Sound absorption performance of a micro-perforated plate sandwich structure based on selective laser melting

References

• Ramnath BV, Alagarraja K, Elanchezhian C. Review on sandwich composite and their applications [J]. Mater Today Proc. 2019;16:859–864.
   Google Scholar
• Birman V, Kardomateas G A. Review of current trends in research and applications of sandwich structures [J]. Compos B Eng. 2018;142:221–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D'alessandro V, Petrone G, Franco F, et al. A review of the vibroacoustics of sandwich panels: models and experiments [J]. J Sandw Struct Mater. 2013;15(5):541–582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patekar V, Kale K. State of the art review on mechanical properties of sandwich composite structures [J]. Polym Compos. 2022;43(9):5820–5830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asadi Jafari MH, Zarastvand M, Zhou J. Doubly curved truss core composite shell system for broadband diffuse acoustic insulation [J]. J Vib Control. 2023: 10775463231206229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghafouri M, Ghassabi M, Zarastvand M R, et al. Sound propagation of three-dimensional sandwich panels: influence of three-dimensional re-entrant auxetic core [J]. AIAA J. 2022;60(11):6374–6384.
   Google Scholar
• Zarastvand M, Asadijafari M, Talebitooti R. Acoustic wave transmission characteristics of stiffened composite shell systems with double curvature [J]. Compos Struct. 2022;292:115688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarastvand M, Ghassabi M, Talebitooti R. A review approach for sound propagation prediction of plate constructions [J]. Arch Comput Methods Eng. 2021;28:2817–2843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarastvand M, Ghassabi M, Talebitooti R. Prediction of acoustic wave transmission features of the multilayered plate constructions: A review [J]. J Sandw Struct Mater. 2022;24(1):218–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee W-Y, Kim J-C, Noh H-M. Application of a micro-perforated panel absorber to reduce the curve squeal noise of railways [J]. Noise Control Eng J. 2021;69(6):507–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czwielong F, Floss S, Kaltenbacher M, et al. Influence of a micro-perforated duct absorber on sound emission and performance of axial fans [J]. Appl Acoust. 2021;174:107746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian Y, Wei Y, Kong D, et al. Experimental investigation on motor noise reduction of unmanned aerial vehicles [J]. Appl Acoust. 2021;176:107873.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoshi K, Hanyu T, Okuzono T, et al. Implementation experiment of a honeycomb-backed MPP sound absorber in a meeting room [J]. Appl Acoust. 2020;157:107000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou J, Zhu H, Yuan S, et al. Sound transmission characteristics of underwater flexible micro-perforated panels [J]. Appl Acoust. 2021;181:108165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng H, Galland M-A, Ichchou M, et al. On the low frequency acoustic properties of novel multifunctional honeycomb sandwich panels with micro-perforated faceplates [J]. Appl Acoust. 2019;152:31–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang Y, Ren S, Meng H, et al. Hybrid acoustic metamaterial as super absorber for broadband low-frequency sound [J]. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):43340.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yu D, Wang X, Mei Y. A design method for labyrinth sound absorption structure with micro-perforated plates. Proceedings of the journal of physics: conference series, F, 2020 [C]. IOP publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Meng H, Galland M-A, Ichchou M, et al. Small perforations in corrugated sandwich panel significantly enhance low frequency sound absorption and transmission loss [J]. Compos Struct. 2017;182:1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang C, Li X, Xiao W, et al. Acoustic characteristics of microperforated plate with variable cross-sectional holes [J]. J Acoust Soc Am. 2021;150(3):1652–1662.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu Z, He W, Peng X, et al. Sound absorption theory for micro-perforated panel with petal-shaped perforations [J]. J Acoust Soc Am. 2020;148(1):18–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong Y-S, Sekar V, Noum SYE, et al. Effect of thickness and perforation size on the acoustic absorption performance of a micro-perforated panel. Proceedings of the MATEC Web of conferences, F, 2021 [C]. EDP sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Styles M, Compston P, Kalyanasundaram S. The effect of core thickness on the flexural behaviour of aluminium foam sandwich structures [J]. Compos Struct. 2007;80(4):532–538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alphonse M, Raja V B, Krishna V G, et al. Mechanical behavior of sandwich structures with varying core material–A review [J]. Mater Today Proc. 2021;44:3751–3759.
   Google Scholar
• Tiwari G, Khaire N. Ballistic performance and energy dissipation characteristics of cylindrical honeycomb sandwich structure [J]. Int J Impact Eng. 2022;160:104065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon S, Schiffer A, Cantwell W J, et al. Detection of core-skin disbonds in honeycomb composite sandwich structures using highly nonlinear solitary waves [J]. Compos Struct. 2021;256:113071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu J, Gao L, Xiao M, et al. Isogeometric topology optimization for rational design of ultra-lightweight architected materials [J]. Int J Mech Sci. 2020;166:105103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye G, Bi H, Li Z, et al. Compression performances and failure modes of 3D printed pyramidal lattice truss composite structures [J]. Compos Commun. 2021;24:100615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan N, Chakraborty P. Thermomechanical homogenization of corrugated core sandwich structures of reusable launch vehicles [J]. AIAA J. 2021;59(10):4228–4242.
   Google Scholar
• Liu J, Ou H, He J, et al. Topological design of a lightweight sandwich aircraft spoiler [J]. Materials (Basel). 2019;12(19):3225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang D-W, Wen Z-H, Glorieux C, et al. Sound absorption of face-centered cubic sandwich structure with micro-perforations [J]. Mater Des. 2020;186:108344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang B, Wu L, Ma L, et al. Mechanical behavior of the sandwich structures with carbon fiber-reinforced pyramidal lattice truss core [J]. Mater Des. 2010;31(5):2659–2663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang K, Zeng T, Xu G, et al. Mechanical properties of SiCp/SiC composite lattice core sandwich panels fabricated by 3D printing combined with precursor impregnation and pyrolysis [J]. Compos Struct. 2020;240:112060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma D, Hiremath S S. Additively manufactured mechanical metamaterials based on triply periodic minimal surfaces: performance,: challenges, and application [J]. Mech Adv Mater Struct. 2022;29(26):5077–5107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almahri S, Santiago R, Lee D-W, et al. Evaluation of the dynamic response of triply periodic minimal surfaces subjected to high strain-rate compression [J]. Addit Manuf. 2021;46:102220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tran P, Peng C. Triply periodic minimal surfaces sandwich structures subjected to shock impact [J]. J Sandw Struct Mater. 2021;23(6):2146–2175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poltue T, Karuna C, Khrueaduangkham S, et al. Design exploration of 3D-printed triply periodic minimal surface scaffolds for bone implants [J]. Int J Mech Sci. 2021;211:106762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li W, Yu G, Yu Z. Bioinspired heat exchangers based on triply periodic minimal surfaces for supercritical CO2 cycles [J]. Appl Therm Eng. 2020;179:115686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao M, Liu F, Fu G, et al. Improved mechanical properties and energy absorption of BCC lattice structures with triply periodic minimal surfaces fabricated by SLM [J]. Materials (Basel). 2018;11(12):2411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abueidda D W, Jasiuk I, Sobh N A. Acoustic band gaps and elastic stiffness of PMMA cellular solids based on triply periodic minimal surfaces [J]. Mater Des. 2018;145:20–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang C, Zheng H, Yang L, et al. Mechanical responses of sheet-based gyroid-type triply periodic minimal surface lattice structures fabricated using selective laser melting [J]. Mater Des. 2022;214:110407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiang-Nan K, Bin L, Zhong-Hua L, et al. Research on sound absorption properties of tri-periodic minimal surface sandwich structure of selective laser melting titanium alloy [J]. Mater Trans. 2023;64(4):861–868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang W, An J, Chua C K, et al. Acoustic absorptions of multifunctional polymeric cellular structures based on triply periodic minimal surfaces fabricated by stereolithography [J]. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2020;15(2):242–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang M, Liu C, Deng M, et al. Graded minimal surface structures with high specific strength for broadband sound absorption produced by laser powder bed fusion [J]. Coatings. 2023;13(11):1950.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang P, Li Z, Liu B, et al. Sound absorption performance of micro-perforated plate sandwich structure based on triply periodic minimal surface [J]. J Mater Res Technol. 2023;27:386–400.
   Google Scholar
• Liu Z, Zhan J, Fard M, et al. Acoustic properties of multilayer sound absorbers with a 3D printed micro-perforated panel [J]. Appl Acoust. 2017;121:25–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arjunan A, Baroutaji A, Latif A. Acoustic behaviour of 3D printed titanium perforated panels. Results Eng. 2021;11:100252), [Z]. 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Maa D-Y. Potential of microperforated panel absorber [J]. J Acoust Soc Am. 1998;104(5):2861–2866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng J, Fu J, Yao X, et al. Triply periodic minimal surface (TPMS) porous structures: from multi-scale design, precise additive manufacturing to multidisciplinary applications [J]. Int J Extreme Manuf. 2022;4(2):022001.
   Google Scholar