References
- Alves, N.M.F. and Bártolo, P.J.S., 2008. Automatic 3D shape recovery for rapid prototyping. Virtual and Physical Prototyping, 3 (2), 123–137. doi:10.1080/17452750802102506
- Boisot, P.O., Rodriguez-Zas, S.L., and Shanks, R.D., 2002. Repeatability of objective measurements on the rear legs of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 85 (9), 2344–2351. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74314-2
- Bonnechère, B. et al., 2014. Determination of the precision and accuracy of morphological measurements using the Kinect™ sensor: comparison with standard stereophotogrammetry. Ergonomics, 57 (4), 622–631. doi:10.1080/00140139.2014.884246
- Daniell, N., Olds, T., and Tomkinson, G., 2014. Volumetric differences in body shape among adults with differing body mass index values: an analysis using three-dimensional body scans. American Journal of Human Biology, 26 (2), 156–163. doi:10.1002/ajhb.22490
- Edmonson, A.J. et al., 1989. A body condition scoring chart for Holstein dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 72, 68–78. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(89)79081-0
- Houle, D., Govindaraju, D.R., and Omholt, S., 2010. Phenomics: the next challenge. Nature Reviews Genetics, 11 (12), 855–866. doi: 10.1038/nrg2897
- Isensee, A. et al., 2014. Comparison of a classical with a highly formularized body condition scoring system for dairy cattle. Animal, 8 (12), 1971–1977. doi: 10.1017/S1751731114001888
- Kadarmideen, H.N. and Wegmann, S., 2003. Genetic parameters for body condition score and its relationship with type and production traits in Swiss Holsteins. Journal of Dairy Science, 86 (11), 3685–3693. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73974-5
- Koenen, E.P. and Groen, A.F., 1998. Genetic evaluation of body weight of lactating Holstein heifers using body measurements and conformation traits. Journal of Dairy Science, 81 (6), 1709–1713. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(98)75738-8
- Nahkur, E. et al., 2011. Morphological characteristics of pelves of estonian holstein and estonian native breed cows from the perspective of calving. Anatomia, Histologia, Embryologia, 40 (5), 379–388. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0264.2011.01082.x
- Olds, T. et al., 2013. Somatotyping using 3D anthropometry: a cluster analysis. Journal of Sports Sciences, 31 (9), 936–944. doi:10.1080/02640414.2012.759660
- Peyer, K., Morris, M., and Sellers, W.I., 2014. Subject-specific body segment parameter estimation using 3D photogrammetry with multiple cameras. PeerJ, 3, e831. doi:10.7717/peerj.831
- Spitzer, V. et al., 1996. The visible human male: a technical report. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 3, 118–130. doi:10.1136/jamia.1996.96236280
- Veerkamp, R.F. et al., 2002. Evaluation of classifiers that score linear type traits and body condition score using common sires. Journal of Dairy Science, 85 (4), 976–983. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74157-X
- Viana, J.H.M. and Bártolo, P.J.S., 2016. New applications of three-dimensional data acquisition, modelling, and printing in animal sciences: a case report. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Progress in Additive Manufacturing, Singapore. 122–127.
- Wall, E. et al., 2005. The relationship between fertility, rump angle, and selected type information in Holstein-Friesian cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 88 (4), 1521–1528. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72821-6
- Wiggans, G.R. et al., 2006. Genetic parameters and evaluation of rear legs (rear view) for Brown Swiss and Guernseys. Journal of Dairy Science, 89 (12), 4895–4900. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72538-3