A review of constitutive models used in macroscale finite element analysis of additive manufacturing and post-processing of additively manufactured components

References

• Roth CC, Tancogne-Dejean T, Mohr D. Plasticity and fracture of cast and SLM AlSi10Mg: high-throughput testing and modeling. Addit Manuf. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2021.101998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tofail SA, Koumoulos EP, Bandyopadhyay A, et al. Additive manufacturing: scientific and technological challenges, market uptake and opportunities. Mater Today. 2018. doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2017.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pragana J, Sampaio R, Bragança I, et al. Hybrid metal additive manufacturing: a state–of–the-art review. Adv Ind Manuf Eng. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.aime.2021.100032
   Google Scholar
• Li X, Roth CC, Tancogne-Dejean T, et al. Rate- and temperature-dependent plasticity of additively manufactured stainless steel 316L: characterization, modeling and application to crushing of shell-lattices. Int J Impact Eng. 2020. doi:10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2020.103671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan Y, Cheng P, Yao YL, et al. Effect of phase transformations on laser forming of Ti–6Al–4V alloy. J Appl Phys. 2005. doi:10.1063/1.1944202
   Google Scholar
• Zhang K, Dong W, Lu S. Transformation plasticity of AF1410 steel and its influences on the welding residual stress and distortion: experimental and numerical study. Mater Sci Eng A. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2021.141628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai L, Jiang K, Gao L. The influence and mechanism of residual stress on the corrosion behavior of welded structures. Mat Res. 2018. doi:10.1590/1980-5373-mr-2018-01660
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yadroitsev I. Selective laser melting: direct manufacturing of 3D-objects by selective laser melting of metal powders. Saarbrucken: Lambert Academic Publishing; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Collins PC, Brice DA, Samimi P, et al. Microstructural control of additively manufactured metallic materials. Annu Rev Mater Res. 2016. doi:10.1146/annurev-matsci-070115-031816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bariani PF, Dal Negro T, Bruschi S. Testing and modelling of material response to deformation in bulk metal forming. CIRP Ann. 2004. doi:10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60030-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council (U.S.). Integrated computational materials engineering: A transformational discipline for improved competitiveness and national security. Washington: National Academies Press; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitz GJ, Prahl U. ICMEg – the integrated computational materials engineering expert group – a new European coordination action. Integr Mater Manuf Innov. 2014. doi:10.1186/2193-9772-3-2
   Google Scholar
• Bonifaz EA. In: Rodrigues JMF, Cardoso PJS, Monteiro J, Lam R, Krzhizhanovskaya VV, Lees MH, Dongarra JJ, Sloot PM (eds) Computational Science – ICCS 2019. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 647–659; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Francois MM, Sun A, King WE, et al. Modeling of additive manufacturing processes for metals: challenges and opportunities. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci. 2017. doi:10.1016/j.cossms.2016.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatsos T, Elsayed KA, Zhai Y, et al. Review on computational modeling of process–microstructure–property relationships in metal additive manufacturing. JOM. 2020. doi:10.1007/s11837-019-03913-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afrasiabi M, Bambach M. Modelling and simulation of metal additive manufacturing processes with particle methods: A review. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2023. doi:10.1080/17452759.2023.2274494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoyt J. Atomistic and continuum modeling of dendritic solidification. Mater Sci Eng: R: Rep. 2003. doi:10.1016/S0927-796X(03)00036-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moelans N, Blanpain B, Wollants P. An introduction to phase-field modeling of microstructure evolution. Calphad. 2008. doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2007.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kattner UR. The Calphad method and its role in material and process development. Tecnologia em metalurgia, materiais e mineracao. 2016. doi:10.4322/2176-1523.1059
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wei HL, Mukherjee T, Zhang W, et al. Mechanistic models for additive manufacturing of metallic components. Prog Mater Sci. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.100703
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panwisawas C, Qiu C, Anderson MJ, et al. Mesoscale modelling of selective laser melting: thermal fluid dynamics and microstructural evolution. Comput Mater Sci. 2017. doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2016.10.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afazov S, Roberts A, Wright L, et al. Metal powder bed fusion process chains: an overview of modelling techniques. Prog Addit Manuf. 2022. doi:10.1007/s40964-021-00230-1
   Google Scholar
• Chen F, Yan W. High-fidelity modelling of thermal stress for additive manufacturing by linking thermal-fluid and mechanical models. Mater Des. 2020. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2020.109185
   Google Scholar
• Mathews R, Nagaraja KM, Zhang R, et al. Temporally continuous thermofluidic–thermomechanical modeling framework for metal additive manufacturing. Int J Mech Sci. 2023. doi:10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2023.108424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afrasiabi M, Lüthi C, Bambach M, et al. Multi-Resolution SPH simulation of a laser powder Bed fusion additive manufacturing process. Appl Sci. 2021. doi:10.3390/app11072962
   Google Scholar
• Lüthi C, Afrasiabi M, Bambach M. An adaptive smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) scheme for efficient melt pool simulations in additive manufacturing. Comput Math Appl. 2023. doi:10.1016/j.camwa.2023.03.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattenone A, Morganti S, Auricchio F. Basis of the Lattice Boltzmann method for additive manufacturing. Arch Computat Methods Eng. 2020. doi:10.1007/s11831-019-09347-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayat M, Dong W, Thorborg J, et al. A review of multi-scale and multi-physics simulations of metal additive manufacturing processes with focus on modeling strategies. Addit Manuf. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2021.102278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Wang Y, Shi J. On efficiency and effectiveness of finite volume method for thermal analysis of selective laser melting. EC. 2020. doi:10.1108/EC-03-2019-0106
   Google Scholar
• Sampaio R, Pragana J, Bragança I, et al. Modelling of wire-arc additive manufacturing – A review. Adv Ind Manuf Eng. 2023. doi:10.1016/j.aime.2023.100121
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal D. The Theory of Moving Sources of Heat and Its Application to Metal Treatments; 1946.
   Google Scholar
• Goldak J, Chakravarti A, Bibby M. A new finite element model for welding heat sources. MTB. 1984. doi:10.1007/BF02667333
   Google Scholar
• Tan P, Shen F, Li B, et al. A thermo-metallurgical-mechanical model for selective laser melting of Ti6Al4V. Mater Des. 2019. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2019.107642
   Google Scholar
• Behúlová M, Babalová E. Heat source models for numerical simulation of laser welding processes – a short review. J Phys: Conf Ser. 2024. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/2712/1/012018
   Google Scholar
• Kik T. Heat source models in numerical simulations of laser welding. Materials (Basel, Switzerland). 2020. doi:10.3390/ma13112653
   Google Scholar
• Chiumenti M, Cervera M, Salmi A, et al. Finite element modeling of multi-pass welding and shaped metal deposition processes. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2010. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2010.02.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buhl J, Israr R, Bambach M. Modeling and convergence analysis of directed energy deposition simulations with hybrid implicit / explicit and implicit solutions. J Mach Eng. 2019. doi:10.5604/01.3001.0013.4086
   Google Scholar
• Blumm J, Henderson J. Measurement of the volumetric expansion and bulk density of metals in the solid and molten regions. High Temp-High Press. 2000. doi:10.1068/htwu520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang K, Dong W, Lu S. Residual stress and distortion in thick-plate weld joint of AF1410 steel: finite element simulations and experimental studies. Mater Res Express. 2022. doi:10.1088/2053-1591/ac4c5d
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perić M, Tonković Z, Garašić I, et al. An engineering approach for a T-joint fillet welding simulation using simplified material properties. Ocean Eng. 2016. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park S-C, Bang H-S, Seong W-J. Effects of material properties on angular distortion in wire arc additive manufacturing: experimental and computational analyses. Materials (Basel, Switzerland). 2020. doi:10.3390/ma13061399
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Babu B, Lundbäck A, Lindgren L-E. Simulation of Ti-6Al-4V additive manufacturing using coupled physically based flow stress and metallurgical model. Materials (Basel, Switzerland). 2019. doi:10.3390/ma12233844
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caron J, Heinze C, Schwenk C, et al. Effect of continuous cooling transformation variants on numerical calculation of welding induced residual stresses. Weld J. 2010;89(7):151–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu XK, Chao YJ. Effects of temperature-dependent material properties on welding simulation. Comput Struct. 2002. doi:10.1016/S0045-7949(02)00040-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun L, Ren X, He J, et al. Numerical investigation of a novel pattern for reducing residual stress in metal additive manufacturing. J Mater Sci Technol. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.jmst.2020.05.080
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao H, Zhang G, Yin Z, et al. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of thermal stress in single-pass multi-layer weld-based rapid prototyping. J Mater Process Technol. 2012. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2011.09.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Draxler J, Edberg J, Andersson J, et al. Modeling and simulation of weld solidification cracking part III: simulation of solidification cracking in Varestraint tests of alloy 718. Weld World. 2019. doi:10.1007/s40194-019-00784-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijhuis B, Geijselaers H, van den Boogaard AH. Efficient thermal simulation of large-scale metal additive manufacturing using hot element addition. Comput Struct. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.compstruc.2020.106463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nycz A, Lee Y, Noakes M, et al. Effective residual stress prediction validated with neutron diffraction method for metal large-scale additive manufacturing. Mater Des. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding D, Zhang S, Lu Q, et al. The well-distributed volumetric heat source model for numerical simulation of wire arc additive manufacturing process. Mater Today Commun. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.102430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farias RM, Teixeira P, Vilarinho LO. An efficient computational approach for heat source optimization in numerical simulations of arc welding processes. J Constr Steel Res. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2020.106382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tran H-S, Tchuindjang JT, Paydas H, et al. 3D thermal finite element analysis of laser cladding processed Ti-6Al-4V part with microstructural correlations. Mater Des. 2017. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2017.04.092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Outinen J, Mäkeläinen P. Mechanical properties of structural steel at elevated temperatures and after cooling down. Fire Mater. 2004. doi:10.1002/fam.849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maekawa A, Kawahara A, Serizawa H, et al. Fast three-dimensional multipass welding simulation using an iterative substructure method. J Mater Process Technol. 2015. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suman S, Biswas P. Thermo-mechanical study of single and multi-pass welding of CSEF steel for residual stresses and deformations considering solid state phase transformation. Mater Today Proc. 2020. doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2019.12.299
   Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Li W, Ma J, et al. A novel temperature dependent yield strength model for metals considering precipitation strengthening and strain rate. Comput Mater Sci. 2017. doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2016.12.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali MH, Han YS. Effect of phase transformations on scanning strategy in WAAM fabrication. Materials (Basel, Switzerland). 2021. doi:10.3390/ma14247871
   Google Scholar
• Montevecchi F, Venturini G, Grossi N, et al. Finite element mesh coarsening for effective distortion prediction in wire arc additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf. 2017. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2017.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang H, Ma N, Chen J, et al. Toward large-scale simulation of residual stress and distortion in wire and arc additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf. 2020. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2020.101248
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Manurung YHP, Prajadhiana KP, Adenan MS, et al. Analysis of material property models on WAAM distortion using nonlinear numerical computation and experimental verification with P-GMAW. ArchivCivMechEng. 2021. doi:10.1007/s43452-021-00189-4
   Google Scholar
• Deng D, Zhang C, Pu X, et al. Influence of material model on prediction accuracy of welding residual stress in an austenitic stainless steel multi-pass butt-welded joint. J Mater Eng Perform. 2017. doi:10.1007/s11665-017-2626-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malmelöv A, Lundbäck A, Lindgren L-E. History reduction by lumping for time-efficient simulation of additive manufacturing. Metals. 2020. doi:10.3390/met10010058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen W, Xu L, Han Y, et al. Control of residual stress in metal additive manufacturing by low-temperature solid-state phase transformation: An experimental and numerical study. Addit Manuf. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2021.102016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson GR, Cook WH. A constitutive model and data for materials subjected to large strains,: high strain rates, and high temperatures. Proc. 7th Inf. Sympo. Ballistics:541–547; 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Gkatzogiannis S. Strain rate dependency of simulated welding residual stresses. J Mater Eng Perform. 2018. doi:10.1007/s11665-018-3418-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perzyna P. In: Advances in Applied Mechanics Volume 9. Elsevier, pp 243–377; 1966.
   Google Scholar
• Chen F, Liu J, Ou H, et al. Flow characteristics and intrinsic workability of IN718 superalloy. Mater Sci Eng A. 2015. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2015.06.093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonsson T, Fredriksson H. The effect of cooling rate on the solidification of Inconel 718. Metall and Materi Trans B Volume 36B, February 2005—85; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• High-temperature high-strength nickel-base alloys: A practical guide to the use of nickel-containing alloys. Number. 393
   Google Scholar
• Benson M, Raynaud P, Wallace J. Weld Residual Stress Finite Element Analysis Validation: Part II-Proposed Validation Procedure”. US.NRC, NUREG-2228; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• MRP E. Materials reliability program: welding residual stress dissimilar metal butt-weld finite element modeling handbook (MRP-317, revision 1). Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI); 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Seshacharyulu T, Medeiros SC, Frazier WG, et al. Microstructural mechanisms during hot working of commercial grade Ti–6Al–4V with lamellar starting structure. Mater Sci Eng A. 2002. doi:10.1016/S0921-5093(01)01448-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rangaswamy P, Choo H, Prime MB, et al. High Temperature Stress Assessment in SCS-6/Ti-6A1-4V Composite Using Neutron Diffraction and Finite Element Modeling; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatkumar D, Ravindran D. Effect of boundary conditions on residual stresses and distortion in 316 stainless steel butt welded plate. High Temp Mater Processes. 2019. doi:10.1515/htmp-2019-0048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Zhou K, Tan P, et al. Modeling temperature and residual stress fields in selective laser melting. Int J Mech Sci. 2018. doi:10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denlinger ER. In: thermo-mechanical modeling of additive manufacturing. Elsevier; 2018. pp 183–195.
   Google Scholar
• Wu X, Zhu W, He Y. Deformation prediction and experimental study of 316L stainless steel thin-walled parts processed by additive-subtractive hybrid manufacturing. Materials (Basel, Switzerland). 2021. doi:10.3390/ma14195582
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vishwanath MM, Lakshamanaswamy N, Ramesh GK. Numerical simulation of heat transfer behavior of dissimilar AA5052-AA6061 plates in fiction stir welding: An experimental validation. Strojnícky casopis – J Mech Eng. 2019. doi:10.2478/scjme-2019-0011
   Google Scholar
• El-Sayed MM, Shash AY, Abd-Rabou M. Finite element modeling of aluminum alloy AA5083-O friction stir welding process. J Mater Process Technol. 2018. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.09.008
   Google Scholar
• Sedighi M, Afshari D, Nazari F. Investigation of the effect of sheet thickness on residual stresses in resistance spot welding of aluminum sheets. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part C: J Mech Eng Sci. 2018. doi:10.1177/0954406216685124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DebRoy T, Wei HL, Zuback JS, et al. Additive manufacturing of metallic components – Process, structure and properties. Prog Mater Sci. 2018. doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baykasoğlu C, Akyildiz O, Tunay M, et al. A process-microstructure finite element simulation framework for predicting phase transformations and microhardness for directed energy deposition of Ti6Al4V. Addit Manuf. 2020. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2020.101252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Q, Xie J, Gao Z, et al. A metallurgical phase transformation framework applied to SLM additive manufacturing processes. Mater Des. 2019. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2019.107618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang D, Sun S, Qiu D, et al. Metal alloys for fusion-based additive manufacturing. Adv Eng Mater. 2018. doi:10.1002/adem.201700952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison PL, Farrar RA. Application of continuous cooling transformation diagrams for welding of steels. Int Mater Rev. 1989. doi:10.1179/imr.1989.34.1.35
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang K, Wang S, Liu W, et al. Characterization of stainless steel parts by laser metal deposition shaping. Mater Des. 2014. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2013.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pegues JW, Shao S, Shamsaei N, et al. Fatigue of additive manufactured Ti-6Al-4V, Part I: the effects of powder feedstock, manufacturing, and post-process conditions on the resulting microstructure and defects. Int J Fatigue. 2020. doi:10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.105358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindgren L-E, Lundbäck A, Fisk M, et al. Simulation of additive manufacturing using coupled constitutive and microstructure models. Addit Manuf. 2016. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2016.05.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiocchi J, Tuissi A, Biffi CA. Heat treatment of aluminium alloys produced by laser powder bed fusion: a review. Mater Des. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senthamarai Kannan C, Sai Sree Chandra S, Punith Krishnan G, et al. A review on additive manufacturing of AA2024 and AA6061 alloys using powder bed fusion. IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng. 2020. doi:10.1088/1757-899X/988/1/012002
   Google Scholar
• Lu X, Li MV, Yang H. Simulation of precipitates evolution driven by non-isothermal cyclic thermal history during wire and arc additive manufacturing of IN718 superalloy. J Manuf Process. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.03.032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao Y, Zhang D, Cao M, et al. Effect of δ phase on high temperature mechanical performances of Inconel 718 fabricated with SLM process. Mater Sci Eng A. 2019. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2019.138327
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ahn J, He E, Chen L, et al. Prediction and measurement of residual stresses and distortions in fibre laser welded Ti-6Al-4V considering phase transformation. Mater Des. 2017. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2016.11.078
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crespo A. In: Ahsan A (ed) Convection and Conduction Heat Transfer. InTech; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Celleri HM, Portela IV, Passarella DN. Comparison of metallurgical models during quenching using open source software. Asociación Argentina de Mecánica Computacional; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Leblond JB, Devaux J. A new kinetic model for anisothermal metallurgical transformations in steels including effect of austenite grain size. Acta Metall. 1984. doi:10.1016/0001-6160(84)90211-6
   Google Scholar
• Deepu MJ, Phanikumar G. ICME framework for simulation of microstructure and property evolution during gas metal arc welding in DP980 steel. Integrating Materials and Manufacturing Innovation. 2020. doi:10.1007/s40192-020-00182-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jimenez X, Dong W, Paul S, et al. Residual stress modeling with phase transformation for wire arc additive manufacturing of B91 steel. JOM. 2020. doi:10.1007/s11837-020-04424-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murgau C, Lundbäck A, Åkerfeldt P, et al. Temperature and microstructure evolution in gas tungsten arc welding wire feed additive manufacturing of Ti-6Al-4V. Materials (Basel, Switzerland). 2019. doi:10.3390/ma12213534
   Google Scholar
• Tchuindjang JT, Paydas H, Tran H-S, et al. A New concept for modeling phase transformations in Ti6Al4V alloy manufactured by directed energy deposition. Materials (Basel, Switzerland). 2021. doi:10.3390/ma14112985
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Irwin J. In: thermo-mechanical modeling of additive manufacturing. Elsevier; 2018. pp 117–135.
   Google Scholar
• Salsi E, Chiumenti M, Cervera M. Modeling of microstructure evolution of Ti6Al4V for additive manufacturing. Metals. 2018. doi:10.3390/met8080633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vastola G, Zhang G, Pei QX, et al. Modeling the microstructure evolution during additive manufacturing of Ti6Al4V: A comparison between electron beam melting and selective laser melting. JOM. 2016. doi:10.1007/s11837-016-1890-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie J, Oancea V, Hurtado J. Phase transformations in metals during additive manufacturing processes. NAFEMS World Congress 2017; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Costa L, Vilar R, Reti T, et al. Rapid tooling by laser powder deposition: process simulation using finite element analysis. Acta Mater. 2005. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2005.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Depradeux L, Robitaille C, Duval G, et al. Numerical simulation of Rapid Additive Forging (RAF) process. MATEC Web Conf. 2020. doi:10.1051/matecconf/202032103036
   Google Scholar
• Crespo A, Vilar R. Finite element analysis of the rapid manufacturing of Ti–6Al–4V parts by laser powder deposition. Scr Mater. 2010. doi:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.03.036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coret M, Combescure A. A mesomodel for the numerical simulation of the multiphasic behavior of materials under anisothermal loading (application to two low-carbon steels). Int J Mech Sci. 2002. doi:10.1016/S0020-7403(02)00053-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murgau CC, Pederson R, Lindgren LE. A model for Ti–6Al–4V microstructure evolution for arbitrary temperature changes. Modelling Simul Mater Sci Eng. 2012. doi:10.1088/0965-0393/20/5/055006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klusemann B, Bambach M. In: Author(s), p 140012; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Buhl J, Klöppel T, Merten M, et al. Numerical prediction of process-dependent properties of high-performance Ti6Al4 in LS-DYNA. ESAFORM 2021; 2021. doi:10.25518/esaform21.1496
   Google Scholar
• Promoppatum P, Taprachareon K, Chayasombat B, et al. Understanding size-dependent thermal,: microstructural, mechanical behaviors of additively manufactured Ti-6Al-4V from experiments and thermo-metallurgical simulation. J Manuf Process. 2022. doi:10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.01.068
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang X, Barrett RA, Tong M, et al. Prediction of microstructure evolution for additive manufacturing of Ti-6Al-4V. Procedia Manuf. 2020. doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.170
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nitzler J, Meier C, Müller KW, et al. A novel physics-based and data-supported microstructure model for part-scale simulation of laser powder bed fusion of Ti-6Al-4V. Adv Model and Simul in Eng Sci. 2021. doi:10.1186/s40323-021-00201-9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang Q, Xie J, London T, et al. Estimates of the mechanical properties of laser powder bed fusion Ti-6Al-4V parts using finite element models. Mater Des. 2019. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2019.107678
   Google Scholar
• Yang X, Barrett RA, Tong M, et al. Towards a process-structure model for Ti-6Al-4V during additive manufacturing. J Manuf Process. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.11.033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson WA, Mehl RF. Reaction kinetics in processes of nucleation and growth. American Institute of Mining and Metallurgical Engineers Technical publication No. 1089; 1939.
   Google Scholar
• Avrami M. Kinetics of phase change. I general theory. J Chem Phys. 1939. doi:10.1063/1.1750380
   Google Scholar
• Gil Mur FX, Rodríguez D, Planell JA. Influence of tempering temperature and time on the α′-Ti-6Al-4V martensite. J Alloys Compd. 1996. doi:10.1016/0925-8388(95)02057-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krauss G. Steels: heat treatment and processing principles. Materials Park (Ohio): ASM International; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Réti T, Gergely M, Tardy P. Mathematical treatment of non-isothermal transformations. Mater Sci Technol. 1987. doi:10.1179/mst.1987.3.5.365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa L, Deus AM, Reti T, et al. Simulation of layer overlap tempering in steel parts produced by laser cladding. RPD 2002-Advanced Solutions and Development; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Lindgren L-E, Lundbäck A. Additive manufacturing and high performance applications. Nanyang Technological University; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Wen D, Gao C, Zheng Z, et al. Hot tensile behavior of a low-alloyed ultrahigh strength steel: fracture mechanism and physically-based constitutive model. J Mater Res Technol. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.05.100
   Google Scholar
• Wu H, Xu W, Wang S, et al. A cellular automaton coupled FEA model for hot deformation behavior of AZ61 magnesium alloys. J Alloys Compd. 2020. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.152562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babu B, Lindgren L-E. Dislocation density based model for plastic deformation and globularization of Ti-6Al-4V. Int J Plast. 2013. doi:10.1016/j.ijplas.2013.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisk M, Lundbäck A. Simulation and validation of repair welding and heat treatment of an alloy 718 plate. Finite Elem Anal Des. 2012. doi:10.1016/j.finel.2012.04.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seeger A. The mechanism of glide and work hardening in FCC and HCP metals. In: Fisher J, Johnston WG, Thomson R, Vreeland TJ, editors. Dislocations and mechanical properties of crystals. New York, NY: Wiley; 1956. (65). p. 243–655.
   Google Scholar
• Orowan E. Problems of plastic gliding. Proc Phys Soc. 1940. doi:10.1088/0959-5309/52/1/303
   Google Scholar
• Mecking H, Kocks UF. Kinetics of flow and strain-hardening. Acta Metall. 1981. doi:10.1016/0001-6160(81)90112-7
   Google Scholar
