Interactive infill topology optimisation guided by user drawn patterns

References

• Langelaar M. Topology optimization of 3D self-supporting structures for additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf. 2016;12:60–70. doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2016.06.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, Ma Y. A survey of manufacturing oriented topology optimization methods. Adv Eng Softw. 2016;100:161–175. doi: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2016.07.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, et al. Current and future trends in topology optimization for additive manufacturing. Struct Multidiscip Optim. 2018;57(6):2457–2483. doi: 10.1007/s00158-018-1994-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo X, Zhou J, Zhang W, et al. Self-supporting structure design in additive manufacturing through explicit topology optimization. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2017;323:27–63. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2017.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaynor AT, Guest JK. Topology optimization considering overhang constraints: Eliminating sacrificial support material in additive manufacturing through design. Struct Multidiscip Optim. 2016;54(5):1157–1172. doi: 10.1007/s00158-016-1551-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langelaar M. An additive manufacturing filter for topology optimization of print-ready designs. Struct Multidiscip Optim. 2017;55(3):871–883. doi: 10.1007/s00158-016-1522-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jewett JL, Carstensen JV. Topology optimization for material extrusion-based additive manufacturing processes with weak bead bonding. Comput Struct. 2023;289:107158. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2023.107158
   Google Scholar
• Bayat M, et al. Holistic computational design within additive manufacturing through topology optimization combined with multiphysics multi-scale materials and process modelling. Prog Mater Sci. 2023;138:101129. doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2023.101129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffarth M, Gerzen N, and Pedersen CBW. ALM overhang constraint in topology optimization for industrial applications. Proceedings of 12th World Congress on Structural and Multidisciplinary optimization, Braunschweig, Germany; 2017. p. 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Carstensen JV, Kim-Tackowiak H, Liang MY. Improving the manufacturability of highly materially restricted topology-optimized designs with Mixed Integer Linear Programming. Eng Struct. 2023;284:115955. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.115955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu J, Aage N, Westermann R, et al. Infill optimization for additive manufacturing—approaching bone-like porous structures. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2018;24(2):1127–1140. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2017.2655523
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clausen A, Aage N, Sigmund O. Exploiting additive manufacturing infill in topology optimization for improved buckling load. Engineering. 2016;2(2):250–257. doi: 10.1016/J.ENG.2016.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu J, Li H, Gao L, et al. Design of shell-infill structures by a multiscale level set topology optimization method. Comput Struct. 2019;212:162–172. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2018.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H, Gao L, Li H, et al. Spatial-varying multi-phase infill design using density-based topology optimization. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2020;372:113354. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2020.113354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H, Li H, Gao L, et al. Topology optimization of multi-phase shell-infill composite structure for additive manufacturing. Eng Comput. 2023. doi: 10.1007/s00366-023-01837-4
   Google Scholar
• Gerzen N, Mertins T, Pedersen CBW. Geometric dimensionality control of structural components in topology optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim. 2022;65(5):160. doi: 10.1007/s00158-022-03252-7
   Google Scholar
• Bendsøe MP. Optimal shape design as a material distribution problem. Struct Optim. 1989;1(4):193–202. doi: 10.1007/BF01650949
   Google Scholar
• Svanberg K. The method of moving asymptotes—a new method for structural optimization. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 1987;24(2):359–373. doi: 10.1002/nme.1620240207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang RJ, Chen CJ. Stress-based topology optimization. Struct Optim. 1996;12(2–3):98–105. doi:10.1007/BF01196941
   Google Scholar
• Yang D, Liu H, Zhang W, et al. Stress-constrained topology optimization based on maximum stress measures. Comput Struct. 2018;198:23–39. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2018.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le C, Norato J, Bruns T, et al. Stress-based topology optimization for continua. Struct Multidiscip Optim. 2010;41(4):605–620. doi:10.1007/s00158-009-0440-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amir O, Lazarov BS. Achieving stress-constrained topological design via length scale control. Struct Multidiscip Optim. 2018;58(5):2053–2071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiyono CY, Vatanabe SL, Silva ECN, et al. A new multi-p-norm formulation approach for stress-based topology optimization design. Compos Struct. 2016;156:10–19. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.05.058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmberg E, Torstenfelt B, Klarbring A. Stress constrained topology optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim. 2013;48(1):33–47. doi: 10.1007/s00158-012-0880-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CHENG G, JIANG Z. Study on topology optimization with stress constraints. Eng Optim. 1992;20(2):129–148. doi: 10.1080/03052159208941276
   Google Scholar
• Ferrari F, Sigmund O, Guest JK. Topology optimization with linearized buckling criteria in 250 lines of Matlab. Struct Multidiscip Optim. 2021;63(6):3045–3066. doi: 10.1007/s00158-021-02854-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Lai Z, Lu Y, et al. Topology optimization of shell-infill structures considering buckling constraint. Comput Struct. 2023;283:107055. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2023.107055
   Google Scholar
• Ferrari F, Sigmund O. A strategy for avoiding spurious localized buckling modes in topology optimization. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 2023;124(18):4118–4140. doi: 10.1002/nme.7309
   Google Scholar
• Dunning PD. Stability constraints for geometrically nonlinear topology optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim. 2023;66(12):253. doi: 10.1007/s00158-023-03712-8
   Google Scholar
• Carstensen JV, Lotfi R, Guest JK, et al. Topology optimization of cellular materials With maximized energy absorption. In Volume 2B: 41st Design Automation Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers; 2015. doi: 10.1115/DETC2015-47757
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen CBW. Topology optimization design of crushed 2D-frames for desired energy absorption history. Struct Multidiscip Optim. 2003;25(5–6):368–382. doi: 10.1007/s00158-003-0282-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Q, Zhang X, Zhu B. Design of buckling-induced mechanical metamaterials for energy absorption using topology optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim. 2018;58(4):1395–1410. doi: 10.1007/s00158-018-1970-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Yanagimoto J. Topology optimization of microlattice dome with enhanced stiffness and energy absorption for additive manufacturing. Compos Struct. 2021;255:112889. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ha DQ, Carstensen JV. Human-Informed Topology Optimization: interactive application of feature size controls. Struct Multidiscip Optim. 2023;66(3):59. doi: 10.1007/s00158-023-03512-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes C, Goldman DB, Shechtman E, et al. The PatchMatch randomized matching algorithm for image manipulation. Commun ACM. 2011;54(11):103–110. doi: 10.1145/2018396.2018421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes C, Shechtman E, Finkelstein A, et al. PatchMatch. ACM Trans Graph. 2009;28(3):1–11. doi: 10.1145/1531326.1531330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimmel R, Kiryati N, Bruckstein AM. Sub-pixel distance maps and weighted distance transforms. J Math Imaging Vis. 1996;6(2–3):223–233. doi:10.1007/BF00119840
   Google Scholar
• Kaspar A, Neubert B, Lischinski D, et al. Self tuning texture optimization. Comput Graph Forum. 2015;34(2):349–359. doi: 10.1111/cgf.12565
   Google Scholar
• Xiao C, Liu M, Yongwei N, et al. Fast exact nearest patch matching for patch-based image editing and processing. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2011;17(8):1122–1134. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2010.226
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barnes C, Zhang F-L. A survey of the state-of-the-art in patch-based synthesis. Comput Vis Media (Beijing). 2017;3(1):3–20. doi: 10.1007/s41095-016-0064-2
   Google Scholar
• Navez T, Schmidt M-P, Sigmund O, et al. Topology optimization guided by a geometrical pattern library. Struct Multidiscip Optim. 2022;65(4):108. doi: 10.1007/s00158-022-03197-x
   Google Scholar
• Martínez J, Dumas J, Lefebvre S, et al. Structure and appearance optimization for controllable shape design. ACM Trans Graph. 2015;34(6):1–11. doi: 10.1145/2816795.2818101
   Google Scholar
• Schumacher C, Thomaszewski B, Gross M. Stenciling: designing structurally-sound surfaces with decorative patterns. Comput Graph Forum. 2016;35(5):101–110. doi: 10.1111/cgf.12967
   Google Scholar
• Dumas J, Lu A, Lefebvre S, et al. By-example synthesis of structurally sound patterns. ACM Trans Graph. 2015;34(4):1–12. doi: 10.1145/2766984
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu J, Li M, Gao S. Texture-guided generative structural designs under local control. Computer-Aided Design. 2019;108:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.cad.2018.10.002
   Google Scholar
• Vulimiri PS, Deng H, Dugast F, et al. Integrating geometric data into topology optimization via neural style transfer. Materials (Basel). 2021;14(16):4551.doi: 10.3390/ma14164551
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Zhang Z, Luo J, et al. Concurrent topology optimization of shells with pattern-guided infills for intuitive design and additive manufacturing. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2024;418:116485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang W, Wang Y, Du Z, et al. Machine-learning assisted topology optimization for architectural design with artistic flavor. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2023;413:116041. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2023.116041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei D, Zhu G, Shi Z, et al. Isogeometric topology optimization for infill designs of porous structures with stress minimization in additive manufacturing. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 2024;125(3). doi:10.1002/nme.7391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoang V-N, Tran P, Vu V-T, et al. Design of lattice structures with direct multiscale topology optimization. Compos Struct. 2020;252:112718. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoang V-N, Tran P, Nguyen N-L, et al. Adaptive concurrent topology optimization of coated structures with nonperiodic infill for additive manufacturing. Computer-Aided Design. 2020;129:102918. doi: 10.1016/j.cad.2020.102918
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoang V-N, Pham T, Ho D, et al. Robust multiscale design of incompressible multi-materials under loading uncertainties. Eng Comput. 2022;38(1):875–890. doi: 10.1007/s00366-021-01372-0
   Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Yan S, Xie X, et al. Multi-dimensional hybridized TPMS with high energy absorption capacity. Int J Mech Sci. 2024;273:109244. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2024.109244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tran KQ, Hoang T-D, Lee J, et al. Three novel computational modeling frameworks of 3D-printed graphene platelets reinforced functionally graded triply periodic minimal surface (GPLR-FG-TPMS) plates. Appl Math Model. 2024;126:667–697. doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2023.10.043
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen NV, Tran KQ, Lee J, et al. Nonlocal strain gradient-based isogeometric analysis of graphene platelets-reinforced functionally graded triply periodic minimal surface nanoplates. Appl Math Comput. 2024;466:128461. doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2023.128461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao J, et al. Rational designs of mechanical metamaterials: Formulations, architectures, tessellations and prospects. Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports. 2023;156:100755. doi: 10.1016/j.mser.2023.100755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazarov BS, Wang F, Sigmund O. Length scale and manufacturability in density-based topology optimization. Arch Appl Mech. 2016;86(1–2):189–218. doi:10.1007/s00419-015-1106-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández E, Yang K, Koppen S, et al. Imposing minimum and maximum member size, minimum cavity size, and minimum separation distance between solid members in topology optimization. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2020;368:113157. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2020.113157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Q, Liang G, Luo Y, et al. An explicit formulation for minimum length scale control in density-based topology optimization. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2023;404:115761. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2022.115761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou M, Lazarov BS, Wang F, et al. Minimum length scale in topology optimization by geometric constraints. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2015;293:266–282. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2015.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigmund O. Morphology-based black and white filters for topology optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim. 2007;33(4–5):401–424. doi:10.1007/s00158-006-0087-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guest JK. Imposing maximum length scale in topology optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim. 2009;37(5):463–473. doi: 10.1007/s00158-008-0250-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazarov BS, Wang F. Maximum length scale in density based topology optimization. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2017;318:826–844. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2017.02.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa G, Montemurro M, Pailhès J, et al. Maximum length scale requirement in a topology optimisation method based on NURBS hyper-surfaces. CIRP Ann. 2019;68(1):153–156. doi: 10.1016/j.cirp.2019.04.048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carstensen JV, Guest JK. Projection-based two-phase minimum and maximum length scale control in topology optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim. 2018;58(5):1845–1860. doi: 10.1007/s00158-018-2066-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allaire G, Jouve F, Michailidis G. Thickness control in structural optimization via a level set method. Struct Multidiscip Optim. 2016;53(6):1349–1382. doi: 10.1007/s00158-016-1453-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo X, Zhang W, Zhong W. Explicit feature control in structural topology optimization via level set method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2014;272:354–378. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2014.01.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt M-P, Pedersen CBW, Gout C. On structural topology optimization using graded porosity control. Struct Multidiscip Optim. 2019;60(4):1437–1453. doi: 10.1007/s00158-019-02275-x
   Google Scholar
• Li Z, Lee T-U, Xie YM. Interactive structural topology optimization with subjective scoring and drawing systems. Computer-Aided Design. 2023;160:103532. doi: 10.1016/j.cad.2023.103532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiffer G, Ha DQ, Carstensen JV. HiTop 2.0: combining topology optimisation with multiple feature size controls and human preferences. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2023;18(1). doi:10.1080/17452759.2023.2268603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Dassault Systèmes Abaqus & Tosca; 2022. [Online]. Available from: www.simulia.com.”
   Google Scholar
• Buhl T, Pedersen CBW, Sigmund O. Stiffness design of geometrically nonlinear structures using topology optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim. 2000;19(2):93–104. doi:10.1007/s001580050089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang F, Lazarov BS, Sigmund O, et al. Interpolation scheme for fictitious domain techniques and topology optimization of finite strain elastic problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2014;276:453–472. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2014.03.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreassen E, Clausen A, Schevenels M, et al. Efficient topology optimization in MATLAB using 88 lines of code. Struct Multidiscip Optim. 2011;43(1):1–16. doi: 10.1007/s00158-010-0594-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guest JK, Prévost JH, Belytschko T. Achieving minimum length scale in topology optimization using nodal design variables and projection functions. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 2004;61(2):238–254. doi: 10.1002/nme.1064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdin B. Filters in topology optimization. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 2001;50(9):2143–2158. doi: 10.1002/nme.116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruns TE, Tortorelli DA. Topology optimization of non-linear elastic structures and compliant mechanisms. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2001;190(26–27):3443–3459. doi: 10.1016/S0045-7825(00)00278-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Defining materials in Abaqus,” Abaqus Version 6.8. [Online]. Available from: http://130.149.89.49:2080/v6.8/books/gsk/default.htm?startat=ch10s01.html
   Google Scholar