Numerical comparison of lattice unit cell designs for medical implants by additive manufacturing

References

• Ahmadi, S.M., et al., 2014. Mechanical behavior of regular open-cell porous biomaterials made of diamond lattice unit cells. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 34, 106–115. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.02.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmadi, S.M., et al., 2015. Additively manufactured open-cell porous biomaterials made from six different space-filling unit cells: The mechanical and morphological properties. Materials, 8 (4), 1871–1896. doi: 10.3390/ma8041871
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arabnejad, S., et al., 2016. High-strength porous biomaterials for bone replacement: A strategy to assess the interplay between cell morphology, mechanical properties, bone ingrowth and manufacturing constraints. Acta Biomaterialia, 30, 345–356. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.10.048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashby, M.F., et al., 2000. Metal foams: a design guide. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Bagheri, Z.S., et al., 2017. Compensation strategy to reduce geometry and mechanics mismatches in porous biomaterials built with selective laser melting. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 70, 17–27. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.04.041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bobbert, F.S.L., et al., 2017. Additively manufactured metallic porous biomaterials based on minimal surfaces: A unique combination of topological, mechanical, and mass transport properties. Acta Biomaterialia, 53, 572–584. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.02.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bobyn, J.D., et al., 1980. The optimum pore size for the fixation of porous-surfaced metal implants by the ingrowth of bone. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 150, 263–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broeckhoven, C., and du Plessis, A, 2017. Has snake fang evolution lost its bite? New insights from a structural mechanics viewpoint. Biology Letters, 13 (8), p.20170293. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2017.0293
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broeckhoven, C., du Plessis, A., and Hui, C, 2017. Functional trade-off between strength and thermal capacity of dermal armor: insights from girdled lizards. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 74, 189–194. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.06.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clymer, DR, Cagan, J, and Beuth, J, 2017. Power–velocity process design charts for powder Bed additive manufacturing. Journal of Mechanical Design, 139 (10), 100907–100907-7. doi: 10.1115/1.4037302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong, G, Tang, Y, and Zhao, Y, 2017. A survey of modeling of lattice structures fabricated by additive manufacturing. Journal of Mechanical Design, 139 (10), 100906–100906-13. doi: 10.1115/1.4037305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doube, M., et al., 2010. Bonej: free and extensible bone image analysis in ImageJ. Bone, 47 (6), 1076–1079. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2010.08.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• du Plessis, A., et al., 2017. Prediction of mechanical performance of Ti6Al4 V cast alloy based on microCT-based load simulation. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 724, 267–274. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.06.320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fieres, J, Schumann, P, and Reinhart, C, 2018. Predicting failure in additively manufactured parts using X-ray computed tomography and simulation. Procedia Engineering, 213, 69–78. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2018.02.008
   Google Scholar
• Frazier, W.E, 2014. Metal additive manufacturing: a review. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 23 (6), 1917–1928. doi: 10.1007/s11665-014-0958-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freytag, M., Shapiro, V., and Tsukanov, I., 2011. Finite element analysis in situ. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 47 (9), 957–972. doi: 10.1016/j.finel.2011.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, I., Rosen, D.W., and Stucker, B., 2010. Additive manufacturing technologies (Vol. 238). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, L.J., and Ashby, M.F., 1999. Cellular solids: structure and properties. Cambridge: Cambridge university press.
   Google Scholar
• Gu, D.D., et al., 2012. Laser additive manufacturing of metallic components: materials, processes and mechanisms. International Materials Reviews, 57 (3), 133–164. doi: 10.1179/1743280411Y.0000000014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedayati, R., et al., 2016. Mechanical properties of regular porous biomaterials made from truncated cube repeating unit cells: analytical solutions and computational models. Materials Science and Engineering: C, 60, 163–183. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2015.11.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedayati, R., et al., 2018. Comparison of elastic properties of open-cell metallic biomaterials with different unit cell types. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials, 106 (1), 386–398. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.33854
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hildebrand, T., et al., 1999. Direct three-dimensional morphometric analysis of human cancellous bone: microstructural data from spine, femur, iliac crest, and calcaneus. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 14 (7), 1167–1174. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.1999.14.7.1167
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hildebrand, T., and Rüegsegger, P, 1997. A new method for the model-independent assessment of thickness in three-dimensional images. Journal of Microscopy, 185 (1), 67–75. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2818.1997.1340694.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollister, S.J, 2005. Porous scaffold design for tissue engineering. Nature Materials, 4 (7), 518–524. doi: 10.1038/nmat1421
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, C.W.J., et al., 2016. An overview of 3-D printing in manufacturing, aerospace, and automotive industries. IEEE Potentials, 35 (4), 18–22. doi: 10.1109/MPOT.2016.2540098
   Google Scholar
• Lopez-Heredia, M. A., et al., 2008. Bone growth in rapid prototyped porous titanium implants. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 85 (3), 664–673. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.31468
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murr, L.E, 2017. Open-cellular metal implant design and fabrication for biomechanical compatibility with bone using electron beam melting. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 76, 164–177. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.02.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nouri A., Hodgson P.D., Wen C. 2009. Biomimetic porous titanium scaffolds for orthopaedic and dental applications. In: M. Amitava ed., Biomimetics, learning from nature. Rijek, Croatia: Intech, 415–450.
   Google Scholar
• Orme, ME, et al., 2017. Designing for additive manufacturing: lightweighting through topology optimization enables lunar spacecraft. ASME. J. Mech. Des, 139 (10), 100905–100905-6. doi: 10.1115/1.4037304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parthasarathy, J., et al., 2010. Mechanical evaluation of porous titanium (Ti6Al4 V) structures with electron beam melting (EBM). Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 3 (3), 249–259. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2009.10.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sallica-Leva, E., Jardini, A.L., and Fogagnolo, J.B, 2013. Microstructure and mechanical behavior of porous Ti–6Al–4 V parts obtained by selective laser melting. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 26, 98–108. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.05.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, V., and Tsukanov, I., Jun. 1999. Meshfree simulation of deforming domains. Computer-Aided Design, 31 (7), 459–471. doi: 10.1016/S0010-4485(99)00043-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sing, S.L., et al., 2016. Characterization of titanium lattice structures fabricated by selective laser melting using an adapted compressive test method. Experimental Mechanics, 56 (5), 735–748. doi: 10.1007/s11340-015-0117-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sing, S.L., Wiria F.E., and Yeong W.Y., 2018. Selective laser melting of lattice structures: A statistical approach to manufacturability and mechanical behavior. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 49, 170–180. doi: 10.1016/j.rcim.2017.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M., Guan, Z., and Cantwell, W.J, 2013. Finite element modelling of the compressive response of lattice structures manufactured using the selective laser melting technique. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 67, 28–41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2012.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Succi, S, 2001. The Lattice Boltzmann equation: for fluid dynamics and beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, X.P., et al., 2017. Metallic powder-bed based 3D printing of cellular scaffolds for orthopaedic implants: A state-of-the-art review on manufacturing, topological design, mechanical properties and biocompatibility. Materials Science and Engineering: C. 76, 1328–1343. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2017.02.094
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taniguchi, N., et al., 2016. Effect of pore size on bone ingrowth into porous titanium implants fabricated by additive manufacturing: An in vivo experiment. Materials Science and Engineering: C, 59, 690–701. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2015.10.069
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomsen, J.S., et al., 2005. Stereological measures of trabecular bone structure: comparison of 3D micro computed tomography with 2D histological sections in human proximal tibial bone biopsies. Journal of Microscopy, 218 (2), 171–179. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2005.01469.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasconcellos, L. M. R., et al., 2010. Evaluation of bone ingrowth into porous titanium implant: histomorphometric analysis in rabbits. Brazilian Oral Research, 24 (4), 399–405. doi: 10.1590/S1806-83242010000400005
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang, X., et al., 2016. Topological design and additive manufacturing of porous metals for bone scaffolds and orthopaedic implants: a review. Biomaterials, 83, 127–141. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.01.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, C., et al., 2015. Ti–6Al–4 V triply periodic minimal surface structures for bone implants fabricated via selective laser melting. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 51, 61–73. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.06.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadpoor, A.A, 2017. Mechanics of additively manufactured biomaterials. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 70, 1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.03.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadpoor, A.A., and Hedayati, R, 2016. Analytical relationships for prediction of the mechanical properties of additively manufactured porous biomaterials. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 104A, 3164–3174. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.35855
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, X.Y., Fang, G., and Zhou, J, 2017. Additively manufactured scaffolds for bone tissue engineering and the prediction of their mechanical behavior: a review. Materials, 10 (1), 50. doi: 10.3390/ma10010050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar