Towards a BIM-enabled sustainable building design process: roles, responsibilities, and requirements

References

• Anumba, C. J., Baugh, C., & Khalfan, M. M. (2002). Organisational structures to support concurrent engineering in construction. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 102(5), 260–270. doi: 10.1108/02635570210428294
   Google Scholar
• Attia, S., Beltrán, L., De Herde, A., & Hensen, J. (2009, July 27–30). Architect friendly: A comparison of ten different building performance simulation tools. Proceedings of IBPSA ‘09 Buildings Simulation conference, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland, pp. 204–211.
   Google Scholar
• Azhar, S., Carlton, W. A., Olsen, D., & Ahmad, I. (2011). Building information modeling for sustainable design and LEED® rating analysis. Automation in Construction, 20(2), 217–224. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2010.09.019
   Google Scholar
• Barlow, S. (2011). Guide to BREEAM. London: RIBA.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, P., & Davies, N. (2014). BIM in principle and in practice. London: ICE.
   Google Scholar
• Biswas, T., & Tsung-Hsien Wang, R. K. (2008). Integrating sustainable building rating systems with building information models. Retrieved from http://cumincad.scix.net/data/works/att/caadria2008_24_session3a_193.content.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bordens, K. S., & Abbott, B. B. (2002). Research design and methods: A process approach. Abingdon: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Bouchlaghem, D. (2012). Collaborative working in construction (Vol. 1). Abingdon: SPON Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bouchlaghem, D., Shang, H., Anumba, C. J., Cen, M., Miles, J., & Taylor, M. (2005). ICT-enabled collaborative working environment for concurrent conceptual design. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 1(4), 261–280. doi: 10.1080/17452007.2005.9684597
   Google Scholar
• Brahme, R., Mahdavi, A., Lam, K. P., & Gupta, S. (2001, August 13–15). Complex building performance analysis in the early stages of design. Seventh International IBPSA Conference, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, pp. 661–668.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• BSI. (2013). PAS 1192-2:2013 – specification for information management for the capital/delivery phase of construction projects using building information modelling. Retrieved from http://shop.bsigroup.com/Navigate-by/PAS/PAS-1192-22013/:CIC
   Google Scholar
• Burati, J. L.Jr., Farrington, J. J., & Ledbetter, W. B. (1992). Causes of quality deviations in design and construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 118(1), 34–49. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1992)118:1(34)
   Google Scholar
• Cabinet Office. (2011). Government construction strategy, May 2011. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/government-construction-strategy
   Google Scholar
• Chung, P. W. H., Cheung, L. Y. C., Stader, J., Jarvis, P., Moore, J., & Macintosh, A. (2003). Knowledge-based process management – an approach to handling adaptive workflow. Knowledge-Based Systems, 16(3), 149–160. doi: 10.1016/S0950-7051(02)00080-1
   Google Scholar
• Cinquemani, V., & Prior, J. J. (2010). Integrating BREEAM throughout the design process: A guide to achieving higher BREEAM and code for sustainable homes ratings through incorporation with the RIBA outline plan of work and other procurement routes. Bracknell: IHS/BRE Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cnudde, M., Bezelga, A., & Brandon, P. S. (1991). Lack of quality in construction – economic losses. In Management, quality and economics in building (pp. 508–515). Retrieved from https://books.google.co.uk/books?hl=en&lr=&id=fQKRAgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA461&dq=Cnudde,+M.,+Bezelga,+A.,+and+Brandon,+P.+S.+(1991).+Lack+of+quality+in+construction%E2%80%94economic+losses.+Management,+Quality+and+Economics+in+Building,+508%E2%80%93515.&ots=d34RPTvPh1&sig=spCbySrJqzUAjIUreyiMVXYGLGo#v=onepage&q&f=false
   Google Scholar
• Crawley, D., & Aho, I. (1999). Building environmental assessment methods: Applications and development trends. Building Research and Information, 27(4–5), 300–308. doi: 10.1080/096132199369417
   Google Scholar
• Crawley, D. B., Hand, J. W., Kummert, M., & Griffith, B. T. (2008). Contrasting the capabilities of building energy performance simulation programs. Building and Environment, 43(4), 661–673. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.10.027
   Google Scholar
• CURT. (2004). Collaboration, integrated information, and the project lifecycle in building design, construction and operation. Retrieved from http://codebim.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/CurtCollaboration.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dorador, J. M., & Young, R. I. M. (2000). Application of IDEF0, IDEF3 and UML methodologies in the creation of information models. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 13(5), 430–445. doi: 10.1080/09511920050117928
   Google Scholar
• Dubois, A., & Gadde, L. E. (2002). Systematic combining: An abductive approach to case research. Journal of Business Research, 55(7), 553–560. doi:10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00195-8
   Google Scholar
• Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x/full
   Google Scholar
• Feng, C.-W., Mustaklem, O., & Chen, Y. J. (2012). The BIM-based information integration sphere for construction projects. Proceedings of the 28th ISARC Conference, Seoul, Korea, pp. 156–161.
   Google Scholar
• Garber, R. (2009). Optimisation stories: The impact of building information modelling on contemporary design practice. Architectural Design, 79(2), 6–13. doi: 10.1002/ad.842
   Google Scholar
• Ghosh, S., Negahban, S., Kwak, Y. H., & Skibniewski, M. J. (2011). Impact of sustainability on integration and interoperability between BIM and ERP – a governance framework. In Technology management conference (ITMC), 2011 IEEE International (pp. 187–193). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (2009). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.uk/books?hl=enandlr=andid=rtiNK68Xt08Candoi=fndandpg=PP1anddq=Glaser,+Barney+%26+Strauss,+Anselm+(1967).+The+discovery+of+groundedandots=UVy_RhWHZPandsig=-2Bd0JziNHUSygXy9dBlHG6VAdE
   Google Scholar
• Goldschmidt, G. (2014). Linkography unfolding the design process. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gunasekaran, A., & Love, P. E. D. (1998). Concurrent engineering: A multi-disciplinary approach for construction. Logistics Information Management, 11(5), 295–300. doi: 10.1108/09576059810234209
   Google Scholar
• Haapio, A., & Viitaniemi, P. (2008). A critical review of building environmental assessment tools. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 28(7), 469–482. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2008.01.002
   Google Scholar
• Hammarlund, Y., & Josephson, P.-E. (1991). Sources of quality failures in building. In Proceedings of the European Symposium on Management, quality and economics in housing and other building sectors, Lisbon, Portugal (Vol. 30, pp. 671–679). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, D., Akinci, B., Oliver, A. A., Anil, E., Okorn, B. E., & Xiong, X. (2011, January 4–7). Methods for automatically modeling and representing as-built building information models. Proceedings of NSF CMMI Research Innovation Conference, Atlanta, GA.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, G. A., Calderwood, R., & Macgregor, D. (1989). Critical decision method for eliciting knowledge. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, IEEE Transactions on, 19(3), 462–472. doi: 10.1109/21.31053
   Google Scholar
• Knowledge Based Systems Inc. (1993). Integration DEFinition for function modeling (IDEF0). Retrieved from http://www.idef.com/pdf/idef0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Laseau, P. (2001). Graphic thinking for architects and designers. New York: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Levin-Rozalis, M. (2004). Searching for the unknowable: A process of detection – abductive research generated by projective techniques. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. Retrieved from http://ijq.sagepub.com/content/3/2/1.short
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, K., & Mistree, F. (1998). Collaborative, sequential, and isolated decisions in design. Journal of Mechanical Design, 120(4), 643–652. doi: 10.1115/1.2829327
   Google Scholar
• Love, P. E. D., & Gunasekaran, A. (1997). Concurrent engineering in the construction industry. Concurrent Engineering, 5(2), 155–162. doi: 10.1177/1063293X9700500207
   Google Scholar
• Love, P. E. D., Gunasekaran, A., & Li, H. (1998). Concurrent engineering: A strategy for procuring construction projects. International Journal of Project Management, 16(6), 375–383. doi: 10.1016/S0263-7863(97)00066-5
   Google Scholar
• Love, P. E. D., & Li, H. (2000). Quantifying the causes and costs of rework in construction. Construction Management and Economics, 18(4), 479–490. doi: 10.1080/01446190050024897
   Google Scholar
• Lützkendorf, T., & Lorenz, D. P. (2006). Using an integrated performance approach in building assessment tools. Building Research and Information, 34(4), 334–356. doi: 10.1080/09613210600672914
   Google Scholar
• Mahdavi, A., Brahme, R., & Gupta, S. (2001). Performance-based computational design via differential modeling and two-staged mapping. Proceedings of the CAAD Futures Conference, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, pp. 667–680.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. J., Menzel, C. P., Painter, M. K., Dewitte, P. S., Blinn, T., & Perakath, B. (1995). Information integration for concurrent engineering (IICE) IDEF3 process description capture method report. DTIC Document.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. J., & DeWitte, P. S. (1999). Delivering Results: Evolving BPR from art to engineering. In D. J. Elzinga, T. R. Gulledge, & C.-Y. Lee (Eds.). Business process engineering (pp. 83–129). Boston, MA: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-5091-4_5
   Google Scholar
• Mendler, S., & Odell, W. (2000). The HOK guidebook to sustainable design. New York: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• NBS. (2015). NBS National BIM Report 2015. UK: National Building Specification (NBS).
   Google Scholar
• Nofera, W., & Korkmaz, S. (2010, November 4–7). Design process integration for sustainable, high performance buildings. South Lake Tahoe, CA. Retrieved from http://www.academiceventplanner.com/EPOC2010/Papers/EPOC_2010_NoferaKorkmaz.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pala, M., & Bouchlaghem, N. M. (2012, August 15–17). How could ICT benefit design managers for assessing sustainability of their project? Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Innovation in AEC, São Paulo, Brazil.
   Google Scholar
• Peña-Mora, F., Hussein, K., Vadhavkar, S., & Benjamin, K. (2000). CAIRO: A concurrent engineering meeting environment for virtual design teams. Artificial Intelligence in Engineering, 14(3), 203–219. doi: 10.1016/S0954-1810(00)00016-9
   Google Scholar
• Potts, C., & Bruns, G. (1988, April 11–15). Recording the reasons for design decisions. In Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Software engineering, Singapore (pp. 418–427). IEEE Computer Society Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reichertz, J. (2004). 4.3 Abduction, deduction and induction in qualitative research. A companion to. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.uk/books?hl=enandlr=andid=lRSL1KJjEPoCandoi=fndandpg=PA159anddq=reichertz+a+rule-governed+way+to+new+knowledgeandots=eMHOdevcJoandsig=4NWvGO8XucSdPuCCMjir7P-bXP8
   Google Scholar
• Reigeluth, C. M. (1999). The elaboration theory: Guidance for scope and sequence decisions. Instructional Design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory, 2, 425–453.
   Google Scholar
• RIBA. (2013). RIBA Plan of Work 2013. Retrieved from http://www.ribaplanofwork.com/
   Google Scholar
• Robichaud, L. B., & Anantatmula, V. S. (2010). Greening project management practices for sustainable construction. Journal of Management in Engineering, 27(1), 48–57. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000030
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, S. I. (2002). Sustainability assessment and reporting for the University of Michigan’s Ann Arbor Campus. The University of Michigan. Retrieved from http://css.snre.umich.edu/css_doc/CSS02-04.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ruikar, K., Anumba, C. J., & Carrillo, P. M. (2006). VERDICT – an e-readiness assessment application for construction companies. Automation in Construction, 15(1), 98–110. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2005.02.009
   Google Scholar
• Schlueter, A., & Thesseling, F. (2009). Building information model based energy/exergy performance assessment in early design stages. Automation in Construction, 18(2), 153–163. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2008.07.003
   Google Scholar
• Sharp, H., Finkelstein, A., & Galal, G. (1999). Stakeholder identification in the requirements engineering process. In Database and expert systems applications, 1999. Proceedings. Tenth international workshop on (pp. 387–391). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, D. (2013). Assembling a collaborative project team: Practical tools including multidisciplinary schedules of services. London: RIBA.
   Google Scholar
• Sinou, M., & Kyvelou, S. (2006). Present and future of building performance assessment tools. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 17(5), 570–586. doi: 10.1108/14777830610684530
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. K., & Tardif, M. (2012). Building information modeling: A strategic implementation guide for architects, engineers, constructors, and real estate asset managers. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Succar, B. (2009). Building information modelling framework: A research and delivery foundation for industry stakeholders. Automation in Construction, 18(3), 357–375. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2008.10.003
   Google Scholar
• Succar, B., Sher, W., & Williams, A. (2012). Measuring BIM performance: Five metrics. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 8(2), 120–142. doi:10.1080/17452007.2012.659506
   Google Scholar
• Svennevig, J. (2001). Abduction as a methodological approach to the study of spoken interaction. Norskrift. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jan_Svennevig3/publication/251398301_Abduction_as_a_methodological_approach_to_the_study_of_spoken_interaction._Norskrift/links/552798870cf2520617a72415.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ternoey, S., Bickle, L., Robbins, C., Busch, R., & McCord, K. (1985). Solar energy research institute: The design of energy-responsible commercial buildings. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Tudor, R. (2013). A practical guide to building thermal modelling. BSRIA. Retrieved from www.bsria.co.uk
   Google Scholar
• Watts, R. D. (1966). The elements of design. In S. A. Gregory (Ed.), The design method (pp. 85–95). New York City: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Welle, B., Haymaker, J., & Rogers, Z. (2011). ThermalOpt: A methodology for BIM-based passive thermal multidisciplinary design optimization (Center for Integrated Facility Engineering Technical Report No. 200).
   Google Scholar
• Wong, K. A., & Fan, Q. (2012). Building information modelling (BIM) for sustainable building design. Facilities, 31(3/4), 138–158. Retrieved from http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1108/02632771311299412 doi: 10.1108/02632771311299412
   Google Scholar
• Yang, R. J., Zou, P. X. W., & Keating, B. (2013). Analysing stakeholder-associated risks in green buildings: A social network analysis method. In WBC 2013: Proceedings of the 19th International CIB World Building Congress (pp. 1–12). Queensland University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.uk/books?hl=enandlr=andid=OgyqBAAAQBAJandoi=fndandpg=PT243anddq=yin+case+study+research+fourthe+ditionandots=FaJ6m9o30iandsig=bXGm-CAipbDY22pFcSY-nC1c2zY
   Google Scholar