• Holt DL. Dislocation cell formation in metals. J Appl Phys. 1970. doi:10.1063/1.1659399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Militzer M, Sun WP, Jonas JJ. Modelling the effect of deformation-induced vacancies on segregation and precipitation. Acta Metall Mater. 1994. doi:10.1016/0956-7151(94)90056-6
   Google Scholar
• Sandström R, Lagneborg R. A model for hot working occurring by recrystallization. Acta Metall. 1975. doi:10.1016/0001-6160(75)90132-7
   Google Scholar
• Mecking H, Estrin Y. The effect of vacancy generation on plastic deformation. Scr Metall. 1980. doi:10.1016/0036-9748(80)90295-1
   Google Scholar
• Sargent GA, Zane AP, Fagin PN, et al. Low-Temperature coarsening and plastic flow behavior of an alpha/beta titanium billet material with an ultrafine microstructure. Metall Mat Trans A. 2008. doi:10.1007/s11661-008-9650-y
   Google Scholar
• Semiatin SL, Stefansson N, Doherty RD. Prediction of the kinetics of static globularization of Ti-6Al-4V. Metall Mat Trans A. 2005. doi:10.1007/s11661-005-0229-6
   Google Scholar
• Thomas J, Semiatin S. Mesoscale Modeling of the Recrystallization of Waspaloy and application to the simulation of the ingot-cogging process; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Nembach E, Neite G. Precipitation hardening of superalloys by ordered γ′-particles. Prog Mater Sci. 1985. doi:10.1016/0079-6425(85)90001-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirkoohi E, Mahdavi M, Li D, et al. Microstructure affected residual stress prediction based on mechanical threshold stress in direct metal deposition of Ti-6Al-4V. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2021. doi:10.1007/s00170-020-06526-w
   Google Scholar
• Lundbäck A, Lindgren L-E. Modelling of metal deposition. Finite Elem Anal Des. 2011. doi:10.1016/j.finel.2011.05.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eskandari Sabzi H, Rivera-Díaz-del-Castillo PE. Composition and process parameter dependence of yield strength in laser powder bed fusion alloys. Mater Des. 2020. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2020.109024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babu B, Lundäck A. Physically based constitutive model for Ti-6Al-4V used in the simulation of manufacturing chain. X International Conference on Computational Plasticity COMPLAS X; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Kale AB, Alluri P, Singh AK, et al. The deformation and fracture behavior of 316L SS fabricated by SLM under mini V-bending test. Int J Mech Sci. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.106292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao P, Zhong J, Li H, et al. Microstructure, mechanical properties, and constitutive models for Ti–6Al–4V alloy fabricated by selective laser melting (SLM). Metals. 2019. doi:10.3390/met9040447
   Google Scholar
• Motoyama Y, Tokunaga H, Kajino S, et al. Stress–strain behavior of a selective laser melted Ti-6Al-4V at strain rates of 0.001–1/s and temperatures 20–1000 °C. J Mater Process Technol. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2021.117141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saboori A, Abdi A, Fatemi SA, et al. Hot deformation behavior and flow stress modeling of Ti–6Al–4V alloy produced via electron beam melting additive manufacturing technology in single β-phase field. Mater Sci Eng A. 2020. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2020.139822
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niu Y, Sun Z, Wang Y, et al. Phenomenological constitutive models for Hot deformation behavior of Ti6Al4V alloy manufactured by directed energy deposition laser. Metals. 2020. doi:10.3390/met10111496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motallebi R, Savaedi Z, Mirzadeh H. Additive manufacturing – A review of hot deformation behavior and constitutive modeling of flow stress. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci. 2022. doi:10.1016/j.cossms.2022.100992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bambach M, Sizova I. In: Author(s), p 170001; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Bambach M, Sizova I, Szyndler J, et al. On the hot deformation behavior of Ti-6Al-4V made by additive manufacturing. J Mater Process Technol. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2020.116840
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao P, Yang H, Fan X, et al. Unified modeling of flow softening and globularization for hot working of two-phase titanium alloy with a lamellar colony microstructure. J Alloys Compd. 2014. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.02.110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galindo-Fernández MA, Mumtaz K, Rivera-Díaz-del-Castillo P, et al. A microstructure sensitive model for deformation of Ti-6Al-4V describing cast-and-wrought and additive manufacturing morphologies. Mater Des. 2018. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2018.09.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes BJ, Martin BW, Welk B, et al. Predicting tensile properties of Ti-6Al-4V produced via directed energy deposition. Acta Mater. 2017. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2017.05.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang X, Barrett RA, Harrison NM, et al. A physically-based structure-property model for additively manufactured Ti-6Al-4V. Mater Des. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obiukwu O, Nwafor M, Okafor B, et al. The effect of surface finish on the low cycle fatigue of low and medium carbon steel. International Conference on Mechanical and Industrial Engineering (ICMIE'15) (Harare(Zimbabwe), (2015); 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Salonitis K, D'Alvise L, Schoinochoritiris B, et al. Additive manufacturing and post-processing simulation: laser cladding followed by high speed machining. Int J Adv ManufTechnol. 2016;85:2401–2411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenis T, van den Brink W, Bosman M. Full process chain simulation of the (wire-based) laser metal deposition process towards fatigue life prediction. Procedia Structural Integrity. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.prostr.2021.12.034
   Google Scholar
• Afazov S, Ceesay L, Larkin O, et al. A methodology for precision manufacture of a nozzle using hybrid laser powder-bed fusion: A case study. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part B: J Eng Manuf. 2021. doi:10.1177/0954405420958856
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He Y, Wei J, Peng Y, et al. Deformation prediction and experimental investigation on alternating additive-subtractive hybrid manufacturing of 316L stainless steel thin-walled parts. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2023. doi:10.1007/s00170-023-12592-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Luo Y, Zheng K, Zhao P, et al. Machining characteristics of 316L stainless steel in hybrid manufacturing via a three-dimensional thermal-mechanical coupled model. J Manuf Process. 2023. doi:10.1016/j.jmapro.2023.06.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novotný L, Béreš M, Abreu Hd, et al. Thermal analysis and phase transformation behaviour during additive manufacturing of Ti–6Al–4V alloy. Mater Sci Technol. 2019. doi:10.1080/02670836.2019.1593669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spierings AB, Starr TL, Wegener K. Fatigue performance of additive manufactured metallic parts. Rapid Prototyp J. 2013. doi:10.1108/13552541311302932
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronkhorst CA, Mayeur JR, Livescu V, et al. Structural representation of additively manufactured 316L austenitic stainless steel. Int J Plast. 2019. doi:10.1016/j.ijplas.2019.01.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riemer A, Leuders S, Thöne M, et al. On the fatigue crack growth behavior in 316L stainless steel manufactured by selective laser melting. Eng Fract Mech. 2014. doi:10.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palanivel S, Dutt AK, Faierson EJ, et al. Spatially dependent properties in a laser additive manufactured Ti–6Al–4V component. Mater Sci Eng A. 2016. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2015.12.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nalli F, Cortese L, Concli F. Ductile damage assessment of Ti6Al4V, 17-4PH and AlSi10Mg for additive manufacturing. Eng Fract Mech. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.107395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tancogne-Dejean T, Roth CC, Mohr D. Rate-dependent strength and ductility of binder jetting 3D-printed stainless steel 316L: experiments and modeling. Int J Mech Sci. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.106647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson-Heid AE, Qin S, Beese AM. Anisotropic multiaxial plasticity model for laser powder bed fusion additively manufactured Ti-6Al-4V. Mater Sci Eng A. 2018. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2018.09.077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson-Heid AE, Qin S, Beese AM. Multiaxial plasticity and fracture behavior of stainless steel 316L by laser powder bed fusion: experiments and computational modeling. Acta Mater. 2020. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2020.08.066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson-Heid AE, Beese AM. Fracture of laser powder bed fusion additively manufactured Ti–6Al–4V under multiaxial loading: calibration and comparison of fracture models. Mater Sci Eng A. 2019. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2019.05.097
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang X, Li Y, Duan M, et al. An investigation of ductile fracture behavior of Ti6Al4V alloy fabricated by selective laser melting. J Alloys Compd. 2022. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.161926
   Google Scholar
• Qin S, Novak TC, Vailhe MK, et al. Plasticity and fracture behavior of Inconel 625 manufactured by laser powder bed fusion: comparison between as-built and stress relieved conditions. Mater Sci Eng A. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2021.140808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul SK, Tarlochan F, Hilditch T. Fatigue life prediction of the additively manufactured specimen. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng. 2022. doi:10.1088/1361-651X/ac11b9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yadollahi A, Shamsaei N. Additive manufacturing of fatigue resistant materials: challenges and opportunities. Int J Fatigue. 2017. doi:10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blinn B, Krebs F, Ley M, et al. Determination of the influence of a stress-relief heat treatment and additively manufactured surface on the fatigue behavior of selectively laser melted AISI 316L by using efficient short-time procedures. Int J Fatigue. 2020. doi:10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.105301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fotovvati B, Namdari N, Dehghanghadikolaei A. Fatigue performance of selective laser melted Ti6Al4 V components: state of the art. Mater Res Express. 2019. doi:10.1088/2053-1591/aae10e
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molaei R, Fatemi A, Sanaei N, et al. Fatigue of additive manufactured Ti-6Al-4V,: part II: The relationship between microstructure, material cyclic properties, and component performance. Int J Fatigue. 2020. doi:10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.105363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torries B, Imandoust A, Beretta S, et al. Overview on microstructure- and defect-sensitive fatigue modeling of additively manufactured materials. JOM. 2018. doi:10.1007/s11837-018-2987-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindström T, Nilsson D, Simonsson K, et al. Constitutive model for thermomechanical fatigue conditions of an additively manufactured combustor alloy. Mech Mater. 2022. doi:10.1016/j.mechmat.2022.104273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mooney B, Agius D, Kourousis KI. Cyclic plasticity of the As-built EOS maraging steel: preliminary experimental and computational results. Applied Sciences. 2020. doi:10.3390/app10041232
   Google Scholar
• Kourousis IK, Agius D, Wang C, et al. Constitutive modeling of additive manufactured Ti-6Al-4V cyclic elastoplastic behaviour. Technische Mechanik. 2016;36(1–2):57–72.
   Google Scholar
• Lindström T, Ewest D, Simonsson K, et al. Constitutive model of an additively manufactured ductile nickel-based superalloy undergoing cyclic plasticity. Int J Plast. 2020. doi:10.1016/j.ijplas.2020.102752
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Wang X, Paddea S, et al. Fatigue crack propagation behaviour in wire+arc additive manufactured Ti-6Al-4V: effects of microstructure and residual stress. Mater Des. 2016. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2015.10.141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huynh L, Rotella J, Sangid MD. Fatigue behavior of IN718 microtrusses produced via additive manufacturing. Mater Des. 2016. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2016.05.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li P, Warner DH, Phan N. Predicting the fatigue performance of an additively manufactured Ti-6Al-4V component from witness coupon behavior. Addit Manufa. 2020. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2020.101230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbeiter F, Trávníček L, Petersmann S, et al. Damage tolerance-based methodology for fatigue lifetime estimation of a structural component produced by material extrusion-based additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf. 2020. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2020.101730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torries B, Sterling AJ, Shamsaei N, et al. Utilization of a microstructure sensitive fatigue model for additively manufactured Ti-6Al-4V. RPJ. 2016. doi:10.1108/RPJ-11-2015-0168
   Google Scholar
• Rutherford BA, Avery DZ, Phillips BJ, et al. Effect of thermomechanical processing on fatigue behavior in solid-state additive manufacturing of Al-Mg-Si alloy. Metals. 2020. doi:10.3390/met10070947
   Google Scholar
• Pröbstle M, Neumeier S, Hopfenmüller J, et al. Superior creep strength of a nickel-based superalloy produced by selective laser melting. Mater Sci Eng A. 2016. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2016.07.061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim Y-K, Park S-H, Yu J-H, et al. Improvement in the high-temperature creep properties via heat treatment of Ti-6Al-4V alloy manufactured by selective laser melting. Mater Sci Eng A. 2018. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2017.12.085
   Google Scholar
• Uzan NE, Shneck R, Yeheskel O, et al. High-temperature mechanical properties of AlSi10Mg specimens fabricated by additive manufacturing using selective laser melting technologies (AM-SLM). Additive Manufacturing. 2018. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2018.09.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardon A, Mareau C, Ayed Y, et al. In: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 22ND INTERNATIONAL ESAFORM CONFERENCE ON MATERIAL FORMING: ESAFORM 2019. AIP Publishing, p 150018; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• He Y, Ma Y, Zhang W, et al. Effects of build direction on thermal exposure and creep performance of SLM Ti6Al4V titanium alloy. Eng Fail Anal. 2022. doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paoletti C, Santecchia E, Cabibbo M, et al. Modelling the creep behavior of an AlSi10Mg alloy produced by additive manufacturing. Mater Sci Eng A. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2020.140138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paoletti C, Cerri E, Ghio E, et al. Effect of low-temperature annealing on creep properties of AlSi10Mg alloy produced by additive manufacturing: experiments and modeling. Metals. 2021. doi:10.3390/met11020179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim Y-K, Yang S, Lee K-A. Compressive creep behavior of selective laser melted CoCrFeMnNi high-entropy alloy strengthened by in-situ formation of nano-oxides. Addit Manuf. 2020. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2020.101543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mbang S, Haasis S. Automation of the computer-aided design–computer-aided quality assurance process chain in car body engineering. Int J Prod Res. 2004. doi:10.1080/00207540410001717119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afazov SM. Modelling and simulation of manufacturing process chains. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol. 2013. doi:10.1016/j.cirpj.2012.10.005
   Google Scholar
• Afazov SM, Becker AA, Hyde TH. Development of a finite element data exchange system for chain simulation of manufacturing processes. Adv Eng Softw. 2012. doi:10.1016/j.advengsoft.2011.12.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Rashed S, Murakawa H. Mechanism investigation of welding induced buckling using inherent deformation method. Thin-Walled Struct. 2014. doi:10.1016/j.tws.2014.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien JM, Montgomery S, Yaghi A, et al. Process chain simulation of laser powder bed fusion including heat treatment and surface hardening. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.cirpj.2021.01.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaghi A, Ayvar-Soberanis S, Moturu S, et al. Design against distortion for additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf. 2019. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2019.03.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaghi A, Afazov S, Villa M. Maturity assessment of laser powder bed fusion process chain modelling and simulation. Digital Manuf Technology. 2021. doi:10.37256/dmt.112021822
   Google Scholar
• Bleck W, Brecher C, Herty M, et al. In: Brecher C, Özdemir D (eds) Integrative Production Technology. Springer International Publishing. Cham. 2017: 253–364.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang XX, Lutz A, Andrä H, et al. An additively manufactured and direct-aged AlSi3.5Mg2.5 alloy with superior strength and ductility: micromechanical mechanisms. Int J Plast. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.ijplas.2021.103083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang XX, Bauer P-P, Lutz A, et al. Microplasticity and macroplasticity behavior of additively manufactured Al-Mg-Sc-Zr alloys: In-situ experiment and modeling. Int J Plast. 2023. doi:10.1016/j.ijplas.2023.103659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang XX, Andrä H. Crystal plasticity simulation of the macroscale and microscale stress–strain relations of additively manufactured AlSi10Mg alloy. Comput Mater Sci. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2021.110832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang XX, Knoop D, Andrä H, et al. Multiscale constitutive modeling of additively manufactured Al–Si–Mg alloys based on measured phase stresses and dislocation density. Int J Plast. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.ijplas.2021.102972
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bambach M, Heppner S, Steinmetz D, et al. Assessing and ensuring parameter identifiability for a physically-based strain hardening model for twinning-induced plasticity. Mech Mater. 2015. doi:10.1016/j.mechmat.2015.01.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddique S, Imran M, Rauer M, et al. Computed tomography for characterization of fatigue performance of selective laser melted parts. Mater Des. 2015. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2015.06.063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biswal R, Zhang X, Shamir M, et al. Interrupted fatigue testing with periodic tomography to monitor porosity defects in wire + arc additive manufactured Ti-6Al-4V. Additive Manufacturing. 2019. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2019.04.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grüger L, Sydow B, Woll R, et al. Design of a cost-effective and statistically validated test specification with selected machine elements to evaluate the influence of the manufacturing process with a focus on additive manufacturing. Metals. 2023. doi:10.3390/met13111900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar