Research. 336:1341–1351. doi:10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-16-00145.1.
   Google Scholar
• Pickering H, Whitmarsh D, Jensen A. 1999. Artificial reefs as a tool to aid rehabilitation of coastal ecosystems: investigating the potential. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 37(8–12):505–514. doi:10.1016/S0025-326X(98)00121-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinkas L, Oliphant MS, Iverson ILK. 1971. Food habits of albacore, bluefin tuna and bonito in Californian waters. Fish Bulletin. 152:5–10.
   Google Scholar
• Říha M, Jůza T, Prchalová M, Mrkvička T, Čech M, Draštík V, Muška M, Kratochvíl M, Peterka J, Tušer M, et al. 2012. The size selectivity of the main body of a sampling pelagic pair trawl in freshwater reservoirs during the night. Fisheries Research. 127-128(9):56–60. doi:10.1016/j.fishres.2012.04.012.
   Google Scholar
• Simmonds EJ, MacLennan DN. 2005. Fisheries acoustics: theory and practice. 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell Science.
   Google Scholar
• Simrad. 2008. Simrad ER60 scientific echo sounder software reference manual. Norway: Simrad Maritime as Kongsberg, p. 19–31.
   Google Scholar
• Soria M, Franon P, Gerlotto F. 1996. Analysis of vessel influence on spatial behaviour of fish schools using a multi-beam sonar and consequences for biomass estimates by echo-sounder. ICES Journal of Marine Science. 53:453–458. doi:10.1006/jmsc.1996.0064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steimle FW, Meier MH. 1997. What information do artificial reef managers really want from fishery science? Fisheries. 22(4):6–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streich MK, Ajemian MJ, Wetz JJ, Shively JD, Shipley JB, Stunz GW. 2017. Effects of a New artificial reef Complex on Red Snapper and the Associated fish community: an evaluation Using a before–after Control–impact Approach. Marine and Coastal Fisheries. 9:404–418. doi:10.1080/19425120.2017.1347116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tesfaye G, Wolff M, Taylor M. 2016. Gear selectivity of fishery target resources in Lake Koka, Ethiopia: evaluation and management implications. Hydrobiologia. 765:277–295. doi:10.1007/s10750-015-2420-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tessier A, Pastor J, Francour P, Gilles S, Crechiou R, Lenfant P. 2013. Video transects as a complement to underwater visual census to study reserve effect on fish assemblages. Aquatic Biology. 18(3):229–241. doi:10.3354/ab00506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tessier A, Verdoit MJ, Blouet S, Dalias N, Lenfant P. 2014. A case study of artificial reefs as a potential tool for maintaining artisanal fisheries in the French Mediterranean Sea. Aquatic Biology. 20(20):255–272. doi:10.3354/ab00563.
   Google Scholar
• Thorne RE, Hedgepeth JB, Campos J. 1989. Hydroacoustic observations of fish abundance and behavior around an artificial reef in Costa Rica. Bulletin of Marine Science. 44(2):1058–1064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong F, Tang ZZ, Jia XP, Chen PM. 2018. Frame-type artificial reef measurement by side-scan sonar. South China Fisheries Science. 14(1):99–104.
   Google Scholar
• Trenkel VM, Ressler PH, Jech M, Giannoulaki M, Taylor C. 2011. Underwater acoustics for ecosystem-based management: state of the science and proposals forecosystem indicators. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 442:285–301. doi:10.3354/meps09425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang ZH, Zhang SY, Wang K. 2009. Fish and macroinvertebrates community structure in artificial habitat around Sanheng Isle, Shengsi. China. Acta Ecologica Sinica. 30(8):2026–2035.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson KDP, Leung AWY, Kennish R. 2002. Restoration of Hong Kong fisheries through deployment of artificial reefs in marine protected areas. ICES Journal of Marine Science. 59(59):S157–S163. doi:10.1006/jmsc.2002.1186
   Google Scholar
• Zeng L, Tang ZZ, Chen PM, Hou CQ, Chen GB. 2018. Bioacoustic application on fisheries management in an artificial reefs’ ecological reserve of Bohai Gulf China. Environmental Earth Sciences. 77(21):1–11. doi:10.1007/s12665-018-7912-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng L, Tang ZZ, Jia XP, Yu J, Chen GB. 2019. Study on the trapping effect of artificial reefs on small reef fishes in Fangchenggang Gulf. Journal of Fishery Sciences of China. 26(4):783–795.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao XY, Ona E. 2003. Estimation and compensation models for the shadowing effect in dense fish aggregations. ICES Journal of Marine Science. 60(1):155–163. doi:10.1006/jmsc.2002.1319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar