Microstructure and mechanical properties of Al-Cu alloy during wire and arc additive manufacturing by adding micron TiB₂ particles

References

• He H, Yi Y, Huang S, et al. An improved process for grain refinement of large 2219 Al alloy rings and its influence on mechanical properties. J Mater Sci Technol. 2019;35(1):55–63. doi:10.1016/j.jmst.2018.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou Y, Lin X, Kang N, et al. Influence of travel speed on microstructure and mechanical properties of wire + arc additively manufactured 2219 aluminum alloy. J Mater Sci Technol. 2020;37:143–153. doi:10.1016/j.jmst.2019.06.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derekar KS. A review of wire arc additive manufacturing and advances in wire arc additive manufacturing of aluminium. Mater Sci Technol. 2018;34(8):895–916. doi:10.1080/02670836.2018.1455012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan EM, Sabin TJ, Watts JF, et al. The influence of build parameters and wire batch on porosity of wire and arc additive manufactured aluminium alloy 2319. J Mater Process Technol. 2018;262:577–584. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.07.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLean N, Bermingham MJ, Colegrove P, et al. Effect of hot isostatic pressing and heat treatments on porosity of wire arc additive manufactured Al 2319. J Mater Process Technol. 2022;310:117769, doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2022.117769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jing Y, Fang X, Xi N, et al. Improved tensile strength and fatigue properties of wire-arc additively manufactured 2319 aluminum alloy by surface laser shock peening. Mater Sci Eng A. 2023;864:144599, doi:10.1016/j.msea.2023.144599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu J, Yang S, Gao M, et al. Influence of deposition strategy of structural interface on microstructures and mechanical properties of additively manufactured Al alloy. Additive Manufacturing. 2020;34:101370, doi:10.1016/j.addma.2020.101370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai JY, Fan CL, Lin SB, et al. Mechanical properties and fracture behaviors of GTA-additive manufactured 2219-Al after an especial heat treatment. J Mater Eng Perform. 2017;26(4):1808–1816. doi:10.1007/s11665-017-2627-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu J, Gao M, Yang S, et al. Microstructure, defects, and mechanical properties of wire + arc additively manufactured Al Cu4.3-Mg1.5 alloy. Mater Design. 2020;186:108357, doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang X, Zhang L, Chen G, et al. Microstructure evolution of wire-arc additively manufactured 2319 aluminum alloy with interlayer hammering. Mater Sci Eng A. 2021;800:140168, doi:10.1016/j.msea.2020.140168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu J, Ding J, Williams SW, et al. The strengthening effect of inter-layer cold working and post-deposition heat treatment on the additively manufactured Al–6.3Cu alloy. Mater Sci Eng A. 2016;651:18–26. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2015.10.101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu JL, Ding JL, Williams SW, et al. The effect of inter-layer cold working and post-deposition heat treatment on porosity in additively manufactured aluminum alloys. J Mater Process Technol. 2016;230:26–34. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu DD, Rao XW, Dai DH, et al. Laser additive manufacturing of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) reinforced aluminum matrix nanocomposites: Processing optimization, microstructure evolution and mechanical properties. Addit Manuf. 2019;29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xinwei L, Shi S, Shuang H, et al. Microstructure, solidification behavior and mechanical properties of Al-Si-Mg-Ti/TiC fabricated by selective laser melting. Addit Manuf. 2020;34; doi:10.1016/j.addma.2020.101326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biffi CA, Bassani P, Fiocchi J, et al. Selective laser melting of AlCu-TiB2 alloy using pulsed wave laser emission mode: processability, microstructure and mechanical properties. Mater Design. 2021;204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen XL, Wang QZ, Mu Q, et al. Laser solid forming additive manufacturing TiB2 reinforced 2024Al composite: Microstructure and mechanical properties. Mater Sci Eng Struct Mater Prop Microstruct Process. 2019;745:319–325. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2018.12.072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li XP, Ji G, Chen Z, et al. Selective laser melting of nano-TiB2 decorated AlSi10Mg alloy with high fracture strength and ductility. Acta Mater. 2017;129:183–193. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2017.02.062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren H, Liu Y, Sun Q, et al. Promoting strengthening and grain refinement of aluminum alloy during wire and arc additive manufacturing by adding TiB2 particles. Mater Sci Eng A. 2023;888:145805, doi:10.1016/j.msea.2023.145805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu X, Liu Y, Zhou Z, et al. Grain refinement and crack inhibition of selective laser melted AA2024 aluminum alloy via inoculation with TiC–TiH2. Mater Sci Eng A. 2021;813:141171. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2021.141171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei WH, Zhang Q, Wu WJ, et al. Agglomeration-free nanoscale TiC reinforced titanium matrix composites achieved by in-situ laser additive manufacturing. Scr Mater. 2020;187:310–316. doi:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2020.06.057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer CR, Yang LW, Singh SS, et al. Anisotropy, size, and aspect ratio effects on micropillar compression of Al SiC nanolaminate composites. Acta Mater. 2016;114:25–32. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2016.05.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiao Y, Zhu J, Li X, et al. In-situ synthesis, microstructure and mechanism of SiC/Al–Mg–Si composites: Effects of Mg addition. Ceram Int. 2020;46(11, Part A):17675–17683. doi:10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.04.070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X-H, Yan H. Solid–liquid interface dynamics during solidification of Al 7075–Al2O3np based metal matrix composites. Mater Design. 2016;94:148–158. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokoluk M, Cao C, Pan S, et al. Nanoparticle-enabled phase control for arc welding of unweldable aluminum alloy 7075. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):98, doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07989-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uhlmann DR, Chalmers B, Jackson KA. Interaction between particles and a solid-liquid interface. J Appl Phys. 1964;35(10):2986–2993. doi:10.1063/1.1713142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shangguan D, Ahuja S, Stefanescu DM. An analytical model for the interaction between an insoluble particle and an advancing solid/liquid interface. Metall Trans A. 1992;23(2):669–680. doi:10.1007/BF02801184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chernov A, Melnikova AM. Theory of the capture of solid inclusions during the growth of crystals from the melt. Sov Phys Crystallogr. 1976;21(4):369–373.
