Classification criteria and markers for biomimetic building envelope within circular economy principles: a critical review

References

• ADB, UN, UNEP. (2019). Strengthening the environmental dimensions of the sustainable development goals in Asia and the Pacific, tool compendium.
   Google Scholar
• Badarnah, L. (2012). Towards the LIVING envelope: Biomimicry for building envelope adaptation. Delft University of Technology. doi:10.4233/uuid:4128b611-9b48-4c8d-b52f-38a59ad5de65.
   Google Scholar
• Badarnah, L., & Kadri, U. (2015). A methodology for the generation of biomimetic design concepts. Architectural Science Review, 58(2), 120–133. doi:10.1080/00038628.2014.922458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bae, H., & Lee, E. (2019). Biological and ecological classification of biomimicry from a biology push standpoint. Ecosphere, 10(11), e02959. doi: 10.1002/ecs2.2959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bar Cohen, Y. (2005). Biomimetics: Biologically inspired technologies. Boca Raton: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Baumeister, D., Tocke, R., Dwyer, J., Ritter, S., & Benyus, J. (2014). Biomimicry resource handbook: A seed bank of best practices. Missoula.
   Google Scholar
• Benyus, J. (1997). Biomimicry: Innovation inspired by nature. William Morrow Paperbacks. New York: Morrow.
   Google Scholar
• Biomimicry Guild. (2007). Innovation inspired by nature, Work Book. Biomimicry Guild, April.
   Google Scholar
• Blok, V., & Gremmen, B. (2016). Ecological innovation: Biomimicry as a new way of thinking and acting ecologically. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 29(2), 203–217. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9596-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colombo, B. (2010). Bionic design. Lo sviluppo del prodotto industriale attraverso lo studio della natura. Roma: Aracne.
   Google Scholar
• Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament. (2018). The council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions on a monitoring framework for the circular economy, Strasbourg, 16.1.2018 COM29.
   Google Scholar
• Daniel, E. C., Levy, M., Srebotnjak, T., & de Sherbinin, A. (2005). Environmental sustainability index: Benchmarking national environmental stewardship. New Haven: Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy.
   Google Scholar
• De Pauw, I., Karana, E., Kandachar, P., & Poppelaars, F. (2014). Comparing biomimicry and cradle to cradle with ecodesign: A case study of student design projects. Journal of Cleaner Production, 78, 174–183. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EASAC. (2016). Indicators for a circular circular economy. Halle: European Academies’ Science Advisory Council.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2012). Manifesto for a resource-efficient Europe, Report.
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, J. (2005). Biomimicry for green design (a how to). Retrieved from Worldchanging.
   Google Scholar
• Gallo, M. (2018). Biomimicry: Learning from nature for sustainable solutions. Wageningen: Aeres University of Applied Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Gamage, A., & Hyde, R. (2012). A model based on biomimicry to enhance ecologically sustainable design, architectural science review. Taylor & Francis, 55(3), 224–235.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia-Holguera, M., Zisa, A., & Grant Clark, O. (2016). An ecomimetic case study: Building retrofit inspired from the ecosystem of leaf-cutting ants. CIB World building congress.
   Google Scholar
• Garner, A., & Keoleian, G. A. (1995). Industrial ecology: An introduction. Anna Arbor, MI: National Pollution Prevention Center for Higer Education.
   Google Scholar
• Geisendorf, S., & Pietrulla, F. (2017). The circular economy and circular economic concepts—a literature analysis and redefinition, Wiley, Companies in the circular economy, p 772, https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.21924.
   Google Scholar
• Geng, Y., Fu, J., Sarkis, J., & Xue, B. (2012). Towards a national circular economy indicator system in China: An evaluation and critical analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 23, 216–224. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleich, A. V., Pade, C., Petschow, U., & Pissarskoi, E. (2010). Potential and trends in biomimetics. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Goel, A., Rubager, S., & Vattam, S. (2009). Structure, behavior and function of complex systems: The SBF modeling language. International Journal of AI in Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 23–25, Special Issue on Developing and using Engineering Ontologies.
   Google Scholar
• Gomez, C. M., Zuazua Ros, A., Bermejo-Busto, J., Baquero, E., Miranda, R., & Sanz, C. (2019). Potential strategies offered by animals to implement in buildings’ energy performance: Theory and practice. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 8(1), 17–31. doi:10.1016/j.foar.2018.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GRI. (2020). GRI’s contribution to sustainable development. Global Sustainability Standard Board (GSSB), Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Group, B. (2014). Biomimicry, 3.8 (2014), p. 8(WWW Document)
   Google Scholar
• Hawken, P., Lovins, A. B., & Lovins, L. H. (1999). Natural capitalism: The next industrial revolution. New York: Little Brown & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Heil, N. C., & Belkadi, N. H. (2017). Towards a platform of investigative tools for Biomimicry as a New approach for energy-efficient building design. Buildings, 7, 19. doi:10.3390/buildings7010019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helms, M., Vattam, S. S., & Goel, A. K. (2009). Biologically inspired design: Process and products. Design Studies, 30, 606–622. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2009.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensel, M. (2013). Performance-Oriented architecture. London: Willey and Son.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, M. (2017). The Art of performance-driven design – Biomimicry and structure. Building Technology educators’ Society conference, At Des Moines, IA.
   Google Scholar
• Imani, M., Donn, M., Balador, Z., et al. (2018). Bio-Inspired materials: Contribution of biology to energy efficiency of buildings. In L. M. T. Martínez (Ed.), Handbook of ecomaterials 9–18. Cham: Springer International Publishing AG. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-48281-1_136-1.
   Google Scholar
• ISO. (2015). International organization for standardization 18458:2015: Biomimetics – terminology, concepts and methodology. Berlin, Germany: BeuthVerlag.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, E. B., & Marting, T. A. (2016). Biomimicry: Streamlining the front end of innovation for environmentally sustainable products. Research-Technology Management, 59(4), 40–48. doi:10.1080/08956308.2016.1185342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, E. B., & Niewiarowski, P. H. (2018). Biomimicry: Do frames of inquiry support search and identification of biological models? Designs, 2, 27. doi:10.3390/designs2030027
   Google Scholar
• Kuru, A., Fiorito, F., Oldfield, P., & Bonseer, S. (2018). Multi-functional biomimetic adaptive façades: Developing a framework. FAÇADE 2018 final conference of COST TU1403 adaptive facades network, lucerne, November 26/27.
   Google Scholar
• Kuru, A., Oldfield, P., Bonser, S., & Fiorito, F. (2020). A framework to achieve multifunctionality in biomimetic adaptive building skin. Buildings, 10(7), 114. doi:10.3390/buildings10070114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López, M., Rubio, R., Martín, S., & Croxford, B. (2017). How plants inspire façades. From plants to architecture: Biomimetic principles for the development of adaptive architectural envelopes. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 67, 692–703. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lüdeke-Freund, F., Gold, S., & Bocken, N. M. P. (2018). A review and typology of circular economy business model patterns. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 23, 36–61. doi:10.1111/jiec.12763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyle, J. T. (1994). Regenerative design for sustainable development. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• MacArthur Foundation E. (2015). Delivering the circular economy. A toolkit for policymakers. Oxford: Ruth Sheppard.
   Google Scholar
• MacArthur Foundation E. (2016). CE100 circularity in the built environment: Applying the ReSOLVE framework, Circularity in the built environment: case studies a compilation of case studies from CE100.
   Google Scholar
• MacArthur Foundation E. (2019). Circular economy. Available online: https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/ (accessed on 20december 2020)
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, A., & Lozeva, S. (2009). Questioning the theory and practice of biomimicry. International Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics, 4(1), 1–10. doi:10.2495/DNE-V4-N1-1-10
   Google Scholar
• McDonough, W., & Braungart, M. (2002). Cradle to cradle – remaking the way we make things. New York: North Point Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mirniazmandan, S., & Rahimianzarif, E. (2017). Biomimicry an approach toward sustainability of high-rise buildings. Journal of Architectural Engineering Technology, 6, 2. doi:10.4172/2168-9717.1000203
   Google Scholar
• Moraga, G., Huysveld, S., Mathieux, F., Blengini, G. A., Alaerts, L., Van Acker, K., …  Dewulf, J. (2019). Circular economy indicators: What do they measure? Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 146, 452–461. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.03.045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nachtigall, W. (2003). Bau-Bionik: Natur ← analogien → technik. Berlin: Springer. Auflage.
   Google Scholar
• Oguntona, O. A., & Aigbavboa, C. O. (2017). Biomimicry principles as evaluation criteria of sustainability in the construction industry. 9th International conference on applied energy, Science direct, elsevier, ICAE.
   Google Scholar
• Ohlander, L., Willems, M., Leistra, P., & Damstra, S. (2018). Biomimicry Toolbox, a strategic tool for generating sustainable solutions?, Master’s Degree Thesis, Blekinge Institute of Technology Karlskrona, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Olaizola, E., Morales-Sánchez, R., & Eguiguren Huerta, M. (2020). Biomimetic organisations: A management model that learns from nature. Sustainability, 12(6), 2329. doi:10.3390/su12062329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pagani, R., Chiesa, G., & Tulliani, J. (2015). Biomimetica e architettura. Come la natura domina la tecnologia. Milano: Franco Angeli.
   Google Scholar
• Pauli, G. (2010). Blue Economy-10 years, 100 innovations, 100 million jobs. Bendix Drive: Paradigm Pubns.
   Google Scholar
• Persiani, S. (2019). Biomimetics of motion. Nature-inspired parameters and schemes for kinetic design. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Pietroni, L. (2015). Bio-inspired design. LaBiomimesi come promettente prospettiva di ricerca per un design sostenibile. Scienze e Ricerche, 4, 18–20.
   Google Scholar
• Pohl, G. (2010). Textiles, polymers and composites for buildings. Oxford, PA: Woodhead Pub in association with the Textile Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Pohl, G., & Nachtigall, W. (2015). Biomimetics for architecture and design. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Radwan, G. A. N., & Osama, N. (2016). Biomimicry, an approach for energy efficient building skin design. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 34, 178–189. doi:10.1016/j.proenv.2016.04.017
   Google Scholar
• Reed, B. (2006). Shifting our mental model – sustainability to regeneration. Sarasota, FL: Rethinking Sustainable Construction: Next Generation Green Buildings.
   Google Scholar
• Ricard, P. (2015). Le biomimétisme: S’inspirer de la nature pour innoverdurablement. Paris: Les projetd’avis du Conseiléconomique, social etenvironnemental (CESE).
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, O. (1969). Some interesting and useful biomimetic transforms, Third International Biophysics Congress, p. 297.
   Google Scholar
• Shu, L. H. (2010). A natural language approach to biomimetic design. dblp. Vol. 24. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, A., & Nayyar, N. (2015). Biomimicry-An alternative solution to sustainable buildings. Journal of Civil Engineering and Environmental Technology, 2(14), 96–101.
   Google Scholar
• Stahel, W. R., & Reday-Mulvey, G. (1976/1981). Jobs for tomorrow, the potential for substituting manpower for energy, Report to the Commission of the European communities. Brussels, NY: Vantage Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tokuç, A., Feyzal Özkaban, F., & Çakır, ÖA. (2018). Biomimetic facade applications for a more sustainable future. London: IntechOpen.
   Google Scholar
• UNEP. (2013). Environmental risks and challenges of anthropogenic metals flows and cycles. A Report of the Working Group on the Global Metal Flows to the International Resource Panel.
   Google Scholar
• Vierra, S. (2016). Biomimicry: designing to model nature. WBDG Whole Building Design Guide.
   Google Scholar
• Vincent J. F. V. (2016). TRIZ as a primary tool for biomimetics. In Research and practice on the theory of inventive problem solving (TRIZ), 225–235. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31782-3_13
   Google Scholar
• Vincent, J. F. V., Bogatyreva, O. A., Bogatyrev, N. R., Bowyer, A., & Pahl, A. K. (2006a). Biomimetics: Its practice and theory. Journal of the Royal Society, 3(9), 3471–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent, J. F. V., Bogatyreva, O. A., Bogatyrev, N. R., Bowyer, A., & Pahl, A. K. (2006b). The materials revolution. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 3(4), 217–234. doi:10.1016/S1672-6529(07)60005-5
   Google Scholar
• Zari, M. P. (2007). Biomimetic approaches to architectural design for increased sustainability. The SB07 NZ sustainable building conference: Transforming Our built environment, 14–16 November, Auckland, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar