Building design and construction strategies for a circular economy

References

• Adams, K. T., Osmani, M., Thorpe, T., & Thornback, J. (2017). Circular economy in construction: Current awareness, challenges and enablers. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers – Waste and Resource Management, 170(1), 15–24. doi: https://doi.org/10.1680/jwarm.16.00011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Advisory Board for Cirkulær Økonomi. (2017). Advisory Board for cirkulær økonomi. Anbefalinger til regeringen [Circular Economy Advisory Board. Recommendations for the gorvernment].
   Google Scholar
• Akanbi, L. A., Oyedele, L. O., Akinade, O. O., Ajayi, A. O., Davila Delgado, M., Bilal, M., & Bello, S. A. (2018). Salvaging building materials in a circular economy: A BIM-based whole-life performance estimator. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 129(May 2017), 175–186. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.10.026
   Google Scholar
• Azcárate-Aguerre, J. F., Den Heijer, A., & Klein, T. (2018). Integrated faades as a product-service system -business process innovation to accelerate integral product implementation. Journal of Facade Design and Engineering, 6(1), 41–56. doi: https://doi.org/10.7480/jfde.2018.1.1840
   Google Scholar
• Blomsma, F., & Brennan, G. (2017). The emergence of circular economy: A new framing around prolonging resource productivity. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21(3), 603–614. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blomsma, F., Kjaer, L., Pigosso, D., McAloone, T., & Lloyd, S. (2018, May). Exploring circular strategy combinations – towards understanding the role of PSS. Procedia CIRP, 69, 752–757. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.11.129
   Google Scholar
• Bocken, N. M. P., de Pauw, I., Bakker, C., & van der Grinten, B. (2016). Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 33(5), 308–320. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/21681015.2016.1172124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulding, K. (1996). The economics of the coming spaceship earth. In H. Jarret (Ed.), Environmental quality in a growing economy - essay from the sixth RFF forum (pp. 3–14). Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braungart, M., & McDonough, W. (2002). Cradle to cradle: Remaking the way we make things (1st ed.). New York: North Point.
   Google Scholar
• Brezet, J. C., & van Hemel, C. G. (1997). Ecodesign: A promising approach to sustainable production and consumption. Paris: United Nations Environ- ment Program.
   Google Scholar
• Chau, C. K., Xu, J. M., Leung, T. M., & Ng, W. Y. (2017). Evaluation of the impacts of end-of-life management strategies for deconstruction of a high-rise concrete framed office building. Applied Energy, 185, 1595–1603. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.01.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheshire, D. (2016). Building revolutions applying the circular economy to the built environement. Newcastle upon Tyne: RIBA Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, S. J. G., Giesekam, J., Hammond, G. P., Norman, J. B., Owen, A., Rogers, J. G., & Scott, K. (2017). Thermodynamic insights and assessment of the circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 162, 1356–1367. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Danish Government. (2018). Strategi for cirkulær økonomi - Mere værdi og bedre miljø gennem design, forbrug og genanvendelse [Circular economy strategy - more value and a better environment through design, consumption and recycling]. Copenhagen.
   Google Scholar
• de Almeida Biolchini, J. C., Mian, P. G., Natali, A. C. C., Conte, T. U., & Travassos, G. H. (2007). Scientific research ontology to support systematic review in software engineering. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 21(2), 133–151. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2006.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eberhardt, L. C. M., Birgisdóttir, H., & Birkved, M. (2019). Life cycle assessment of a Danish office building designed for disassembly. Building Research & Information, 47(6), 666–680. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2018.1517458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellen MacArthur Foundation [EMF]. (2012). Towards the circular economy - economic and business rationale for an accelerated transition (Vol. 1). doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/108819806775545321
   Google Scholar
• Ellen MacArthur Foundation [EMF]. (2013). Towards the circular economy - opportunities for the consumer goods sector (Vol. 2).
   Google Scholar
• Ellen MacArthur Foundation [EMF]. (2014). Potential for Denmark as a circular economy a case study from: Delivering the circular economy – a Toolkit for policy makers. Retrieved from http://mst.dk/media/151170/15-11-25-cirkulaer-oekonomi.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ellen MacArthur Foundation [EMF]. (2015). Growth within: A circular economy vision for a competitive Europe. Ellen MacArthur Foundation, 100, 81–92.
   Google Scholar
• Ellen MacArthur Foundation [EMF]. (2016a). Circular economy schools of thought. Retrieved from https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/circular-economy/concept/schools-of-thought
   Google Scholar
• Ellen MacArthur Foundation [EMF]. (2016b). Circularity in the built environment: Case studies. Retrieved from https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/assets/downloads/Built-Env-Co.Project.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ellen MacArthur Foundation [EMF]. (2017). Cities in the circular economy. Retrieved from https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/assets/downloads/publications/Cities-in-the-CE_An-Initial-Exploration.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ellen MacArthur Foundation, World Economic Forum, & The Boston Consulting Group. (2016). Can the circular economy transform the world’s number one consumer of raw materials? | World Economic Forum. Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/05/can-the-circular-economy-transform-the-world-s-number-one-consumer-of-raw-materials/
   Google Scholar
• Esa, M. R., Halog, A., & Rigamonti, L. (2017). Developing strategies for managing construction and demolition wastes in Malaysia based on the concept of circular economy. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 19(3), 1144–1154. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-016-0516-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2008). Directive 2008/98/EC on waste (Waste Framework Directive). Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/environment/waste/framework/
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2017). Circular Economy Strategy - Environment - European Commission. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/environment/circular-economy/index_en.htm
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2019a). Circular economy implementation of the circular economy action plan. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/environment/circular-economy/
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2019b). Going climate neutral by 2050 a strategic longterm vision for a prosperous, modern, competetive and climate-neutral EU economy. Luxemborg.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2019c). What are Technology Readiness Levels (TRLs) and to which Horizon 2020 call topics are they applicable? Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/portal/screen/support/faq/2890
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. (2018). Directive (EU) 2018/851 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 amending Directive 2008/98/EC on waste. In Official Journal of the European Union. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1530557218036&uri=CELEX:32018L0851
   Google Scholar
• Fregonara, E., Giordano, R., Ferrando, D. G., & Pattono, S. (2017). Economic-environmental indicators to support investment decisions: A focus on the buildings’ end-of-life stage. Buildings, 7(3), 65. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings7030065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frosch, R. A., & Gallopoulos, N. E. (1989). Strategies for manufacturing. Scientific American, 261(3), 144–152. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0989-144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gálvez-Martos, J. L., Styles, D., Schoenberger, H., & Zeschmar-Lahl, B. (2018, April). Construction and demolition waste best management practice in Europe. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 136, 166–178. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.04.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geldermans, R. J. (2016, October). Design for change and circularity - accommodating circular material & product flows in construction. Energy Procedia, 96, 301–311. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2016.09.153
   Google Scholar
• Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., & Ulgiati, S. (2015). A review on circular economy: The expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 1–22. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007
   Google Scholar
• Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., & Ulgiati, S. (2016, November). A review on circular economy: The expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 114, 11–32. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghisellini, P., Ji, X., Liu, G., & Ulgiati, S. (2018). Evaluating the transition towards cleaner production in the construction and demolition sector of China: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 195, 418–434. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghisellini, P., Ripa, M., & Ulgiati, S. (2018). Exploring environmental and economic costs and benefits of a circular economy approach to the construction and demolition sector. A literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 178, 618–643. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, J., Adams, K., Giesekam, J., Tingley, D. D., & Pomponi, F. (2019). Barriers and drivers in a circular economy: The case of the built environment. Procedia CIRP, 80, 619–624. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.12.015
   Google Scholar
• Hopkinson, P., Chen, H. M., Zhou, K., Wang, Y., & Lam, D. (2019). Recovery and reuse of structural products from end-of-life buildings. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Engineering Sustainability, 172(3), 119–128. doi: https://doi.org/10.1680/jensu.18.00007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hossain, M. U., & Ng, S. T. (2018). Critical consideration of buildings’ environmental impact assessment towards adoption of circular economy: An analytical review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 205, 763–780. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innobyg. (2018). Idekatalog over designstrategier for design for disassembly i præfabrikeret byggeri [Idea catalogue of designstrategies for design for disassembly in prefabricated buildings]. Retrieved from https://issuu.com/cinark/docs/idekatalog
   Google Scholar
• ISO. (2019). Connecting the dots in a circular economy: A new ISO technical committee just formed. Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/news/ref2402.html
   Google Scholar
• Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2017). Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 127, 221–232. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleis, B. (2013a). Det Foranderlige Hus - Bygget til at bygge om. Retrieved from https://www.realdaniabyogbygklubben.dk/media/202375/dfh_web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kleis, B. (2013b). Upcycle house - genbrug fra inderst til yderst. Copenhagen: Realdania Byg.
   Google Scholar
• Kleis, B. (2014a). Det vedligeholdelsesfri hus - Fornyelse fortolker fortiden. Copenhagen: Realdania Byg.
   Google Scholar
• Kleis, B. (2014b). Det Vedligeholdelsesfri Hus Murværk holder. Copenhagen: Realdania Byg.
   Google Scholar
• Kurdve, M., & De Goey, H. (2017). Can social sustainability values be incorporated in a product service system for temporary public building modules? Procedia CIRP, 64, 193–198. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.039
   Google Scholar
• Kyrö, R., Jylhä, T., & Peltokorpi, A. (2019). Embodying circularity through usable relocatable modular buildings. Facilities, 37(1–2), 75–90. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/F-12-2017-0129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leising, E., Quist, J., & Bocken, N. (2018). Circular economy in the building sector: Three cases and a collaboration tool. Journal of Cleaner Production, 176, 976–989. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieder, M., & Rashid, A. (2016). Towards circular economy implementation: A comprehensive review in context of manufacturing industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 115, 36–51. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahpour, A. (2018). Prioritizing barriers to adopt circular economy in construction and demolition waste management. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 134, 216–227. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.01.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malmqvist, T., Nehasilova, M., Moncaster, A., Birgisdottir, H., Nygaard, F., Houlihan Wiberg, A., & Potting, J. (2018). Energy & Buildings Design and construction strategies for reducing embodied impacts from buildings – case study analysis. Energy and Buildings, 166, 35–47. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.01.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maslesa, E., Jensen, P. A., & Birkved, M. (2018, March). Indicators for quantifying environmental building performance: A systematic literature review. Journal of Building Engineering, 19, 552–560. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2018.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mestre, A., & Cooper, T. (2017). Circular product design. A multiple loops life cycle design approach for the circular economy. The Design Journal, 20, S1620–S1635. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minunno, R., O’Grady, T., Morrison, G., Gruner, R., & Colling, M. (2018). Strategies for applying the circular economy to prefabricated buildings. Buildings, 8(9), 125. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings8090125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasir, M. H. A., Genovese, A., Acquaye, A. A., Koh, S. C. L., & Yamoah, F. (2017). Comparing linear and circular supply chains: A case study from the construction industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 183, 443–457. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.06.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ness, D. A., & Xing, K. (2017). Toward a resource-efficient built environment: A literature review and conceptual model. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21(3), 572–592. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nußholz, J., & Milios, L. (2017). Applying circular economy principles to building materials: Front-running companies ‘business model innovation in the value chain for buildings Applying circular economy principles to building materials: Front-running companies ‘business model innovati. In SustEcon Conference, Berlin, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Pagoropoulos, A., Pigosso, D. C. A., & McAloone, T. C. (2017). The emergent role of digital technologies in the circular economy: A review. Procedia CIRP, 64, 19–24. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.02.047
   Google Scholar
• Partners Circle House. (2018). Circle House (GXN, Ed.).
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, D. W., & Turner, R. K. (1990). Economics of natural resources and the environment. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
   Google Scholar
• Pieroni, M. P. P., McAloone, T. C., & Pigosso, D. C. A. (2019). Business model innovation for circular economy and sustainability: A review of approaches. Journal of Cleaner Production, 215, 198–216. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomponi, F., & Moncaster, A. (2016). Embodied carbon mitigation and reduction in the built environment – what does the evidence say? Journal of Environmental Management, 181, 687–700. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.08.036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomponi, F., & Moncaster, A. (2017). Circular economy for the built environment : A research framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 710–718. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomponi, F., & Moncaster, A. (2019). Briefing : BS 8001 and the built environment: A review and critique. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers – Engineering Sustainability, 172(3), 111–114. doi: https://doi.org/10.1680/jensu.17.00067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potting, J., Hekkert, M., Worrell, E., & Hanemaaijer, A. (2017). Circular economy: Measuring innovation in the product chain. PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency. Publication no. 2544, 14–22.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, F. N., Birkved, M., & Birgisdóttir, H. (2018). Upcycling and design for disassembly – LCA of buildings employing circular design strategies. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 225, 012040. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/225/1/012040
   Google Scholar
• Reike, D., Vermeulen, W. J. V., & Witjes, S. (2018). The circular economy: New or refurbished as CE 3.0? — Exploring controversies in the conceptualization of the circular economy through a focus on history and resource value retention options. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 135, 246–264. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.08.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rios, F. C., Chong, W. K., & Grau, D. (2015). Design for disassembly and deconstruction - challenges and opportunities. Procedia Engineering, 118, 1296–1304. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.485
   Google Scholar
• Röck, M., Ruschi Mendes Saade, M., Balouktsi, M., Nygaard, F., Birgisdottir, H., Frischknecht, R., … Passer, A. (2020, June). Embodied GHG emissions of buildings – the hidden challenge for e ff ective climate change mitigation. Applied Energy, 258, 114107. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez, B., & Haas, C. (2018a). A novel selective disassembly sequence planning method for adaptive reuse of buildings. Journal of Cleaner Production, 183, 998–1010. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez, B., & Haas, C. (2018b). Capital project planning for a circular economy. Construction Management and Economics, 36(6), 303–312. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2018.1435895
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommer, J., & Guldager, K. (2016). Building a circular future. Hvidovre: The Danish Environmental Protection Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Stahel, W. (1982). The product-life factor. In An inquiry into the nature of sustainable societies: The role af the private sector, edited by S. G. Orr, 72–96: The Woodlands, TX: HARC.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Environment Programme. (2012). Sustainable, resource efficient cities – making it happen! Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Vandkunsten Architects. (2017). Rebeauty Nordic built component reuse (Vandkunsten architects, Ed.). Vallensbæk.
   Google Scholar
• van Sante, M. (2017). Circular construction most opportunities for demolishers and wholesalers.
   Google Scholar
• Wohlin, C. (2014). Guidelines for snowballing in systematic literature studies and a replication in software engineering. Procceedings of the 18th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering - EASE ‘14 (pp. 1–10), ACM Press, New York, USA. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/2601248.2601268
   Google Scholar
• World Resources Institute. (2016). Accelerating building efficiency: eight actions for urban leaders. Retrieved from https://www.wri.org/publication/accelerating-building-efficiency-actions-city-leaders
   Google Scholar
• Zimmermann, R., O’Brian, H., Hargrave, J., & Morrell, M. (2016). The circular economy in the built environment. London.
   Google Scholar