Advances in precision microfabrication through digital light processing: system development, material and applications

References

• Melchels FP, Feijen J, Grijpma DW. A review on stereolithography and its applications in biomedical engineering. Biomaterials. 2010;31(24):6121–6130. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.04.050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ge Q, Li Z, Wang Z, et al.. Projection micro stereolithography based 3D printing and its applications. Int J Extreme Manuf. 2020;2:2. doi:10.1088/2631-7990/ab8d9a
   Google Scholar
• Quan H, Zhang T, Xu H, et al. Photo-curing 3D printing technique and its challenges. Bioact Mater. 2020;5(1):110–115. doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2019.12.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng X, Deotte J, Alonso MP, et al.. Design and optimization of a light-emitting diode projection micro-stereolithography three-dimensional manufacturing system. Rev Sci Instrum. 2012a;12:125001. doi:10.1063/1.4769050
   Google Scholar
• Lee K-S, Kim RH, Yang D-Y, et al. Advances in 3D nano/microfabrication using two-photon initiated polymerization. Progr Polymer Sci. 2008;33(6):631–681. doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2008.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darkes-Burkey C, Shepherd RF. High-resolution 3D printing in seconds. Nature. 2020;588(7839):594–95. doi:10.1038/d41586-020-03543-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hull C. F. P. m. p.-p. (resin)-SLA, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Hornbeck, L. J. (29 Oct. 1991). U. S. Patent.
   Google Scholar
• Bertsch A. Microstereophotolithography using a liquid crystal display as dynamic mask-generator.pdf. Microsyst Technol. 1997;3(2):42–47. doi:10.1007/s005420050053.
   Google Scholar
• Beluze L. Microstereolithography a new process to build complex 3D objects, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Shoji Maruo KIaTN. Multi-polymer microstereolithography for hybrid opto-MEMS.pdf. IEEE, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• G W. Digital micromirror device based microstereolithography for micro structures of transparent photopolymer and nanocomposites, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Wicker AIR. Development of an automated multiple material stereolithography machine. 2006.
   Google Scholar
•  Sun C, Fang N, Wu DM, et al. Projection micro-stereolithography using digital micro-mirror dynamic mask. Sensors Actuat A Phys 2005; 1:113–120. doi:10.1016/j.sna.2004.12.011.
   Google Scholar
•  Choi W,R. Multi-material microstereolithography. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2009;5-8:543–551. doi:10.1007/s00170-009-2434-8.
   Google Scholar
• Wicker R. Multi-material stereolithography. J Mater Process Technol. 2011;3:318–328. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.10.003
   Google Scholar
• B9Creations. https://tracxn.com/d/companies/b9creations/__iNXQYOQtobKhLI1S10wagHhhGRNuLFKdCrM-Y_O1fds, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou C, Chen Y, Yang Z, et al. Digital material fabrication using mask-image-projection-based stereolithography. Rapid Prototyping J. 2013;3:153–165. doi:10.1108/13552541311312148
   Google Scholar
• Ge Q, Qi HJ, Dunn ML. Active materials by four-dimension printing. Appl Phys Lett. 2013;103:13. doi:10.1063/1.4819837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
•  Zheng X, Lee H, Weisgraber TH, et al. Ultralight: ultrastiff mechanical metamaterials. Science. 2014;6190:1373–1377. doi:10.1126/science.1252291.
   Google Scholar
• Janusziewicz R, Tumbleston JR, Quintanilla AL, et al. Layerless fabrication with continuous liquid interface production. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113(42):11703–11708. doi:10.1073/pnas.1605271113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tumbleston JR. Continuous liquid interface production of 3D objects. Science. 2015;347(6228):1349–52. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa2397.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shusteff M, et al. One-step volumetric additive manufacturing of complex polymer structures. Sci Adv. 2017;3(12). doi:10.1126/sciadv.aao5496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowsari K, Akbari S, Wang D, et al. High-efficiency high-resolution multimaterial fabrication for digital light processing-based three-dimensional printing. 3D Print Add Manuf . 2018a;3:185–193. doi:10.1089/3dp.2018.0004
   Google Scholar
• Miri AK, Nieto D, Iglesias L, et al. Microfluidics-enabled multimaterial maskless stereolithographic bioprinting. Adv Mater. 2018;27:e1800242. doi:10.1002/adma.201800242
   Google Scholar
• Kelly BE, et al. Volumetric additive manufacturing via tomographic reconstruction. Science. 2019;363(6431):1075–1079. doi:10.1126/science.aau7114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernal PN, Delrot P, Loterie D, et al. Volumetric bioprinting of complex living-tissue constructs within seconds. Adv Mater. 2019;31(42):e1904209. doi:10.1002/adma.201904209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker DA, Hedrick JL, Mirkin CA. Rapid, large-volume, thermally controlled 3D printing using a mobile liquid interface. Science. 2019;366(6463):360–364. doi:10.1126/science.aax1562.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang M, Han C, Jeon H. Submicrometer-scale pattern generation via maskless digital photolithography. Optica. 2020;7:12. doi:10.1364/optica.406304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabrication BM. (S140). https://bmf3d.com/10%ce%bcm-series-printers/.
   Google Scholar
•  Li Y, Mao Q, Li X, et al. High-fidelity and high-efficiency additive manufacturing using tunable pre-curing digital light processing. Addit Manufac. 2019. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2019.100889.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renap K, K JP. Recoating issues in stereolithography. Rapid Prototyp J. 1995;1(3):4–16. doi:10.1108/13552549510094223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozhevnikov A, Kunnen RPJ, van Baars GE, et al. Investigation of the fluid flow during the recoating process in additive manufacturing. Rapid Prototyp J. 2019;26(4):605–613. doi:10.1108/rpj-06-2019-0152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santoliquido O, Colombo P, Ortona A. Additive manufacturing of ceramic components by digital light processing: a comparison between the “bottom-up” and the “top-down” approaches. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2019;39(6):2140–2148. doi:10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2019.01.044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunwar P, Xiong Z, McLoughlin ST, et al. Oxygen-permeable films for continuous additive, subtractive, and hybrid additive/subtractive manufacturing. 3D Print Addit Manuf. 2020;5:216–221. doi:10.1089/3dp.2019.0166
   Google Scholar
• Chockalingam K, Jawahar N, Ramanathan KN, et al. Optimization of stereolithography process parameters for part strength using design of experiments. Int J Adv Manufac Technol. 2005;29(1–2):79–88. doi:10.1007/s00170-004-2307-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhaagen B, Zanderink T, Fernandez Rivas D. Ultrasonic cleaning of 3D printed objects and cleaning challenge devices. Appl Acoust. 2016;103:172–181. doi:10.1016/j.apacoust.2015.06.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aznarte, E., C. Ayranci, and A. J. Qureshi. (2017). Digital light processing (DLP) anisotropic tensile considerations. 2017 International solid freeform fabrication symposium.
   Google Scholar
• Sun W-S, Chiang Y-C, Tsuei C-H. Optical design for the DLP pocket projector using LED light source. Phys Proc. 2011;19:301–307. doi:10.1016/j.phpro.2011.06.165
   Google Scholar
• Gu Z, Fu J, Lin H, et al. Development of 3D bioprinting: from printing methods to biomedical applications. Asian J Pharm Sci. 2020;5:529–557. doi:10.1016/j.ajps.2019.11.003
   Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Xue D, Mei D. Projection-based continuous 3D printing process With the grayscale display method. J Manufac Sci Eng. 2020;142:2. doi:10.1115/1.4045616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu H, Davey AB, Wilkinson TD, et al. Performance of UV-stable STN mixtures for PL-LCDs. Mol Cryst Liquid Cryst. 2004;411(1):79–91. doi:10.1080/15421400490434810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyo SH, Wang P, Hwang HH, et al. Continuous optical 3D printing of green aliphatic polyurethanes. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9(1):836–844. doi:10.1021/acsami.6b12500
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang C, Zhang H, Song J, et al. Digital micromirror device (DMD)-based high-cycle tensile fatigue testing of 1D nanomaterials. Extreme Mech Lett. 2018;18:79–85. doi:10.1016/j.eml.2017.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan J-W, Lin S-H. Achromatic design in the illumination system for a mini projector with LED light source. Optics Express. 2011;19(17):15750–15759. doi:10.1364/oe.19.015750.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun WS, Pan JW. Non-telecentric projection lens design for an LED projector. Appl Opt. 2017;56(3):712–720. doi:10.1364/AO.56.000712
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liravi F, Das S, Zhou C. Separation force analysis and prediction based on cohesive element model for constrained-surface stereolithography processes. Comput Aid Design. 2015;69:134–142. doi:10.1016/j.cad.2015.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
•  Nosonovsky M, Bhushan B. Lotus versus rose: biomimetic surface effects. In: Green Tribology; 2012. p. 25–40.
   Google Scholar
• Kowsari K, Zhang B, Panjwani S, et al. Photopolymer formulation to minimize feature size: surface roughness, and stair-stepping in digital light processing-based three-dimensional printing. Addit Manufac. 2018b;24:627–638. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2018.10.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan Y, Zhao X, Zhou C, et al. Smooth surface fabrication in mask projection based stereolithography. J Manufac Process. 2012;14(4):460–470. doi:10.1016/j.jmapro.2012.09.003
   Google Scholar
• Yeung C, Chen S, King B, et al. A 3D-printed microfluidic-enabled hollow microneedle architecture for transdermal drug delivery. Biomicrofluidics. 2019;13(6):064125. doi:10.1063/1.5127778
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
•  Dendukuri D, Pregibon DC, Collins J, et al. Continuous-flow lithography for high-throughput microparticle synthesis. Nat Mater. 2006;5:365–369. doi:10.1038/nmat1617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan Y, Zhou C, Chen Y. A fast mask projection stereolithography process for fabricating digital models in minutes. J Manufac Sci Eng. 2012;134:5. doi:10.1115/1.4007465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu X, Lian Q, Li D, et al. Tilting separation analysis of bottom-up mask projection stereolithography based on cohesive zone model. J Mater Process Technol. 2017;243:184–196. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.12.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribo MM, et al. Optimization of a self-peeling vat for precision vat photopolymerization setups. Eur Soc Precision Eng Nanotechnol. 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, F. W. (2018). Optimization of an experimental DLP platform by construction and process studies tech. Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs PF. (1992). Rapid Prototyping Manufacturing Fundamentals of StereoLithography by Jacobs P.F. (z-lib.org).
   Google Scholar
• Gong H, Beauchamp M, Perry S, et al. Optical approach to resin formulation for 3D printed microfluidics. RSC Adv. 2015;129:106621–106632. doi:10.1039/C5RA23855B
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin AD, Abbasi R, Owens M, et al. Light-based 3D printing of hydrogels with high-resolution channels. Biomed Phys Eng Expr. 2019;5:2. doi:10.1088/2057-1976/aad667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swineharf, D. F. (1962). Beer-Lambert Law.doi:10.1021/ed039p333
   Google Scholar
• Lee JH, Prud'homme RK, Aksay IA. Cure depth in photopolymerization: experiments and theory. J Mater Res. 2011;12:3536–3544. doi:10.1557/jmr.2001.0485
   Google Scholar
• Bennett J. Measuring UV curing parameters of commercial photopolymers used in additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf. 2017: 203–212. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2017.10.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emami MM, Barazandeh F, Yaghmaie F. Scanning-projection based stereolithography: method and structure. Sensors Actuat A Phys. 2014;218:116–124. doi:10.1016/j.sna.2014.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
•  Zhakeyev A, Zhang L, Xuan J. Photoactive resin formulations and composites for optical 3D and 4D printing of functional materials and devices. In: 3D and 4D printing of polymer nanocomposite materials, Vol. The matematic model basic of my first time. 2020. p. 387–425.
   Google Scholar
• Ligon SC, Liska R, Stampfl J, et al. Polymers for 3D printing and customized additive manufacturing. Chem Rev. 2017;15:10212–10290. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00074
   Google Scholar
• Carbon. (2023). https://www.carbon3d.com/about.
   Google Scholar
• Odian, G. (2004). Principles of polymerization. John Wiley & Sons. doi:10.1002/047147875x
   Google Scholar
• Wu J, Zhao Z, Hamel CM, et al. Evolution of material properties during free radical photopolymerization. J Mech Phys Solids. 2018;112:25–49. doi:10.1016/j.jmps.2017.11.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaukat, U., Rossegger, E., & Schlogl, S. (2022). A review of multi-material 3D printing of functional materials via vat photopolymerization. Polymers (Basel), 14(12). doi:10.3390/polym14122449
   Google Scholar
• Braunecker WA, Matyjaszewski K. Controlled/living radical polymerization: features,: developments, and perspectives. Progr Polymer Sci. 2007;32(1):93–146. doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2006.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen M, Zhong M, Johnson JA. Light-controlled radical polymerization: mechanisms,: methods, and applications. Chem Rev. 2016;116(17):10167–10211. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00671
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mota C, Camarero-Espinosa S, Baker MB, et al. Bioprinting: from tissue and organ development to in vitro models. Chem Rev. 2020;19:10547–10607. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00789
   Google Scholar
• Ba´rtolo, P. J. Stereolithography: materials,: processes and ApplicationsStereolithography. MaterProc Appl. 2011:1–36. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-92904-0_1.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, Y. Stereolithography cure process modeling, Georgia Institute of Technology.pdf, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Xiao P. 3D printing of photopolymers. Polymer Chem. 2018;9(13):1530–1540. doi:10.1039/c8py00157j
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandon V. Slaughter SSK, Fisher OZ, Khademhosseini A, et al. Hydrogels in regenerative medicine. Adv Mater. 2009: 32–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Tsang V, Chen AA, Cho LM, et al. Fabrication of 3D hepatic tissues by additive photopatterning of cellular hydrogels. FASEB J. 2007;21(3):790–801. doi:10.1096/fj.06-7117com
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanan Du EL, Ali S, Khademhosseini A. Directed assembly of cell-laden microgels for fabrication of 3D tissue constructs. National Acad Sci. 2008;105(28):9522–27. doi:10.1073/pnas.0801866105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gou M, Qu X, Zhu W, et al. Bio-inspired detoxification using 3D-printed hydrogel nanocomposites. Nat Commun. 2014;5:3774. doi:10.1038/ncomms4774
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu S, Yeo DC, Wiraja C, et al. Peptide delivery with poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate microneedles through swelling effect. Bioeng Transl Med. 2017;2(3):258–267. doi:10.1002/btm2.10070
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munoz-Pinto DJ, Jimenez-Vergara AC, Gharat TP, et al. Characterization of sequential collagen-poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate interpenetrating networks and initial assessment of their potential for vascular tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2015;40:32–42. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.10.051
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichol JW, Koshy ST, Bae H, et al. Cell-laden microengineered gelatin methacrylate hydrogels. Biomaterials. 2010;31(21):5536–5544. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.03.064
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Den Bulcke AI, et al. Structural and rheological properties of methacrylamide modified gelatin hydrogels. Biomacromolecules. 2000;1:31–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahadian S, Ramon-Azcon J, Estili M, et al. Facile and rapid generation of 3D chemical gradients within hydrogels for high-throughput drug screening applications. Biosens Bioelectron. 2014;59:166–173. doi:10.1016/j.bios.2014.03.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahadian S, Yamada S, Ramon-Azcon J, et al. Hybrid hydrogel-aligned carbon nanotube scaffolds to enhance cardiac differentiation of embryoid bodies. Acta Biomater. 2016;31:134–143. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2015.11.047
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Athirasala A, Lins F, Tahayeri A, et al. A novel strategy to engineer Pre-vascularized full-length dental pulp-like tissue constructs. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):3323. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-02532-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeon O, Wolfson DW, Alsberg E. In-situ formation of growth-factor-loaded coacervate microparticle-embedded hydrogels for directing encapsulated stem cell fate. Adv Mater. 2015;27(13):2216–2223. doi:10.1002/adma.201405337
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levato R, Webb WR, Otto IA, et al. The bio in the ink: cartilage regeneration with bioprintable hydrogels and articular cartilage-derived progenitor cells. Acta Biomater. 2017;61:41–53. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2017.08.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul A, Manoharan V, Krafft D, et al. Nanoengineered biomimetic hydrogels for guiding human stem cell osteogenesis in three dimensional microenvironments. J Mater Chem B. 2016;4(20):3544–3554. doi:10.1039/C5TB02745D
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadeghi AH, Shin SR, Deddens JC, et al. Engineered 3D cardiac fibrotic tissue to study fibrotic remodeling. Adv Healthc Mater. 2017;6:11. doi:10.1002/adhm.201601434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin SR, Zihlmann C, Akbari M, et al. Reduced graphene oxide-GelMA hybrid hydrogels as scaffolds for cardiac tissue engineering. Small. 2016;12(27):3677–3689. doi:10.1002/smll.201600178
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenz A, Borchers K, Tovar GEM, et al. Bone matrix production in hydroxyapatite-modified hydrogels suitable for bone bioprinting. Biofabrication. 2017;9(4):044103. doi:10.1088/1758-5090/aa91ec
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yue K, Trujillo-de Santiago G, Alvarez MM, et al. Synthesis, properties, and biomedical applications of gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogels. Biomaterials. 2015;73:254–271. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.08.045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang YS, Davoudi F, Walch P, et al. Bioprinted thrombosis-on-a-chip. Lab Chip. 2016;16(21):4097–4105. doi:10.1039/c6lc00380j
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu S, Xu R, Duan B, et al. Three-dimensional hyaluronic acid hydrogel-based models for In vitro human iPSC-derived NPC culture and differentiation. J Mater Chem B. 2017;5(21):3870–3878. doi:10.1039/C7TB00721C
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin S, Lee WYW, Feng Q, et al. Synergistic effects on mesenchymal stem cell-based cartilage regeneration by chondrogenic preconditioning and mechanical stimulation. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2017;8(1):221. doi:10.1186/s13287-017-0672-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Poldervaart MT, Goversen B, de Ruijter M, et al. 3D bioprinting of methacrylated hyaluronic acid (MeHA) hydrogel with intrinsic osteogenicity. PLoS One. 2017;12(6):e0177628. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0177628
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossegger E, Höller R, Hrbinič K, et al. 3D printing of soft magnetoactive devices with thiol-click photopolymer composites. Adv Eng Mater. 2022;25:7. doi:10.1002/adem.202200749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cazin I, Rossegger E, Roppolo I, et al. Digital light processing 3D printing of dynamic magneto-responsive thiol-acrylate composites. RSC Adv. 2023;13(26):17536–17544. doi:10.1039/d3ra02504g
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lantean S, Roppolo I, Sangermano M, et al. Magnetoresponsive devices with programmable behavior using a customized commercial stereolithographic 3D printer. Adv Mater Technol. 2022;7:11. doi:10.1002/admt.202200288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fantino E, Chiappone A, Roppolo I, et al. 3D printing of conductive complex structures with in situ generation of silver nanoparticles. Adv Mater. 2016;28(19):3712–3717. doi:10.1002/adma.201505109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez G, Chiappone A, Roppolo I, et al. Development of 3D printable formulations containing CNT with enhanced electrical properties. Polymer. 2017;109:246–253. doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2016.12.051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salas A, Pazniak H, Gonzalez-Julian J, et al. Development of polymeric/MXenes composites towards 3D printable electronics. Composites B Eng. 2023;263. doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2023.110854
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gastaldi M, Roppolo I, Chiappone A, et al. Thermochromic photoluminescent 3D printed polymeric devices based on copper-iodide clusters. Addit Manufac. 2022;49. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2021.102504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
•  Chabok H ZC, Chen Y, Eskandarinazhad A, et al. Ultrasound transducer array fabrication based on additive manufacturing of piezocomposites. Int Symp Flexible Autom. 2012;45110:433–444.
   Google Scholar
• H JW. Ceramic stereolithography: additive manufacturing for ceramics by photopolymerization. Ann Rev Mater Res. 2016;46:19–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Layani M, Wang X, Magdassi S. Novel materials for 3D printing by photopolymerization. Adv Mater. 2018;30(41):e1706344. doi:10.1002/adma.201706344
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diesendruck CE, Sottos NR, Moore JS, et al. Biomimetic self-healing. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2015;54(36):10428–10447. doi:10.1002/anie.201500484
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sardon H, Dove AP. Plastics recycling with a difference. Science. 2018;360:380–381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
•  Zhu G, Houck HA, Spiegel CA, et al. Introducing dynamic bonds in light-based 3D printing. Adv Funct Mater. 2023. doi:10.1002/adfm.202300456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X, Yu R, He Y, et al. Four-dimensional printing of shape memory polyurethanes with high strength and recyclability based on diels-alder chemistry. Polymer. 2020;200. doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2020.122532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song Y, Liu Y, Qi T, et al. Towards dynamic but supertough healable polymers through biomimetic hierarchical hydrogen-bonding interactions. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2018;57(42):13838–13842. doi:10.1002/anie.201807622
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou X, Guo B, Zhang L, et al. Progress in bio-inspired sacrificial bonds in artificial polymeric materials. Chem Soc Rev. 2017;46(20):6301–6329. doi:10.1039/c7cs00276a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu G, Hou Y, Xiang J, et al. Digital light processing 3D printing of healable and recyclable polymers with tailorable mechanical properties. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2021;13(29):34954–34961. doi:10.1021/acsami.1c08872
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binyamin I, Grossman E, Gorodnitsky M, et al. 3D printing thermally stable high-performance polymers based on a dual curing mechanism. Adv Funct Mater. 2023;33:24. doi:10.1002/adfm.202214368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bobrin VA, Yao Y, Shi X, et al. Nano- to macro-scale control of 3D printed materials via polymerization induced microphase separation. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):3577. doi:10.1038/s41467-022-31095-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel DK, Sakhaei AH, Layani M, et al. Highly stretchable and UV curable elastomers for digital light processing based 3D printing. Adv Mater. 2017;29:15. doi:10.1002/adma.201606000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cafiso D, Septevani AA, Noè C, et al. 3D printing of fully cellulose-based hydrogels by digital light processing. Sustain Mater Technol. 2022;32. doi:10.1016/j.susmat.2022.e00444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caprioli M, Roppolo I, Chiappone A, et al. 3D-printed self-healing hydrogels via digital light processing. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):2462. doi:10.1038/s41467-021-22802-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EwaAndrzejewska. Photopolymerization kinetics of multifunctional monomers. Progr Polymer Sci. 2001;26(4):605–665. doi:10.1016/s0079-6700(01)00004-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crivello JV. The discovery and development of onium salt cationic photoinitiators. J Polymer Sci A Polymer Chem. 1999;37:4241–4254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green WA. (2010). Industrial photoinitiators: a technical guide.
   Google Scholar
• Kaur M, Srivastava AK. Photopolymerization: a review. J Macromol Sci. 2002;42(4):481–512. doi:10.1081/mc-120015988
   Google Scholar
•  Malik MS, Schlogl S, Wolfahrt M, et al. Review on UV-induced cationic frontal polymerization of epoxy monomers. Polymers (Basel). 2020;12:9. doi:10.3390/polym12092146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sangermano M, Razza N, Crivello JV. Cationic UV-curing: technology and applications. Macromol Mater Eng. 2014;299(7):775–793. doi:10.1002/mame.201300349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green W. Green, W. A. Industrial Photoinitiators A Technical Guide; CRC.pdf, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Fairbanks BD, Schwartz MP, Bowman CN, et al. Photoinitiated polymerization of PEG-diacrylate with lithium phenyl-2,4,6-trimethylbenzoylphosphinate: polymerization rate and cytocompatibility. Biomaterials. 2009;30(35):6702–6707. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.08.055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KT Nguyen JW. Photopolymerizable hydrogels for tissue engineering applications. Biomaterials. 2002;23(22):4307–14. doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(02)00175-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arsu N, et al. One component thioxanthone based type II photoinitiators. Photochem UV Curing. 2006: 17–29.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Xu Y, Simon-Masseron A, et al. Radical photoinitiation with LEDs and applications in the 3D printing of composites. Chem Soc Rev. 2021;50(6):3824–3841. doi:10.1039/d0cs01411g
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant SJ, Nuttelman CR, Anseth KS. Cytocompatibility of UV and visible light photoinitiating systems on cultured NIH/3T3 fibroblasts in vitro. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2000;11(5):439–457. doi:10.1163/156856200743805
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams CG, Malik AN, Kim TK, et al. Variable cytocompatibility of six cell lines with photoinitiators used for polymerizing hydrogels and cell encapsulation. Biomaterials. 2005;26(11):1211–1218. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.04.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park S, Kim D, Ko SY, et al. Controlling uniformity of photopolymerized microscopic hydrogels. Lab Chip. 2014;14(9):1551–1563. doi:10.1039/c4lc00158c
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
•  Pawar AA, et al. High-performance 3D printing of hydrogels by water-dispersible photoinitiator nanoparticles. Science Adv. 2016;2(4):e1501381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
•  Huang X, Wang X, Zhao Y. Study on a series of water-soluble photoinitiators for fabrication of 3D hydrogels by two-photon polymerization. X. 2017;141:413–419. doi:10.1016/j.dyepig.2017.02.040.
   Google Scholar
• JR Choi KY, Choi JY, Cowie AC. Recent advances in photo-crosslinkable hydrogels for biomedical applications. BioTechniques. 2019;66(1):40–53. doi:10.2144/btn-2018-0083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin H, Zhang D, Alexander PG, et al. Application of visible light-based projection stereolithography for live cell-scaffold fabrication with designed architecture. Biomaterials. 2013;34(2):331–339. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.09.048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Kumar H, Tian Z, et al. Visible light photoinitiation of cell-adhesive gelatin methacryloyl hydrogels for stereolithography 3D bioprinting. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10(32):26859–26869. doi:10.1021/acsami.8b06607
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowsari K, Lee W, Yoo SS, et al. Scalable visible light 3D printing and bioprinting using an organic light-emitting diode microdisplay. iScience. 2021;24(11):103372. doi:10.1016/j.isci.2021.103372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
•  Zaborniak I CP. Ultrasound transducer array fabrication based on additive manufacturing of piezocomposites. Eur Polymer J. 2021;142:110152.
   Google Scholar
•  Odent J, Wallin TJ, Pan W, et al. Highly elastic, transparent, and conductive 3D-printed ionic composite Hydrogels. Advanced Functional Materials. 2017;27(33). doi:10.1002/adfm.201701807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallastegui A, Dominguez-Alfaro A, Lezama L, et al. Fast visible-light photopolymerization in the presence of multiwalled carbon nanotubes: toward 3D printing conducting nanocomposites. ACS Macro Lett. 2022;11(3):303–309. doi:10.1021/acsmacrolett.1c00758
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolczak U, et al. Reaction mechanism of monoacyl- and bisacylphosphine oxide photoinitiators studied by 31P-, 13C-, and 1H-CIDNP and ESR. J Amer Chem Soc. 1996;118(27):6477–6489. doi:10.1021/ja9534213.
   Google Scholar
• Vazquez-Martel C, Mainik P, Blasco E. Natural and naturally derived photoinitiating systems for light-based 3D printing. Organic Mater. 2022;4(04):281–291. doi:10.1055/a-1976-0453
   Google Scholar
• Kolb C, Lindemann N, Wolter H, et al. 3D-printing of highly translucent ORMOCER ®-based resin using light absorber for high dimensional accuracy. J Appl Polymer Sci. 2020;138:3. doi:10.1002/app.49691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang F, Chong Y, Wang F, et al. Photopolymer resins for luminescent three-dimensional printing. J Appl Polymer Sci. 2017;134:32. doi:10.1002/app.44988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang R, Larsen NB. Stereolithographic hydrogel printing of 3D culture chips with biofunctionalized complex 3D perfusion networks. Lab Chip. 2017;17(24):4273–4282. doi:10.1039/c7lc00926g
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
•  Stevens LJ, Burgess JR, Stochelski MA, et al. Amounts of artificial food dyes and added sugars in foods and sweets commonly consumed by children. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2015;54(4):309–321. doi:10.1177/0009922814530803.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grigoryan B, DC Corbett SP, Sazer DW. Multivascular networks and functional intravascular topologies within biocompatible hydrogels. Science. 2019;364:458–464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obaid MK, Abdullah LC, Idan IJ. Removal of reactive orange 16 Dye from aqueous solution by using modified kenaf core fiber. J Chem. 2016;2016:1–7. doi:10.1155/2016/4262578
   Google Scholar
• U Simon SD. Direct 3D printing of monolithic ion exchange adsorbers. J Chromatogr. 2019;1587:119–128. doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2018.12.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong H, Bickham BP, Woolley AT, et al. Custom 3D printer and resin for 18 mu m×20 mu m microfluidic flow channels. Lab on a Chip. 2017;17:2899–2909. doi:10.1039/c7lc00644f
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gastaldi M, Cardano F, Zanetti M, et al. Functional dyes in polymeric 3D printing: applications and perspectives. ACS Mater Lett. 2020;3(1):1–17. doi:10.1021/acsmaterialslett.0c00455
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Q, Bei HP, Zhao M, et al. Shedding light on 3D printing: printing photo-crosslinkable constructs for tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2022b;286:121566. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121566
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee S, Kim Y, Park D, et al. The thermal properties of a UV curable acrylate composite prepared by digital light processing 3D printing. Compos Commun. 2021;26. doi:10.1016/j.coco.2021.100796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
•  Zhang B, Li H, Cheng J, et al. Mechanically robust and UV-curable shape-memory polymers for digital light processing based 4D printing. Adv Mater. 2021aa;27:e2101298. doi:10.1002/adma.202101298.
   Google Scholar
• Borrello J, Nasser P, Iatridis J, et al. 3D printing a mechanically-tunable acrylate resin on a commercial DLP-SLA printer. Addit Manuf. 2018;23:374–380. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2018.08.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He Y, Li N, Xiang Z, et al. Natural polyphenol as radical inhibitors used for DLP-based 3D printing of photosensitive gels. Mater Today Commun. 2022;33. doi:10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.104698
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarcha PJ, Su L, Baker T, et al. Stability of photocurable anhydrides: methacrylic acid mixed anhydrides of nontoxic diacids. J Polymer Sci A Polymer Chem. 2001;39(24):4189–4195. doi:10.1002/pola.10073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Li Z, Yang P, et al. Polyphenol scaffolds in tissue engineering. Mater Horiz. 2021;8(1):145–167. doi:10.1039/d0mh01317j
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russo A, Maschio G, Ampelli C. Reaction inhibition as a method for preventing thermal runaway in industrial processes. Macromol Symposia. 2007;259(1):365–370. doi:10.1002/masy.200751341
   Google Scholar
• Esfandiari P, Ligon SC, Lagref JJ, et al. Efficient stabilization of thiol-ene formulations in radical photopolymerization. J Polymer Sci A Polymer Chem. 2013;51(20):4261–4266. doi:10.1002/pola.26848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salas A, Zanatta M, Sans V, et al. Chemistry in light-induced 3D printing. ChemTexts. 2023b;9:1. doi:10.1007/s40828-022-00176-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nauman N, Zaquen N, Boyer C, et al. Miniemulsion photopolymerization in a continuous tubular reactor: particle size controlviamembrane emulsification. Polymer Chem. 2020;11(28):4660–4669. doi:10.1039/d0py00654h
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson RS. Exploring the science,: technology and applications of UV and EB curing. Sita Technology. 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Fouassier J-P. (1995). Photoinitiation, photopolymerization, and photocuring: fundamentals and applications.
   Google Scholar
•  Fouassier J-P, Rabek JF. Radiation curing in polymer science and technology: practical aspects and applications. Springer Science & Business Media; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Sato R, Kurihara T, Takeishi M. Rate enhancement of amines in the photopolymerization of methyl methacrylate under oxygen. Polymer International. 1998;47(2):159–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decker C. Die Makromolekulare Chemie. 1979;180(8):2027–2030. doi:10.1002/macp.1979.021800818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belon C, Allonas X, Croutxé-barghorn C, et al. Overcoming the oxygen inhibition in the photopolymerization of acrylates: A study of the beneficial effect of triphenylphosphine. J Polymer Sci A Polymer Chem. 2010;48(11):2462–2469. doi:10.1002/pola.24017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ligon SC, Husar B, Wutzel H, et al. Strategies to reduce oxygen inhibition in photoinduced polymerization. Chem Rev. 2014;114(1):557–589. doi:10.1021/cr3005197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yong He QG, Jin Y. (2022). Cell assembly with 3D bioprinting. WILEY-VCH.
   Google Scholar
• Kim SH, Yeon YK, Lee JM, et al. Precisely printable and biocompatible silk fibroin bioink for digital light processing 3D printing. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):1620. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03759-y
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mendes-Felipe C, Oliveira J, Etxebarria I, et al. State-of-the-Art and future challenges of UV curable polymer-based smart materials for printing technologies. Adv Mater Technol. 2019;4:3. doi:10.1002/admt.201800618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang S, Yin J, Huang W, et al. UV-induced disulfide metathesis: strengthening interlayer adhesion and rectifying warped 3D printed materials. Addit Manufac. 2022;59. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2022.103085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu X, Zhou S, Wu J, et al. Relationship between the adhesion properties of UV-curable alumina suspensions and the functionalities and structures of UV-curable acrylate monomers for DLP-based ceramic stereolithography. Ceramics Int. 2021;47(23):32699–32709. doi:10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.08.166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song P, Li M, Zhang B, et al. DLP fabricating of precision GelMA/HAp porous composite scaffold for bone tissue engineering application. Composites B Eng. 2022;244. doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.110163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weng Z, Huang X, Peng S, et al. 3D printing of ultra-high viscosity resin by a linear scan-based vat photopolymerization system. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):4303. doi:10.1038/s41467-023-39913-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu L, Dong Z. Interfacial regulation for 3D printing based on slice-based photopolymerization. Adv Mater. 2023;35(29):e2300903. doi:10.1002/adma.202300903
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raj R, Dixit AR, Singh SS, et al. Print parameter optimization and mechanical deformation analysis of alumina-nanoparticle doped photocurable nanocomposites fabricated using vat-photopolymerization based additive technology. Addit Manufac. 2022;60. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2022.103201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu B, Zheng J, Wu J, et al. Preparation of isotropic tensile photosensitive resins for digital light processing 3D printing using orthogonal thiol-ene and thiol-epoxy dual-cured strategies. Polymer Testing. 2022;116. doi:10.1016/j.polymertesting.2022.107767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
•  Bae JH, Won JC, Lim WB, et al. Highly flexible and photo-activating acryl-polyurethane for 3D steric architectures. Polymers (Basel. 2021;13:6. doi:10.3390/polym13060844.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanon MM, Ghaly A, Zsidai L, et al. Tribological characteristics of digital light processing (DLP) 3D printed graphene/resin composite: influence of graphene presence and process settings. Mater Design. 2022;218. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2022.110718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu C, Schimelman J, Wang P, et al. Photopolymerizable biomaterials and light-based 3D printing strategies for biomedical applications. Chem Rev. 2020;120(19):10695–10743. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00810
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karalekas D, Aggelopoulos A. Study of shrinkage strains in a stereolithography cured acrylic photopolymer resin. J Mater Process Technol. 2003;136(1–3):146–150. doi:10.1016/s0924-0136(03)00028-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmoria GV, Ahrens CH, Beal VE, et al. Evaluation of post-curing and laser manufacturing parameters on the properties of SOMOS 7110 photosensitive resin used in stereolithography. Mater Design. 2009;30(3):758–763. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2008.05.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steyrer B, Busetti B, Harakály G, et al. Hot lithography vs. room temperature DLP 3D-printing of a dimethacrylate. Addit Manufac. 2018;21:209–214. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2018.03.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eibel A, Fast DE, Gescheidt G. Choosing the ideal photoinitiator for free radical photopolymerizations: predictions based on simulations using established data. Polymer Chemistry. 2018;9(41):5107–5115. doi:10.1039/c8py01195h
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weigel N, Mannel MJ, Thiele J. Flexible materials for high-resolution 3D printing of microfluidic devices with integrated droplet size regulation. ACS Appl Mater Interface. 2021;26:31086–31101. doi:10.1021/acsami.1c05547
   Google Scholar
• Taki K, Watanabe Y, Ito H, et al. Effect of oxygen inhibition on the kinetic constants of the UV-radical photopolymerization of diurethane dimethacrylate/photoinitiator systems. Macromolecules. 2014;47(6):1906–1913. doi:10.1021/ma402437q
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Zhang Q, Xu T, et al. Photocrosslinkable nanocomposite ink for printing strong,: biodegradable and bioactive bone graft. Biomaterials. 2020;263:120378. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120378
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrzejewska E. Free radical photopolymerization of multifunctional Monomers. In: Three-dimensional microfabrication using two-photon polymerization. 2016. p. 62–81.
   Google Scholar
• Dickens SH, et al. Photopolymerization kinetics of methacrylate dental resins. Macromolecules. 2003;36(16):6043–6053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucciarelli, A., Paolelli, X., De Vitis, E., et al. VAT photopolymerization 3D printing optimization of high aspect ratio structures for additive manufacturing of chips towards biomedical applications. Addit Manufac. 2022;60; doi:10.1016/j.addma.2022.103200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razavi Bazaz S, Rouhi O, Raoufi MA, et al. 3D printing of inertial microfluidic devices. Sci Rep. 2020;1:5929. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-62569-9
   Google Scholar
• Yuan C, Kowsari K, Panjwani S, et al. Ultrafast three-dimensional printing of optically smooth microlens arrays by oscillation-assisted digital light processing. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11(43):40662–40668. doi:10.1021/acsami.9b14692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streets AM, Huang Y. Chip in a lab: microfluidics for next generation life science research. Biomicrofluidics. 2013;7(1):11302. doi:10.1063/1.4789751
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
•  Zhang H, Liu H, Zhang N. A review of microinjection moulding of polymeric micro devices. Micromachines (Basel). 2022;13:9. doi:10.3390/mi13091530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo MT, Rotem A, Heyman JA, et al. Droplet microfluidics for high-throughput biological assays. Lab Chip. 2012;12(12):2146–2155. doi:10.1039/c2lc21147e
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Son J, Samuel R, Gale BK, et al. Separation of sperm cells from samples containing high concentrations of white blood cells using a spiral channel. Biomicrofluidics. 2017;11(5):054106. doi:10.1063/1.4994548
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jafek AR, Harbertson S, Brady H, et al. Instrumentation for xPCR incorporating qPCR and HRMA. Anal Chem. 2018;90(12):7190–7196. doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.7b05176
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitesides GM. The origins and the future of microfluidics. Nature. 2006;442(7101):368–373. doi:10.1038/nature05058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim P, Lee SE, Jung HS, et al. Soft lithographic patterning of supported lipid bilayers onto a surface and inside microfluidic channels. Lab Chip. 2006;6(1):54–59. doi:10.1039/b512593f
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yazdi AA, Popma A, Wong W, et al. 3D printing: an emerging tool for novel microfluidics and lab-on-a-chip applications. Microfluid Nanofluid. 2016;20:3. doi:10.1007/s10404-016-1715-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hongbin Y, Guangya Z, Siong CF, et al. Novel polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) based microchannel fabrication method for lab-on-a-chip application. Sensors Actuat B Chem. 2009;137(2):754–761. doi:10.1016/j.snb.2008.11.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson ME, Kota N, Kim Y, et al. Fabrication of circular microfluidic channels by combining mechanical micromilling and soft lithography. Lab Chip. 2011;11(8):1550–1555. doi:10.1039/c0lc00561d
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
•  Mao M, He J, Li X, et al. The emerging frontiers and applications of high-resolution 3D printing. Micromachines, Micro/Nano Manufacturing Backgroud. 2017;4. doi:10.3390/mi8040113.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu W, Qu X, Zhu J, et al. Direct 3D bioprinting of prevascularized tissue constructs with complex microarchitecture. Biomaterials. 2017: 106–115. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.01.042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shallan AI, Smejkal P, Corban M, et al. Cost-effective three-dimensional printing of visibly transparent microchips within minutes. Anal Chem. 2014;6:3124–3130. doi:10.1021/ac4041857
   Google Scholar
•  Buttner U, Sivashankar S, Agambayev S, et al. Flash μ-fluidics: a rapid prototyping method for fabricating microfluidic devices. RSC Adv Microfluidic Chip. 2016;78:74822–74832. doi:10.1039/c6ra13582j.
   Google Scholar
• Macdonald NP, Cabot JM, Smejkal P, et al. Comparing microfluidic performance of three-dimensional (3D) printing platforms. Anal Chem. 2017;7:3858–3866. doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.7b00136
   Google Scholar
• van der Linden P, Popov AM, Pontoni D. Accurate and rapid 3D printing of microfluidic devices using wavelength selection on a DLP printer. Lab Chip. 2020;22:4128–4140. doi:10.1039/d0lc00767f.
   Google Scholar
•  Bhusal A, Dogan E, Nguyen HA, et al. Multi-material digital light processing bioprinting of hydrogel-based microfluidic chips. Biofabrication. 2021;1. doi:10.1088/1758-5090/ac2d78.
   Google Scholar
•  Limaye AS, Rosen DW. Process planning method for mask projection micro-stereolithography. Rapid Prototyping Journal. 2007;13(2):76–84. doi:10.1108/13552540710736759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
•  Zhou C, Chen Y, Waltz RA. Optimized mask image projection for solid freeform fabrication. In: Paper presented at the international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference. 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Gong H, Woolley AT, Nordin GP. High density 3D printed microfluidic valves: pumps, and multiplexers. Lab Chip. 2016;16(13):2450–2458. doi:10.1039/c6lc00565a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Männel MJ, Selzer L, Bernhardt R, et al. Optimizing process parameters in commercial micro-stereolithography for forming emulsions and polymer microparticles in nonplanar microfluidic devices. Adv Mater Technol. 2019;4:1. doi:10.1002/admt.201800408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo AP, Bhattacharjee N, Lee YS, et al. High-Precision stereolithography of biomicrofluidic devices. Adv Mater Technol. 2019;4:6. doi:10.1002/admt.201800395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee YS, Bhattacharjee N, Folch A. 3D-printed Quake-style microvalves and micropumps. Lab Chip. 2018;18(8):1207–1214. doi:10.1039/C8LC00001H
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu Y, Qi F, Mao H, et al. In-situ transfer vat photopolymerization for transparent microfluidic device fabrication. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):918. doi:10.1038/s41467-022-28579-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui K., et al. A kind of accuracy improving method based on error analysis and feedback for DLP 3D Printing. In 2019 IEEE international conference on service operations and logistics, and informatics (SOLI), IEEE, 2019. Retrieved from Dsitoration
   Google Scholar
• Huang YC, Pan JW. High contrast ratio and compact-sized prism for DLP projection system. Opt Express. 2014;22(14):17016–17029. doi:10.1364/OE.22.017016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan JW, Wang HH. High contrast ratio prism design in a mini projector. Appl Opt. 2013;52(34):8347–8354. doi:10.1364/AO.52.008347
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhen Chen GX,  Ju K, et al. Study on mask graphics optimization of face exposure rapid prototyping system. Mechatronics. 2016;22(1):23–28.
   Google Scholar
• Li Z, Chen Z, Liu J, et al. Additive manufacturing of lightweight and high-strength polymer-derived SiOC ceramics. Virtual Phys Protot. 2020;15(2):163–177. doi:10.1080/17452759.2019.1710919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
•  Li Y, Mao Q, Yin J, et al. Theoretical prediction and experimental validation of the digital light processing (DLP) working curve for photocurable materials. Addit Manufac. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2020.101716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith JM. Motorized stage DLP large-scale printing: U.S. Patent No. 6, 245. 21 May 2002, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Mitcham L, Nelson WE. Multi-projector printing: U.S. Patent 5, 180, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Wu C. et al. Delta DLP 3D printing with large size. IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS). IEEE, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng X, Smith W, Jackson J, et al. Multiscale metallic metamaterials. Nat Mater. 2016;10:1100–1106. doi:10.1038/nmat4694
   Google Scholar
• Sack J-R and Urrutia J. Handbook of computational geometry, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Xu Y, Mao H, Liu C, et al. Hopping light Vat photopolymerization for multiscale fabrication. Small. 2023;19(11):e2205784. doi:10.1002/smll.202205784
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan Wicker FM, Elkins C. Multiple material micro-fabrication extending stereo lithography to tissue engineering and other novel application, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Han D, Yang C, Fang NX, et al. Rapid multi-material 3D printing with projection micro-stereolithography using dynamic fluidic control. Additive Manuf. 2019;27:606–615. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2019.03.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin JJ, Fiore BE, Erb RM. Designing bioinspired composite reinforcement architectures via 3D magnetic printing. Nat Commun. 2015;6:8641. doi:10.1038/ncomms9641
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Chen Z, Song X, et al. Biomimetic anisotropic reinforcement architectures by electrically assisted nanocomposite 3D printing. Adv Mater. 2017;29:11. doi:10.1002/adma.201605750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng J, Wang R, Sun Z, et al. Centrifugal multimaterial 3D printing of multifunctional heterogeneous objects. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):7931. doi:10.1038/s41467-022-35622-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toombs, J. T., et al. Volumetric additive manufacturing of silica glass with microscale computed axial lithography. Science. 2022;376:308–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regehly M, Garmshausen Y, Reuter M, et al. Xolography for linear volumetric 3D printing. Nature. 2020;588(7839):620–624. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-3029-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Beer, MP, et al. Rapid, continuous additive manufacturing by volumetric polymerization inhibition patterning. Science Advances, 2019, 8723.
   Google Scholar