   Google Scholar
• Bolling GF, Cissé J. A theory for the interaction of particles with a solidifying front. J Cryst Growth. 1971;10(1):56–66. doi:10.1016/0022-0248(71)90046-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefanescu DM, Juretzko FR, Catalina A, et al. Particle engulfment and pushing by solidifying interfaces: Part II. Microgravity Exp Theor Anal Metall Mater Trans A. 1998;29:1697–1706. doi:10.1007/s11661-998-0092-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azouni MA, Casses P. Thermophysical properties effects on segregation during solidification. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 1998;75(2):83–106. doi:10.1016/S0001-8686(97)00002-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim JK, Rohatgi PK. An analytical solution of the critical interface velocity for the encapturing of insoluble particles by a moving solid/liquid interface. Metall Mater Trans A. 1998;29(1):351–358. doi:10.1007/s11661-998-0186-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma Y, Addad A, Ji G, et al. Atomic-scale investigation of the interface precipitation in a TiB2 nanoparticles reinforced Al–Zn–Mg–Cu matrix composite. Acta Mater. 2020;185:287–299. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2019.11.068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang K, Jiang HY, Jia YW, et al. Nanoparticle-inhibited growth of primary aluminum in Al–10Si alloys. Acta Mater. 2016;103:252–263. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2015.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong B-X, Li Q, Wang Z-F, et al. Enhancing strength-ductility synergy and mechanisms of Al-based composites by size-tunable in-situ TiB2 particles with specific spatial distribution. Compos Part B: Eng. 2021;217:108912, doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.108912
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du R, Gao Q, Wu S, et al. Influence of TiB2 particles on aging behavior of in-situ TiB2/Al-4.5Cu composites. Mater Sci Eng A. 2018;721:244–250. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2018.02.099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin P, Liu Y, Li F, et al. Realization of structural evolution in grain boundary, solute redistribution and improved mechanical properties by adding TiCnps in wire and arc additive manufacturing 2219 aluminium alloy. J Mater Res Technol. 2021;11:834–848. doi:10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.01.030
   Google Scholar
• Jin P, Liu Y, Li F, et al. Realization of synergistic enhancement for fracture strength and ductility by adding TiC particles in wire and arc additive manufacturing 2219 aluminium alloy. Compos Part B: Eng. 2021;219:108921, doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.108921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin P, Ren H, Liu Y, et al. Microstructural evolution and mechanical properties of 2219 aluminum alloy deposited by wire and Arc additive manufacturing. Adv Eng Mater. 2022;24(9):2101799, doi:10.1002/adem.202101799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cong B, Ding J, Williams S. Effect of arc mode in cold metal transfer process on porosity of additively manufactured Al-6.3%Cu alloy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2015;76(9):1593–1606. doi:10.1007/s00170-014-6346-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen S, Curreri P, Kaukler WF, et al. Dynamics of solid/liquid interface shape evolution near an insoluble particle – an X-ray transmission microscopy investigation. Metall Mater Trans A. 1997;28(10):2129–2135. doi:10.1007/s11661-997-0170-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma K, Hu T, Yang H, et al. Coupling of dislocations and precipitates: impact on the mechanical behavior of ultrafine grained Al–Zn–Mg alloys. Acta Mater. 2016;103:153–164. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2015.09.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Q, Ma Y, Chen Z, et al. A new powder metallurgy routine to fabricate TiB2/Al–Zn–Mg–Cu nanocomposites based on composite powders with pre-embedded nanoparticles. Materialia. 2019;8:100458, doi:10.1016/j.mtla.2019.100458
   Google Scholar
• Youssef YM, Dashwood RJ, Lee PD. Effect of clustering on particle pushing and solidification behaviour in TiB2 reinforced aluminium PMMCs. Appl Sci Manuf. 2005;36(6):747–763. doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2004.10.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin P, Liu Y, Sun Q. Evolution of crystallographic orientation, columnar to equiaxed transformation and mechanical properties realized by adding TiCps in wire and arc additive manufacturing 2219 aluminum alloy. Addit Manuf. 2021;39:101878, doi:10.1016/j.addma.2021.101878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter DA, Easterling KE. Phase transformations in metals and alloys (Revised Reprint) 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Hu T, Ma K, Topping TD, et al. Precipitation phenomena in an ultrafine-grained Al alloy. Acta Mater. 2013;61(6):2163–2178. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2012.12.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blavette D, Cadel E, Fraczkiewicz A, et al. Three-dimensional atomic-scale imaging of impurity segregation to line defects. Science. 1999;286(5448):2317–2319. doi:10.1126/science.286.5448.2317
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deschamps A, Fribourg G, Bréchet Y, et al. In situ evaluation of dynamic precipitation during plastic straining of an Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy. Acta Mater. 2012;60(5):1905–1916. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2012.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar