Sustainable site selection using system dynamics; case study LEED-certified project

References

• Amiri, A., Ottelin, J., & Sorvari, J. (2019). Are LEED-certified buildings energy-efficient in practice? Sustainability, 11(6), 1672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asdrubali, F., Baldinelli, G., Bianchi, F., & Sambuco, S. (2015). A comparison between environmental sustainability rating systems LEED and ITACA for residential buildings. Building and Environment, 86, 98–108. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bank, L. C., McCarthy, M. P., Thompson, B. T., & Menassa, C. C. (2010). Integrating BIM with system dynamics as a decision-making framework for sustainable building design and operation. In: First International Conference on Sustainable Urbanization (ICSU 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Bendewald, M., & Zhai, Z. J. (2013). Using carrying capacity as a baseline for building sustainability assessment. Habitat International, 37, 22–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardi, E., Carlucci, S., Cornaro, C., & Bohne, R. (2017). An analysis of the most adopted rating systems for assessing the environmental impact of buildings. Sustainability, 9, 1226. doi:10.3390/su9071226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buffat, R., Froemelt, A., Heeren, N., Raubal, M., & Hellweg, S. (2017). Big data GIS analysis for novel approaches in building stock modelling. Applied Energy, 208, 277–290. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.10.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butera, F. M., Kitio, V., Adhikari, R., & Aste, N. (2014). Sustainable building design for tropical climates. Principles and Applications for Eastern Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, T., & Keeler, A. (2008). Life-cycle cost-benefit analysis of extensive vegetated roof systems. Journal of Environmental Management, 87, 350–363. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.01.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chew, M. Y. L., & Das, S. (2008). Building grading systems: A review of the state-of-the-art. Architectural Science Review, 51(1), 3–13.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, R. J., Busby, P., Guenther, R., Briney, L., Blaviesciunaite, A., & Alencar, T. (2012). A regenerative design framework: Setting new aspirations and initiating new discussions. Building Research & Information, 40(1), 95–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jong, M., Joss, S., Schraven, D., Zhan, C., & Weijnen, M. (2015). Sustainable-smart-resilient-low carbon-eco-knowledge cities: Making sense of a multitude of concepts promoting sustainable urbanization. Journal of Cleaner Production, 109, 25–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eker, S., Zimmermann, N., Carnohan, S., & Davies, M. (2018). Participatory system dynamics modelling for housing, energy and wellbeing interactions. Building Research & Information, 46, 738–754. doi:10.1080/09613218.2017.1362919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ercan, T., Onat, N. C., & Tatari, O. (2016). Investigating carbon footprint reduction potential of public transportation in United States: A system dynamics approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 133, 1260–1276. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, A. E. (2011). Issues in green building and the federal response: An introduction. International Journal of Energy, Environment, and Economics, 19, 149–181.
   Google Scholar
• Folke, C., Carpenter, S. R., Walker, B., Scheffer, M., Chapin, T., & Rockström, J. (2010). Resilience thinking: Integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecology and Society, 15(4), 20. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art20/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonseca, J. A., & Schlueter, A. (2015). Integrated model for characterization of spatiotemporal building energy consumption patterns in neighborhoods and city districts. Applied Energy, 142, 247–265. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.12.068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forrester, J. (1995). The beginning of system dynamics. McKinsey Q.
   Google Scholar
• Frayssinet, L., Merlier, L., Kuznik, F., Hubert, J. L., Milliez, M., & Roux, J.-J. (2018). Modeling the heating and cooling energy demand of urban buildings at city scale. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 81, 2318–2327. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geng, Y., Zhang, L., Chen, X., Xue, B., Fujita, T., & Dong, H. (2014). Urban ecological footprint analysis: A comparative study between Shenyang in China and Kawasaki in Japan. Journal of Cleaner Production, 75, 130–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghaffarianhoseini, A., Dahlan, N. D., Berardi, U., Ghaffarianhoseini, A., Makaremi, N., & Ghaffarianhoseini, M. (2013). Sustainable energy performances of green buildings: A review of current theories, implementations and challenges. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 25, 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gou, Z., & Xie, X. (2017). Evolving green building: Triple bottom line or regenerative design? Journal of Cleaner Production, 153, 600–607. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, Y., Kvan, T., Liu, M., & Li, B. (2018). How green building rating systems affect designing green. Building and Environment, 133, 19–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hester, P. T., & Adams, K. M. G. (2017). Systems theory. In: Topics in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-54672-8_4
   Google Scholar
• Ismaeel, W. S. E. (2016). Assessing and developing the application of LEED green building rating system as a sustainable project management and market tool in the Italian context. Journal of Engineering, Project, and Production Management, 6, 136–152.
   Google Scholar
• Ismaeel, W. S. E. (2018). Midpoint and endpoint impact categories in green building rating systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 182, 783–793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ismaeel, W. S. E. (2019a). Drawing the operating mechanisms of green building rating systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 213, 599–609. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ismaeel, W. S. E. (2019b). Systems thinking and modelling for sustainable site selection. In C. Gorse & C. J. Neilson (Eds.), 35th annual ARCOM conference. Associations of researchers in construction management, Leeds, United Kingdom (pp. 437–444). Leeds: The Association of Researchers in Construction Management (ARCOM).
   Google Scholar
• Ismaeel, W. S. E. (2019c). Appraising a decade of LEED in the MENA region. Journal of Cleaner Production, 213, 733–744. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ismaeel, W. S. E. (2020). An integrated model for energy-efficient building opening design. In: ARCOM.
   Google Scholar
• Ismaeel, W. S. E., Adel, M., Sayed, E., Dabaieh, M., & Kenawy, I. (2016). Using GIS as a decision making support tool for LEED credits LEED Location and Transportation and Sustainable Sites categories. In: PLEA 2016 Los Angeles - 36th International Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture: Cities, Buildings, People: Towards Regenerative Environments (pp. 11–13).
   Google Scholar
• Ismaeel, W. S. E., & Ali, A. A. M. M. (2020). Assessment of eco-rehabilitation plans: Case study ‘Richordi Berchet’ palace. Journal of Cleaner Production, 259, 120857. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Julien, A. (2009). Assessing the assessor: BREEAM vs LEED. Sustain Magazine, 6(9), 30–33.
   Google Scholar
• Kaur, H., & Garg, P. (2019). Urban sustainability assessment tools: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 210, 146–158. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavgic, M., Mavrogianni, A., Mumovic, D., Summerfield, A., Stevanovic, Z., & Djurovic-petrovic, M. (2010). A review of bottom-up building stock models for energy consumption in the residential sector. Building and Environment, 45, 1683–1697. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.01.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavy, S., & Fernández-Solis, J. L. (2009). LEED accredited professionals’ perceptions affecting credit point adoption. Facilities, 27, 531–548. doi:10.1108/02632770910996360
   Google Scholar
• Lee, W. L. (2013). A comprehensive review of metrics of building environmental assessment schemes. Energy and Buildings, 62, 403–413. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.03.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovins, A. B., Lovins, L. H., & Hawken, P. (2005). A road map for natural capitalism. In: Understanding Business Environments.
