Biophilia in school buildings: towards a simplified assessment method based on spatial geometry

References

• Appleton, J. (1975). The experience of landscape. London: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Archidata. (2019). Property management software, asset management software. http://www.archidata.com
   Google Scholar
• Baird, G. (1995). The space of appearance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baird, J. C., Cassidy, B., & Kurr, J. (1978). Room preference as a function of architectural features and user activities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63(6), 719–727. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.63.6.719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, G. H. (1989). Design strategies in architecture: An approach to the analysis of form. London: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, N., & Steemers, K. (2000). Energy and environment in architecture: A technical design guide. New York: E&FN Spon.
   Google Scholar
• Barbiero, G., & Berto, R. (2016). Introduzione alla biofilia. La relazione con la natura tra genetica e psicologia. Rome: Carocci.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, P., Davies, F., Zhang, Y., & Barrett, L. (2015). The impact of classroom design on pupils’ learning: Final results of a holistic, multi-level analysis. Building and Environment, 89, 118–133. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.02.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beatley, T. (2011). Biophilic cities: Integrating nature into urban design and planning. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Browning, W. D., & Ryan, C. O. (2020). Nature inside: A biophilic design guide. London: RIBA Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Browning, W. D., Ryan, C. O., & Clancy, J. O. (2014). 14 Patterns of biophilic design: Improving health & well-being in the built environment. Terrapin Bright Green.
   Google Scholar
• Camacho-Montano, S. C., Cook, M., & Wagner, A. (2019). Avoiding overheating in existing school buildings through optimized passive measures. Building Research & Information, 48(4), 349–363. doi:10.1080/09613218.2019.1663137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlos, J. S. (2017). The impact of refurbished windows on Portuguese old school buildings. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 13(3), 185–201. doi:10.1080/17452007.2016.1274252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrier, A., Demers, C. M. H., Hébert, M., & Potvin, A. (2019). An architectural representation of human-centric light in northern schools. [Manuscript submitted for publication].
   Google Scholar
• Chawla, L. (2015). Benefits of nature contact for children. Journal of Planning Literature, 30(4), 433–452. doi:10.1177/0885412215595441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clements-Croome, D. (2005). Designing the indoor environment for people. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 1(1), 45–55. doi:10.1080/17452007.2005.9684583
   Google Scholar
• Cochran Hameen, E., Ken-Opurum, B., & Son, Y. J. (2020). Protocol for post occupancy evaluation in schools to improve indoor environmental quality and energy efficiency. Sustainability, 12(9), 3712. doi:10.3390/su12093712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collado, S., Corraliza, J. A., Staats, H., & Ruiz, M. (2015). Effect of frequency and mode of contact with nature on children’s self-reported ecological behaviors. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 41, 65–73. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeKay, M., & Brown, G. Z. (2014). Sun, wind & light: Architectural design strategies (3rd ed.). Hoboken: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Demers, C. M. H., & Potvin, A. (2016). From history to architectural imagination: A physical ambiences laboratory to interpret past sensory experiences and speculate on future spaces. Ambiances, 2. doi:10.4000/ambiances.756
   Google Scholar
• Després, C., Larivière-Lajoie, A.-A., Tremblay-Lemieux, S., Legault, M., & Piché, D. (2017). Healthy Schools - Healthy lifestyles. In D. Kopec (Ed.), Health and wellbeing for interior architecture (pp. 123–136). New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, G. W., Otto, S., & Kaiser, F. G. (2018). Childhood origins of young adult environmental behavior. Psychological Science, 29(5), 679–687. doi:10.1177/0956797617741894
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farley, K. M., & Veitch, J. A. (2001). A room with a view: A review of the effects of windows on work and well-being (Report No. IRC-RR-136). Institute for Research in Construction.
   Google Scholar
• Giedion, S. (1954). Space, time, and architecture: The growth of a new tradition (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grondzik, W. T., & Kwok, A. G. (2015). Mechanical and electrical equipment for buildings (12th ed.). Hoboken: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Guzowski, M. (2000). Daylighting for sustainable design. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Hanc, M., McAndrew, C., & Ucci, M. (2019). Conceptual approaches to wellbeing in buildings: A scoping review. Building Research & Information, 47(6), 767–783. doi:10.1080/09613218.2018.1513695
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassanain, M. A., Mathar, H., & Aker, A. (2016). Post-occupancy evaluation of a university student cafeteria. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 12(1), 67–77. doi:10.1080/17452007.2015.1092941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heschong-Mahone Group. (2003). Windows and classrooms: Student performance and the indoor environment. Heschong-Mahone Group.
   Google Scholar
• Hodson, C. B., & Sander, H. A. (2017). Green urban landscapes and school-level academic performance. Landscape and Urban Planning, 160, 16–27. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.11.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Illuminating Engineering Society (IES). (2011). The lighting handbook (10th ed.). New York: Illuminating Engineering Society of North America.
