Deposition dynamics and analysis of polyurethane foam structure boundaries for aerial additive manufacturing

References

• Ashrafi N, Duarte JP, Nazarian S, et al. Evaluating the relationship between deposition and layer quality in large-scale additive manufacturing of concrete. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2019;14:135–140. doi: 10.1080/17452759.2018.1532800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim S, Buswell RA, Le TT, et al. Developments in construction-scale additive manufacturing processes. Automation in Construction. 2012;21:262–268. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2011.06.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ames J, White DJ, Alhasan A. Conference on Autonomous and Robotic Construction of Infrastructure Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Autonomous and Robotic Construction of Infrastructure, Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Autonomous and Robotic Construction of Infrastructure (2015).
   Google Scholar
• Raza MH, Zhong RY, Khan M. Recent advances and productivity analysis of 3D printed geopolymers. Addit Manuf. 2022;52:102685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bos F, Wolfs R, Ahmed Z, et al. Additive manufacturing of concrete in construction: potentials and challenges of 3D concrete printing. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2016;11:209–225. doi: 10.1080/17452759.2016.1209867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaezi M, Chianrabutra S, Mellor B, et al. Multiple material additive manufacturing–part 1: a review: this review paper covers a decade of research on multiple material additive manufacturing technologies which can produce complex geometry parts with different materials. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2013;8:19–50. doi: 10.1080/17452759.2013.778175.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed ZY, Bos FP, Van Brunschot M, et al. On-demand additive manufacturing of functionally graded concrete. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2020;15:194–210. doi: 10.1080/17452759.2019.1709009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang M, Wang CC, Sepasgozar S, et al. A systematic review of digital technology adoption in off-site construction: current status and future direction towards industry 4.0. Buildings. 2020;10:204. doi: 10.3390/buildings10110204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WASP. The infinite 3D printer 3D WASP 2022, 2022. Available from: https://www.3dwasp.com/en/3d-printer-house-crane-wasp/.
   Google Scholar
• ICON. ICON and lennar to build largest neighborhood of 3D-printed homes codesigned by BIG-Bjarke Ingels Group, 2022. Available from: https://www.iconbuild.com/updates/icon-and-lennar-to-build–largest-neighborhood-of-3d-printed-homes-codesigned.
   Google Scholar
• Winsun. 3D printing architecture's future, 2022. Available from: http://www.winsun3d.com/En/Index/.
   Google Scholar
• Apis Cor. A revolutionary robotic 3D printer, 2022. https://apis-cor.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Tiryaki ME, Zhang X, Pham Q-C. Printing-while-moving: a new paradigm for large-scale robotic 3D printing. In: 2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE; 2019. p. 2286–2291.
   Google Scholar
• Krizmancic M, Arbanas B, Petrovic T, et al. Cooperative aerial-ground multi-robot system for automated construction tasks. IEEE Robot Autom Lett. 2020;5:798–805. doi: 10.1109/LSP.2016..
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alhijaily A, Kilic ZM, Bartolo AP. Teams of robots in additive manufacturing: a review. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2023;18:e2162929. doi: 10.1080/17452759.2022.2162929.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giftthaler M, Sandy T, Dörfler K, et al. Mobile robotic fabrication at 1: 1 scale: the in situ fabricator: system, experiences and current developments. Constr Robot. 2017;1:3–14. doi: 10.1007/s41693-017-0003-5.
   Google Scholar
• Dakhli Z, Lafhaj Z. Robotic mechanical design for brick-laying automation. Cogent Eng. 2017;4:1361600. doi: 10.1080/23311916.2017.1361600.
   Google Scholar
• Helm V, Ercan S, Gramazio F, et al. Mobile robotic fabrication on construction sites: dimrob. In: 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE; 2012. p. 4335–4341.
   Google Scholar
• Yablonina M, Prado M, Baharlou E, et al. Mobile robotic fabrication system for filament structures. Fabricate Rethinking Des Constr. 2017;3:202–209.
   Google Scholar
• Wang L, Culha U, Iida F. A dragline-forming mobile robot inspired by spiders. Bioinspir Biomim. 2014;9:016006. doi: 10.1088/1748-3182/9/1/016006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braithwaite A, Alhinai T, Haas-Heger M, et al. Tensile web construction and perching with nano aerial vehicles. Robot Res Vol. 2018;1:71–88. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-51532-8.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Li M, Lim JH, et al. Large-scale 3D printing by a team of mobile robots. Autom Constr. 2018;95:98–106. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2018.08.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sustarevas J, Butters D, Hammid M, et al. Map-a mobile agile printer robot for on-site construction. In: 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE; 2018. p. 2441–2448.
   Google Scholar
• Oxman N, Duro-Royo J, Keating S, et al. Towards robotic swarm printing. Archit Des. 2014;84:108–115.
   Google Scholar
• Jokic S, Novikov P, Maggs S, et al. Robotic positioning device for three-dimensional printing, arXiv preprint arXiv:1406.3400. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen KH, Napp N, Stuart-Smith R, et al. A review of collective robotic construction. Sci Robot. 2019;4:eaau8479. doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.aau8479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauf F, Kocer BB, Slatter A, et al. Learning tethered perching for aerial robots. In: 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE; 2023. p. 1298–1304.
   Google Scholar
• Dillow C. Drones take off in the construction industry as a cost-saving tool — Fortune.com, 2016. Available from: http://fortune.com/2016/09/13/commercial-drone-construction-industry/.
   Google Scholar
• Drones Direct. The UK drone users report, 2017. Available from: http://www.dronesdirect.co.uk/files/pdf/dronesreport.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Feron E, Johnson EN. Aerial robotics. In: Springer handbook of robotics F/44. Berlin (Germany): Springer Science & Business Media; 2008. p. 1009–1029. Available from: http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-540-30301-5_45.pdf\%5Cnpapers3://publication/uuid/FCD0AE08-B03E-4D9D-AD43-3D5385728D72.
   Google Scholar
• Health and Safety Executive. Fatal injuries arising from accidents at work in Great Britain 2017. 2017. p. 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Nadhim EA, Hon C, Xia B, et al. Falls from height in the construction industry: a critical review of the scientific literature. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016;13. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13070638
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Commonly Used Statistics — Occupational Safety and Health Administration, 2015. Available from: https://www.osha.gov/oshstats/commonstats.html.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Ding X, Ou Y. Properties of rigid polyurethane foams prepared with synthesized PIPA polyol. Am J Appl Chem. 2014;1:7–14. Available from: http://www.aascit.org/journal/ajca
   Google Scholar
• Widya T, Macosko C. Nanoclay modified rigid polyurethane foam. J Macromol Sci Part B Phys. 2005;44:897–908. doi: 10.1080/00222340500364809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett E, Gosselin C. Weak support material techniques for alternative additive manufacturing materials. Addit Manuf. 2015;8:95–104. doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2015.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett E, Gosselin C. Large-scale 3D printing with a cable-suspended robot. Addit Manuf. 2015;7:27–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furet B, Poullain P, Garnier S. 3D printing for construction based on a complex wall of polymer-foam and concrete. Addit Manuf. 2019;28:58–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedarf P, Dutto A, Zanini M, et al. Foam 3D printing for construction: a review of applications, materials, and processes. Autom Constr. 2021;130:103861. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103861.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keating SJ, Leland JC, Cai L, et al. Toward site-specific and self-sufficient robotic fabrication on architectural scales. Sci Robot. 2017;2:eaam8986. doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.aam8986.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prajapati MJ, Kumar A, Lin S-C, et al. Multi-material additive manufacturing with lightweight closed-cell foam-filled lattice structures for enhanced mechanical and functional properties. Addit Manuf. 2022;54:102766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labonnote N, Ronnquist A, Manum B, et al. Additive construction: state-of-the-art, challenges and opportunities. Autom Constr. 2016;72:347–366. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2016.08.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frearson A. DUS Architects builds 3D-printed micro home in Amsterdam, 2016. Available from: https://www.dezeen.com/2016/08/30/dus-architects-3d-printed-micro-home-amsterdam-cabin-bathtub/.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt G, Mitzalis F, Alhinai T, et al. 3D printing with flying robots. In: 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE; 2014. p. 4493–4499.
   Google Scholar
• Chermprayong P, Zhang K, Xiao F, et al. An integrated delta manipulator for aerial repair: a new aerial robotic system. IEEE Robot Autom Mag. 2019;26:54–66. doi: 10.1109/MRA.100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chermprayong P. Enabling technologies for precise aerial manufacturing with unmanned aerial vehicles. 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Alhinai TMT. Methods of manufacturing with aerial robots [Ph.D. thesis]. Imperial College London; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Dams B, Sareh S, Zhang K, et al. Aerial additive building manufacturing: three-dimensional printing of polymer structures using drones. Proc Inst Civil Eng-Constr Mater. 2020;173:3–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dams B. Cementitious and polymeric materials for aerial additive manufacturing [Ph.D. thesis]. University of Bath; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang K, Chermprayong P, Xiao F, et al. Aerial additive manufacturing with multiple autonomous robots. Nature. 2022;609:709–717. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04988-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alaa M, Yusoh K, Hasany S. Pure polyurethane and castor oil based polyurethane: synthesis and characterization. J Mech Eng Sci (JMES). 2015;8:1507–1515. doi: 10.1002/mrm.10658
   Google Scholar
• Trovati G, Sanches EA, Neto SC, et al. Characterization of polyurethane resins by FTIR, TGA, and XRD. J Appl Polym Sci. 2010. doi: 10.1002/app.31096
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhao Y, Gordon MJ, Tekeei A, et al. Modeling reaction kinetics of rigid polyurethane foaming process. J Appl Polym Sci. 2013;130:1131–1138. doi: 10.1002/app.39287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isothane Ltd.. LD40 -- Isothane, 2016. http://www.isothane.com/prod/ld40/.
   Google Scholar
• Ridha M, Shim VPW. Microstructure and tensile mechanical properties of anisotropic rigid polyurethane foam. Exp Mech. 2008;48:763–776. doi: 10.1007/s11340-008-9146-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BSI. BS ISO 1922 : 2012 BSI Standards Publication Rigid cellular plastics – Determination of shear strength. 2012.
   Google Scholar
• BSI. Rigid cellular materials – Part 4: method 14. Determination of flexural properties, BS 4370-4:1991 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• PX4. PX4 user guide. Available from: https://docs.px4.io/main/en/, [???? accessed: 2022 May 02].
   Google Scholar
• Mills N. Chapter 2 Polyurethane foams: processing and microstructure. In: Polymer foams handbook. Oxford (UK): Elsevier Ltd.; 2007. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-7506-8069-1.50003-9
   Google Scholar
• Dawson JR, Shortall JB. The microstructure of rigid polyurethane foams. J Mater Sci. 1982;17:220–224. doi: 10.1007/BF00809056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isothane Ltd.. The reprocell range -- isothane, 2016. Available from: http://www.isothane.com/prod/reprocell-range/.
   Google Scholar
• Saint-Michel F, Chazeau L, Cavaillé J-Y. Mechanical properties of high density polyurethane foams: II effect of the filler size. Compos Sci Technol. 2006;66:2709–2718. doi: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orr L, Stephens B, Kocer BB, et al. A high payload aerial platform for infrastructure repair and manufacturing. In: 2021 Aerial Robotic Systems Physically Interacting with the Environment (AIRPHARO). IEEE; 2021. p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Stephens B, Orr L, Kocer BB, et al. An aerial parallel manipulator with shared compliance. IEEE Robot Autom Lett. 2022;7:11902–11909. doi: 10.1109/LRA.2022.3205111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kocer BB, Orr L, Stephens B, et al. An intelligent aerial manipulator for wind turbine inspection and repair. In: 2022 UKACC 13th International Conference on Control (CONTROL). IEEE; 2022. p. 226–227.
   Google Scholar