222
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Morphological Box Classification Framework for supporting 3D scanner selection

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 211-221 | Received 30 Nov 2017, Accepted 25 Jan 2018, Published online: 11 Feb 2018

References

  • Aberman, K., et al., 2017. Dip transform for 3D shape reconstruction. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 36 (4), 1–11. doi: 10.1145/3072959.3073693
  • ASTM, 2015. Standard terminology for additive manufacturing – general principles – terminology. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
  • Deng, S., and Suresh, K., 2016. Multi-constrained 3D topology optimization via augmented topological level-set. Computers & Structures, 170, 1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2016.02.009
  • Deng, S., and Suresh, K., 2017a. Stress constrained thermo-elastic topology optimization with varying temperature fields via augmented topological sensitivity based level-set. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 56 (6), 1413–1427. doi: 10.1007/s00158-017-1732-2
  • Deng, S., and Suresh, K., 2017b. Topology optimization under thermo-elastic buckling. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 55 (5), 1759–1772. doi: 10.1007/s00158-016-1611-2
  • Friel, K., et al., 2015. The use of 3D scanning for sporting applications. In: Three-dimensional imaging, visualization, and display 2015, 949517.
  • Georgiadis, M., et al., 2015. 3D scanning SAXS: a novel method for the assessment of bone ultrastructure orientation. Bone, 71, 42–52. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2014.10.002
  • Grivon, D., Vezzetti, E., and Violante, M.G, 2013. Development of an innovative low-cost MARG sensors alignment and distortion compensation methodology for 3D scanning applications. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 61 (12), 1710–1716. doi: 10.1016/j.robot.2013.06.003
  • Khairyanto, A., et al., 2016. Evaluation of 3D scanner using elimination and multi criteria decision making (MCDM) method. In: 2nd International Conference on Progress in Additive Manufacturing. Singapore.
  • Motavalli, S., and Bidanda, B., 1991. A part image reconstruction system for reverse engineering of design modifications. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 10 (5), 383–395. doi: 10.1016/0278-6125(91)90056-8
  • Paquette, S., 1996. 3D scanning in apparel design and human engineering. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 16 (5), 11–15. doi: 10.1109/38.536269
  • Pesce, M., Galantucci, L.M., and Lavecchia, F, 2016. A 12-camera body scanning system based on close-range photogrammetry for precise applications. Virtual and Physical Prototyping, 11 (1), 49–56. doi: 10.1080/17452759.2015.1101872
  • Stuyck, T., et al., 2014. HR-kinect-high-resolution dynamic 3D scanning for facial expression analysis. Available online: http://www.student.kuleuven.be/~s0200995/paper.pdf [Accessed 10 Aug 2014].
  • Viana, J.H.M., Hinduja, S., and Bártolo, P.J.S, 2016. Estimation of biometric parameters from cattle rump using free-hand scanning and a 3D data processing algorithm. Virtual and Physical Prototyping, 11 (3), 167–172. doi: 10.1080/17452759.2016.1211292

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.