   Google Scholar
• International Living Future Institute. (2019). Living building challenge: Standard 4.0. https://living-future.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/LBC-4_0_v13.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, B., Song, Y., Li, H. X., Lau, S. S.-Y., & Lei, Q. (2020). Incorporating biophilic criteria into Green building rating tools: Case study of Green mark and LEED. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 82. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 169–182. doi:10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kellert, S. R. (2005). Building for life: Designing and understanding the human-nature connection. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kellert, S. R. (2018). Nature by design: The practice of biophilic design. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kellert, S. R., & Calabrese, E. F. (2015). The practice of biophilic design. https://www.biophilic-design.com
   Google Scholar
• Kellert, S. R., Heerwagen, J., & Mador, M. (2008). Biophilic design: The theory, science, and practice of bringing buildings to life. Hoboken: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kellert, S. R., & Wilson, E. O. (1993). The biophilia hypothesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kweon, B.-S., Ellis, C. D., Lee, J., & Jacobs, K. (2017). The link between school environments and student academic performance. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 23, 35–43. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2017.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, W. M. C. (1992). Perception and lighting as formgivers for architecture. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
   Google Scholar
• Li, D., & Sullivan, W. C. (2016). Impact of views to school landscapes on recovery from stress and mental fatigue. Landscape and Urban Planning, 148, 149–158. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.12.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuoka, R. H. (2010). Student performance and high school landscapes: Examining the links. Landscape and Urban Planning, 97(4), 273–282. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.06.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matusiak, B. S., & Klöckner, C. A. (2016). How we evaluate the view out through the window. Architectural Science Review, 59(3), 203–211. doi:10.1080/00038628.2015.1032879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGee, B., Park, N.-K., Portillo, M., Bosch, S., & Swisher, M. (2019). DIY biophilia: Development of the biophilic interior design matrix as a design tool. Journal of Interior Design, 44(4), 201–221. doi:10.1111/joid.12159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montenegro, E., Potvin, A., & Demers, C. M. H. (2012). Impact of school building typologies on visual, thermal and energy performances. Proceedings of the PLEA.
   Google Scholar
• Norðdahl, K., & Einarsdóttir, J. (2015). Children’s views and preferences regarding their outdoor environment. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 15(2), 152–167. doi:10.1080/14729679.2014.896746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orr, D. W. (1993). Architecture as pedagogy. Conservation Biology, 7(2), 226–228. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1993.07020226.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roös, P., Downton, P., Jones, D., & Zeunert, J. (2016, November 7). Biophilic-inspired railway stations: The new frontier for future cities. 9th International Urban Design Conference (277-293). Association for Sustainability in Business Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Schola. (2020). Schola.ca - plateforme d’expertise en architecture scolaire. https://schola.ca/
   Google Scholar
• Steemers, K., & Steane, M. A. (2004). Environmental diversity in architecture. London: Spon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Terrapin Bright Green. (2019). Biophilic design case studies. https://www.terrapinbrightgreen.com/report/biophilic-design-case-studies/
   Google Scholar
• Ulrich, R. S., Simons, R. F., Losito, B. D., Fiorito, E., Miles, M. A., & Zelson, M. (1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11(3), 201–230. doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80184-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Berg, A. E., Wesselius, J. E., Maas, J., & Tanja-Dijkstra, K. (2017). Green walls for a restorative classroom environment: A controlled evaluation study. Environment and Behavior, 49(7), 791–813. doi:10.1177/0013916516667976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vartanian, O., Navarrete, G., Chatterjee, A., Fich, L. B., Gonzalez-Mora, J. L., Leder, H., … Skov, M. (2015). Architectural design and the brain: Effects of ceiling height and perceived enclosure on beauty judgments and approach-avoidance decisions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 41, 10–18. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vásquez, N. G., Felippe, M. L., Pereira, F. O. R., & Kuhnen, A. (2019). Luminous and visual preferences of young children in their classrooms: Curtain use, artificial lighting and window views. Building and Environment, 152, 59–73. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.01.049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watchman, M., Demers, C. M. H., & Potvin, A. (2021a). Biophilic school architecture in cold climates. Indoor and Built Environment, 30(5), 585–605. doi:10.1177/1420326X20908308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watchman, M., Demers, C. M. H., & Potvin, A. (2021b). Towards a Biophilic Experience Representation Tool (BERT) for architectural walkthroughs: A pilot study in two Canadian primary schools. Intelligent Buildings International. Advance Online Publication.
   Google Scholar
• WELL Building Institute. (2018). WELL v2 pilot - The next version of the WELL Building Standard. https://v2.wellcertified.com/v2.2/en/overview
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, E. O. (1995). Biophilia and the conservation ethic. In S. R. Kellert, & E. O. Wilson (Eds.), The biophilia hypothesis (pp. 31–41). Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Xue, F., Lau, S. S., Gou, Z., Song, Y., & Jiang, B. (2019). Incorporating biophilia into Green building rating tools for promoting health and wellbeing. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 76, 98–112. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2019.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar