163
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Report

The interspecific abundance–occupancy relationship in rocky intertidal communities

&
Pages 13-18 | Received 15 Apr 2022, Accepted 18 Jul 2022, Published online: 05 Aug 2022

References

  • Arribas LP, Donnarumma L, Palomo MG, Scrosati RA. 2014. Intertidal mussels as ecosystem engineers: their associated invertebrate biodiversity under contrasting wave exposures. Marine Biodiversity. 44:203–211. doi:10.1007/s12526-014-0201-z
  • Barnes RSK. 2022. Intraspecific abundance–occupancy–patchiness relations in the intertidal benthic macrofauna of a cool-temperate North Sea mudflat. Estuaries and Coasts. 45:827–838. doi:10.1007/s12237-021-00998-z
  • Blackburn TM, Cassey P, Gaston KJ. 2006. Variations on a theme: sources of heterogeneity in the form of the interspecific relationship between abundance and distribution. Journal of Animal Ecology. 75:1426–1439. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01167.x
  • Boraks A, Amend AS. 2021. Fungi in soil and understory have coupled distribution patterns. PeerJ. 9:e11915. doi:10.7717/peerj.11915
  • Buckley HL, Freckleton RP. 2010. Understanding the role of species dynamics in abundance–occupancy relationships. Journal of Ecology. 98:645–658. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01650.x
  • Catford JA, Wilson JRU, Pyšek P, Hulme PE, Duncan RP. 2022. Addressing context dependence in ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 37:158–170. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2021.09.007
  • Clarke KR. 1993. Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Australian Journal of Ecology. 18:117–143. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.1993.tb00438.x
  • Clarke KR, Warwick RM. 2001. Change in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation. Plymouth: PRIMER-E.
  • Faulks L, Svanbäck R, Ragnarsson-Stabo H, Eklöv P, Östman Ö. 2015. Intraspecific niche variation drives abundance–occupancy relationships in freshwater fish communities. The American Naturalist. 186:272–283. doi:10.1086/682004
  • Foggo A, Bilton DT, Rundle SD. 2007. Do developmental mode and dispersal shape abundance–occupancy relationships in marine macroinvertebrates? Journal of Animal Ecology. 76:695–702. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01245.x
  • Freilich MA, Wieters E, Broitman BR, Marquet PA, Navarrete SA. 2018. Species co-occurrence networks: can they reveal trophic and non-trophic interactions in ecological communities? Ecology. 99:690–699. doi:10.1002/ecy.2142
  • Gibson M. 2003. Seashores of the Maritimes. Halifax (NS): Nimbus Publishing.
  • Guedo DD, Lamb EG. 2013. Temporal changes in abundance–occupancy relationships within and between communities after disturbance. Journal of Vegetation Science. 24:607–615. doi:10.1111/jvs.12006
  • He F, Gaston KJ. 2000. Estimating species abundance from occurrence. The American Naturalist. 156:553–559. doi:10.1086/303403
  • Holt AR, Gaston KJ, He F. 2002. Occupancy–abundance relationships and spatial distribution: a review. Basic and Applied Ecology. 3:1–13. doi:10.1078/1439-1791-00083
  • Izabel-Shen D, Höger AL, Jürgens K. 2021. Abundance–occupancy relationships along taxonomic ranks reveal a consistency of niche differentiation in marine bacterioplankton with distinct lifestyles. Frontiers in Microbiology. 12:690712. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2021.690712
  • Manne LL, Veit RR. 2020. Temporal changes in abundance–occupancy relationships over 40 years. Ecology and Evolution. 10:602–611. doi:10.1002/ece3.5505
  • Martínez AJ. 2003. Marine life of the North Atlantic: Canada to New England. New York (NY): Aqua Quest Publications.
  • Menge BA. 2000. Recruitment vs. postrecruitment processes as determinants of barnacle population abundance. Ecological Monographs. 70:265–288. doi:10.1890/0012-9615(2000)070[0265:RVPPAD]2.0.CO;2
  • Menge BA, Bracken MES, Lubchenco J, Leslie HM. 2017. Alternative state? Experimentally induced Fucus canopy persists 38 years in an Ascophyllum-dominated community. Ecosphere. 8:e01725. doi:10.1002/ecs2.1725
  • Pollock LW. 1998. A practical guide to the marine animals of Northeastern North America. New Brunswick (NJ): Rutgers University Press.
  • Raffaelli D, Hawkins S. 1999. Intertidal ecology. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Rivera M, Scrosati R. 2008. Self-thinning and size inequality dynamics in a clonal seaweed (Sargassum lapazeanum). Journal of Phycology. 44:45–49. doi:10.1111/j.1529-8817.2007.00427.x
  • Schiel DR. 2019. Experimental analyses of diversity partitioning in southern hemisphere algal communities. Oecologia. 190:179–193. doi:10.1007/s00442-019-04375-3
  • Scrosati R. 2002. An updated definition of genet applicable to clonal seaweeds, bryophytes, and vascular plants. Basic and Applied Ecology. 3:97–99. doi:10.1078/1439-1791-00106
  • Scrosati R. 2005. Review of studies on biomass-density relationships (including self-thinning lines) in seaweeds: main contributions and persisting misconceptions. Phycological Research. 53:224–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-183.2005.00390.x
  • Scrosati R, Heaven C. 2007. Spatial trends in community richness, diversity, and evenness across rocky intertidal environmental stress gradients in eastern Canada. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 342:1–14. doi:10.3354/meps342001
  • Scrosati RA. 2022. Low winter extremes in intertidal temperature in Nova Scotia in the absence of an ice foot. Frontiers in Marine Science. 8:811545. doi:10.3389/fmars.2021.811545
  • Scrosati RA, Ellrich JA, Freeman MJ. 2020a. Half-hourly changes in intertidal temperature at nine wave-exposed locations along the Atlantic Canadian coast: a 5.5-year study. Earth System Science Data. 12:2695–2703. doi:10.5194/essd-12-2695-2020
  • Scrosati RA, Freeman MJ, Ellrich JA. 2020b. The subhabitat dependence of biogeographic pattern. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution. 8:550612. doi:10.3389/fevo.2020.550612
  • Sears JR. 1998. NEAS keys to the Benthic marine algae of the Northeastern Coast of North America from Long Island Sound to the Strait of Belle Isle. Dartmouth (MA): Northeast Algal Society.
  • Şen B, Akçakaya HR. 2022. Interspecific variability in demographic processes affects abundance-occupancy relationships. Oecologia. 198:153–165. doi:10.1007/s00442-021-05085-5
  • Suhonen J, Jokimaki J. 2019. Temporally stable species occupancy frequency distributions and abundance–occupancy relationship patterns in urban wintering bird asseemblages. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution. 7:129. doi:10.3389/fevo.2019.00129
  • Tam JC, Scrosati RA. 2011. Mussel and dogwhelk distribution along the NW Atlantic coast: testing predictions derived from the abundant-centre model. Journal of Biogeography. 38:1536–1545. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2011.02498.x
  • Tam JC, Scrosati RA. 2014. Distribution of cryptic mussel species (Mytilus edulis and M. trossulus) along wave exposure gradients on northwest Atlantic rocky shores. Marine Biology Research. 10:51–60. doi:10.1080/17451000.2013.793809
  • Ten Caten C, Holian LA, Dallas T. 2022. Effects of occupancy estimation on abundance–occupancy relationships. Biology Letters. 18:20220137. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2022.0137
  • van Genne B, Scrosati RA. 2022. Abundance and occupancy data for intertidal algae and invertebrates. Figshare dataset. [accessed 2022 July 7]. doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.19579003.v1
  • Verberk WCEP, van der Velde G, Esselink H. 2010. Explaining abundance–occupancy relationships in specialists and generalists: a case study on aquatic macroinvertebrates in standing waters. Journal of Animal Ecology. 79:589–601. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01660.x
  • Villalard-Bohnsack M. 2003. Illustrated key to the seaweeds of New England. Kingston (RI): The Rhode Island Natural History Survey.
  • Webb TJ, Tyler EHM, Somerfield PJ. 2009. Life history mediates large-scale population ecology in marine benthic taxa. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 396:293–306. doi:10.3354/meps08253
  • WoRMS. 2022. World register of marine species. http://marinespecies.org [accessed 2022 July 7].

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.