Comparative environmental assessment of 3D concrete printing with engineered cementitious composites

References

• CO2 Emissions in 2022. 2022. International Energy Agency. Available from: https://www.iea.org/reports/co2-emissions-in-2022.
   Google Scholar
• World Energy & Climate Statistics – Yearbook. 2023. Available from: https://yearbook.enerdata.net/total-energy/world-consumption-statistics.html.
   Google Scholar
• Sustainable Construction. 2023. Construction Industry Council. Available from: https://www.sc.cic.hk/index.php/en.
   Google Scholar
• 2022 Research Report of China Building Energy Consumption and Carbon Emissions. 2022. China Association of building energy efficiency.
   Google Scholar
• Chen C, Habert G, Bouzidi Y, et al. LCA allocation procedure used as an incitative method for waste recycling: an application to mineral additions in concrete. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2010;54(12):1231–1240. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weng Y, Li M, Ruan S, et al. Comparative economic, environmental and productivity assessment of a concrete bathroom unit fabricated through 3D printing and a precast approach. J Clean Prod. 2020;261:121245. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teng F, Li M, Zhang D, et al. BIM-enabled collaborative-robots 3D concrete printing to construct MiC with reinforcement. Hong Kong Inst Eng. 2023;30:123–131. doi:10.33430/V30N1THIE-2022-0023
   Google Scholar
• Ding Y, Yu J, Yu K, et al. Basic mechanical properties of ultra-high ductility cementitious composites: from 40 MPa to 120 MPa. Compos Struct. 2017;185:634–645. doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.11.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soltan DG, VC L. A self-reinforced cementitious composite for building-scale 3D printing. Cem Concr Compos. 2018;90:1–13. doi:10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.03.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye J, Yu K, Yu J, et al. Designing ductile, tough, nacre-inspired concrete member in metric scale. Cem Concr Compos. 2021;118:103987. doi:10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.103987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu B, Pan J, Zhou Z, et al. Mechanical properties of engineered cementitious composites beams fabricated by extrusion-based 3D printing. Eng Struct. 2021;238:112201. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinoco MP, de Mendonça ÉM, Fernandez LIC, et al. Life cycle assessment (LCA) and environmental sustainability of cementitious materials for 3D concrete printing: a systematic literature review. J Build Eng. 2022;52:104456. doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu K, Li L, Yu J, et al. Direct tensile properties of engineered cementitious composites: a review. Constr Build Mater. 2017;165:346–362. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.12.124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bao Y, Xu M, Soltan D, et al. Three-dimensional printing multifunctional engineered cementitious composites (ECC) for structural elements. RILEM Bookseries. 2018;19:115–128. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-99519-9_11
   Google Scholar
• Xu N, Qian Y, Yu J, et al. Tensile performance of 3D-printed strain-hardening cementitious composites (SHCC) considering material parameters, nozzle size and printing pattern. Cem Concr Compos. 2022;132:104601. doi:10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.104601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu B, Pan J, Nematollahi B, et al. Development of 3D printable engineered cementitious composites with ultra-high tensile ductility for digital construction. Mater Des. 2019;181:108088. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li VC, Bos FP, Yu K, et al. On the emergence of 3D printable engineered, strain hardening cementitious composites (ECC/SHCC). Cem Concr Res. 2020;132:106038. doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2020.106038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu K, McGee W, Ng TY, et al. 3D-printable engineered cementitious composites (3DP-ECC): fresh and hardened properties. Cem Concr Res. 2021;143:106388. doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2021.106388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye J, Teng F, Yu J, et al. Development of 3D printable engineered cementitious composites with incineration bottom ash (IBA) for sustainable and digital construction. J Clean Prod. 2023;422:138639. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weng Y, Li M, Tan MJ, et al. Design 3D printing cementitious materials via Fuller Thompson theory and Marson-Percy model. Constr Build Mater. 2017;163:600–610. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.12.112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye J, Cui C, Yu J, et al. Effect of polyethylene fiber content on workability and mechanical-anisotropic properties of 3D printed ultra-high ductile concrete. Constr Build Mater. 2021;281:122586. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye J, Cui C, Yu J, et al. Fresh and anisotropic-mechanical properties of 3D printable ultra-high ductile concrete with crumb rubber. Compos Part B Eng. 2021;211:108639. doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.108639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li VC. Engineered cementitious composites (ECC): bendable concrete for sustainable and resilient infrastructure. Berlin: Springer; 2019. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-58438-5
   Google Scholar
• Ruan S, Qiu J, Yang E, et al. Fiber-reinforced reactive magnesia-based tensile strain-hardening composites. Cem Concr Compos. 2018;89:52–61. doi:10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu K, Wang Y, Yu J, et al. A strain-hardening cementitious composites with the tensile capacity up to 8%. Constr Build Mater. 2017;137:410–419. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.01.060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu B, Pan J, Zhou Z, et al. Mechanical properties of engineered cementitious composites beams fabricated by extrusion-based 3D printing. Eng Struct. 2021;238:112201. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye J, Zhang J, Yu J, et al. Flexural behaviors of 3D printed lightweight engineered cementitious composites (ECC) slab with hollow sections. Eng Struct. 2024;299:117113. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.117113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu K, Li L, Yu J, et al. Feasibility of using ultra-high ductility cementitious composites for concrete structures without steel rebar. Eng Struct. 2018;170:11–20. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.05.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Building. (2007). ASCE Stand. doi:10.1201/9781439804810-c7
   Google Scholar
• Liao Q, Yu J, Huang Y, et al. Study on static and impact resistance performance of ultra-high ductility concrete arch without reinforcement. Build Struct. 2023;53(24):21–28. https://link.cnki.net/doi/10.19701j.jzjg.zj210066.
   Google Scholar
• Ter Haar B, Kruger J, van Zijl G. Off-site construction with 3D concrete printing. Autom Constr. 2023;152:104906. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2023.104906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salet TAM, Ahmed ZY, Bos FP, et al. Design of a 3D printed concrete bridge by testing. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2018;13:222–236. doi:10.1080/17452759.2018.1476064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma G, Buswell R, da Silva L, et al. Technology readiness: a global snapshot of 3D concrete printing and the frontiers for development. Cem Concr Res. 2022;156:106774. doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2022.106774
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang R, Wang L, Xue X, et al. Environmental profile of 3D concrete printing technology in desert areas via life cycle assessment. J Clean Prod. 2023;396:136412. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu S, Lu B, Li H, et al. A comparative study on environmental performance of 3D printing and conventional casting of concrete products with industrial wastes. Chemosphere. 2022;298:134310. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agustí-Juan I, Müller F, Hack N, et al. Potential benefits of digital fabrication for complex structures: environmental assessment of a robotically fabricated concrete wall. J Clean Prod. 2017;154:330–340. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han Y, Yang Z, Ding T, et al. Environmental and economic assessment on 3D printed buildings with recycled concrete. J Clean Prod. 2020;278:123884. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding T, Xiao J, Tam VWY. A closed-loop life cycle assessment of recycled aggregate concrete utilization in China. Waste Manag. 2016;56:367–375. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2016.05.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding T, Xiao J, Zou S, et al. Flexural properties of 3D printed fiber-reinforced concrete with recycled sand. Constr Build Mater. 2021;288:123077. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alhumayani H, Gomaa M, Soebarto V, et al. Environmental assessment of large-scale 3D printing in construction: a comparative study between cob and concrete. J Clean Prod. 2020;270:122463. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu X, Li Q, Wang L, et al. Systematic approach for printability evaluation and mechanical property optimization of spray-based 3D printed mortar. Cem Concr Compos. 2022;133:104688. doi:10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.104688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma G, Hu T, Wang F, et al. Magnesium phosphate cement for powder-based 3D concrete printing: Systematic evaluation and optimization of printability and printing quality. Cem Concr Compos. 2023;139:105000. doi:10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2023.105000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu K, Lin M, Tian L, et al. Long-term stable and sustainable high-strength engineered cementitious composite incorporating limestone powder. Structures. 2022;47:530–543. doi:10.1016/j.istruc.2022.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khajavi SH, Tetik M, Mohite A, et al. Additive manufacturing in the construction industry: the comparative competitiveness of 3d concrete printing. Appl Sci. 2021;11(9):3865. doi:10.3390/app11093865
   Google Scholar
• ISO14040. Environmental management: life cycle assessment – principles and framework. Geneva: International Standards Organization; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Salama T, Salah A, Moselhi O, et al. Near optimum selection of module configuration for efficient modular construction. Autom Constr. 2017;83:316–329. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2017.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussein M, Karam A, Eltoukhy AEE, et al. Optimized multimodal logistics planning of modular integrated construction using hybrid multi-agent and metamodeling. Autom Constr. 2023;145:104637. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh BK, Choi SW, Park HS, et al. Influence of variations in CO2 emission data upon environmental impact of building construction. J Clean Prod. 2016;140:1194–1203. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruan S, Unluer C. Comparative life cycle assessment of reactive MgO and Portland cement production. J Clean Prod. 2016;137:258–273. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruan S, Unluer C. Influence of supplementary cementitious materials on the performance and environmental impacts of reactive magnesia cement concrete. J Clean Prod. 2017;159:62–73. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAC (Standardization Administration of China). Code for Seismic Design of Buildings. GB 50011. Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press. 2016.
   Google Scholar