   Google Scholar
• Marzouk, M., & El-Hawary, M. (2017). Towards evaluation and prediction of building sustainability using life cycle behaviour simulation. MATEC Web of Conferences, 120, 1–7. doi:10.1051/matecconf/201712008002
   Google Scholar
• Mata, É, Kalagasidis, A. S., & Johnsson, F. (2013). A modelling strategy for energy, carbon, and cost assessments of building stocks. Energy and Buildings, 56, 100–108. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.09.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mata, É., Kalagasidis, A. S., & Johnsson, F. (2014). Building-stock aggregation through archetype buildings: France, Germany, Spain and the UK. Building and Environment, 81, 270–282. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.06.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newsham, G. R., Mancini, S., & Birt, B. J. (2009). Do LEED-certified buildings save energy? Yes, but …  Energy and Buildings, 41(8), 897–905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obata, S. H., Agostinho, F., Almeida, C. M. V. B., & Giannetti, B. F. (2019). LEED certification as booster for sustainable buildings: Insights for a Brazilian context. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 145, 170–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onat, N. C., Egilmez, G., & Tatari, O. (2014). Towards greening the U.S. residential building stock: A system dynamics approach. Building and Environment, 78, 68–80. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.03.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Österbring, M., Mata, É, Thuvander, L., Mangold, M., Johnsson, F., & Wallbaum, H. (2016). A differentiated description of building-stocks for a georeferenced urban bottom-up building-stock model. Energy and Buildings, 120, 78–84. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.03.060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham, D. H., Kim, B., Lee, J., & Ahn, Y. (2020). An investigation of the selection of LEED version 4 credits for sustainable building projects. Applied Sciences, 10, 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Pushkar, S. (2020). LEED-EB gold projects for office spaces in large buildings transitioning from version 3 (v3) to 4 (v4): Similarities and differences between Finland and Spain. Applied Science, 10(23), 8737. doi:10.3390/app10238737
   Google Scholar
• Sandberg, N., Sartori, I., Heidrich, O., Dawson, R., Dascalaki, E., Dimitriou, S., Vimm-r, T., Filippidou, F., Stegnar, G., Šijanec Zavrl, M., & Brattebø, H. (2016). Dynamic building stock modelling: Application to 11 European countries to support the energy efficiency and retrofit ambitions of the EU. Energy and Buildings, 132, 26–38. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.05.100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharifi, A. (2019). A critical review of selected smart city assessment tools and indicator sets. Journal of Cleaner Production, 233, 1269–1283. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharifi, A., & Murayama, A. (2014). Neighborhood sustainability assessment in action: Cross-evaluation of three assessment systems and their cases from the US, the UK, and Japan. Building and Environment, 72, 243–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, C. C. S. (1972). The limits to growth. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 8(4), 837–837.
   Google Scholar
• Sterman, J. D. (2002a). System dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. Proc. ESD Intern. Symp.
   Google Scholar
• Sterman, J. D. (2002b). Systems dynamics modeling: Tools for learning in a complex world. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 30(1), 42–42.
   Google Scholar
• Sterman, J. D. (2004). Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world, interfaces.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, Y., Liang, R., Wu, Y., Wilson, R., & Rutherford, P. (2017). Development of a comprehensive method to analyse glazing systems with Parallel Slat Transparent Insulation material (PS-TIM). Applied Energy, 205, 951–963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, B. P., & Bank, L. C. (2010). Use of system dynamics as a decision-making tool in building design and operation. Building and Environment, 45, 1006–1015. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uribe, D., Veraand, S., & Bustamante, W. (2017). Optimization of complex fenestration systems using an artificial neural network. In: Back to the Future: The Next 50 Years, (51st International Conference of the Architectural Science Association (ANZAScA).
   Google Scholar
• USGBC. (2017). LEED v4 for Building Design and Construction - current version | U.S. Green Building Council [WWW Document]. Retrieved from http://www.usgbc.org/resources/leed-v4-building-design-and-construction-current-version
   Google Scholar
• Vallero, D. A., & Brasier, C. (2008). Sustainable design; the science of sustainability and green engineering. SciTech B. News.
   Google Scholar
• van Kerkhoff, L. (2014). Developing integrative research for sustainability science through a complexity principles-based approach. Sustainability Science, 9, 143–155. doi:10.1007/s11625-013-0203-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VENSIM PLE 7.3.5. (2019). VENSIM PLE 7.3.5.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, W., Zmeureanu, R., & Rivard, H. (2005). Applying multi-objective genetic algorithms in green building design optimization. Building and Environment, 40(11), 1512–1525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, W., Culp, C., & Graf, R. (2011). Integrating BIM and gaming for real-time interactive architectural visualization. Automation in Construction, 20, 446–458. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2010.11.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yellamraju, V. (2011). LEED–New construction project management. MCGRAW-HILL’S GREENSOURCE SERIES Attmann.
   Google Scholar
• Yudelson, J. (2007). Marketing Green Buildings, Heating/Piping/Air Conditioning Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Zou, Y., Kiviniemi, A., & Jones, S. W. (2017). A review of risk management through BIM and BIM-related technologies. Safety Science, 97, 88–98. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2015.12.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar