Enhanced bone regeneration with bioprinted GelMA/Bentonite scaffolds inspired by bone matrix

References

• Feng P, Jia J, Peng S, et al. Graphene oxide-driven interfacial coupling in laser 3D printed PEEK/PVA scaffolds for bone regeneration. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2020;15(2):211–226. doi:10.1080/17452759.2020.1719457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Ling C, Li Y, et al. Microstructure development and biodegradation behavior of additively manufactured Mg-Zn-Gd alloy with LPSO structure. J Mater Sci Technol. 2023;144:1–14. doi:10.1016/j.jmst.2022.09.059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Li X, Wang S, et al. Bone-targeted exosomes: strategies and applications. Adv Healthcare Mater. 2023;12(18):e2203361. doi:10.1002/adhm.202203361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Wu S, Chen W, et al. Bone/cartilage targeted hydrogel: strategies and applications. Bioact Mater. 2023;23:156–169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling C, Li Q, Zhang Z, et al. Influence of heat treatment on microstructure, mechanical and corrosion behavior of WE43 alloy fabricated by laser-beam powder bed fusion. Int J Extreme Manuf. 2024;6(1):015001. doi:10.1088/2631-7990/acfad5
   Google Scholar
• Huang Y, Zhou Z, Hu Y, et al. Modified mannan for 3D bioprinting: a potential novel bioink for tissue engineering. Biomed Mater. 2021;16(5):055015. doi:10.1088/1748-605X/ac1ab4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engel N, Fechner C, Voges A, et al. An optimized 3D-printed perfusion bioreactor for homogeneous cell seeding in bone substitute scaffolds for future chairside applications. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):22228. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-01516-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu H, Zhou H, Lan H, et al. Organ regeneration: integration application of cell encapsulation and 3D bioprinting. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2017;12(4):279–289. doi:10.1080/17452759.2017.1338065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Y, Li M, Su H, et al. Up-to-date progress in bioprinting of bone tissue. Int J Bioprint. 2022;9(1):628. doi:10.18063/ijb.v9i1.628
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maresca JA, DeMel DC, Wagner GA, et al. Three-Dimensional bioprinting applications for bone tissue engineering. Cells. 2023;12(9)1230. doi:10.3390/cells12091230
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Li G, Wang J, et al. Small joint organoids 3D bioprinting: construction strategy and application. Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany). 2024;20(8):e2302506. doi:10.1002/smll.202302506
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji S, Guvendiren M. Recent advances in bioink design for 3d bioprinting of tissues and organs. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2017;5:23. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2017.00023
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sakr MA, Sakthivel K, Hossain T, et al. Recent trends in gelatin methacryloyl nanocomposite hydrogels for tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2022;110(3):708–724. doi:10.1002/jbm.a.37310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Jiang J, Yuan C, et al. 3D bioprinting of GelMA with enhanced extrusion printability through coupling sacrificial carrageenan. Biomater Sci. 2024;12(3):738–747. doi:10.1039/d3bm01489d
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren X, Wang J, Wu Y, et al. One-pot synthesis of hydroxyapatite hybrid bioinks for digital light processing 3D printing in bone regeneration. J Mater Sci Technol. 2024;188:84–97. doi:10.1016/j.jmst.2024.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shuai C, Zan J, Deng F, et al. Core–shell-structured ZIF-8@PDA-HA with controllable zinc ion release and superior bioactivity for improving a poly-l-lactic acid scaffold. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2021;9(4):1814–1825. doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c08009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu W, Li C, Yao M, et al. Advances in osseointegration of biomimetic mineralized collagen and inorganic metal elements of natural bone for bone repair. Regen Biomater. 2023;10:rbad030. doi:10.1093/rb/rbad030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdul Halim NA, Hussein MZ, Kandar MK. Nanomaterials-upconverted hydroxyapatite for bone tissue engineering and a platform for drug delivery. Int J Nanomed. 2021;16:6477–6496. doi:10.2147/IJN.S298936
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu J-N, Wang X, Yang M, et al. Scaffold-Based tissue engineering strategies for osteochondral repair. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022;9:812383. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2021.812383
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui ZK, Kim S, Baljon JJ, et al. Microporous methacrylated glycol chitosan-montmorillonite nanocomposite hydrogel for bone tissue engineering. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):3523. doi:10.1038/s41467-019-11511-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kali A, Loulidi I, Amar A, et al. (2021). Exploitation of bentonite for wastewater treatment.
   Google Scholar
• Lv A, Lv X, Xu X, et al. Tailored ultra-tough, antimicrobial and recyclable hydrogels based on chitosan and ionic liquid modified montmorillonite with different chain lengths for efficient adsorption of organic dyes in wastewater. Int J Biol Macromol. 2024;257(Pt 2):128752. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.128752
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yoshikawa E, Yokoyama S, Watanabe Y. Separation and purification of montmorillonite from raw bentonite using a simple hydrothermal treatment. Chem Lett. 2023;52(3):132–135. doi:10.1246/cl.220499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li D, Li P, Xu Y, et al. Progress in montmorillonite functionalized artificial bone scaffolds: intercalation and interlocking, nanoenhancement, and controlled drug release. J Nanomater. 2022;2022(4):1-20. doi:10.1155/2022/7900382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srasra E, Bekri-Abbes I. Bentonite clays for therapeutic purposes and biomaterial design. Curr Pharm Des. 2020;26(6):642–649. doi:10.2174/1381612826666200203144034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maisanaba S, Pichardo S, Puerto M, et al. Toxicological evaluation of clay minerals and derived nanocomposites: a review. Environ Res. 2015;138:233–254. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2014.12.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavares MT, Gaspar VM, Monteiro MV, et al. GelMA/bioactive silica nanocomposite bioinks for stem cell osteogenic differentiation. Biofabrication. 2021;13(3):10. doi:10.1088/1758-5090/abdc86
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi H, Ur Rehman F, Zhao C, et al. Recent advances in nano scaffolds for bone repair. Bone Res. 2016;4:16050. doi:10.1038/boneres.2016.50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novelli G. Bentonite: an industrial mineral at man kind service. Ann Chim. 2003;93(1–2):129–136.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pedroza-González SC, Rodriguez-Salvador M, Pérez-Benítez BE, et al. Bioinks for 3D bioprinting: a scientometric analysis of two decades of progress. Int J Bioprinting. 2021;7(2):333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxim LD, Niebo R, McConnell EE. Bentonite toxicology and epidemiology - a review. Inhalation Toxicol. 2016;28(13):591–617. doi:10.1080/08958378.2016.1240727
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caliari SR, Burdick JA. A practical guide to hydrogels for cell culture. Nat Methods. 2016;13(5):405–414. doi:10.1038/nmeth.3839
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen C, Wang J, Li G, et al. Boosting cartilage repair with silk fibroin-DNA hydrogel-based cartilage organoid precursor. Bioact Mater. 2024;35:429–444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutta SD, Bin J, Ganguly K, et al. Electromagnetic field-assisted cell-laden 3D printed poloxamer-407 hydrogel for enhanced osteogenesis. RSC Adv. 2021;11(33):20342–20354. doi:10.1039/D1RA01143J
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi YH, Yeo YH, Lee D, et al. 3D bioprinting of cell-laden thermosensitive methylcellulose/nanosilicate composite hydrogels. Cellulose. 2023;30(8):5093-5112. doi:10.1007/s10570-023-05209-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Griesbach J, Ganeyev M, et al. Long-term mechanical loading is required for the formation of 3D bioprinted functional osteocyte bone organoids. Biofabrication. 2022;14(3):035018. doi:10.1088/1758-5090/ac73b9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng F, Wang G, Zhou F, et al. Exosomes from young plasma alleviate osteoporosis through miR-217-5p-regulated osteogenesis of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell. Compos Part B-Eng. 2024;276:111358. doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2024.111358
   Google Scholar
• Raptopoulos M, Fischer NG, Aparicio C. Implant surface physicochemistry affects keratinocyte hemidesmosome formation. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2023;111(7):1021–1030. doi:10.1002/jbm.a.37486
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou Y, Damasceno PF, Somashekar BS, et al. Unusual multiscale mechanics of biomimetic nanoparticle hydrogels. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):181. doi:10.1038/s41467-017-02579-w
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cao H, Duan L, Zhang Y, et al. Current hydrogel advances in physicochemical and biological response-driven biomedical application diversity. Sig Transd Target Ther. 2021;6(1):426. doi:10.1038/s41392-021-00830-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams AH, Roh S, Jacob AR, et al. Printable homocomposite hydrogels with synergistically reinforced molecular-colloidal networks. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):2834. doi:10.1038/s41467-021-23098-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Guo M. Thermo-responsive, mechanically robust and 3D printable supramolecular hydrogels. Polym Chem. 2022;13(12):1695–1704. doi:10.1039/D2PY00127F
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vejjasilpa K, Maqsood I, Schulz-Siegmund M, et al. Adjustable thermo-responsive, cell-adhesive tissue engineering scaffolds for cell stimulation through periodic changes in culture temperature. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;24(1):572. doi:10.3390/ijms24010572
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gan X, Li C, Sun J, et al. GelMA/κ-carrageenan double-network hydrogels with superior mechanics and biocompatibility. RSC Adv. 2023;13(3):1558–1566. doi:10.1039/D2RA06101E
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman S, Calabro S, Williams R, et al. Bioink formulation and machine learning-empowered bioprinting optimization. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022;10:913579. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2022.913579
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia P, Luo Y. Vascularization in tissue engineering: the architecture cues of pores in scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res B. 2022;110(5):1206–1214. doi:10.1002/jbm.b.34979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han Y, Cao L, Li G, et al. Harnessing nucleic acids nanotechnology for bone/cartilage regeneration, Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany). 2023;19(37):e2301996. doi:10.1002/smll.202301996
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu R, Li Y, Shen M, et al. Bone tissue regeneration: the role of finely tuned pore architecture of bioactive scaffolds before clinical translation. Bioact Mater. 2021;6(5):1242–1254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hao S, Wang M, Yin Z, et al. Microenvironment-targeted strategy steers advanced bone regeneration, materials today. Bio. 2023;22:100741.
   Google Scholar