An integrated multiscale simulation guiding the processing optimisation for additively manufactured nickel-based superalloys

References

• DebRoy T, Wei HL, Zuback JS, et al. Additive manufacturing of metallic components – process, structure and properties. Prog Mater Sci. 2018;92:112–224. doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mostafaei A, Ghiaasiaan R, Ho IT, et al. Additive manufacturing of nickel-based superalloys: A state-of-the-art review on process-structure-defect-property relationship. Prog Mater Sci. 2023;136:101108. doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2023.101108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akande IG, Oluwole OO, Fayomi OSI, et al. Overview of mechanical, microstructural, oxidation properties and high-temperature applications of superalloys. Mater Today Proc. 2021;43:2222–2231. doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.523
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez S, Smith P, Xu Z, et al. Powder bed fusion of nickel-based superalloys: a review. Int J Machine Tools Manuf. 2021;165:103729. doi:10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2021.103729
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie Y, Teng Q, Shen M, et al. The role of overlap region width in multi-laser powder bed fusion of Hastelloy X superalloy. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2023;18(1):e2142802. doi:10.1080/17452759.2022.2142802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan W, Chen H, Cheng T, et al. Effects of laser scanning speeds on different states of the molten pool during selective laser melting: simulation and experiment. Mater Des. 2020;189:108542. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He X, Kong D, Zhou Y, et al. Powder recycling effects on porosity development and mechanical properties of Hastelloy X alloy during laser powder bed fusion process. Addit Manuf. 2022;55:102840. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2022.102840
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanaei N, Fatemi A. Defects in additive manufactured metals and their effect on fatigue performance: a state-of-the-art review. Prog Mater Sci. 2021;117:100724. doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.100724
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pourbabak S, Montero-Sistiaga ML, Schryvers D, et al. Microscopic investigation of as built and hot isostatic pressed Hastelloy X processed by selective laser melting. Mater Charact. 2019;153:366–371. doi:10.1016/j.matchar.2019.05.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He X, Wang L, Kong D, et al. Recrystallization effect on surface passivation of Hastelloy X alloy fabricated by laser powder bed fusion. J Mater Sci Technol. 2023;163:245–258. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2023.06.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabzi HE, Maeng S, Liang X, et al. Controlling crack formation and porosity in laser powder bed fusion: alloy design and process optimisation. Addit Manuf. 2020;34:101360. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2020.101360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu C, Chen N, Li R, et al. Selective laser melting of GH3536 superalloy: microstructure, mechanical properties, and hydrocyclone manufacturing. Adv Powder Mater. 2023: 100134. doi:10.1016/j.apmate.2023.100134
   Google Scholar
• Ye C, Zhang C, Zhao J, et al. Effects of post-processing on the surface finish, porosity, residual stresses, and fatigue performance of additive manufactured metals: a review. J Mater Eng Perform. 2021;30(9):6407–6425. doi:10.1007/s11665-021-06021-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang W, Zheng Y, Liu F, et al. Effect of solution temperature on the microstructure and mechanical properties of Hastelloy X superalloy fabricated by laser directed energy deposition. Mater Sci Eng A. 2021;820:141537. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2021.141537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehmann T, Rose D, Ranjbar E, et al. Large-scale metal additive manufacturing: a holistic review of the state of the art and challenges. Int Mater Rev. 2021;67(4):410–459. doi:10.1080/09506608.2021.1971427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu S, Hu Y, Yang B, et al. Review on defect characterization and structural integrity assessment method of additively manufactured materials. J Mech Eng. 2021;57(22):3–34. doi:10.3901/JME.2021.22.003
   Google Scholar
• Keller C, Mokhtari M, Vieille B, et al. Influence of a rescanning strategy with different laser powers on the microstructure and mechanical properties of Hastelloy X elaborated by powder bed fusion. Mater Sci Eng A. 2021;803:140474. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2020.140474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keshavarzkermani A, Marzbanrad E, Esmaeilizadeh R, et al. An investigation into the effect of process parameters on melt pool geometry, cell spacing, and grain refinement during laser powder bed fusion. Optics & Laser Technol. 2019;116:83–91. doi:10.1016/j.optlastec.2019.03.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watring DS, Benzing JT, Hrabe N, et al. Effects of laser-energy density and build orientation on the structure-property relationships in as-built Inconel 718 manufactured by laser powder bed fusion. Addit Manuf. 2020;36:101425. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2020.101425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao H, Liu X, Xiao W, et al. Influence of molten-pool cooling rate on solidification structure and mechanical property of laser additive manufactured Inconel 718. J Mater Res Technol. 2022;19:4404–4416. doi:10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.06.162
   Google Scholar
• Wang J, Zhu R, Liu Y, et al. Understanding melt pool characteristics in laser powder bed fusion: An overview of single- and multi-track melt pools for process optimization. Adv Powder Mater. 2023;2(4):100137. doi:10.1016/j.apmate.2023.100137
   Google Scholar
• Li Z, Deng Y, Yao B, et al. Effect of laser scan speed on pool size and densification of selective laser melted CoCr alloy under constant laser energy density. Laser Optoelectronics Progress. 2022;59(7):0736001. doi:10.3788/LOP202259.0736001
   Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Yuan W, Song B, et al. Towards understanding metallurgical defect formation of selective laser melted wrought aluminum alloys. Adv Powder Mater. 2022;1(4):100035. doi:10.1016/j.apmate.2022.100035
   Google Scholar
• Rui H, Meiping W, Chen C, et al. Effects of laser energy density on microstructure and corrosion resistance of FeCrNiMnAl high entropy alloy coating. Optics & Laser Technol. 2022;152:108188. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2022.108188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Y, Sun W, Wang Q, et al. Effect of beam energy density characteristics on microstructure and mechanical properties of nickel-based alloys manufactured by laser directed energy deposition. J Mater Process Technol. 2023;319:118074. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2023.118074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan P, Zhou M, Tang C, et al. Multiphysics modelling of powder bed fusion for polymers. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2023;18(1):e2257191. doi:10.1080/17452759.2023.2257191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan P, Shen F, Shian Tey W, et al. A numerical study on the packing quality of fibre/polymer composite powder for powder bed fusion additive manufacturing. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2021;16(sup1):S1–S18. doi:10.1080/17452759.2021.1922965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kusano M, Watanabe M. Microstructure control of Hastelloy X by geometry-induced elevation of sample temperature during a laser powder bed fusion process. Mater Des. 2022;222:111016. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2022.111016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee YS, Zhang W. Modeling of heat transfer, fluid flow and solidification microstructure of nickel-base superalloy fabricated by laser powder bed fusion. Addit Manuf. 2016;12:178–188. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2016.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lv F, Liang HX, Xie DQ, et al. On the role of laser in situ re-melting into pore elimination of Ti-6Al-4V components fabricated by selective laser melting. J Alloys Compd. 2021;854:156866. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.156866
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prithivirajan V, Sangid MD. The role of defects and critical pore size analysis in the fatigue response of additively manufactured IN718 via crystal plasticity. Mater Des. 2018;150:139–153. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2018.04.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang Y. A user-material subroutine incroporating single crystal plasticity in the ABAQUS finite element program. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Pilgar CM, Fernandez AM, Lucarini S, et al. Effect of printing direction and thickness on the mechanical behavior of SLM fabricated Hastelloy-X. Int J Plasticity. 2022;153:103250. doi:10.1016/j.ijplas.2022.103250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garlea E, Choo H, Sluss CC, et al. Variation of elastic mechanical properties with texture, porosity, and defect characteristics in laser powder bed fusion 316L stainless steel. Mater Sci Eng A. 2019;763:138032. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2019.138032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez-Mata O, Wang X, Muñiz-Lerma JA, et al. Dependence of mechanical properties on crystallographic orientation in nickel-based superalloy Hastelloy X fabricated by laser powder bed fusion. J Alloys Compd. 2021;865:158868. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.158868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu H, Wei C, Li L, et al. Multi-physics modelling of molten pool development and track formation in multi-track, multi-layer and multi-material selective laser melting. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2020;151:119458. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.119458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson L, Mahmoudi M, Zhang B, et al. Assessing printability maps in additive manufacturing of metal alloys. Acta Mater. 2019;176:199–210. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2019.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang S, Ning J, Zhu L, et al. Role of porosity defects in metal 3D printing: formation mechanisms, impacts on properties and mitigation strategies. Mater Today. 2022;59:133–160. doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2022.08.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo Y, Collins DM, Tarleton E, et al. Measurements of stress fields near a grain boundary: exploring blocked arrays of dislocations in 3D. Acta Mater. 2015;96:229–236. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2015.05.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong D, Dong C, Ni X, et al. Hetero-deformation-induced stress in additively manufactured 316L stainless steel. Mater Res Lett. 2020;8(10):390–397. doi:10.1080/21663831.2020.1775149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar